Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Duodenal underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has been suggested as a feasible treatment option for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). However, its efficacy and safety have not been fully established yet. Thus, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy and safety of UEMR as compared with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) in the treatment of SNADETs. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing CEMR and UEMR for the resection of SNADET were included. Outcomes included en-bloc and complete resection rates, adverse events, and procedure time. RESULTS: A total of six studies with 2454 lesions were included in the quantitative synthesis. En-bloc and complete resection rates were not significantly different between UEMR and CEMR (OR for en-bloc resection: 0.997 [95% CI 0.439-2.266]; OR for complete resection: 0.960 [95% CI 0.628-1.468]). There was no significant risk difference for perforation (risk difference: - 0.002; 95% CI - 0.009 to 0.005) or delayed bleeding (risk difference: - 0.001; 95% CI - 0.014 to 0.011). Procedure time was significantly shorter in the UEMR (standardized mean difference: - 1.294; 95% CI - 2.461 to - 0.127). The risk of recurrence was not significantly different between UEMR and CEMR (risk difference: 0.001; 95% CI - 0.041 to 0.044). CONCLUSION: Although our results did not show any superiority of UEMR over CEMR in the treatment of SNADETs, UEMR showed equivalent efficacy and safety as compared with CEMR and was associated with a shorter procedure time.

Effect of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents on Small Intestinal Injuries as Evaluated by Capsule Endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Currently, because the population is aging, use of medications has been increasing, including use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antithrombotic agents. AIMS: This study aims to investigate whether NSAIDs can cause damage to the small bowel (SB) mucosa. METHODS: Endoscopic videos of subjects who had undergone capsule endoscopy (CE) were evaluated by three experts in order to identify SB injury. All medications taken within 2 weeks from the time of CE were investigated. Cases with a final diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis, inflammatory bowel disease, Behcet's disease, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, small bowel lymphoma, or Henoch-Schönlein purpura were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: Among the 273 subjects, 125 (45.8%) had SB erosions or ulcers (erosion group) and the remaining 148 (54.2%) did not (no erosion group). SB erosions or ulcers were more common in females, patients aged > 60 years, and subjects taking NSAIDs (p = 0.048, 0.032, and < 0.001, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the following variables: history of cancer and GI surgery, reasons for the test, comorbidities, and use of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. Multivariate analysis showed that use of NSAIDs [OR 4.191 (95% CI 1.858-9.458), p < 0.001] was an independent risk factor for SB erosions or ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: Use of NSAIDs is the only independent risk factor for SB injury identified in this study. Antithrombotic agents do not cause or exacerbate damage to the SB, according to our results. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: KCT0004795.

The role of linked color imaging in endoscopic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori associated gastritis.

OBJECTIVE: Linked color imaging (LCI), a novel image-enhanced endoscopy, can make it easy to recognize differences in mucosal color. It may be helpful for diagnosing H. pylori associated gastritis and H. pylori infection status. We investigated whether LCI could improve the diagnostic accuracy of H. pylori associated gastritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Upper endoscopy was performed for 100 patients using white light imaging (WLI) and LCI. During the exam, endoscopic video was recorded. It was then analyzed by four expert endoscopists. They reviewed these videos for endoscopic diagnosis of atrophic gastritis, metaplastic gastritis, nodular gastritis and H. pylori infection. Tissue biopsies with rapid urease test were done to confirm H. pylori infection status and intestinal metaplasia. RESULTS: Kappa values for the inter-observer variability among the four endoscopists were fair to moderate under WLI and fair to good under LCI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for diagnosing H. pylori infection using WLI were 32.4%, 93.3%, 85.2% and 53.6%, respectively, while those for LCI were 57.4%, 91.3%, 88.7% and 64.3%, respectively. Total diagnostic accuracies for diagnosing H. pylori infection using WLI/LCI were 70.8%/78.8%. The accuracy and sensitivity of LCI for diagnosing H. pylori infection were significantly higher than those of WLI (p < .001 for both). However, there were no significant differences in the accuracy, sensitivity or specificity for diagnosing metaplastic gastritis between LCI and WLI. CONCLUSIONS: LCI has better diagnostic accuracy for H. pylori infection status than WLI. Clinical trial registration number: KCT0003674.

The Protective Effect of 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Against Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Induced Injury Through Free Radical Scavenging in Small Intestinal Epithelial Cells.

