RESUMEN
Intraorbital wooden foreign bodies are sometimes difficult to diagnose because of nonspecific clinical manifestations and diversity of imaging characteristics. We herein report a case involving a 72-year-old woman with a history of trauma induced by a coated wooden chopstick 3 years prior. Two years after the incident, computed tomography (CT) scan revealed an intraorbital mass that was initially diagnosed as an intraorbital hemangioma. The patient presented with hyperemia, impairment of ocular movement, and optic neuropathy in her right eye. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed granulation tissue and an abscess around a foreign body, which was compressing the eyeball. Surgical extraction of the foreign body was performed, leading to resolution of symptoms. The depiction of wooden foreign bodies by imaging is complicated and affected by several factors, increasing the risk of delayed diagnosis. To avoid permanent sequelae, MRI might be helpful because its imaging capabilities are superior to those of CT.
RESUMEN
We report four cases of syphilitic uveitis with diverse clinical presentations. All patients were men who have sex with women, and were aged 19-68 years, and none were HIV-positive. All cases were bilateral. One case presented with anterior uveitis, while three exhibited panuveitis. One patient had acute syphilitic posterior placoid chorioretinitis and two had retinal vasculitis resulting in damage to the outer retinal and retinal pigment epithelium. The rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test and Treponema pallidum (TP) hemagglutination test were both positive in all cases. Six of eight eyes had improved vision and best-corrected visual acuity better than 20/20 after antibiotic treatment. Serological testing is mandatory for the diagnosis of syphilitic uveitis. Additionally, multimodal imaging, including optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and fluorescein angiography (FA), can provide useful adjunctive information for early diagnosis and assessment of treatment response.
RESUMEN
Identification and screening of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) is important to prevent liver cancer. Comprehensive antiviral treatments should follow three sequential steps: Hepatitis screening (step 1; examination of HB surface antigen and HCV antibody), medical examination (step 2; examination of HBV-DNA and/or HCV-RNA and performance of abdominal ultrasonography) and antiviral treatment (step 3). Patients who underwent these three steps were studied to determine effective information sources (factors) for raising awareness of comprehensive treatments. A total of 182 patients from 11 medical institutions were who were undergoing antiviral treatment were investigated. The number of patients who accessed each of the 18 information sources in each of the three steps and the percentage of these information sources that directly influenced the participants to make treatment-related decisions were calculated. 'Recommendation from a primary care physician' was the most common information source (64.3, 77.5, and 75.8% at steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively). 'Recommendation from a public health nurse (PHN),' 'recommendation from friends or family,' and 'recommendation from work colleagues' were the next most common human factors (3.3-19.8%). 'Recommendation from a primary care physician' had the greatest influence (76.9, 73.0, and 77.5% at steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively). 'Recommendation from a PHN' (50.0, 26.3 and 64.3%), 'recommendations from friends and family' (58.3, 38.9 and 58.3%), and 'recommendations from work colleagues' (33.3, 33.3 and 42.9%) were highly influential factors. Media such as TV commercial messages and programs also had high recognition, but were not directly influential. The findings of the present study indicated that recommendations from primary care physicians, friends, family and work colleagues influenced patients' decision-making regarding hepatitis screening, examination and treatment.