Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 222
Filtrar
1.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 103(4): 688-695, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34343522

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index Assistive Technology (SCI-FI/AT) scores from FIM motor items. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis. SETTING: Fourteen Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) programs. PARTICIPANTS: Persons with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) discharged from inpatient rehabilitation at 14 SCIMS programs (N=1237). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FIM motor items were matched to SCI-FI/AT domains and summary scores for each measure were developed. The kernel-based method was employed to develop a concordance table to estimate SCI-FI/AT domain summary scores from content-matched FIM motor item summary scores. We conducted analyses to compare agreement between actual SCI-FI/AT summary scores (actual SCI-FI/AT_S) and estimated SCI-FI/AT summary scores (est-SCI-FI/AT_S) for the total sample and for participants with different SCI injury categories. RESULTS: Nine FIM items matched SCI-FI/AT basic mobility and self-care domain content. Pearson correlations for actual and est-SCI-FI/AT_S scores (0.79) were adequate for using concordance linking methods. Intraclass correlation coefficient values (0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.81) indicated moderate reliability. t tests revealed no significant differences between actual and est-SCI-FI/AT_S scores in the total sample. For almost 60% of the sample, actual and est-SCI-FI/AT_S score differences were <5 points (half of a SD). Greater differences between actual and est-SCI-FI/AT_S scores were noted for persons with tetraplegia American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scales (AISs) A, B, and C. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences between the FIM and SCI-FI/AT assessments, we developed a concordance table to estimate self-care and basic mobility SCI-FI/AT scores from content-matched FIM motor item scores. This concordance table allows researchers to merge FIM data with SCI-FI/AT data to analyze SCI functional outcomes at the group level. However, owing to greater differences between actual and estimated scores, the concordance table should be used with caution to interpret scores for those with cervical-level injuries AISs A, B, C.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Autoayuda , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Actividades Cotidianas , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Autocuidado , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación
2.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 103(2): 191-198, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33453193

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index (SCI-FI) instruments in a community-dwelling sample. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Community setting. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=269) recruited from 6 SCI Model Systems sites. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants completed computer adaptive test and short form versions of 4 SCI-FI/Capacity (C) banks (ie, Ambulation, Basic Mobility, Fine Motor, Self-Care) and 1 SCI-FI/Assistive Technology (AT) bank (Wheelchair Mobility) at baseline and after 2 weeks. The Self-Report Functional Measure (SRFM) and the clinician-rated motor FIM were used to evaluate evidence of convergent validity. RESULTS: Pearson correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients, minimal detectable change, and Bland-Altman plots supported the test-retest reliability of the SCI-FI instruments. Correlations were large with the SRFM (.69-.89) and moderate-to-large for the FIM instrument (.44-.64), supporting convergent validity. Known-groups validity was demonstrated by a significant main effect of injury level on all instruments and a main effect of injury completeness on the SCI-FI/C instruments. A ceiling effect was detected for individuals with incomplete paraplegia on the Fine Motor/C and Self-Care/C Short Forms. CONCLUSION: Findings support the test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and known-groups validity of the SCI-FI/C instruments and the SCI-FI/AT Wheelchair Mobility instruments for use by community-dwelling individuals.


Asunto(s)
Vida Independiente , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Actividades Cotidianas , Estudios Transversales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
3.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 103(2): 199-206, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34717921