Background and objectives: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been among the major causes of small intestinal injury in clinical practice. As such, the current study investigated the protective effect of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) against an NSAID-induced small intestinal injury. Materials and Methods: IEC-6 cells were treated with various concentrations of indomethacin with or without 5-ASA in a serum-free medium, after which an 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Dromide (MTT) assay, a cell apoptosis assay, a caspase-3 activity assay, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) content and Superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) activity measurement, a Western blotting for occludin and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and a wound healing assay were conducted. Results: 5-ASA ameliorated indomethacin-induced cell apoptosis and an increase in the intracellular ROS content while augmenting the indomethacin-induced suppression of SOD2 activity in IEC-6 cells. Moreover, 5-ASA reversed the indomethacin-induced attenuation of occludin and ZO-1 expression and promoted faster wound healing effects in IEC-6 cells following an indomethacin-induced injury. Conclusion: Our results suggested that 5-ASA protects small intestinal cells against an NSAID-induced small intestinal injury by scavenging free radicals. Therefore, 5-ASA could be a potential treatment for an NSAID-induced small intestinal injury.

Effect of ilaprazole on the healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcer: randomized-controlled, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment regimen or the duration of treatment for an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced gastric ulcer has not been established. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of novel proton-pump inhibitor, ilaprazole, for the treatment of ESD-induced gastric ulcer. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, randomized multicenter study. Between June 2015 and March 2018, a total of 176 patients (178 lesions) who underwent ESD for a gastric neoplasm were randomly allocated to receive the oral proton-pump inhibitor ilaprazole 20 mg or rabeprazole 20 mg daily for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the ulcer healing rate at 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 155 (157 lesions) and 154 patients (156 lesions) were included in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol analyses, respectively. There was no significant difference in the ulcer healing rate (ilaprazole vs. rabeprazole, 97.4% vs. 97.0 p = 0.78 at 4 weeks, 100% vs. 100%, p = 0.95 at 8 weeks in the mITT analysis) or stage of ulcer (scar stage, 25.6% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.25 at 4 weeks, 92.3% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.59 at 8 weeks in the mITT analysis) between the treatment groups. The quality of ulcer healing was not significantly different between the two groups. No independent predictive factor for higher-quality ulcer healing was found in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: According to this trial, ilaprazole and rabeprazole showed no significant difference in the healing of artificial gastric ulcers. Most of the ulcers achieved complete healing within 4-8 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT02638584.

Efficacy and safety of etomidate-based sedation compared with propofol-based sedation during ERCP in low-risk patients: a double-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Etomidate is a short-acting intravenous hypnotic with a safety profile that is superior to alternative drugs such as propofol. However, there is a lack of evidence on the safety of etomidate in ERCP. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and safety profiles of etomidate and propofol for endoscopic sedation. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial included patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to II who had been scheduled for ERCP. All patients received .05 mg/kg midazolam intravenously as pretreatment before receiving etomidate or propofol. Either etomidate or propofol was then administered according to group allocation. The primary endpoint was an overall respiratory event. A noninferiority margin of 10% was assumed. RESULTS: Sixty-three and 64 patients were enrolled in the etomidate and propofol groups, respectively. Respiratory events were identified in 10 patients (15.6%) in the etomidate group and 16 patients (25.4%) on the propofol group, with a rate difference of -9.8% (1-sided 97.5% confidence interval, -∞ to 4.2%). The overall incidence of cardiovascular events tended to be higher in the etomidate group (67.2% vs 50.8%, P = .060). In particular, tachycardia (heart rate > 100 beats/min) was more common in the etomidate group than in the propofol group (64.1% vs 34.9%, P = .001). Transient hypotension tended to be less common in the etomidate group (6.3 vs 15.9%, P = .084). CONCLUSIONS: Etomidate-based sedation during ERCP was noninferior to propofol-based sedation in terms of the overall incidence of respiratory events in patients with ASA physical status I to II. (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform number: KCT0001926.).

