Inadvertent laparoscopic lavage of perforated colon cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis has been grabbing the headlines, it is known that the clinical presentation of peritonitis can also be caused by an underlying perforated carcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of patients undergoing inadvertent laparoscopic lavage of perforated colon cancer as well as the delay in cancer diagnosis. METHODS: The PubMed database was systematically searched to include all studies meeting inclusion criteria. Studies were screened through titles and abstracts with potentially eligible studies undergoing full-text screening. The primary endpoints of this meta-analysis were the rates of perforated colon cancer patients having undergone inadvertent laparoscopic lavage as well as the delay in cancer diagnosis. This was expressed in pooled rate % and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Eleven studies (three randomized, two prospective, six retrospective) totaling 642 patients met inclusion criteria. Eight studies reported how patients were screened for cancer and the number of patients who completed follow-up. The pooled cancer rate was 3.4% (0.9%, 5.8%) with low heterogeneity (Isquare2 = 34.02%) in eight studies. Cancer rates were 8.2% (0%, 3%) (Isquare2 = 58.2%) and 1.7% (0%, 4.5%) (Isquare2 = 0%) in prospective and retrospective studies, respectively. Randomized trials reported a cancer rate of 7.2% (3.1%, 11.2%) with low among-study heterogeneity (Isquare2 = 0%) and a median delay to diagnosis of 2 (1.5-5) months. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found that 7% of patients undergoing laparoscopic lavage for peritonitis had perforated colon cancer with a delay to diagnosis of up to 5 months.

Robotic TAMIS: A Technical Note Comparing Si® versus Xi®.

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) can be performed robotically assisted (R-TAMIS) for easier rectal defect suture closure particularly on the anterior rectal wall. The surgical technique described in this technical note emphasizes three safety points: 1) decreased likelihood for rectal injury when the ports are inserted into the GelPOINT® Path Transanal Access Platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, California) on the back table rather than being inserted into the rectum; 2) decreased external collision between ports when using ports of different length; and 3) increased stabilization of pneumorectum when insufflating with an AirSeal™ port (Intelligent Flow System, ConMed, Utica, New York). Although R-TAMIS can be safely performed with the da Vinci® Si® or Xi® (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, California) patient cart, the following differences are noteworthy: a) the Si® vertically-mounted arms design forces the patient in an uncomfortable position with asymmetrical hip flexion as opposed to the Xi® boom-mounted horizontal arm design; b) the 28cm circumference of each Si® patient cart arms operating between the patient's legs offer decreased maneuvering freedom as opposed to the 19cm circumference of the Xi® counterparts; and c) the abduction pattern of movement of the Si® arms potentially increases the risk of external collision with the patient's legs as opposed to the Xi® "jack-knife" pattern of movement.

Independent Predictors for Surgical Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) in patients with large abdominal defects have become a common procedure. The aim of this study was to identify independent predictors of surgical site infections (SSI) in patients undergoing CAWR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an ambidirectional cohort study of 240 patients who underwent CAWR with biologic mesh between 2012 and 2020 at an academic tertiary/quaternary care center. Prior superficial SSI, deep SSI, organ space infections, enterocutaneous fistulae, and combined abdominal infections were defined as prior abdominal infections. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to determine independent risk factors for SSI. RESULTS: There were a total of 39 wound infections, with an infection rate of 16.3%. Forty percent of patients who underwent CAWR in this study had a history of prior abdominal infections. In the multivariable regression models not weighted for length of stay (LOS), prior abdominal infection (odds ratio [OR]: 2.49, p=0.013) and higher body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.05, p=0.023) were independent predictors of SSI. In the multivariable regression model weighted for LOS, prior abdominal infection (OR: 2.2, p=0.034), higher BMI (OR: 1.05, p=0.024), and LOS (OR: 1.04, p=0.043) were independent predictors of SSI. CONCLUSION: The history of prior abdominal infections, higher BMI, and increased LOS are important independent predictor of SSI following CAWR.