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To establish responsiveness of 3 Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index/Capacity (SCI-FI/C) item banks in the first year after spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes assessment replicated through secondary analysis of an independent data set. SETTING: A total of 8 SCI Model Systems rehabilitation hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Study 1 participants included 184 adults with recent (≤4 months) traumatic SCI and 221 community-dwelling adults (>1 year post injury) (N=405). Study 2 participants were 418 individuals with recent SCI (≤4 months) (N=418). INTERVENTIONS: In study 1, SCI-FI/C computer adaptive tests were presented in a standardized interview format either in person or by phone call at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Responsiveness was examined by comparing 6-month changes in SCI-FI scores within and across samples (recently injured vs community-dwelling) because only the recent injury sample was expected to exhibit change over time. Effect sizes were also computed. In study 2, the study 1 results were cross-validated in a second sample with recent SCI 1 year after baseline measurement. Study 2 also compared the SCI-FI/C measures' responsiveness to that of the Self-reported Functional Measure (SRFM) and stratified results by injury diagnosis and completeness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The SCI-FI Basic Mobility/C, Self-care/C and Fine Motor/C item banks (study 1 and study 2); Self-reported Functional Measure SRFM (study 2 only). RESULTS: In study 1, changes in SCI-FI/C scores between baseline and 6-month follow-up were statistically significant (P<.01) for recently injured individuals. SCI-FI Basic Mobility/C, Self-care/C, and Fine Motor/C item banks demonstrated small to medium effect sizes in the recently injured sample. In the community-dwelling sample, all SCI-FI/C effects were negligible (ie, effect size<0.08). Study 2 results were similar to study 1. As expected, SCI-FI Basic Mobility/C and Self-care/C were responsive to change for all individuals in study 2, whereas the SCI-FI Fine Motor/C was responsive only for individuals with tetraplegia and incomplete paraplegia. The SRFM demonstrated a medium effect size for responsiveness (effect size=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The SCI-FI Basic Mobility/C and Self-care/C banks demonstrate adequate sensitivity to change at 6 months and 1 year for all individuals with SCI, while the SCI-FI/C Fine Motor item bank is sensitive to change in individuals with tetraplegia or incomplete paraplegia. All SCI-FI/C banks demonstrate stability in a sample not expected to change. Results provide support for the use of these measures for research or clinical use.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Humanos , Paraplejía/rehabilitación , Cuadriplejía/rehabilitación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Estados Unidos
4.
Spinal Cord ; 59(11): 1146-1154, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34079073

RESUMEN

DESIGN: Mixed methods cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To develop and assess psychometric properties of the pediatric measure of participation (PMoP) short forms (SF) version 2.0. SETTING: Secondary analyses of data collected from 381 children with spinal cord injury (SCI) of at least 3-month duration living in the community, and 322 parents of children with SCI at three pediatric orthopedic hospitals in the United States. METHODS: Mixed methods iterative process to customize SF based on, highly relevant items, age and school analysis of item distributions; ceiling and floor effects; internal consistency and group-level reliability; correlation of SF scores with scores derived from the total item bank; and assessment of the degree to which item difficulty matched the abilities of children in the sample. RESULTS: PMoP SF V2.0 mean T scores ranged from 47.59 to 51.23. Overall, mean scores were somewhat higher for older children and parent respondents. Group-level reliability values ranged from 0.66 to 0.79; Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.79 to 0.90; ICC values ranged from 0.89 to 0.95. Pearson Correlations ranged from 0.80 to 0.95, showing good to strong correlation between scores from the SFs and total item bank for each domain. Test information function demonstrated that score estimates will be less precise at higher ends of the scale. CONCLUSIONS: PMoP SFs V2.0 contain items relevant to participation among children with SCI, and are tailored for four age groups and school status. They are recommended for use when computer adaptive testing (CAT) is not possible.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
Qual Life Res ; 28(5): 1217-1229, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30539361