Safety and efficacy of early feeding based on clinical assessment at 4 hours after ERCP: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The optimal timing of refeeding after ERCP is unknown. Some practices keep the patient fasting for 24 hours after ERCP, whereas others resume feeding earlier. We aimed to evaluate the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in patients who initiate early feeding, based on their clinical assessment, including serum amylase testing performed at 4 hours after ERCP. METHODS: Patients who were scheduled for ERCP were recruited. Patients without abdominal pain and tenderness and a serum amylase level within 1.5-fold the upper limit of normal at 4 hours after ERCP were randomly assigned to either the 4-hour fasting or 24-hour fasting group. Patients from the 4-hour fasting group started oral intake 4 hours after ERCP, whereas those from the 24-hour fasting group fasted for 24 hours after ERCP. RESULTS: Among the 276 enrolled, PEP was identified in 3 (2.2%) from the 4-hour fasting group and in 5 (3.6%) from the 24-hour fasting group, with a rate difference of -1.4% (1-sided 97.5% confidence interval, -∞ to 2.5%). Four-hour fasting was non-inferior to 24-hour fasting in terms of PEP incidence. The total medical costs for treatment-related ERCP were significantly lower in the 4-hour fasting group than in the 24-hour fasting group (1157.20 ± 311.90 vs 1311.20 ± 410.70 U.S. dollars; P = .032). CONCLUSION: Early feeding in patients without abdominal pain and tenderness and a serum amylase level <1.5-fold the upper limit of normal at 4 hours after ERCP does not increase the incidence of PEP after ERCP and decreases medical costs. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0002354.).

Etomidate versus propofol sedation for complex upper endoscopic procedures: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although a growing body of evidence demonstrates that propofol-induced deep sedation can be effective and performed safely, cardiopulmonary adverse events have been observed frequently. Etomidate is a new emerging drug that provides hemodynamic and respiratory stability, even in high-risk patient groups. The objective of this study was to compare safety and efficacy profiles of etomidate and propofol for endoscopic sedation. METHODS: A total of 128 patients undergoing EUS were randomized to receive either etomidate or propofol blinded administered by a registered nurse. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with any cardiopulmonary adverse events. RESULTS: Overall cardiopulmonary adverse events were identified in 22 patients (34.38%) of the etomidate group and 33 patients (51.56%) of the propofol group, without significant difference (P = .074). However, the incidence of oxygen desaturation (4/64 [6.25%] vs 20/64 [31.25%]; P =.001) and respiratory depression (5/64 [7.81%] vs 21/64 [32.81%]; P =.001) was significantly lower in the etomidate group than in the propofol group. The frequency of myoclonus was significantly higher in the etomidate group (22/64 [34.37%]) compared with the propofol group (8/64 [12.50%]) (P =.012). Repeated measure analysis of variance revealed significant effects of sedation group and time on systolic blood pressure (etomidate group greater than propofol group). Physician satisfaction was greater in the etomidate group than in the propofol group. CONCLUSIONS: Etomidate administration resulted in fewer respiratory depression events and had a better sedative efficacy than propofol; however, it was more frequently associated with myoclonus and increased blood pressure during endoscopic procedures. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0001701.).

Meta-Analysis for Cyto-Pathological Outcomes in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration With and Without the Stylet.

BACKGROUND: Theoretically, use of the stylet during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) will prevent the tip of the needle from being blocked and the sample from being contaminated, improving the quality and diagnostic yield of specimens. AIM: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate any benefit from the use of a stylet during EUS-FNA. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, WEB of SCIENCE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for articles published through October 2015. A fixed-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effects when there is no heterogeneity and a random-effects model was used in situations with significant heterogeneity. RESULTS: Five prospective randomized controlled studies and two retrospective studies of a total of 5491 specimens (2504 specimens in the S+ group and 2987 specimens in the S- group) were included in this study. The pooled analysis demonstrated no significant differences in the adequate sample rate between the S+ group (2135/2504, 85.26 %) and S- group (2609/2987, 87.35 %) [odds ratio 0.94 (95 % confidence interval 0.79-1.11), p = 0.45]. Furthermore, the rate of cellularity > 50 %, the contamination rate, and the blood contamination rate were not significantly superior in the S+ group when compared with the S- group. CONCLUSIONS: Whether the use of a stylet improves the proportion of adequate specimens or quality of the specimen is questionable. Our results suggest that the use of a stylet dose not guarantee any advantage during EUS-guided tissue sampling.

