Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis: Clinical Characteristics, Pathogenesis, and Management.

BACKGROUND: Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a potentially severe adverse cutaneous drug reaction, which typically occurs within 24-48 h after the intake of the culprit drug. SUMMARY: AGEP is characterized by numerous sterile subcorneal pustules on erythematous skin and in less than a third of cases it can be associated with organ manifestations possibly leading to life-threatening symptoms (e.g., cholestasis, nephritis, and lung and bone marrow involvement). In contrast to generalized pustular psoriasis, it can involve mucosal regions and typically resolves rapidly if the culprit drug is removed, and adequate therapy with topical or systemic steroids administered. Diagnosis based on patient history, clinical signs, and characteristic cutaneous histology is rarely challenging. Identification of the culprit drug may be aided by patch testing or lymphocyte transformation tests that are of limited value. KEY MESSAGES: Recent experimental data reviewed herein are supportive of an early role of drug-induced innate immune activation and innate cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-36, and IL-17 in the pathogenesis of AGEP. This explains the rapid onset and neutrophilic character of the cutaneous inflammation, but also provides new avenues for in vitro tests aimed at better identifying the culprit drug.

Clinical, histopathological and prognostic features of primary cutaneous acral CD8+ T-cell lymphoma and other dermal CD8+ cutaneous lymphoproliferations: results of an EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Group workshop.

BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis of atypical dermal nonepidermotropic CD8+ lymphocytic infiltrates includes a heterogeneous spectrum of lymphoproliferations with overlapping histological and phenotypic features, but divergent clinical manifestations and prognoses. As these neoplasms are rare, more data on their clinicopathological presentation and course are needed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical, histological and immunophenotypic features; outcomes of; and differences between dermal CD8+ lymphoproliferations. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a series of 46 patients and biopsies by the international EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Group. RESULTS: The dermal CD8+ lymphoproliferations (n = 46) could be assigned to one of three groups: (i) cutaneous acral CD8+ T-cell lymphoma (n = 31), characterized mostly by a solitary nodule arising at acral sites, a monotonous dermal infiltrate of small-to-medium-sized CD8+ lymphocytes with a characteristic dot-like pattern of CD68, a low proliferation rate and an excellent prognosis; (ii) primary cutaneous CD8+ peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified/NOS (n = 11), presenting with one or multiple rapidly evolving tumours, mostly medium-sized pleomorphic CD8+ tumour cells with expression of several cytotoxic markers, and high proliferative activity; and (iii) cutaneous CD8+ lymphoproliferations (n = 4), associated with congenital immunodeficiency syndromes in two patients with persisting localized or disseminated violaceous to brownish plaques on the extremities, a histiocyte-rich infiltrate of mostly small CD8+ lymphocytes with subtle atypia and a protracted course; and papular CD8+ eruptions in two patients with acquired immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: A constellation of distinct clinical, histopathological and phenotypic features allows discrimination and assignment of dermal CD8+ infiltrates into distinct disease entities. Primary cutaneous acral CD8+ lymphoma, assigned a provisional category in current lymphoma classifications, is a distinct and reproducible entity. A correct diagnosis is essential to avoid unnecessarily aggressive treatment for indolent CD8+ lymphoproliferations and to identify cases with underlying immuno-deficiency or potential for dismal outcome.

Glucocorticoid Receptor Beta and Its Prognostic Value on Treatment Response in Chronic Vulvar Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic vulvar dermatitis (CVD) is the most prevalent disease in gynecologic dermatology. The treatment mainly depends on topical glucocorticoids (TGC) but is challenged by insufficient treatment response. On a histological level, the upregulation of the glucocorticoid receptor ß (GRß), an inhibitor of the active glucocorticoid receptor α (GRα), is discussed as mechanism of glucocorticoid insensitivity. OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether the expression of GRß protein at baseline in keratinocytes may predict responsiveness to TGC in patients with CVD. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, clinical and biological data of 25 women with a histological diagnosis of chronic vulvar eczema were analyzed. Randomization was done according to the responsiveness to TGC treatment (responsive vs. nonresponsive). Clinical data and the expression of GRß in the immunohistochemical stained biopsies were examined. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of women with CVD were nonresponsive to TGC. GRß was abundantly expressed in the cytoplasma of keratinocytes of the vulvar epithelium, but no difference in the level of expression was found among GC responsive and nonresponsive patients in the semiquantitative (p = 0.376) and quantitative analysis (p = 0.894). CONCLUSION: GRß is highly expressed in keratinocytes of the vulvar epidermis affected by CVD, but GRß expression was not increased in patients nonresponsive to TGC compared to responsive patients. Thus, the failure mechanism in nonresponders still remains to be elucidated.

Checkpoint inhibitor-induced lichen planus differs from spontaneous lichen planus on the clinical, histological, and gene expression level.

Background: Although highly efficacious, immune checkpoint inhibitors induce a multitude of immune-related adverse events including lichenoid skin reactions (irLP) that are often therapy-resistant. Objectives: To compare the clinical, histological, and transcriptional features of irLP with spontaneous lichen planus (LP). Methods: Clinical and histological presentations of irLP and LP, as well as the gene expression profiles of irLP and LP lesional and healthy skin were assessed. Results: irLP differed considerably from LP with regard to the distribution pattern of skin lesions with irLP appearing mostly in an exanthematous form, whereas lesions were more localized in the LP group. Histologically, dermal lymphocyte infiltration was significantly lower in irLP compared with LP, whereas lymphocyte exocytosis and apoptotic keratinocytes were significantly higher in irLP. Gene expression analysis revealed irLP to have a more inflammatory profile with elevated IFNG levels and a possible role of phagosome signaling compared with LP. Limitations: The study is descriptive and necessitates further investigation with larger cohorts and broader analyses. Conclusion: irLP differs from spontaneous LP on the clinical, histopathological, and gene expression level. The inflammatory gene signature in irLP suggests that topical JAK inhibitors could be an effective treatment, targeting local skin inflammation without systemic immunosuppression.