Early Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Biologic Mesh is Feasible after Catastrophic Abdominal Wall Disruption from Blunt Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWHs) after blunt trauma, while rare, are typically associated with severe injuries, particularly those involved with the seatbelt triad of abdominal wall disruption. The aim of this study is to present a case series of patients with TAWHs that were managed at an early stage post injury with a biological mesh. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with TAWH undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) between 2017 and 2020 were identified from our institutional database. All patients underwent definitive reconstruction using advanced surgical techniques including a posterior component separation with biological mesh (STRATTICE™, Allergan, Inc., Dublin, Ireland) placed in a sublay fashion. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent definitive TAWH repair during their index admission: the median age was 56 years (range 20-77) and the median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 34 (29-50). The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash (MVC) at 86%, while the most common intra-abdominal concomitant injury was small bowel. Traumatic hernia location was on the right side of the abdominal wall in three patients, left in three patients, and bilaterally in one patient. There were no hernia recurrences or deaths in this small cohort. CONCLUSION: Traumatic abdominal wall disruption can be safely reconstructed using advanced surgical techniques with a biological mesh during the acute phase or same index hospitalization.

Evolution of the Circular Stapler in Rectal Cancer Surgery.

The circular stapler has played a critical role in fashioning colorectal anastomoses following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. One of the greatest benefits of the circular stapler has been the feasibility of constructing ultra-low anastomoses, thereby decreasing permanent colostomy rates. A notable US innovation to the original design was the addition of disposable cartridges of various sizes, which greatly decreased assembly time and made the instrument more versatile. Another important modification was the ability to detach the anvil from the stapler shaft. This markedly simplified the construction of anastomoses by negating the need for a double purse-string and avoiding an open rectal stump. An additional modification to facilitate transanal stapler extraction was the tilted-top anvil, which flipped parallel to the shaft once the stapler was fired. The circular stapler continues to evolve while maintaining the basic elements of Hültl's brilliant concept from over a century ago.

Timing and Type of Bacteria In Surgical Site Infections Following Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess the bacteriology of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) with biologic mesh. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of all patients who developed SSI following CAWR with biologic mesh between 2017-2020 at an academic tertiary/quaternary care center. The patients were subdivided into six overlapping groups: infections found during hospitalization vs. infections found after discharge, sensitive bacteria vs. resistant bacteria, and nosocomial bacteria vs. intestinal bacteria. RESULTS: Of the 194 patients who underwent CAWR during the study period, 33 (17%) developed SSI. SSI was more commonly discovered after discharge than during hospitalization. These SSIs were vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) rather than sensitive bacteria, and required re-operation, which were more frequently found following elective procedures. VRE and MRSA infections were more common with clean wounds than with clean/contaminated, contaminated, or dirty wounds, while SSIs with intestinal flora were more common following fistula and stoma takedown. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical site infections with resistant bacteria manifest more frequently post-discharge and require more re-admissions and re-operations.

A Multicenter Prospective Non-Randomized Study Comparing Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy and Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization for Prolapsed, Nonincarcerated, Reducible Hemorrhoids: A Study Protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Current evidence suggests that transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) is associated with less postoperative pain and faster recovery than Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. However, there is some uncertainty regarding the durability of the therapeutic effect in terms of recurrent disease. Objective and significance: The aim of this study will be to evaluate the outcome of THD compared to Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in terms of recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: This is a multicenter, parallel-arm, non-randomized prospective study comparing Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of recurrence rate at one year. The primary endpoint is recurrence rate at one year defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids at physical examination. Secondary endpoints include the following postoperative complications: urinary retention, constipation (requiring laxative or emergency room visit), dysuria, pruritis ani, anal pain, anal stenosis, unhealed wound, fissure, fecal urgency, and flatus or stool incontinence. Adults older than 18 years with prolapsed, non-incarcerated, reducible hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns at physical examination will be included in one of the study arms: Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD. Surgeons with proven expertise in hemorrhoids surgery will enroll patients undergoing Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD (not both). Each participating surgeon will enroll a maximum of 10 patients. Ethics and Dissemination: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Stony Brook University (previously) and New York Medical College (currently), and registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03245086). The findings of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Use of Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation for Intra-Abdominal Catastrophes: A Technical Note.

Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) involves instilling 2.5% dextrose peritoneal dialysate into the abdomen in an attempt to both resuscitate the patient and decrease systemic inflammation; 800cc are instilled in the first hour and 400cc/h are instilled each subsequent hour. DPR has been shown to decrease systemic inflammation, increase the rate of primary abdominal closure, lower the rate of intra-abdominal infections, and lower the rate of complications. It also increases blood flow to the intestines, helping to prevent ischemia and re-perfusion injury. We present the technique used for DPR in a patient with an intra-abdominal catastrophe, as well as the use of Kerecis® Omega3 Wound graft (Kerecis, Arlington, VA) and wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) for creation of a floating stoma.

Repair of Parastomal Hernia with Component Separation at Reversal of Loop Ileostomy. A technical note.

AIM: The aim of this technical note is to describe a surgical technique to repair parastomal hernias with component separation and mesh at reversal of loop ileostomy. BACKGROUND: Stage III rectal cancer patients who have completed neoadjuvant chemoradiation will undergo low anterior resection with loop ileostomy. Following completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, the ileostomy will be reversed after an average of five to six months. A minority of patients presenting with an obstructed rectal cancer may undergo laparoscopic loop ileostomy prior to commencing neoadjuvant chemoradiation, resulting in a longer ileostomy time. TECHNIQUE: Loop ileostomy reversal consists of five steps: mobilization of the stoma, side-to-side anastomosis, component separation, placement of biologic mesh, and purse-string skin closure. CONCLUSION: The surgical technique described here, consisting of component separation and mesh at loop ileostomy reversal, is effective for repairing parastomal hernia.

Impact of robotic total mesorectal excision upon pathology metrics in overweight males with low rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 836 cases.

The aim of this pooled analysis was to evaluate the impact of robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) on pathology metrics in Male Overweight patients with Low rectal cancer (MOL). This was a multicenter retrospective pooled analysis of data. Two groups were defined: MOL (Male, Overweight, Low rectal cancer) and non-MOL. Overweight was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. Low rectal cancer was defined as cancer within 6 cm from the anal verge. The primary endpoints of this study were histopathological metrics, namely circumferential resection margin (CRM) (mm), CRM involvement rate (%), and the quality of TME. Circumferential resection margin (CRM) was involved if < 1 mm. 836 (106 MOL and 730 non-MOL) patients that underwent robotic TME by six surgeons over 3 years were compared. No significant differences in demographics and perioperative variables were found, except for operating time, distal margin, and number of lymph nodes harvested. CRM involvement rate did not significantly differ (7.5% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.395). Mean CRM was statistically significantly narrower in MOL patients (6.6 vs. 7.7 mm, p = 0.04). Quality of TME did not differ. Distance of tumor from the anal verge was the only independent predictor of CRM involvement. Robotic TME may provide optimal pathology metrics in overweight males with low rectal cancer. Although CRM was a few millimeters narrower in MOL, the values were within the range of uninvolved margins making the difference statistically significant, but not clinically. Being MOL was not a risk factor for involvement of circumferential resection margin.