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Having independent versions of the PROMIS® scales (for Pediatric and Adults) is problematic as scores cannot be evaluated longitudinally as individuals move from childhood into adulthood. The primary aim of this research project is to use item response theory (IRT) to develop a transitional scoring link (or "crosswalk") between the PROMIS adult and pediatric physical health measures. SETTING: Sample 1 was collected at 6 rehabilitation hospitals in the U.S., and participants in Sample 2 were recruited from public health insurance programs and an online research panel. METHODS: PROMIS pediatric and adult physical function, mobility, upper extremity, fatigue, and pain measures were administered to a sample of 874 individuals aged 14-20 years old with special health needs and a sample of 641 individuals aged 14-25 years with a disability. IRT-based scores were linked using a linear approximation to calibrated projection. RESULTS: Estimated latent variable correlations ranged between 0.84 and 0.95 for the PROMIS pediatric and adult scores. Root Expected Mean Square Difference values were below the 0.08 threshold in all cases except when comparing genders on the Mobility (0.097) and Pain (0.10) scales in the special health care needs sample. Sum score conversion tables for the pediatric and adult PROMIS measures are presented. CONCLUSIONS: The linking coefficients can be used to calculate scale scores on PROMIS adult measures from pediatric measure scores and vice versa. This may lead to more accurate measurement in cross-sectional studies spanning multiple age groups or longitudinal studies that require comparable measurement across distinct developmental stages.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Psicometría/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Adulto Joven
6.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 100(10): 1924-1931, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31153853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Validation of linking coefficients to transform Pediatric Spinal Cord Injury Activity Measure (PEDI-SCI/AM) scores to adult Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index (SCI-FI) scores. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study administered PEDI-SCI/AM and SCI-FI computerized adaptive tests (CATs) and short forms (SFs) to children with SCI and parents or caregivers. SETTING: Hospitals, university, and rehabilitation institute. PARTICIPANTS: About 107 children with SCI and 96 parent or caregivers. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Linking coefficients estimated SCI-FI (est-SCI-FI) scores from PEDI-SCI/AM scores for matched domains. Correlations between est-SCI-FI and actual SCI-FI scores were calculated. If correlations exceeded the criterion linking (0.866), the following analyses to compare est-SCI-FI and actual SCI-FI scores were conducted: paired t tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs 3, 1), percent of cases with absolute score differences at different thresholds. RESULTS: Two matched domains, PEDI-SCI/AM Daily Routine/SCI-FI Self-Care and PEDI-SCI/AM General Mobility/SCI-FI Basic Mobility, met the linking criterion for both respondent-types (parent and child) and administration modes (CAT and SF). PEDI-SCI/AM Daily Routine and SCI-FI Fine Motor Function did not meet linking criterion for respondent type or mode. The linking criterion was met for wheelchair domains (child SF and CAT) and ambulation domains (child SF only). Significant differences between est-SCI-FI and actual SCI-FI scores were noted for all matched domains except Daily Routine/Self-Care (child SF only; parent SF and CAT). ICC values showed excellent agreement (range=0.75-0.89). Absolute differences between est-SCI-FI and actual SCI-FI scores were less than 1 standard deviation (except wheelchair CAT child). CONCLUSIONS: Linking coefficients applied to PEDI-SCI/AM scores can provide valid SCI-FI estimates that vary by domain, mode, and respondent type.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/fisiopatología , Actividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Limitación de la Movilidad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Autocuidado , Silla de Ruedas
7.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 99(3): 521-528, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28888383

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop self-reported short forms for the Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile. DESIGN: Short forms based on the item parameters of discrimination and average difficulty. SETTING: A support network for burn survivors, peer support networks, social media, and mailings. PARTICIPANTS: Burn survivors (N=601) older than 18 years. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The LIBRE Profile. RESULTS: Ten-item short forms were developed to cover the 6 LIBRE Profile scales: Relationships with Family & Friends, Social Interactions, Social Activities, Work & Employment, Romantic Relationships, and Sexual Relationships. Ceiling effects were ≤15% for all scales; floor effects were <1% for all scales. The marginal reliability of the short forms ranged from .85 to .89. CONCLUSIONS: The LIBRE Profile-Short Forms demonstrated credible psychometric properties. The short form version provides a viable alternative to administering the LIBRE Profile when resources do not allow computer or Internet access. The full item bank, computerized adaptive test, and short forms are all scored along the same metric, and therefore scores are comparable regardless of the mode of administration.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/psicología , Autoinforme/normas , Conducta Social , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Adulto , Empleo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Trabajo/psicología
8.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 99(9): 1798-1804, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29752911

