Identification of Neural-Relevant ToxCast High-Throughput Assay Intended Gene Targets: Applicability to Neurotoxicity and Neurotoxicant Putative Molecular Initiating Events.

The US EPA's Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) is a suite of high-throughput in vitro assays to screen environmental toxicants and predict potential toxicity of uncharacterized chemicals. This work examines the relevance of ToxCast assay intended gene targets to putative molecular initiating events (MIEs) of neurotoxicants. This effort is needed as there is growing interest in the regulatory and scientific communities about developing new approach methodologies (NAMs) to screen large numbers of chemicals for neurotoxicity and developmental neurotoxicity. Assay gene function (GeneCards, NCBI-PUBMED) was used to categorize gene target neural relevance (1 = neural, 2 = neural development, 3 = general cellular process, 3A = cellular process critical during neural development, 4 = unlikely significance). Of 481 unique gene targets, 80 = category 1 (16.6%); 16 = category 2 (3.3%); 303 = category 3 (63.0%); 97 = category 3A (20.2%); 82 = category 4 (17.0%). A representative list of neurotoxicants (548) was researched (ex. PUBMED, PubChem) for neurotoxicity associated MIEs/Key Events (KEs). MIEs were identified for 375 compounds, whereas only KEs for 173. ToxCast gene targets associated with MIEs were primarily neurotransmitter (ex. dopaminergic, GABA) and ion channel (calcium, sodium, potassium) receptors. Conversely, numerous MIEs associated with neurotoxicity were absent. Oxidative stress (OS) mechanisms were 79.1% of KEs. In summary, 40% of ToxCast assay gene targets are relevant to neurotoxicity mechanisms. Additional receptor and ion channel subtypes and increased OS pathway coverage are identified for potential future assay inclusion to provide more complete coverage of neural and developmental neural targets in assessing neurotoxicity.

Undertaking positive control studies as part of developmental neurotoxicity testing: a report from the ILSI Research Foundation/Risk Science Institute expert working group on neurodevelopmental endpoints.

Developmental neurotoxicity testing involves functional and neurohistological assessments in offspring during and following maternal and/or neonatal exposure. Data from positive control studies are an integral component in developmental neurotoxicity risk assessments. Positive control data are crucial for evaluating a laboratory's capability to detect chemical-induced changes in measured endpoints. Positive control data are also valuable in a weight-of-evidence approach to help determine the biological significance of results and provide confidence in negative results from developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) studies. This review is a practical guide for the selection and use of positive control agents in developmental neurotoxicology. The advantages and disadvantages of various positive control agents are discussed for the endpoints in developmental neurotoxicity studies. Design issues specific to positive control studies in developmental neurotoxicity are considered and recommendations on how to interpret and report positive control data are made. Positive control studies should be conducted as an integral component of the incorporation and use of developmental neurotoxicity testing methods in laboratories that generate data used in risk decisions.

Expanding the test set: Chemicals with potential to disrupt mammalian brain development.

High-throughput test methods including molecular, cellular, and alternative species-based assays that examine critical events of normal brain development are being developed for detection of developmental neurotoxicants. As new assays are developed, a "training set" of chemicals is used to evaluate the relevance of individual assays for specific endpoints. Different training sets are necessary for each assay that would comprise a developmental neurotoxicity test battery. In contrast, evaluation of the predictive ability of a comprehensive test battery requires a set of chemicals that have been shown to alter brain development after in vivo exposure ("test set"). Because only a small number of substances have been well documented to alter human neurodevelopment, we have proposed an expanded test set that includes chemicals demonstrated to adversely affect neurodevelopment in animals. To compile a list of potential developmental neurotoxicants, a literature review of compounds that have been examined for effects on the developing nervous system was conducted. The search was limited to mammalian studies published in the peer-reviewed literature and regulatory studies submitted to the U.S. EPA. The definition of developmental neurotoxicity encompassed changes in behavior, brain morphology, and neurochemistry after gestational or lactational exposure. Reports that indicated developmental neurotoxicity was observed only at doses that resulted in significant maternal toxicity or were lethal to the fetus or offspring were not considered. As a basic indication of reproducibility, we only included a chemical if data on its developmental neurotoxicity were available from more than one laboratory (defined as studies originating from laboratories with a different senior investigator). Evidence from human studies was included when available. Approximately 100 developmental neurotoxicity test set chemicals were identified, with 22% having evidence in humans.