Is annual endoscopic surveillance necessary for the early detection of gastric remnant cancer in Korea? A retrospective multi-center study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study investigated the clinical characteristics, survival outcomes of the patients with gastric remnant cancers (GRC) diagnosed after gastric cancer surgery and the need of annual endoscopic surveillance after gastric resection for early detection of GRC. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed the medical records of 30 patients who underwent endoscopy and diagnosed with GRC between 1999 and 2009. We analyzed the clinical features, tumor characteristics, regular endoscopic surveillance, treatment, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: The median time interval between first operation and diagnosis of GRC was 36 months. Fifteen patients (50%) had GRC at non-anastomotic sites. Seventeen patients (56.7%) underwent annual endoscopic surveillance and nine patients (30%) had no symptom at the time of diagnosis of GRC. GRC were detected earlier in patients with annual endoscopic surveillance than those without surveillance (p=0.0014). The median overall survival (OS) after the diagnosis of GRC for all patients was 35.9 months. The median OS of patients with curative resection including endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer was longer than those without resectability (46.3 vs. 13.6 months, p=0.0026). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that annual endoscopic surveillance program after gastric partial resection would be helpful to detect early cancer of remnant stomach for curative resection.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in severely burned patients: a case-control study to assess risk factors, causes, and outcome.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine the risk factors, causes, and outcome of clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding that occurs in severely burned patients. METHODOLOGY: The charts of all patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit were analyzed retrospectively over a 4-year period (from January 2006 to December 2009). Cases consisted of burned patients who developed upper gastrointestinal bleeding more than 24 hours after admission to the burn intensive care unit. Controls were a set of patients, in the burn intensive care unit, without upper gastrointestinal bleeding matched with cases for age and gender. Cases and controls were compared with respect to the risk factors of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 20 patients out of all 964 patients. The most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding was duodenal ulcer (11 of 20 cases, 55%). In the multivariate analysis, mechanical ventilation (p = 0.044) and coagulopathy (p = 0.035) were found to be the independent predictors of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in severely burned patients. CONCLUSIONS: Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage tends to occur more frequently after having prolonged mechanical ventilation and coagulopathy.

Clinical usefulness of double balloon enteroscopy in suspected Crohn's disease: the KASID multi-center trial.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The recently developed double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) may be useful to evaluate small bowel lesions in patients with suspected Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the findings of DBE, small bowel follow-through and abdominal CT in patients with suspected CD who could not be diagnosed with CD using conventional colonoscopy. METHODOLOGY: Thirty patients (27 males, mean age 32.7±9.27 years) with suspected CD were consecutively enrolled in this study. The main symptoms were abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, weight loss, obscure bleeding, or anemia. These patients were enrolled from May 2006 to January 2007 at 10 tertiary medical centers participating in the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. RESULTS: The DBE demonstrated definite CD in 24 patients (80.0%) and suspected findings of CD in six patients. The pathology results obtained by endoscopic biopsies revealed a granuloma in six patients (23.1%). The DBE identified additional findings not detected by radiology studies in 24 patients (80%) although the small bowel followthrough and the abdominal CT revealed the abnormal findings (73.1% and 64%). CONCLUSIONS: DBE may be a promising alternative and useful technique for patients with suspected CD. DBE provides biopsy sampling and more detailed information than radiology studies.

Pravastatin activates the expression of farnesoid X receptor and liver X receptor alpha in Hep3B cells.

BACKGROUND: Statins are suggested to preserve gallbladder function by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines and preventing cholesterol accumulation in gallbladder epithelial cells. They also affect cross-talk among the nuclear hormone receptors that regulate cholesterol-bile acid metabolism in the nuclei of hepatocytes. However, there is controversy over whether or how statins change the expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha, PPARgamma, liver X receptor alpha (LXRalpha), farnesoid X receptor (FXR), ABCG5, ABCG8, and 7alpha-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) which are directly involved in the cholesterol saturation index in bile. METHODS: Human Hep3B cells were cultured on dishes. MTT assays were performed to determine the appropriate concentrations of reagents to be used. The protein expression of PPARalpha and PPARgamma was measured by Western blotting analysis, and the mRNA expression of LXRalpha, FXR, ABCG5, ABCG8 and CYP7A1 was estimated by RT-PCR. RESULTS: In cultured Hep3B cells, pravastatin activated PPARalpha and PPARgamma protein expression, induced stronger expression of PPARgamma than that of PPARalpha, increased LXRalpha mRNA expression, activated ABCG5 and ABCG8 mRNA expression mediated by FXR as well as LXRalpha, enhanced FXR mRNA expression, and increased CYP7A1 mRNA expression mediated by the PPARgamma and LXRalpha pathways, together or independently. CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that pravastatin prevents cholesterol gallstone diseases via the increase of FXR, LXRalpha and CYP7A1 in human hepatocytes.

Outcomes of the Conventional versus Pocket-Creation Method for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Body Tumors Using a Dual Knife: A Retrospective Study.