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity of the self-report Work-Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB) physical function scales relative to clinician ratings of function and a performance-based functional capacity evaluation called the Physical Work Performance Evaluation (PWPE). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=50) participating in physical therapy for musculoskeletal conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients completed the PWPE and the WD-FAB physical function scales including Changing and Maintaining Body Position, Whole Body Mobility, Upper Body Function, and Upper Extremity Fine Motor. The physical therapist also answered the WD-FAB questions on the patient's physical functioning. The WD-FAB computer-adaptive test version administered up to 10 items for each scale. The PWPE produces ratings from 0 to 5 indicating overall Level of Work ability: 0 (unable to work); 1 (sedentary); 2 (light); 3 (medium); 4 (heavy); 5 (very heavy). The PWPE also produces Level of Work ability ratings in the Dynamic Strength, Position Tolerance, and Mobility subsections. RESULTS: Participating in the study were 50 patients with 1 or more conditions (shoulder, n=21; knee, n=16; low back, n=13; ankle/foot, n=10; neck, n=8; hip, n=7). The patient-based WD-FAB scores demonstrated moderate, statistically significant correlations with the provider proxy WD-FAB report (R=.49-.65). The WD-FAB Upper Body Function scale scores demonstrated moderate strength relationships with the PWPE overall ratings. The Whole Body Mobility and Changing and Maintaining Body Position scales did not demonstrate statistically significant relationships with the PWPE overall ratings. CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate evidence for validity for the WD-FAB Upper Body Function, Whole Body Mobility, and Changing and Maintaining Body Position scales relative to clinician report and varied evidence relative to the PWPE in this clinical sample.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/rehabilitación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/psicología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Pacientes Ambulatorios/psicología , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
9.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 99(9): 1783-1788, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29608900

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of the Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index/Assistive Technology (SCI-FI/AT) measure to detect change in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Multisite longitudinal (12-mo follow-up) study. SETTING: Nine SCI Model Systems programs. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=165) with SCI enrolled in the SCI Model Systems database. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SCI-FI/AT computerized adaptive test (CAT) (Basic Mobility, Self-Care, Fine Motor Function, Wheelchair Mobility, and/or Ambulation domains) completed at discharge from rehabilitation and 12 months after SCI. For each domain, effect size estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for subgroups with paraplegia and tetraplegia. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the sample were as follows: 46% (n=76) individuals with paraplegia, 76% (n=125) male participants, 57% (n=94) used a manual wheelchair, 38% (n=63) used a power wheelchair, 30% (n=50) were ambulatory. For individuals with paraplegia, the Basic Mobility, Self-Care, and Ambulation domains of the SCI-FI/AT detected a significantly large amount of change; in contrast, the Fine Motor Function and Wheelchair Mobility domains detected only a small amount of change. For those with tetraplegia, the Basic Mobility, Fine Motor Function, and Self-Care domains detected a small amount of change whereas the Ambulation item domain detected a medium amount of change. The Wheelchair Mobility domain for people with tetraplegia was the only SCI-FI/AT domain that did not detect significant change. CONCLUSIONS: SCI-FI/AT CAT item banks detected an increase in function from discharge to 12 months after SCI. The effect size estimates for the SCI-FI/AT CAT vary by domain and level of lesion. Findings support the use of the SCI-FI/AT CAT in the population with SCI and highlight the importance of multidimensional functional measures.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Autocuidado/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Silla de Ruedas/estadística & datos numéricos , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paraplejía/etiología , Paraplejía/rehabilitación , Psicometría , Cuadriplejía/etiología , Cuadriplejía/rehabilitación , Dispositivos de Autoayuda/estadística & datos numéricos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Caminata
10.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 19(1): 29, 2018 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29361920

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The intent of this study was to examine and compare the ability to detect change of two patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments that use a computerized adaptive test (CAT) approach to measurement. The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Physical Function scale is a generic PRO, while the Osteoarthritis Computerized Adaptive Test (OA-CAT) is an osteoarthritis-specific PRO. METHODS: This descriptive, longitudinal study was conducted in a community setting, involving individuals from the greater Boston area. INCLUSION CRITERIA: age > 50, self-reported doctor-diagnosed knee osteoarthritis (OA) and knee pain. The PROMIS® Physical Function CAT and OA-CAT Functional Difficulty scale were administered at baseline and at the conclusion of a 6-week exercise program. Effect sizes (ES) were calculated for both measures, and bootstrap methods were used to construct confidence intervals and to test for significant ES differences between the measures. RESULTS: The OA-CAT Functional Difficulty scale achieved an ES of 0.62 (0.43, 0.87) compared to the PROMIS® Physical Function CAT ES of 0.42 (0.24, 0.63). ES estimates for the two CAT measures were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: The condition-specific OA-CAT and generic PROMIS® Physical Function CAT both demonstrated the ability to detect change in function. While the OA-CAT scale showed larger effect size, no statistically significant difference was found in the effect size estimates for the generic and condition-specific CATs. Both CATs have potential for use in arthritis research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 6/21/11 (Identifier NCT01394874 ).