Quilting Suture Technique After Mastectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is no level 1a evidence testing quilting suture (QS) technique after mastectomy on wound outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates QS and association with surgical site occurrences as compared to conventional closure (CC) for mastectomy. METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched to include adult women with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy. The primary endpoint was postoperative seroma rate. Secondary endpoints included rates of hematoma, surgical site infection (SSI), and flap necrosis. The Mantel-Haenszel method with random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Number needed to treat was calculated to assess clinical relevance of statistical findings. RESULTS: Thirteen studies totaling 1748 patients (870 QS and 878 CC) were included. Seroma rates were statistically significantly lower in patients with QS (OR [95%CI] = .32 [.18, .57]; P < .0001) than CC. Hematoma rates (OR [95%CI] = 1.07 [.52, 2.20]; P = .85), SSI rates (OR [95%CI] = .93 [.61, 1.41]; P = .73), and flap necrosis rates (OR [95%CI] = .61 [.30, 1.23]; P = .17) did not significantly vary between QS and CC. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found that QS was associated with significantly decreased seroma rates when compared to CC in patients undergoing mastectomy for cancer. However, improvement in seroma rates did not translate into a difference in hematoma, SSI, or flap necrosis rates.

Chances of Mortality Are 3.5-Times Greater in Elderly Patients with Umbilical Hernia Than in Adult Patients: An Analysis of 21,242 Patients.

The goal of this study was to identify risk factors that are associated with mortality in adult and elderly patients who were hospitalized for umbilical hernia. A total of 14,752 adult patients (ages 18−64 years) and 6490 elderly patients (ages 65+), who were admitted emergently for umbilical hernia, were included in this retrospective cohort study. The data were gathered from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2005−2014 database. Predictors of mortality were identified via a multivariable logistic regression, in patients who underwent surgery and those who did not for adult and elderly age groups. The mean (SD) ages for adult males and females were 48.95 (9.61) and 46.59 (11.35) years, respectively. The mean (SD) ages for elderly males and females were 73.62 (6.83) and 77.31 (7.98) years, respectively. The overall mortality was low (113 or 0.8%) in the adult group and in the elderly group (179 or 2.8%). In adult patients who underwent operation, age (OR = 1.066, 95% CI: 1.040−1.093, p < 0.001) and gangrene (OR = 5.635, 95% CI: 2.288−13.874, p < 0.001) were the main risk factors associated with mortality. Within the same population, female sex was found to be a protective factor (OR = 0.547, 95% CI: 0.351−0.854, p = 0.008). Of the total adult sample, 43% used private insurance, while only 18% of patients in the deceased population used private insurance. Conversely, within the entire adult population, only about 48% of patients used Medicare, Medicaid, or self-pay, while these patients made up 75% of the deceased group. In the elderly surgical group, the main risk factors significantly associated with mortality were frailty (OR = 1.284, 95% CI: 1.105−1.491, p = 0.001), gangrene (OR = 13.914, 95% CI: 5.074−38.154, p < 0.001), and age (OR = 1.034, 95% CI: 1.011−1.057, p = 0.003). In the adult non-operation group, hospital length of stay (HLOS) was a significant risk factor associated with mortality (OR = 1.077, 95% CI: 1.004−1.155, p = 0.038). In the elderly non-operation group, obstruction was the main risk factor (OR = 4.534, 95% CI: 1.387−14.819, p = 0.012). Elderly patients experienced a 3.5-fold higher mortality than adult patients who were emergently admitted with umbilical hernia. Increasing age was a significant risk factor of mortality within all patient populations. In the adult surgical group, gangrene, Medicare, Medicaid, and self-pay were significant risk factors of mortality and female sex was a significant protective factor. In the adult non-surgical group, HLOS was the main risk factor of mortality. In the elderly population, frailty and gangrene were the main risk factors of mortality within the surgical group, and obstruction was the main risk factor for the non-surgical group.

Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Neutropenic Patients.

The aim of our study was to determine whether patients with neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤1,500 cells/µL) had higher rates of surgical site infection after elective abdominal wall reconstruction. This was a case series from a prospective complex abdominal wall reconstruction cohort describing the surgical outcomes of 4 neutropenic patients (ANC ≤1,500 cells/µL) within 48 hours of index operation. Median age was 55 years, 3 patients were female. All patients had liver cirrhosis as a comorbidity: 2 patients as a result of alcohol abuse and 2 patients secondary to cryptogenic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, respectively. All patients underwent a posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release and retro-rectus biologic mesh. None of the 4 patients developed a surgical site infection 90 days postoperatively. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction in neutropenic patients could be safe.

