A mix of aminophylline and heparin plus nitroglycerin can reduce bradycardia during rotational atherectomy on the right coronary artery and dominant circumflex artery.

BACKGROUND: Rotational atherectomy (RA) may cause bradyarrhythmias and transitory atrioventricular block when performed in the right coronary artery (RCA) or a dominant circumflex (CX) coronary artery. However, there are no studies of a solution that can prevent coronary flow deterioration and bradycardia complications that may occur during RA. We aimed to create an alternative rota-flush solution to minimize the risk of bradycardia and complete atrioventricular block (AVB) that can occur during RA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 60 patients who were randomly divided into two groups: 30 received rotaphylline (= 240 mg aminophylline, 10,000 U unfractionated heparin, and 2000 mcg nitroglycerin to 1000 mL saline), and 30 received the traditional rota-flush (= 10,000 U unfractionated heparin, 2000 mcg nitroglycerin, and 1000 mL saline). The incidence of bradycardia or high-grade AVB (HAVB) during RA, coronary slow-flow phenomenon or no-reflow phenomenon, and coronary spasm were the primary endpoints of the study. Procedure success and RA-related procedural complications were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The use of rotaphylline was an independent predictor of bradycardia and HAVB after accounting for all other factors (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.79, p < 0.001). Lesion length (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.24-3.04, p < 0.001), burr-to-artery ratio (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.39-1.68, p < 0.001), and total run duration (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.35-1.43, p < 0.001) were additional independent predictors. CONCLUSION: Bradycardia and the development of HAVB may be avoided by rotaphylline intracoronary infusion during RA applied to the RCA and dominant CX lesions. Multicenter studies including sizable patient populations should be conducted to validate the present findings.

The Left Distal transradial access site could give a safe alternate site for transradial coronary intervention (The Litaunent Study).

Transradial Access (TRA) is the suggested method when performing coronary procedures. TRA has several advantages over the transfemoral approach, but also some restrictions. The present study compared the efficacy and safety of the traditional proximal transradial approach (pTRA) with a newer technique known as the distal transradial approach (dTRA) for performing a coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients (n = 700) were placed into one of two categories (dTRA or pTRA) based on a random technique. The primary endpoint was RAO at follow-up. The secondary endpoints included the time required for sheath insertion, the rate of successful sheath insertion, rate of successful completion of CAG and PCI, total procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, total radiation dose, total contrast volume used, pain perception (visual analog scale 0-10), and hemostasis duration. dTRA patients had more skin punctures, failed punctures, failed wiring, overlap of access sites, sheath insertion time, and pain evaluation scale, while the pTRA group had more hemostasis time and first-time cannulation. RAO and pseudoaneurysm (PseA) were lower in the dTRA group. In this randomized study, dTRA had lower RAO and PseA than pTRA. However, multicenter, larger-patient trials are needed to provide definitive evidence.