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Fisiológica/fisiología , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/rehabilitación , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Anciano , Diagnóstico por Computador/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Dimensión del Dolor/normas
11.
J Occup Rehabil ; 28(1): 190-199, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28477069

RESUMEN

Purpose To improve the mental health component of the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB), developed for the US Social Security Administration's (SSA) disability determination process. Specifically our goal was to expand the WD-FAB scales of mood & emotions, resilience, social interactions, and behavioral control to improve the depth and breadth of the current scales and expand the content coverage to include aspects of cognition & communication function. Methods Data were collected from a random, stratified sample of 1695 claimants applying for the SSA work disability benefits, and a general population sample of 2025 working age adults. 169 new items were developed to replenish the WD-FAB scales and analyzed using factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) analysis to construct unidimensional scales. We conducted computer adaptive test (CAT) simulations to examine the psychometric properties of the WD-FAB. Results Analyses supported the inclusion of four mental health subdomains: Cognition & Communication (68 items), Self-Regulation (34 items), Resilience & Sociability (29 items) and Mood & Emotions (34 items). All scales yielded acceptable psychometric properties. Conclusions IRT methods were effective in expanding the WD-FAB to assess mental health function. The WD-FAB has the potential to enhance work disability assessment both within the context of the SSA disability programs as well as other clinical and vocational rehabilitation settings.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Seguridad Social , Estados Unidos
12.
Qual Life Res ; 26(10): 2851-2866, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28493205

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Measuring the impact burn injuries have on social participation is integral to understanding and improving survivors' quality of life, yet there are no existing instruments that comprehensively measure the social participation of burn survivors. This project aimed to develop the Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation Profile (LIBRE), a patient-reported multidimensional assessment for understanding the social participation after burn injuries. METHODS: 192 questions representing multiple social participation areas were administered to a convenience sample of 601 burn survivors. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to identify the underlying structure of the data. Using item response theory methods, a Graded Response Model was applied for each identified sub-domain. The resultant multidimensional LIBRE Profile can be administered via Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) or fixed short forms. RESULTS: The study sample included 54.7% women with a mean age of 44.6 (SD 15.9) years. The average time since burn injury was 15.4 years (0-74 years) and the average total body surface area burned was 40% (1-97%). The CFA indicated acceptable fit statistics (CFI range 0.913-0.977, TLI range 0.904-0.974, RMSEA range 0.06-0.096). The six unidimensional scales were named: relationships with family and friends, social interactions, social activities, work and employment, romantic relationships, and sexual relationships. The marginal reliability of the full item bank and CATs ranged from 0.84 to 0.93, with ceiling effects less than 15% for all scales. CONCLUSIONS: The LIBRE Profile is a promising new measure of social participation following a burn injury that enables burn survivors and their care providers to measure social participation.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Participación Social/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sobrevivientes
13.
Qual Life Res ; 26(3): 789-798, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28005243