Simultaneous Robot Assisted Colon and Liver Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous robot assisted colon and liver resections are being performed more frequently at present due to the expanded adoption of the robotic platform for surgical management of metastatic colon cancer. However, this approach has not been studied in detail with only case series available in the literature. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current body of evidence on the feasibility of performing simultaneous robotic colon and liver resections. METHODS: A systematic review was performed through PubMed to identify relevant articles describing simultaneous colon and liver resections for metastatic colon cancer. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients underwent simultaneous resections robotically with an average operative time of 420.3 minutes and average blood loss of 275.6 ml. Postoperative stay was 8.6 days on average with all cases achieving negative surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with liver metastases is technically feasible and seems oncologically equivalent to open or laparoscopic surgery. Further studies are urgently needed to assess benefits of robotic surgery in the patient population.

Does an Ileostomy Rod Prevent Stoma Retraction? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

A rod passed through the mesenteric window is commonly used during maturation of ileostomies, but evidence for the effectiveness of this procedure is limited. PURPOSE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether ileostomy rods decrease stoma retraction rates in patients undergoing loop ileostomy (LI). METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in English from 1990 to the present date using the MeSH terms ostomy, rod, and bridge to compare ileostomies with a rod to those without a rod. Study information, patient demographics, characteristics, and stoma retraction rates were abstracted. The primary endpoint, stoma retraction, was defined as the disappearance of normal stomal protrusion to at, or below, skin level. The Mantel-Haenszel method of meta-analysis with odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (OR [95% CI]) was used. Among-study statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane chi-squared and I² tests. Tau² analysis to assess between-study variance was employed when I² was greater than 50%. The number needed to treat/harm (NNT) was calculated to assess clinical relevance of any statistical difference. Visual assessment of funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess for publication bias. RESULTS: Of the 228 publications identified, 3 RCTs totaling 392 patients (194 LI with rod and 198 LI without rod) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Overall bias risk was low. The stoma retraction rate was 3.1% (6/194) in patients with a rod versus 4.5% (9/198) in patients with LI without a rod at a mean follow-up of 3 months. This difference was not statistically or clinically significant (OR [95% CI] = 0.60 (0.21-1.72); P = .34; NNT = 69), with low statistical heterogeneity noted among the studies (I² = 0%). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found that ileostomy rods do not decrease stoma retraction rates at 3-month follow-up. Studies examining the rate of all potential complications in patients who do and do not receive rod placement following IL are needed to help surgeons make evidence-based decisions.

Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome of Adenocarcinoma of the Anal Canal: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Anal canal adenocarcinoma (AA) is an uncommon tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. We seek to provide a detailed description of the incidence, demographics, and outcome of this rare tumor in the United States. METHODS: The data on anal canal adenocarcinoma from SEER Program, between 1973-2015, were extracted. We analyzed the incidence rates by demographics and tumor characteristics, followed by analysis of its impact on survival. RESULTS: The incidence of AA increased initially by 4.03% yearly from 1973 to 1985 but had a modest decline of 0.32% annually thereafter. The mean age for diagnosis of AA was 68.12 ± 14.02 years. Males outnumbered females by 54.8 to 45.2%. Tumors were mostly localized on presentation (44.4%) and moderately differentiated (41.1%). Age generally correlated with poor overall cancer survival. However, young patients (age <40 years) also showed poor long-term survival. Patients with localized disease and well-differentiated tumors showed better survival outcomes. Surgical intervention improved survival significantly as compared to patients who did not (116.7 months vs 42.7 months, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Anal canal adenocarcinoma demonstrated a poor bimodal cancer-free survival in both younger and older patient groups. Surgery significantly improves odds of survival and should be offered to patients amenable to intervention.