Background/Aims: Various endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) methods for gastric tumors have been tried. However, no studies have yet compared results according to the ESD method for gastric body tumors using a dual knife. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of two ESD methods for gastric body tumors: the pocket-creation method and conventional method. Methods: Patients who underwent ESD for a gastric body tumor were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the ESD method: the conventional method (group I) and pocket-creation method (group II). Characteristics of patients and tumors, hospitalization period, incidence of complications, resection margin status, incidence of surgical operation, procedure time, and laboratory findings were investigated. Results: Of the total of 100 patients, 52 belonged to group I and 48 to group II. All tumors were successfully resected en bloc. Resection margin involvement was found in six (11.5%) of group I and six (12.5%) of group II. Complications were observed in seven (13.5%; major complication five, minor two) of group I and eight (16.7%; major two, minor six) of group II. There were no significant differences in ESD outcomes such as hospitalization period, incidence of complications, resection margin status, incidence of surgical operation, procedure time, or inflammatory response after ESD between the two groups. Conclusions: Both methods are suitable for treating gastric body tumors with adequate treatment success rates and comparable complication rates.

Can rebamipide and proton pump inhibitor combination therapy promote the healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers? A randomized, prospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: There has been no consensus regarding the optimal treatment durations and drug regimens in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced ulcers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and rebamipide combination therapy compared with PPI monotherapy for ESD-induced ulcer healing. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, controlled study; clinical trial. SETTING: Five hospitals in a University Medical Center group in Korea. PATIENTS: This study involved 290 adults (309 lesions) who underwent ESD for gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer. INTERVENTION: PPI and rebamipide combination therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The ulcer healing rate at 4 weeks after ESD. RESULTS: The ulcer healing rates at 4 weeks after ESD in the PPI and rebamipide combination therapy group were significantly higher than those in the PPI alone group, both in the full analysis (94.9% vs 89.9%; P < .0001) and in the per-protocol analysis (94.5% vs 91.2%; P = .020). This combination therapy was an independent predictive factor for a high ulcer healing rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.572; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.615-11.876; P = .014). Additionally, the combination therapy group exhibited a higher quality of ulcer healing than the PPI monotherapy group (reviewer 1: P = .027; OR 1.949; 95% CI, 1.077-3.527; reviewer 2: P = .027; OR 1.933; 95% CI, 1.074-3.481). LIMITATIONS: Open-label study. CONCLUSION: PPI and rebamipide combination therapy had a superior 4-week ESD-induced ulcer healing rate and quality of ulcer healing compared with PPI monotherapy. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01167101.).

Prevalence of minimal change lesions in patients with non-erosive reflux disease: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Some minimal changes (MCs) are believed to have a certain relationship with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Nonetheless, the individual meaning of MC is still unclear. Our aim was to compare the overall and individual prevalence of MC between patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Twelve endoscopic findings in the esophagogastric junction were prospectively compared between NERD (n = 64) and control (n = 104). RESULTS: Overall frequency of MC (≥ 1 out of 12 criteria) was higher in the NERD group (71.9%) than in the HC group (45.2%). In individual analysis, white mucosal turbidity, irregular Z-line, horizontal erosions, and mucosal protrusion of cardia were significantly more common in the NERD group compared to controls. Among them, only white mucosal turbidity was independently associated with the NERD group (OR 3.97, 95% CI 1.72-9.13). Individuals with male gender, reflux symptoms, higher height, current smoking, ethanol intake and hiatal hernia were more likely to have white mucosal turbidity compared to the group without white turbidity. CONCLUSIONS: MC could be a useful marker to support clinical diagnosis of GERD. White mucosal turbidity in particular might be a GERD-specific sign related to acid-induced mucosal damage.

Familial Mediterranean fever: the first adult case in Korea.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is known to be a genetic disorder that prevalent among populations surrounding the Mediterranean Sea. Since Mediterranean fever gene (MEFV) was discovered at 1997, some cases have been reported in countries not related or close to this area like Japan. In addition it has been generally accepted that the clinical onset of FMF begins before 20 yr of age in most patients. Onset of the disease at an older age may occur but is rare. Adult-onset FMF may be a form of disease with distinct clinical, demographic and molecular characteristics. We describe a case of adult-onset FMF confirmed by DNA analysis of the MEFV gene in a Korean patient. A 32-yr-old man, who has no family history of FMF, presented with periodic fever, abdominal pain and vomiting. Though several various tests were thoroughly performed to evaluate the cause of his symptoms, there was no evidence of infectious, autoimmune or neoplastic diseases. Several gene analysis of periodic fever syndrome was finally performed and two point mutations (p.Leu110Pro, p.Glu148Gln) were identified. We confirmed the first adult case of FMF through detection of MEFV gene mutations in Korea and describe his clinical characteristics.