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To expand content of the physical function domain of the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB), developed for the US Social Security Administration's (SSA) disability determination process. METHODS: Newly developed questions were administered to 3532 recent SSA applicants for work disability benefits and 2025 US adults. Factor analyses and item response theory (IRT) methods were used to calibrate and link the new items to the existing WD-FAB, and computer-adaptive test simulations were conducted. RESULTS: Factor and IRT analyses supported integration of 44 new items into three existing WD-FAB scales and the addition of a new 11-item scale (Community Mobility). The final physical function domain consisting of: Basic Mobility (56 items), Upper Body Function (34 items), Fine Motor Function (45 items), and Community Mobility (11 items) demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. CONCLUSIONS: The WD-FAB offers an important tool for enhancement of work disability determination. The FAB could provide relevant information about work-related functioning for initial assessment of claimants; identifying denied applicants who may benefit from interventions to improve work and health outcomes; enhancing periodic review of work disability beneficiaries; and assessing outcomes for policies, programs and services targeting people with work disability.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados Unidos , United States Social Security Administration , Adulto Joven
14.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 58(11): 1132-1138, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27098277

RESUMEN

AIM: The present study examined the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Mobility, Fatigue, and Pain Interference Short Forms (SFs) in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP) for the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) relative to the original calibration sample. METHOD: Using the Graded Response Model we compared item parameter estimates generated from a sample of 303 children and adolescents with CP (175 males, 128 females; mean age 15y 5mo) to parameter estimates from the PROMIS calibration sample, which served as the reference group. DIF was assessed in a two-step process using the item response theory-likelihood ratio-differential item functioning detection procedure. RESULTS: Significant DIF was identified for four of eight items in the PROMIS Mobility SF, for two of eight items in the Pain Interference Scale, and for one item out of 10 on the Fatigue Scale. Impact of DIF on total score estimation was notable for Mobility and Pain Interference, but not for Fatigue. INTERPRETATION: Results suggest differences in the responses of adolescents with CP to some items on the PROMIS Mobility and Pain Interference SFs. Cognitive interviews about the PROMIS items with adolescents with varying degrees of mobility limitations would provide better understanding of how they are interpreting and selecting responses to the PROMIS items and thus help guide selection of the most appropriate way to address this issue.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral/complicaciones , Fatiga/etiología , Limitación de la Movilidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Dolor/etiología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Aplicaciones de la Informática Médica , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Pediatría , Psicometría/instrumentación
15.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 97(8): 1316-22, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27056644

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify neuromuscular impairments most predictive of unfavorable mobility outcomes in late life. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling primary care patients aged ≥65 years (N=391) with self-reported mobility modifications, randomly selected from a research registry. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Categories of decline in and persistently poor mobility across baseline, 1 and 2 years of follow-up in the Lower-Extremity Function scales of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument. The following categories of impairment were assessed as potential predictors of mobility change: strength (leg strength), speed of movement (leg velocity, reaction time, rapid leg coordination), range of motion (ROM) (knee flexion/knee extension/ankle ROM), asymmetry (asymmetry of leg strength and knee flexion/extension ROM measures), and trunk stability (trunk extensor endurance, kyphosis). RESULTS: The largest effect sizes were found for baseline weaker leg strength (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.45 [1.72-6.95]), trunk extensor endurance (2.98 [1.56-5.70]), and slower leg velocity (2.35 [1.21-4.58]) predicting a greater likelihood of persistently poor function over 2 years. Baseline weaker leg strength, trunk extensor endurance, and restricted knee flexion motion also predicted a greater likelihood of decline in function (1.72 [1.10-2.70], 1.83 [1.13-2.95], and 2.03 [1.24-3.35], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults exhibiting poor mobility may be prime candidates for rehabilitation focused on improving these impairments. These findings lay the groundwork for developing interventions aimed at optimizing rehabilitative care and disability prevention, and highlight the importance of both well-recognized (leg strength) and novel impairments (leg velocity, trunk extensor muscle endurance).


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Extremidad Inferior/fisiología , Limitación de la Movilidad , Enfermedades Neuromusculares/rehabilitación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Rodilla/fisiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Movimiento/fisiología , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Enfermedades Neuromusculares/fisiopatología , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Torso/fisiología
16.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 97(10): 1663-1668.e3, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27208647

