Prospective Multicenter Study to Clarify the Frequency of Peristomal Skin Disorders and Appropriate Evaluation Time in Patients with Malignant Rectal Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand the effectiveness of regular care in reducing the incidence of severe peristomal skin disorders, as well as to identify their risk factors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Peristomal skin disorders occur frequently in outpatient settings and require appropriate intervention. It remains, however, to be demonstrated when the need to follow up these patients decreases and whether assessing severity of peristomal skin disorders is useful. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was conducted in six regional high-volume Japanese hospitals. The primary endpoint of the study was the effectiveness of regular follow-up in reducing the incidence of severe peristomal skin disorders via a scoring system at a defined regular outpatient visit. Propensity score matching was performed to compare a control group and patients with severe peristomal skin disorders. RESULTS: In total, 217 patients between December 2019 and December 2021 were enrolled, and 191 patients were analyzed. Multivariate analysis showed that loop stoma (odds ratio [OR], 5.017; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.350-18.639; P=0.016) and stoma height of <10 mm (OR, 7.831; 95% CI, 1.760-34.838; P=0.007) were independent risk factors for all peristomal skin disorders. After propensity score matching, the incidence of the disorders was not significantly different between the specified evaluation timing and historical control groups (75.7% vs. 77.2%, P=0.775), and the incidence of the severe disorders based on the ABCD and DET scores (5.9% vs. 19.1%, P<0.001 and 1.5% vs. 29.4%, P<0.001, respectively) was significantly lower in the specified evaluation timing group than in the historical control group. CONCLUSION: Regular peristomal skin disease follow-up and scoring, as well as appropriate stoma care at the stoma outpatient visit did not change the frequency of peristomal skin disease, but severe peristomal skin disorders were prevented. Additionally, risk factors for peristomal skin disorders were found to be height <10 mm and loop stoma.

Risk factors for the incidence and severity of peristomal skin disorders defined using two scoring systems.

PURPOSE: Peristomal skin disorders (PSDs) are common stoma-related complications. However, there is no standard method for the evaluation of PSDs, and the true incidence is unclear. There are also no reports on risk factors for severe PSDs. Therefore, this study was performed to analyze the incidence of PSD in temporary loop stoma based on the DET score and ABCD-stoma score and to determine the risk factors for all and severe PSDs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patient and surgical characteristics was carried out in 333 consecutive cases of stoma creation with loop ileostomy or colostomy performed at our hospital from January 2014 to December 2016. RESULTS: PSDs were diagnosed in 262 patients (78.7%), including 79 (23.7%) and 71 (21.3%) that were defined as severe based on DET and ABCD-stoma scores, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that parastomal hernia was an independent risk factor for severe PSD defined by DET score and that adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent risk factor for severe PSD defined by the ABCD-stoma score. CONCLUSIONS: Severe PSDs are associated with parastomal hernia when diagnosed by the DET score and with adjuvant chemotherapy when diagnosed by the ABCD-stoma score.

Repositioning accuracy of a novel thermoplastic mask for head and neck cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of patient shoulder position immobilized with a novel and innovative prototype mask (E-Frame, Engineering System). METHODS: The E-frame mask fixes both shoulders and bisaxillary regions compared with that of a commercial mask (Type-S, CIVCO). Thirteen and twelve patients were immobilized with the Type-S and E-Frame mask systems, respectively. For each treatment fraction, cone-beam CT (CBCT) images of the patient were acquired and retrospectively analyzed. The CBCT images were registered to the planning CT based on the cervical spine, and then the displacements of the acromial extremity of the clavicle were measured. RESULTS: The systematic and random errors between the two mask systems were evaluated. The differences of the systematic errors between the two mask systems were not statistically significant. The mean random errors in the three directions (AP, SI and LR) were 2.7 mm, 3.1 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively for the Type-S mask, and 2.8 mm 2.5 mm and 1.4 mm, respectively for the E-Frame mask. The random error of the E-Frame masks in the SI direction was significantly smaller than that of the Type-S. The number of cases showing displacements exceeding 10 mm in the SI direction for at least one fraction was eight (61% of 13 cases) and three (25% of 12 cases) for Type-S and E-Frame masks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The E-Frame masks reduced the random displacements of patient's shoulders in the SI direction, effectively preventing large shoulder shifts that occurred frequently with Type-S masks.