Indication, Location of the Lesion, Diagnostic Yield, and Therapeutic Yield of Double-Balloon Enteroscopy: Seventeen Years of Experience.

Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) has become one of the standard methods in the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel (SB) disease. However, previous studies for DBE have limitations due to heterogeneity of indications and operators. The aim was to investigate the indication, location of the lesion, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic yield of DBE based on long-term data from a single operator. A retrospective study was performed by reviewing medical records of subjects who had received DBE at our unit in the past 17 years. Overall diagnostic yield was 78.7% (210/267). The diagnostic yield for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) was 68.3% (84/123). The diagnostic yield for OGIB was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that for other indications. Therapeutic yield was 24.7% (66/267). Complications occurred in 7 (2.6%). Crohn's disease, intestinal tuberculosis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug enteropathy, and diverticular lesions were mainly found in the ileum. Vascular lesions, non-specific inflammation, and neoplastic lesions were found more frequently in the jejunum. DBE is an excellent and safe endoscopic method for the diagnosis and treatment of SB lesions. DBE has a lower diagnostic rate for OGIB than for other indications. The location where a lesion is commonly found depends on the type of the lesion.

Bismuth-Based Quadruple Therapy versus Metronidazole-Intensified Triple Therapy as a First-Line Treatment for Clarithromycin-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background/Aims: Clarithromycin resistance is a main factor for treatment failure in the context of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the treatment regimen for clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori infection has not yet been determined. We aimed to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy versus 14-day metronidazole-intensified triple therapy for clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori infection with genotypic resistance. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 782 patients with H. pylori infection examined using sequencing-based clarithromycin resistance point mutation tests were recruited between December 2018 and October 2020 in four institutions in Korea. Patients with significant point mutations (A2142G, A2142C, A2143G, A2143C, and A2144G) were randomly assigned to receive either 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (n=102) or 14-day metronidazole-intensified triple therapy (n=99). Results: The overall genotypic clarithromycin resistance rate was 25.7% according to the sequencing method. The eradication rate of 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy was not significantly different in the intention-to-treat analysis (80.4% vs 69.7%, p=0.079), but was significantly higher than that of 14-day metronidazole-intensified triple therapy in the per-protocol analysis (95.1% vs 76.4%, p=0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of side effects. In addition, the 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy was more cost-effective than the 14-day metronidazole-intensified triple therapy. Conclusions: Fourteen-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy showed comparable efficacy with 14-day metronidazole-intensified triple therapy, and it was more cost-effective in the context of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori infection.

Pravastatin activates PPARalpha/PPARgamma expression in the liver and gallbladder epithelium of hamsters.

BACKGROUND: Our earlier study with cultured gallbladder epithelial cells demonstrated that statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) activate the expression of PPARalpha and PPARgamma, consequently blocking the production of pro-inflmmatory cytokines. The present study used hamsters to investigate the effects of pavastatin on PPARalpha/PPARgamma expression in the liver and gallbladder epithelium, and to determine whether pravastatin suppresses cholesterol crystal formation in the gallbladder. METHODS: A total of 40 Golden Syrian male hamsters (4 weeks old) were randomly assigned to four groups (basal diet control; basal diet+pavastatin; high cholesterol diet; high cholesterol diet+pravastatin). All hamsters were 11 weeks old at the end of the experiment. The liver, gallbladder and bile were harvested. Immunohistochemical staining and Western blotting for PPARalpha and PPARgamma were performed in the liver and gallbladder. A drop of fresh bile was examined for cholesterol crystals under a microscope. RESULTS: In the gallbladder and liver of the hamsters, pravastatin activated the PPARalpha and PPARgamma expression of gallbladder epithelial cells and hepatocytes, and particularly the response of PPARgamma was much stronger than that of PPARalpha. Pravastatin suppressed the formation of cholesterol gallstones or crystals in the gallbladder. CONCLUSION: Pravastatin is an effective medication to activate PPARs (especially PPARgamma) in the liver and the gallbladder epithelium of hamsters, and contributes to the prevention of gallstone formation.