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop mathematical models for predicting level of independence with specific functional outcomes 1 year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation for spinal cord injury. DESIGN: Statistical analyses using artificial neural networks and logistic regression. SETTING: Retrospective analysis of data from the national, multicenter Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) Database. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (N=3142; mean age, 41.5y) with traumatic spinal cord injury who contributed data for the National SCIMS Database longitudinal outcomes studies. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported ambulation ability and FIM-derived indices of level of assistance required for self-care activities (ie, bed-chair transfers, bladder and bowel management, eating, toileting). RESULTS: Models for predicting ambulation status were highly accurate (>85% case classification accuracy; areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve between .86 and .90). Models for predicting nonambulation outcomes were moderately accurate (76%-86% case classification accuracy; areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve between .70 and .82). The performance of models generated by artificial neural networks closely paralleled the performance of models analyzed using logistic regression constrained by the same independent variables. CONCLUSIONS: After further prospective validation, such predictive models may allow clinicians to use data available at the time of admission to inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation to accurately predict longer-term ambulation status, and whether individual patients are likely to perform various self-care activities with or without assistance from another person.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Modelos Teóricos , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Recuperación de la Función , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Autocuidado , Caminata/fisiología
17.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 97(10): 1745-1752.e7, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27133356

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index/Assistive Technology (SCI-FI/AT) short forms (SFs) in the domains of basic mobility, self-care, fine motor function, and ambulation based on internal consistency; correlations between SFs and full item banks, and a 10-item computerized adaptive test (CAT) version; magnitude of ceiling and floor effects; and measurement precision across a broad range of function in a sample of adults with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING: Nine national Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems programs. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of adults with traumatic SCI (N=460) stratified by level of injury (paraplegia/tetraplegia), completeness of injury, and time since SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SCI-FI/AT full item bank, 10-item CAT, and SFs (with separate Self-Care and Fine Motor Function SFs for persons with tetraplegia and paraplegia). RESULTS: The SCI-FI/AT SFs demonstrated very good internal consistency, group-level reliability, and excellent correlations between SFs and scores based on the CAT version and the total item bank. Ceiling and floor effects are acceptable (except for unacceptable ceiling effects for persons with paraplegia on the Self-Care and Fine Motor Function SFs). The test information functions are excellent across a broad range of functioning typical of persons with paraplegia and tetraplegia. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians and researchers should consider using the SCI-FI/AT SFs to assess functioning with the use of assistive technology when CAT applications are not available.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Dispositivos de Autoayuda , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hemiplejía/rehabilitación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paraplejía/rehabilitación , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Autocuidado , Factores Socioeconómicos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/clasificación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/psicología , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Caminata
18.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 36(7): 749-56, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26057065

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to provide patient-reported outcome measures that are designed as being universally relevant across health conditions, low burden, and precise. A major problem for research and clinical practice in cerebral palsy (CP) is the void of outcomes instruments that are capable of evaluating the wide range of abilities and broad age spectrum inherent in this clinical population. Given the tremendous potential of PROMIS, the research questions for this study were "How do PROMIS pediatric computer adaptive tests and short forms detect change in children with CP following elective musculoskeletal surgery?" and "How do PROMIS instruments compare to the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Cerebral Palsy Module Version 3.0 (PedsQL CP), Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), the Timed Up and Go (TUG), and the Gross Motor Functional Measure (GMFM)." METHODS: PROMIS Pediatric computer adaptive tests and short forms and the PedsQL, PODCI, TUG, and GMFM were administered before and after surgery. Effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated. Floor and ceiling effects were evaluated and, exposure rates for the PROMIS item banks were examined. RESULTS: ES and SRM for all PROMIS Pediatric Measures were nonsignificant. PedsQL CP detected significant, positive change in mobility at 6 (ES=0.26; SRM=0.31) and 12 (ES=0.36; SRM=0.36) months; pain at 12 months (ES=0.29; SRM=0.34); and fatigue at 6 (ES=0.24; SRM=0.22) and 12 (ES=0.36; SRM=0.41) months. Significant negative changes were detected by the PODCI (ES=-0.20; SRM=-0.26), GMFM (ES=-0.13; SRM=-0.24), and TUG (ES=-0.29; SRM=-0.25). Ceiling effects were high. Exposure to an appropriate range of the PROMIS Mobility item bank was limited. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS measures were less able to detect change than other measures. PROMIS measures may be improved by tailoring start/stop rules or by adding items to include content appropriate for children with mobility impairments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-diagnostic study.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral , Costo de Enfermedad , Ortopedia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Parálisis Cerebral/diagnóstico , Parálisis Cerebral/fisiopatología , Parálisis Cerebral/psicología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ortopedia/métodos , Ortopedia/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Pediatría/métodos , Pediatría/normas , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
19.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(6): 1014-1020.e1, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25701101

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether self-efficacy mediated the effect of the Home-based Post-Hip Fracture Rehabilitation program on activity limitations in older adults after hip fracture and whether the mediating effect was different between sex and age groups. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with hip fracture (N=232; mean age ± SD, 79±9.4y) were randomly assigned to intervention (n=120, 51.7%) and attention control (n=112, 48.3%) groups. INTERVENTIONS: The 6-month intervention, the Home-based Post-Hip Fracture Rehabilitation, is a functionally oriented, home-based exercise program. Data were collected at baseline, postintervention (6mo), and follow-up (9mo). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care. RESULTS: The mediating effect of the Home-based Post-Hip Fracture Rehabilitation program on Basic Mobility function through self-efficacy for exercise was significant at 9 months (ßindirect=.21). Similarly, the mediating effect of the intervention on Daily Activity function through self-efficacy for exercise was significant at 9 months (ßindirect=.49). In subgroup analyses, the mediating effect was significant at 9 months in the younger group (age, ≤79y) in comparison to the older group and was significant in women in comparison to men. CONCLUSIONS: Self-efficacy may play a partial mediating role in the effect on some longer-term functional outcomes in the Home-based Post-Hip Fracture Rehabilitation intervention. The results suggest that program components that target self-efficacy should be incorporated in future hip fracture rehabilitation interventions. Age and sex of the targeted participants may also need to be considered when developing interventions.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Terapia por Ejercicio , Fracturas de Cadera/rehabilitación , Autoeficacia , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores Sexuales
20.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 96(8): 1448-57, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25431830

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop functional ability levels for the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index (SCI-FI) and to validate them using calibration and reliability samples. DESIGN: Three-phase strategy involved (1) performing quantitative synthesis of SCI-FI data to create item maps; (2) using a panel of experts to identify functional ability levels after the bookmarking and Delphi consensus-building process; and (3) performing quantitative analyses to examine demographic characteristics across 2 samples, assessing the distribution pattern across functional ability levels, and examining concurrent validity using the self-reported functional measure and the observer-rated FIM. SETTING: Inpatient and community settings. PARTICIPANTS: People 18 years or older with traumatic spinal cord injury (N=1124) were recruited from the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems programs and stratified by diagnosis, severity, and time since injury (n=855 and n=269 for calibration and reliability samples, respectively). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: SCI-FI. RESULTS: Five functional ability levels were identified for all SCI-FI domains, except fine motor having 4 functional ability levels. Statistical test results indicated no significant differences in the distribution pattern across the 2 samples across functional ability levels for all domains except for ambulation. Known-group comparisons were able to discern the spinal cord injury population as expected. Basic mobility, self-care, and wheelchair mobility domains had a cluster of persons with paraplegia and incomplete lesions at higher functional ability levels and persons with tetraplegia and complete lesions at lower functional ability levels. For the ambulation domain, the distribution was skewed to the lower end, with a relatively small percentage of persons with incomplete lesions (paraplegia and tetraplegia) at higher functional ability levels. For the fine motor domain, the distribution was skewed to higher functional ability levels, with a high percentage of persons with paraplegia at the highest level (complete and incomplete lesions). Concurrent validity analyses revealed SCI-FI functional levels to be significantly (P<.001) positively correlated with both the self-reported functional measure and the observer-rated FIM. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians can use functional ability levels to discuss patients' functional capabilities with them and their family.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Parálisis/rehabilitación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Recuperación de la Función , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Limitación de la Movilidad , Destreza Motora , Parálisis/etiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Autocuidado , Factores Socioeconómicos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Silla de Ruedas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda