Ocular Ischemic Syndrome and the Role of Carotid Artery Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS) is a rare presentation of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis that can result in permanent visual loss. This severely disabling syndrome remains under diagnosed and undertreated due to lack of awareness; especially since it requires expedited multidisciplinary care. The relevance of early diagnosis and treatment is increasing due to an increasing prevalence of cerebrovascular disease. METHODS: The long-term visual and cerebrovascular outcomes following intervention for nonarteritic OIS, remain poorly described and were the objective of this concise review. We conducted a PubMed search to include all English language publications (cohort studies and case reports) between 2002 and 2023. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies (479 patients) report the outcomes of treatment of OIS with carotid endarterectomy (CEA, 304 patients, 19 studies), and carotid artery stenting (CAS, 175 patients, 14 studies). Visual outcomes were improved or did not worsen in 447 patients (93.3%). No periprocedural stroke was reported. Worsening visual symptoms were rare (35 patients, 7.3%); they occurred in the immediate postoperative period secondary to ocular hypoperfusion (3 patients) and in the late postoperative period due to progression of systemic atherosclerotic disease. Symptomatic recurrence due to recurrent stenosis after CEA was reported in 1 patient (0.21%); this was managed successfully with CAS. None of these studies report the results of transcarotid artery revascularization, the long-term operative outcome or stroke rate. CONCLUSIONS: OIS remains to be an underdiagnosed condition. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are crucial in reversal or stabilization of OIS symptoms. An expedited multidisciplinary approach between vascular surgery and ophthalmology services is necessary to facilitate timely treatment and optimize outcome. If diagnosed early, both CEA and CAS have been associated with visual improvement and prevention of progressive visual loss.

Clinical presentation, operative management, and long-term outcomes of rupture after previous abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the presentation trends, intervention, and survival of patients who had been treated for late abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture (LAR) after open repair (OR) or endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data from a single-center, retrospective database for patients treated for LAR from 2000 to 2020. The end points were the 30-day mortality, major postoperative complication, and survival. The outcomes between LAR managed with EVAR (group I) vs OR were compared (group II). RESULTS: Of 390 patients with infrarenal aortic rupture, 40 (10%) had experienced aortic rupture after prior aortic repair and comprised the LAR cohort (34 men; age 78 ± 8 years). LAR had occurred before EVAR in 30 and before OR in 10 patients. LAR was more common in the second half of the study with 32 patients after 2010. LAR after prior OR was secondary to ruptured para-anastomotic pseudoaneurysms. After initial EVAR, LAR had occurred despite reintervention in 17 patients (42%). The time to LAR was shorter after prior EVAR than after OR (6 ± 4 vs 12 ± 4 years, respectively; P = .003). Treatment for LAR was EVAR for 25 patients (63%; group I) and OR for 15 (37%, group II). LAR after initial OR was managed with endovascular salvage for 8 of 10 patients. Endovascular management was more frequent in the latter half of the study period. In group I, fenestrated repair had been used for seven patients (28%). Salvage for the remaining cases was feasible with EVAR, aortic cuffs, or limb extensions. The incidence of free rupture, time to treatment, 30-day mortality (8% vs 13%; P = .3), complications (32% vs 60%; P = .1), and disposition were similar between the two groups. Those in group I had had less blood loss (660 vs 3000 mL; P < .001) and less need for dialysis (0% vs 33%; P < .001) than those in group II. The median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range, 6-45 months). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 76%, 52%, and 41%, respectively, and was similar between groups (28 vs 22 months; P = .48). Late mortality was not related to the aorta. CONCLUSIONS: LAR after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has been encountered more frequently in clinical practice, likely driven by the frequency of EVAR. However, most LARs, including those after previous OR, can now be salvaged with endovascular techniques with lower morbidity and mortality.

Diosmin 600 in adjunction to rivaroxaban reduces the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome after femoropopliteal deep vein thrombosis: results of the RIDILOTT DVT study.

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and safety of long-term diosmin 600 therapy added to rivaroxaban and elastic compression stockings (ECS) in patients with femoropopliteal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: This single-center, open-label randomized clinical trial RIDILOTT DVT enrolled patients with their first femoropopliteal DVT confirmed by duplex ultrasound scan (DUS). Participants were randomly allocated to the control group (standard treatment with rivaroxaban for six months and ECS for 12 months) or the experimental group (standard treatment with the additional use of diosmin 600 mg once daily for 12 months). Patients were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), according to the Villalta Score (≥5). The secondary outcomes were deep vein recanalization, chronic venous disease (CVD) progression, the severity of PTS (Villalta), and CVD (VCSS), quality of life (CIVIQ-20), venous thromboembolism recurrence, and adverse event (AE). RESULTS: Ninety patients were randomized (45 per group). There were 56 men and 34 women with a mean age of 57.8±13.4 years, and 69% had clinically unprovoked DVT. PTS frequency at 12 months was significantly lower (8.9% vs. 48.9%) in the experimental group compared with control one (relative risk, 0.14; 95% confidential interval, 0.04-0.43, P<0.001). Adding diosmin 600 was associated with quicker and complete vein recanalization, lower CVD progression rate, and lower Villalta, VCSS, and CIVIQ-20 scores. There was no difference in recurrent DVT or AE. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive use of diosmin 600 to rivaroxaban and ECS in patients with femoropopliteal DVT can improve the clinical and ultrasound outcomes after 12 months of treatment.

Rivaroxaban in the treatment of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: A single-center experience and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become widely used to treat patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but evidence about their use in the treatment of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To assess rivaroxaban's efficacy and safety in the treatment of UEDVT. PATIENTS/METHODS: This was a single-center prospective observational study involving patients with their first UEDVT episode confirmed by duplex ultrasound scan. All patients initially received low-molecular-weight heparin for 1 to 2 days and then were switched to rivaroxaban for 3-6 months. The primary endpoint was any symptomatic episode of recurrent VTE. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in the study, and all patients were followed for 6 months. There were no episodes of recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism or asymptomatic UEDVT. No episode of major bleeding was observed. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in two patients (6.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-21.4%) with uterine bleeding and large skin hemorrhage. Minor bleeding was observed in two patients (6.7%, 95% CI: 1.9-21.4%) presenting with nasal and gingival bleeding. Recanalization of the upper extremity deep veins was observed in all affected limbs at three months, and it persisted up to 6 months. The signs of upper limb post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) were found in four patients (13.4%; 95% CI: 5.4-29.8%), and the mean modified Villalta score was 2.1 ±â€¯1.9. CONCLUSION: Treatment of UEDVT with rivaroxaban, preceded by one to two days of LMWH, seems to be safe and effective.