RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a hereditary disorder that predisposes patients to colorectal cancer (CRC). Prophylactic colectomy has greatly reduced the risk of CRC. However, new associations between FAP and the risk of other cancers have subsequently emerged. In this study, we assessed the risk of specific primary and secondary cancers among patients with FAP compared with matched controls. METHODS: All known patients with FAP up until April 2021 were identified in the nationwide Danish Polyposis Register and paired with 4 unique controls matched by birth year, sex, and postal code. The risk of overall cancers, specific cancer types, and risk of a second primary cancer was assessed and compared with controls. RESULTS: The analysis included 565 patients with FAP and 1890 controls. The overall risk of cancer was significantly higher for patients with FAP than for controls (hazard ratio [HR], 4.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.28-5.17; P < .001). The increased risk was mainly due to CRC (HR, 4.61; 95% CI, 2.58-8.22; P < .001), pancreatic cancer (HR, 6.45; 95% CI, 2.02-20.64; P = .002), and duodenal/small-bowel cancer (HR, 14.49; 95% CI, 1.76-119.47; P = .013), whereas no significant difference was observed for gastric cancer (HR, 3.29; 95% CI, 0.53-20.23; P = .20). Furthermore, the risk of a second primary cancer was significantly higher for patients with FAP (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.02-3.50; P = .042). Between 1980 and 2020, the risk of cancer among patients with FAP decreased by â¼50%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an absolute reduction in the risk of developing cancer among patients with FAP, the risk remained significantly higher than for the background population due to colorectal, pancreatic, and duodenal/small-bowel cancers.
Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Duodenales , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/complicaciones , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/complicaciones , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/epidemiología , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Duodenales/complicaciones , Dinamarca/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal, dominantly inherited disorder that predisposes to colorectal cancer. An increased risk of cancer may affect mental health, but the magnitude of this effect remains unknown. We assessed the psychosocial functioning, including the educational level attained and risk of psychiatric comorbidity, of patients with FAP by comparing them with matched nonexposed individuals. METHODS: All Danish patients with FAP diagnosed before April 2021 were identified in the Danish Polyposis Register and paired with 4 matched nonexposed individuals. Educational history, psychiatric contacts or diagnoses ( International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision ), and treatment with antidepressants, anxiolytics, or antipsychotics were compared between patients with FAP and nonexposed individuals. RESULTS: The analysis included 445 patients with FAP and 1,538 nonexposed individuals. The highest educational level reached was significantly lower for patients with FAP ( P < 0.001). When comparing patients with FAP and nonexposed and adjusting for a cancer diagnosis, an increased risk was observed for a psychiatric contact (1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.29, P < 0.001), any psychiatric prescription (1.39, 95% CI 1.17-1.66, P < 0.001), a psychiatric diagnosis (1.64, 95% CI 1.19-2.26, P = 0.002), and experiencing any psychiatric event (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.68, P < 0.001). An increased risk was specifically seen for mood (affective) disorders (1.76, 95% CI 1.09-2.83, P = 0.02) and behavioral and emotional disorders (2.01, 95% CI 1.10-3.69, P = 0.02) and the need for antidepressants (1.59, 95% CI 1.24-2.03, P < 0.001) and antipsychotics (1.85, 95% CI 1.26-2.70, P = 0.002). DISCUSSION: Compared with nonexposed individuals, patients with had significantly less education and an increased risk of developing mood and behavioral disorders, with an increased likelihood of needing antidepressants and antipsychotics.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided drainage and, if required, endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) has become the criterion standard for the treatment of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). A dedicated powered endoscopic debridement system, the EndoRotor (Interscope Inc, Northbridge, Mass, USA), has been introduced as an alternative to snare necrosectomy. This study evaluates the novel EndoRotor catheter, NecroMax 6.0 (Interscope Inc, Whitinsville, Mass, USA), for EN in patients with WON. METHODS: This single-center retrospective case series included consecutive patients with WON treated with the NecroMax 6.0 catheter. Safety, ability to perform EN, and clinical resolution were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent 30 EN procedures with the NecroMax 6.0 catheter. One suspected device-related adverse event was observed (3.3%). In 1 procedure, EN could not be performed because of excessive bending of the endoscope. Eighteen patients (90.0%) achieved clinical resolution. CONCLUSIONS: EN with the NecroMax 6.0 catheter was technically feasible in 96.7% of patients with a low rate of adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante , Stents , Humanos , Catéteres , Desbridamiento/métodos , Drenaje/métodos , Necrosis/cirugía , Necrosis/etiología , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents/efectos adversos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) are a promising new disease model in pancreatic cancer for use in personalized medicine. However, the overall success rate (SR) of establishing these cultures from EUS-guided biopsies is unknown. METHODS: We searched relevant database publications reporting SRs of PDTO establishment from pancreatic cancer. The primary outcome was SR stratified on tissue acquisition method (EUS-guided biopsies, percutaneous biopsies, and surgical specimens). RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were identified that included 1053 attempts at establishing PDTOs. Overall SR was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54%-72%). Pooled SRs of PDTO establishment from EUS-guided biopsies, percutaneous biopsies, and surgical specimens were 60% (95% CI, 43%-76%), 36% (95% CI, 14%-61%), and 62% (95% CI, 48%-75%), respectively, and did not differ significantly (P = .1975). CONCLUSION: The SR of PDTO establishment from EUS-guided biopsies is comparable to that from surgical specimens. Both techniques are suitable for tissue acquisition for PDTOs in clinical and research settings. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023425121.).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant condition characterised by recurrent epistaxis, telangiectatic lesions in the skin and mucosal membranes, and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in various organs. In 3%-5% of patients, HHT is caused by pathogenic germline variants (PVs) in SMAD4, and these patients often have additional symptoms of juvenile polyposis syndrome and thoracic aneurysms. The phenotypic spectrum of SMAD4-associated HHT is less known, including the penetrance and severity of HHT. We aimed to investigate the phenotypic spectrum of HHT manifestations in Danish patients with PVs in SMAD4 and compare the findings with current literature. METHODS: The study is a retrospective nationwide study with all known Danish patients with PVs in SMAD4. In total, 35 patients were included. The patients were identified by collecting data from genetic laboratories, various databases and clinical genetic departments across the country. Clinical information was mainly collected from the Danish HHT-Centre at Odense University Hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with PVs in SMAD4 (83%) were seen at the HHT-Centre. Seventy-six per cent of these fulfilled the Curaçao criteria, 86% experienced recurrent epistaxis and 83% presented with telangiectatic lesions at different anatomical localisations. Almost 60% had AVMs, mainly pulmonary and hepatic, while none was found to have cerebral AVMs. Fifteen per cent had thoracic aortic abnormalities. CONCLUSION: We present a nationwide study of one of the largest populations of patients with PVs in SMAD4 that has systematically been examined for HHT manifestations. The patients presented the full spectrum of HHT-related manifestations and the majority fulfilled the Curaçao criteria.
Asunto(s)
Proteína Smad4 , Telangiectasia Hemorrágica Hereditaria , Humanos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Epistaxis/etiología , Epistaxis/genética , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Mutación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proteína Smad4/genética , Telangiectasia Hemorrágica Hereditaria/epidemiología , Telangiectasia Hemorrágica Hereditaria/genética , Telangiectasia Hemorrágica Hereditaria/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In treating pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON), lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have not proven superior to the traditional double pigtail technique (DPT). Among patients with large WON (>15 cm) and their associated substantial risk of treatment failure, the increased drainage capacity of a novel 20-mm LAMS might improve clinical outcomes. Hence, we conducted a study comparing the DPT and 20-mm LAMS in patients with large WON. DESIGN: A single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled superiority trial using an endoscopic step-up approach in patients with WON exceeding 15 cm in size. The primary endpoint was the number of necrosectomies needed to achieve clinical success (clinical and CT resolution), while the secondary endpoints included technical success, adverse events, length of stay and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included in the DPT group and 20 in the LAMS group, with no significant differences in patient characteristics. The median size of WON was 24.1 cm (P25-P75: 19.6-31.1). The technical success rates were 100% for DPT and 95% for LAMS (p=0.48), while clinical success rates were 95.5% and 94.7%, respectively (p=1.0). The mean number of necrosectomies was 2.2 for DPT and 3.2 for LAMS (p=0.42). Five patients (12%) developed procedure-related serious adverse events (DPT=4, LAMS=1, p=0.35). The median length of stay was 43 (P25-P75: 40-67) and 58 days (P25-P75: 40-86) in the DPT and LAMS groups (p=0.71), respectively, with an overall mortality of 4.8%. CONCLUSIONS: For treating large WON, LAMS are not superior to DPT. The techniques are associated with comparable needs for necrosectomy and hospital stay, and no gross difference in adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04057846.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante , Humanos , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/cirugía , Plásticos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents/efectos adversos , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Endosonografía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Colorectal, hamartomatous juvenile polyps occur as part of different hereditary syndromes, including Juvenile polyposis syndrome and PTEN-hamartoma tumour syndrome. However, based on clinical manifestations alone, it is difficult to differentiate between the syndromes, and genetic analysis with an NGS-panel is often used to aid diagnostics. We report a 59-year-old male with colorectal juvenile polyps, who had been referred to genetic testing but had normal genetic analysis. He did not fulfil the clinical criteria of PTEN- hamartoma tumour syndrome, but the clinical criteria of Juvenile polyposis syndrome. With Whole Genome Sequencing we detected a novel intronic variant of unknown significance in PTEN (NC_000010.11:g.89687361 A > G(chr10, hg19), NM_000314.8:c.209 + 2047 A > G). RNA analysis classified the variant as likely pathogenic as it results in a pseudoexon inclusion introducing a frameshift and a premature stop codon. The patient was then diagnosed with PTEN-hamartoma Tumour syndrome. To our knowledge this is the first report of a variant resulting in pseudoexon inclusion in PTEN.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Hamartoma Múltiple , Hamartoma , Síndromes Neoplásicos Hereditarios , Neoplasias del Recto , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes Neoplásicos Hereditarios/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Hamartoma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Hamartoma Múltiple/genética , Síndrome de Hamartoma Múltiple/patología , Fosfohidrolasa PTEN/genéticaRESUMEN
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is an autosomal dominant hereditary polyposis syndrome causing increased morbidity and mortality due to complications of polyposis and the development of cancer. STK11 is the only gene known to be associated with PJS, although in 10%-15% of patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria no pathogenic variant (PV) is identified. The primary aim of this study was to identify the genetic etiology in all known PJS patients in Denmark and to estimate the risk of cancer, effect of surveillance and overall survival. We identified 56 patients (2-83 years old) with PJS. The detection rate of PVs was 96%, including three cases of mosaicism (6%). In two patients a variant was not detected. At the age of 40 years, the probabilities of cancer and death were 21% and 16%, respectively; at the age of 70 years these probabilities were 71% and 69%. Most cases of cancer (92%) were identified between the scheduled examinations in the surveillance program. These observations emphasize that PJS should be regarded as a general cancer predisposition syndrome, where improvement of clinical care is needed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Síndrome de Peutz-Jeghers , Humanos , Adulto , Anciano , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Síndrome de Peutz-Jeghers/complicaciones , Síndrome de Peutz-Jeghers/genética , Síndrome de Peutz-Jeghers/diagnóstico , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/genética , Genotipo , MosaicismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent advances have introduced molecular subtyping of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) as a possible amendment to the diagnostic algorithm. The study evaluated the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of molecular analysis and subtyping of PCLs using the recently introduced EUS-guided through-the-needle-biopsy (TTNB) sampling. METHODS: We prospectively included 101 patients in the study who presented with PCLs >15 mm in the largest cross-section. EUS-guided TTNB samples were obtained by a micro-biopsy forceps introduced through a 19-gauge needle. The TTNB samples were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) for point mutations in tumor suppressors and oncogenes using a 51-gene customized hotspot panel. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated with the histologic diagnosis as reference. RESULTS: After initial microscopic evaluation of the samples, 91 patients had residual TTNB samples available for NGS. Of these, 49 harbored mutations, most frequently in KRAS and GNAS, reflecting an excess frequency of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) in the study population. A sensitivity and specificity of 83.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.3-92.7) and 81.8% (95% CI, 48.2-97.7), respectively, were demonstrated for the diagnosis of a mucinous cyst and 87.2% (95% CI, 74.2-95.2) and 84.6% (95% CI, 54.5-98.1) for the diagnosis of an IPMN. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, molecular analysis of TTNB samples by NGS has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing mucinous cysts and IPMNs. Although the procedure comes with a risk of adverse events of 9.9%, TTNB samples are a robust alternative to cyst fluid for a combined histologic and molecular diagnosis of PCLs. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03578445.).
Asunto(s)
Quiste Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Líquido Quístico , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Páncreas/patología , Quiste Pancreático/diagnóstico , Quiste Pancreático/genética , Quiste Pancreático/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guidelines from the European Hereditary Tumor Group as well as The Danish National Guidelines for Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS) state that both prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) should be offered to patients with PJS. However, only a few cases resulting in viable pregnancies have been published. OBJECTIVE: We present two cases of PJS patients going through PGT-M for PJS. We highlight the awareness of this possibility and discuss the technical and ethical challenges of performing PGT-M for PJS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Case 1: A 36-year-old male with PJS and his partner were referred for genetic counseling. The patient carried a pathogenic de novo variant in STK11. After a terminated pregnancy of a fetus carrying the same pathogenic variant, microsatellite polymorphic marker analysis was established, and the patient was offered PGT-M. The female partner of the patient gave birth to a healthy boy after five years of fertility treatment. Case 2: A 35-year-old female with PJS and her partner were referred for genetic counseling. She carried an inherited pathogenic STK11 variant. The couple was offered PGT-M. Genetic testing of the embryos was performed using microsatellite polymorphic markers. After two rounds of oocyte extraction a blastocyst predicted not to be affected by PJS was identified. The blastocyst was transferred; however, this did not result in a viable pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: PGT-M can be offered to patients with PJS. The process may be long and filled with ethical dilemmas requiring patients to be motivated and persistent.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Peutz-Jeghers , Masculino , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome de Peutz-Jeghers/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Peutz-Jeghers/genética , Síndrome de Peutz-Jeghers/patología , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/genética , DinamarcaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, the Spigelman classification is recommended for staging and risk stratification of duodenal adenomatosis. Although the classification has been used for decades, it has never been formally validated. METHODS: We included consecutive FAP patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopic surveillance and evaluated the inter- and intrarater reliability of the Spigelman classification. RESULTS: The interrater reliability of the endoscopic parameters and the Spigelman classification was good and excellent, respectively. The intrarater reliability of the endoscopic parameters and the Spigelman classification was moderate and good, respectively. DISCUSSION: The results support continued use of the Spigelman classification as the primary end point for future studies and as key endoscopic performance measure.
Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/clasificación , Neoplasias Duodenales/clasificación , Duodenoscopía/métodos , Duodeno/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/diagnóstico , Adulto , Biopsia , Neoplasias Duodenales/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
1: ESGE recommends that patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD; due to viruses, alcohol, and/or nonobese [BMI <â30âkg/m2] nonalcoholic steatohepatitis) and clinically significant portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] >â10âmmHg and/or liver stiffness by transient elastography >â25 kPa) should receive, if no contraindications, nonselective beta blocker (NSBB) therapy (preferably carvedilol) to prevent the development of variceal bleeding.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2: ESGE recommends that in those patients unable to receive NSBB therapy with a screening upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy that demonstrates high risk esophageal varices, endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is the endoscopic prophylactic treatment of choice. EBL should be repeated every 2-4 weeks until variceal eradication is achieved. Thereafter, surveillance EGD should be performed every 3-6 months in the first year following eradication.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends, in hemodynamically stable patients with acute upper GI hemorrhage (UGIH) and no history of cardiovascular disease, a restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy, with a hemoglobin threshold of ≤ 70âg/L prompting RBC transfusion. A post-transfusion target hemoglobin of 70-90âg/L is desired.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4 : ESGE recommends that patients with ACLD presenting with suspected acute variceal bleeding be risk stratified according to the Child-Pugh score and MELD score, and by documentation of active/inactive bleeding at the time of upper GI endoscopy.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 5 : ESGE recommends the vasoactive agents terlipressin, octreotide, or somatostatin be initiated at the time of presentation in patients with suspected acute variceal bleeding and be continued for a duration of up to 5 days.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 6 : ESGE recommends antibiotic prophylaxis using ceftriaxone 1âg/day for up to 7 days for all patients with ACLD presenting with acute variceal hemorrhage, or in accordance with local antibiotic resistance and patient allergies.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 7 : ESGE recommends, in the absence of contraindications, intravenous erythromycin 250âmg be given 30-120 minutes prior to upper GI endoscopy in patients with suspected acute variceal hemorrhage.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 8 : ESGE recommends that, in patients with suspected variceal hemorrhage, endoscopic evaluation should take place within 12 hours from the time of patient presentation provided the patient has been hemodynamically resuscitated.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 9 : ESGE recommends EBL for the treatment of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH).Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 10 : ESGE recommends that, in patients at high risk for recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding following successful endoscopic hemostasis (Child-Pugh C â≤â13 or Child-Pugh B >â7 with active EVH at the time of endoscopy despite vasoactive agents, or HVPG >â20âmmHg), pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) within 72 hours (preferably within 24 hours) must be considered.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 11 : ESGE recommends that, for persistent esophageal variceal bleeding despite vasoactive pharmacological and endoscopic hemostasis therapy, urgent rescue TIPS should be considered (where available).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 12 : ESGE recommends endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for acute gastric (cardiofundal) variceal (GOV2, IGV1) hemorrhage.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 13: ESGE recommends endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection or EBL in patients with GOV1-specific bleeding.Strong recommendations, moderate quality evidence. 14: ESGE suggests urgent rescue TIPS or balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) for gastric variceal bleeding when there is a failure of endoscopic hemostasis or early recurrent bleeding.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 15: ESGE recommends that patients who have undergone EBL for acute EVH should be scheduled for follow-up EBLs at 1- to 4-weekly intervals to eradicate esophageal varices (secondary prophylaxis).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 16: ESGE recommends the use of NSBBs (propranolol or carvedilol) in combination with endoscopic therapy for secondary prophylaxis in EVH in patients with ACLD.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.
Asunto(s)
Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Humanos , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicaciones , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Carvedilol , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , CianoacrilatosRESUMEN
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) presents a short list of performance measures for colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Current performance measures for colonoscopy mainly focus on detecting (pre)malignant lesions. However, these performance measures are not relevant for all colonoscopy indications in IBD patients. Therefore, our aim was to provide endoscopy services across Europe and other interested countries with a tool for quality monitoring and improvement in IBD colonoscopy. Eight key performance measures and one minor performance measure were recommended for measurement and evaluation in daily endoscopy practice.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Colonoscopía , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Acute pancreatitis with walled-off necrosis (WON) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have evaluated outcomes in WON collections of limited size, while data about large WON with long-term follow-up are lacking. We aimed to report our experience in managing large WON. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, consecutive patients with large (>15 cm) WON were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients with chronic pancreatitis or an index intervention 90 days or more from the debut of symptoms were excluded. We registered clinical and technical outcomes following minimally invasive treatment in WON >15 cm. Follow-up was a minimum of 1 year. RESULTS: Overall, 144 patients with WON >15 cm, with a median age of 60 (interquartile range [IQR] 49-69) years, were included. The median WON size was 19.2 cm (IQR 16.8-22.1). Most patients were treated with endoscopic transluminal drainage (93%). The median length of stay was 53 days (IQR 39-76) and 61 (42%) patients needed intensive care support during their hospital stay. As 143 patients (99%) were managed using endoscopic or video-assisted retroperitoneal techniques, only one (0.7%) patient needed an open necrosectomy. Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 10 (7%) patients. Overall, 24 patients (17%) died during admission, all due to multiorgan failure. The median follow-up was 35 months (IQR 15-63.5). Complete resolution was achieved in all remaining patients. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive treatment of large WON is feasible, with a minimal need for surgery and acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis/etiología , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/complicaciones , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The limited data on the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided through-the-needle biopsies (TTNBs) in patients with pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) originate mainly from retrospective studies. Our aim was to determine the clinical impact of TTNBs, their added diagnostic value, and the adverse event rate in a prospective setting. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, open-label controlled study. Between February 2018 and August 2019, consecutive patients presenting with a PCL of 15âmm or more and referred for EUS were included. Primary outcome was a change in clinical management of PCLs following TTNB compared with cross-sectional imaging and cytology. Adverse events were defined according to the ASGE lexicon. RESULTS: 101 patients were included. TTNBs led to a change in clinical management in 11.9â% of cases (nâ=â12). Of these, 10 had serous cysts and surveillance was discontinued, while one of the remaining two cases underwent surgery following diagnosis of a mucinous cystic neoplasm. The diagnostic yield of TTNBs for a specific cyst diagnosis was higher compared with FNA cytology (69.3â% vs. 20.8â%, respectively; Pâ<â0.001). The adverse event rate was 9.9â% (nâ=â10; 95â% confidence interval 5.4â%â-â17.3â%), with the most common event being acute pancreatitis (nâ=â9). Four of the observed adverse events were severe, including one fatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: TTNBs resulted in a change of clinical management in about one in every 10 patients; however, the associated adverse event risk was substantial. Further studies are warranted to elucidate in which subgroups of patients the clinical benefit outweighs the risks.
Asunto(s)
Quiste Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreatitis , Enfermedad Aguda , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico/efectos adversos , Humanos , Quiste Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Hereditary Polyposis Syndromes are a group of rare, inherited syndromes characterized by the presence of histopathologically specific or numerous intestinal polyps and an increased risk of cancer. Some polyposis syndromes have been known for decades, but the development in genetic technologies has allowed the identification of new syndromes.. The diagnosis entails surveillance from an early age, but universal guideline on how to manage and surveille these new syndromes are lacking. This paper represents a condensed version of the recent guideline (2020) from a working group appointed by the Danish Society of Medical Genetics and the Danish Society of Surgery on recommendations for the surveillance of patients with hereditary polyposis syndromes, including rare polyposis syndromes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Abdominal pain is one of the known symptoms associated with coronavirus disease 2019. Little is known about the development of acute pancreatitis as a complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. This case report describes the presentation of acute pancreatitis in two of three family members with severe COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Data were collected from three family members admitted with COVID-19 to the intensive care unit in March 2020. This study was reviewed and approved by the local data and ethics committee (31-1521-253). RESULTS: Two of the three family members were diagnosed with acute pancreatitis associated with SARS-CoV-2. Other causes of acute pancreatitis were excluded for both patients (including alcohol, biliary obstruction/gall stones, drugs, trauma, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercalcemia, and hypotension). CONCLUSIONS: These cases highlight acute pancreatitis as a complication associated with COVID-19 and underlines the importance of measuring pancreas-specific plasma amylase in patients with COVID-19 and abdominal pain.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Pancreatitis/etiología , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Amilasas/sangre , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuidados Críticos , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis/sangre , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagen , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are diagnostically challenging and there are currently several different guidelines. The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic performance of the most widely utilized International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) guidelines and the recent evidence-based European guidelines and to report on postoperative outcomes following surgical treatment of PCLs. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center study of patients undergoing surgery due to a PCL between 2010 and 2019. Primary outcome was a comparison of diagnostic performance between IAP and European guidelines, measured in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Other outcomes included diagnostic performance of different risk features, 30-day postoperative mortality and major morbidity, final diagnosis, and overall survival. RESULTS: We identified 137 patients, three of whom did not undergo curative surgery due to metastatic disease. Overall, there was no difference in the performance of the two guidelines with AUC values ranging from 0.572-0.610 and 0.607-0.621 for IAP and European guidelines respectively. Postoperative 30-day mortality and major morbidity were 0% (95% CI 0.0-2.7%) and 37.3% (95% CI 29.1-46.1%), respectively. More than half of the resected lesions (52.6%) were low-grade dysplastic or non-neoplastic. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the IAP and the European guidelines performed equally, although European guidelines had a slightly higher mean specificity. Pancreatic surgery is associated with high major morbidity, and there is a need for new diagnostic tools and strategies in order to decrease the amount of overtreatment in patients with PCL.
Asunto(s)
Quiste Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Páncreas/cirugía , Quiste Pancreático/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Curva ROC , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disorder that increases risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). We assessed changes in the incidence and prevalence of CRC, and survival times, of patients with FAP participating in the Danish follow-up study. METHODS: We collected data from the Danish Polyposis Registry, a nationwide, complete registry of patients with FAP that includes clinical information, surgical procedures, follow-up findings, and pathology reports. We compared data between the periods of 1990-1999 and 2000-2017. In 2017, the registry contained 226 families with 721 individuals with FAP. Probands were defined as patients diagnosed based on bowel symptoms, without any knowledge of hereditary bowel disease. Call-up patients were defined as those found to have FAP during screening and due to a diagnosis of FAP in first-degree relatives. RESULTS: Although the mean incidence rate of FAP was stable from 1990-1999 (0.19/100,000/year) to 2000-2017 (0.32/100,000/year) (P = .91), the point prevalence increased from 4.86/100,000 in 1999 to 6.11/100,000 by the end of 2017 (P = .005). During 2000-2017, 25 of 72,218 CRC cases were associated with FAP (0.03%)-this was a significant decrease from 1990-1999 (26/30,005 cases; 0.09%) (P = .001). The risk of CRC was significantly higher for probands (n = 191; 61.6%) than call-up cases (n = 5; 1.9%) (P < .001). All CRCs in call-up patients were detected at the diagnosis of FAP (no cases were identified in the follow-up program). The median life expectancy for call-up patients was 72.0 years (95% CI, 63.3-80.7), compared to 55.0 years for probands (95% CI, 51.2-58.8) (P < .001). Therefore, the tracing and follow-up program increased life expectancy by 17.0 years for first-degree family members. CONCLUSION: The Danish Polyposis Registry enables close monitoring of patients with FAP, reducing risk of CRC and prolonging life.