Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0302206, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38625899

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the relationship between the anion gap, including the corrected anion gap, and patient mortality in intensive care units (ICUs) without restricting the analysis to specific diseases or medical specialties. Our primary objective was to investigate the association between the anion gap and ICU mortality using multiple open-access databases. METHODS: We identified 4229 subjects from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database, whose entries were from between 2008 and 2019. For each patient, the anion gap and corrected anion gap were calculated, and the study sample was divided into tertile groups (T) according to these levels. The association between the anion gap and in-hospital mortality was assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Besides MIMIC-IV, we also incorporated study samples from two other databases (MIMIC-III and electronic ICU) to calculate summary HRs using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Within MIMIC-IV, 1015 patients (24%) died during an average follow-up period of 15.5 days. The fully adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for T2 and T3, relative to T1, were 1.31 (95% CI 1.08-1.58) and 1.54 (95% CI 1.24-1.90), respectively. When grouped by corrected anion gap, the results remained statistically significant. In the meta-analysis, the summary HRs and 95% CIs for T2 and T3 were 1.24 (95% CI 1.08-1.43) and 1.55 (95% CI 1.33-1.82), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both the anion gap and corrected anion gap were associated with in-hospital mortality regardless of specific diseases or medical specialties.


Asunto(s)
Equilibrio Ácido-Base , Suero , Humanos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cuidados Críticos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 6784, 2024 03 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38514670

RESUMEN

In this multi-center, assessor-blinded pilot study, the diagnostic efficacy of cCeLL-Ex vivo, a second-generation confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), was compared against the gold standard frozen section analysis for intraoperative brain tumor diagnosis. The study was conducted across three tertiary medical institutions in the Republic of Korea. Biopsy samples from newly diagnosed brain tumor patients were categorized based on location and divided for permanent section analysis, frozen section analysis, and cCeLL-Ex vivo imaging. Of the 74 samples from 55 patients, the majority were from the tumor core (74.3%). cCeLL-Ex vivo exhibited a relatively higher diagnostic accuracy (89.2%) than frozen section analysis (86.5%), with both methods showing a sensitivity of 92.2%. cCeLL-Ex vivo also demonstrated higher specificity (70% vs. 50%), positive predictive value (PPV) (95.2% vs. 92.2%), and negative predictive value (NPV) (58.3% vs. 50%). Furthermore, the time from sample preparation to diagnosis was notably shorter with cCeLL-Ex vivo (13 min 17 s) compared to frozen section analysis (28 min 28 s) (p-value < 0.005). These findings underscore cCeLL-Ex vivo's potential as a supplementary tool for intraoperative brain tumor diagnosis, with future studies anticipated to further validate its clinical utility.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Rayos Láser
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda