Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with infective endocarditis on the left side of the heart are typically treated with intravenous antibiotic agents for up to 6 weeks. Whether a shift from intravenous to oral antibiotics once the patient is in stable condition would result in efficacy and safety similar to those with continued intravenous treatment is unknown. METHODS: In a randomized, noninferiority, multicenter trial, we assigned 400 adults in stable condition who had endocarditis on the left side of the heart caused by streptococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, or coagulase-negative staphylococci and who were being treated with intravenous antibiotics to continue intravenous treatment (199 patients) or to switch to oral antibiotic treatment (201 patients). In all patients, antibiotic treatment was administered intravenously for at least 10 days. If feasible, patients in the orally treated group were discharged to outpatient treatment. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, unplanned cardiac surgery, embolic events, or relapse of bacteremia with the primary pathogen, from the time of randomization until 6 months after antibiotic treatment was completed. RESULTS: After randomization, antibiotic treatment was completed after a median of 19 days (interquartile range, 14 to 25) in the intravenously treated group and 17 days (interquartile range, 14 to 25) in the orally treated group (P=0.48). The primary composite outcome occurred in 24 patients (12.1%) in the intravenously treated group and in 18 (9.0%) in the orally treated group (between-group difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -3.4 to 9.6; P=0.40), which met noninferiority criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with endocarditis on the left side of the heart who were in stable condition, changing to oral antibiotic treatment was noninferior to continued intravenous antibiotic treatment. (Funded by the Danish Heart Foundation and others; POET ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01375257 .).

The impact of partial-oral endocarditis treatment on anxiety and depression in the POET trial.

BACKGROUND: The Partial-Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis Trial (POET) found that partial-oral outpatient treatment was non-inferior to conventional in-hospital intravenous treatment in patients with left-sided infective endocarditis. We examined the impact of treatment strategy on levels of anxiety and depression. METHODS: Patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at randomization, at antibiotic completion, and after month 3 and month 6. Changes in anxiety and depression (each subdimension 0-21, high scores indicating worse) were calculated using a repeated measure analysis of covariance model with primary assessment after 6 months. Change in score of 1.7 represented a minimal clinical important difference (MCID). RESULTS: Among the 400 patients enrolled in the POET trial, 263 (66%) completed HADS at randomization with reassessment rates of 86-87% at the three subsequent timepoints. Patients in the partial-oral group and the intravenous group had similar improvements after 6 months in levels of anxiety (-1.8 versus -1.6, P = 0.62) and depression (-2.1 versus -1.9, P = 0.63), although patients in the partial-oral group had numerically lower levels of anxiety and depression throughout. An improvement in MCID scores after 6 months was reported by 47% versus 45% (p = 0.80) patients for anxiety and by 51% versus 54% (p = 0.70) for depression. CONCLUSION: Patients with endocarditis receiving partial-oral outpatient treatment reported similar significant improvements in anxiety and depression at 6 months, as compared to conventionally treated, but numerically lower levels throughout. These findings support the usefulness of partial-oral treatment.

Aortic valve and left ventricular outflow tract calcium volume and distribution in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Influence on the risk of significant paravalvular regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the impact of aortic root calcium on the risk of significant paravalvular regurgitation (sPAR) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: In 302 consecutive patients from 3 centers, aortic root calcium was quantified volumetrically on pre-TAVR multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in three regions: 1) the aortic valve region, 2) the overall left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and 3) the upper LVOT. Transcathether heart valve (THV) oversizing was calculated as (THV nominal area/MDCT annular area-1) × 100. The study endpoint sPAR was a composite of post-dilatation (PD) and PAR > mild. RESULTS: sPAR occurred in 15% (46/302) of patients. Upper LVOT calcium volume was more predictive of sPAR than overall LVOT calcium volume, with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.80 (0.67-0.89) vs. 0.60 (0.51-0.70); p = 0.0001. The optimal cut-off calcium volume thresholds determined from receiver operating curves were 21 mm3 and 30 mm3 for upper LVOT and overall LVOT calcium, respectively. Upper LVOT calcium ≥ 21 mm3, but not overall LVOT calcium ≥ 30 mm3, independently predicted sPAR, odds ratio (95%CI): 9.5 (4.1-22.3) vs 1.6 (0.6-2.7). Upper LVOT calcium was more predictive of sPAR in patients with THV oversizing ≥ 13% compared to patients with THV oversizing <13%, AUC (95% CI): 0.83 (0.72-0.93) vs. 0.67 (0.51-0.74); p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Upper LVOT calcium predicts more-than-mild paravalvular regurgitation following TAVR or the need for postdilatation. Upper LVOT calcium is most predictive of paravalvular regurgitation in the event of THV oversizing ≥ 13%.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Thrombosis: Incidence, Predisposing Factors, and Clinical Implications.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the incidence, clinical implications, and predisposing factors of transcatheter heart valve (THV) thrombosis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed the incidence, potential predictors, and clinical implications of THV thrombosis as determined by contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) after TAVR. METHODS: Among 460 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with the Edwards Sapien XT or Sapien 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) THV, 405 (88%) underwent MDCT in addition to transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography 1 to 3 months post-TAVR. MDCT scans were evaluated for hypoattenuated leaflet thickening that indicated THV thrombosis. RESULTS: MDCT verified THV thrombosis in 28 of 405 (7%) patients. A total of 23 patients had subclinical THV thrombosis, whereas 5 (18%) patients experienced clinically overt obstructive THV thrombosis. THV thrombosis risk did not differ among different generations of THVs (8% vs. 6%; p = 0.42). The risk of THV thrombosis in patients who did not receive warfarin was higher compared with patients who received warfarin (10.7% vs. 1.8%; risk ratio [RR]: 6.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.86 to 19.84). A larger THV was associated with an increased risk of THV thrombosis (p = 0.03). In multivariable analysis, a 29-mm THV (RR: 2.89; 95% CI: 1.44 to 5.80) and no post-TAVR warfarin treatment (RR: 5.46; 95% CI: 1.68 to 17.7) independently predicted THV thrombosis. Treatment with warfarin effectively reverted THV thrombosis and normalized THV function in 85% of patients as documented by follow-up transesophageal echocardiography and MDCT. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of THV thrombosis in this large study was 7%. A larger THV size may predispose to THV thrombosis, whereas treatment with warfarin appears to have a protective effect. Although often subclinical, THV thrombosis may have important clinical implications.