The Effects of Aortic Clamping Strategy on Myocardial Protection and Early Postoperative Outcomes During Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Operations.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of two different clamping strategies for the construction of the proximal aortocoronary anastomoses on myocardial protection and postoperative outcomes during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we examined prospectively collected data of patients who underwent CABG for a 3-year period. Two hundred consecutive patients, who were diagnosed with triple vessel coronary artery disease (CAD), were selected and divided into two groups. In Group 1 (single clamp) (N = 100), venoaortic proximal anastomoses were performed using a single aortic cross-clamp, while in Group 2 (double clamp) (N = 100), proximal anastomoses were performed by using an aortic side clamp. Operative and postoperative outcomes of the patients were compared between the two groups. The serum levels of myocardial damage biomarkers, creatine phosphokinase-MB (CPK-MB), and high sensitive Troponin (hsTnI) results were measured preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively (6, 12, 24, and 48 hours). RESULTS: Patient demographics and characteristics were similar between the two groups. In Group 1, cross-clamp duration time (65 min versus 49 min; P = .0001) was longer. However, perfusion time (91 min versus 85 min; P = .61) was similar between the two groups. In Group 2, postoperative CK-MB levels were significantly higher intraoperatively (P = .18), 6 hours (P = .22), 24 hours (P = .001), and 48 hours (P = .001) than in Group 1. HsTnI was only significantly higher in Group 2 versus Group 1 at 24 hours (P = .001) and 48 hours (P = .01) postoperatively. Time of intensive care unit stay, duration of extubation, and length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The technique used for proximal anastomosis has a significant effect on perioperative results, especially on myocardial protection.

Comparison of del Nido Cardioplegia vs. blood cardioplegia in adult aortic surgery: Is the single-dose cardioplegia technique really advantageous?

BACKGROUND: /objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the operative and early postoperative results of the use of del Nido Cardioplegia solution (dNCS) with traditional blood cardioplegia (BC) in adult aortic surgery. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed on 118 patients who underwent aortic surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) between January 2016 and June 2020. Patients were divided in to two groups according to the type of cardioplegia solution used. Cardiac arrest was achieved in Group 1 (n = 65) with traditional BC and in Group 2 (n = 53) with dNCS. Operative and postoperative outcomes of the patients were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patient demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. dNCS group showed significantly lower aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time (73.3 vs. 87.5 min, P = 0.001), cardioplegia volume (1323.9 ± 368.5 vs. 2773.8 ± 453.8 ml, P< 0.001), defibrillation rate (44.4%vs. 69.2%, P = 0.006), drainage amount (412 ± 73.2 vs. 446.9 ± 95.1 ml, P = 0.026) and inotropic support need (37% vs. 55.3%, P = 0.046). Also dNCS group had significantly lower high sensitive troponin I (hsTnI) levels at 6th (203.5 ± 68.6 vs. 275.7 ± 76.2 ng/L, P< 0.001) and 24th (253.1 ± 101 vs. 293.4 ± 80.1 ng/L, P = 0.017) postoperative hours. And dNCS group showed significantly higher hematocrit levels at 6th (25.1 ± 3.2 vs. 22.5 ± 2.5%, P< 0.001) and 24th (25.8 ± 2.7 vs. 24.6 ± 2.8%, P = 0.024) postoperative hours. Times of intensive care unit stay, durations of intuabation and hospital stay times were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in terms of postoperative ejection fraction values (P = 0.714). CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional BC, dNCS provided significantly shorter ACC times, reduced the need for intraoperative defibrillation, lowered postoperative hsTnI levels with comparable early clinical outcomes for adult patients undergoing aortic surgery. dNCS is a safe and efficient alternative to the traditional BC solution in adult aortic cardiac surgery.

Effect of del nido cardioplegia use on kidney injury after coronary bypass operations.

OBJECTIVE: After cardiac surgery, acute kidney injury is observed at a rate of 5-30%, and the second most common cause of acute kidney injury in intensive care units is cardiac surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of del Nido cardioplegia solution use on postoperative acute kidney injury development in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting operation with cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent an elective coronary artery bypass grafting operation with cardiopulmonary bypass in our clinic between March 15, 2019, and March 15, 2020, were included in the study retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups as those who received del Nido cardioplegia solution (Group 1) and blood cardioplegia (Group 2), and factors affecting the development of renal failure were examined. RESULTS: A total of 350 consecutive patients were included in the study. There were 156 patients in the del Nido cardioplegia group and 194 patients in the blood cardioplegia group. Among the patient group, 74 (21.1%) patients developed acute kidney injury. The total acute kidney injury development rate was significantly higher in Group 2 (p=0.018). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, advanced age (OR 1.128; 95%CI 1.044-1.217; p=0.042), increased blood product use (OR 1.318; 95%CI 1.154-1.998; p=0.019), preoperative creatinine elevation (OR 2.434; 95%CI 1.655-4.639; p=0.005), and increased cardioplegia volume (OR 1.254; 95%CI 1.109-2.980; p=0.009) were independent predictors of acute kidney injury. CONCLUSION: With this study, we showed that the use of del Nido cardioplegia solution can reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury.

Effect of del nido cardioplegia use on kidney injury after coronary bypass operations

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: After cardiac surgery, acute kidney injury is observed at a rate of 5-30%, and the second most common cause of acute kidney injury in intensive care units is cardiac surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of del Nido cardioplegia solution use on postoperative acute kidney injury development in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting operation with cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent an elective coronary artery bypass grafting operation with cardiopulmonary bypass in our clinic between March 15, 2019, and March 15, 2020, were included in the study retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups as those who received del Nido cardioplegia solution (Group 1) and blood cardioplegia (Group 2), and factors affecting the development of renal failure were examined. RESULTS: A total of 350 consecutive patients were included in the study. There were 156 patients in the del Nido cardioplegia group and 194 patients in the blood cardioplegia group. Among the patient group, 74 (21.1%) patients developed acute kidney injury. The total acute kidney injury development rate was significantly higher in Group 2 (p=0.018). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, advanced age (OR 1.128; 95%CI 1.044-1.217; p=0.042), increased blood product use (OR 1.318; 95%CI 1.154-1.998; p=0.019), preoperative creatinine elevation (OR 2.434; 95%CI 1.655-4.639; p=0.005), and increased cardioplegia volume (OR 1.254; 95%CI 1.109-2.980; p=0.009) were independent predictors of acute kidney injury. CONCLUSION: With this study, we showed that the use of del Nido cardioplegia solution can reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury.