Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Am J Surg ; 208(2): 243-8, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24565365

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A laparotomy is still considered mandatory for patients without previous abdominal surgery presenting with a small bowel obstruction (SBO) because of a perceived high incidence of underlying lesions. However, there is no evidence in literature to support this assumption. We analyzed the etiology of SBO in this subgroup of patients to establish the need for a mandatory laparotomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted over a 5-year period. Basic demographics, radiology results, operative findings, and outpatient investigations were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 689 patients presenting with an SBO, a total of 62 patients, 9.0%, had a virgin abdomen. A known underlying disease (inflammatory bowel disease, malignancy) was the cause in 13 patients. The remaining 49 patients had adhesions in 75.5% and a newly diagnosed malignancy in 10.2% as a cause. CONCLUSIONS: Adhesions are by far the most likely cause of SBO in patients without previous abdominal surgery followed by a small number of newly diagnosed malignancies. Both prevalences are in equal proportion to patients with previous abdominal surgery. A trial of nonoperative management may therefore be justified.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Abdominal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adherencias Tisulares/complicaciones , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda