Comparison of equations for dosing of medications in renal impairment.

AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the concordance among the Cockcroft-Gault, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in hypothetical dosing of renally cleared medications. METHODS: A total of 2163 patients prescribed at least one of the 31 renally cleared drugs under review were included in the study. Kidney function was estimated using the three equations. We compared actual prescribed dosages of the same drug with recommended dosages based on the kidney function as calculated by each of the equations and applying dosing recommendations in the Australian Medicines Handbook. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the kidney function values estimated from the three equations (P < 0.001). Despite the good overall agreement in renal drug dosing, we found selected but potentially important discrepancies among the doses rendered from the equations. The CKD-EPI equation non-normalized for body surface area had a greater rate of concordance with the Cockcroft-Gault equation than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation for renal drug dosing. CONCLUSIONS: There is need for a long-term multi-centre study in a diverse population to define the clinical effects of the discrepancies among the equations for drug dosing. Given the greater concordance of the non-normalized CKD-EPI equation with the Cockcroft-Gault equation for dosing, the recommendation by Kidney Health Australia and the United States National Kidney Disease Education Program that 'dosing based on either eCrCl or an eGFR with body surface area normalization removed are acceptable' seems suitable and practicable for the purpose of dosing of non-critical drugs in the primary care setting.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing of renally cleared drugs in elderly patients in community and aged care settings.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing of renally cleared drugs in elderly patients in Australia. OBJECTIVES: To quantify and compare the extent of inappropriate prescribing (defined as at least one drug prescribed in an excessive dose or when contraindicated with respect to renal function) of renally cleared drugs in elderly patients across the community and aged care settings, and to determine factors associated with patients being prescribed one or more potentially inappropriate renally cleared drugs. METHODS: This retrospective study examined de-identified Home Medicines Review (HMR) and Residential Medication Management Review (RMMR) cases pertaining to 30,898 patients aged 65 years and over. Only 25 % (n = 7625) of these patients had documented information on their renal function. Among them, 4035 patients were prescribed at least one of the 31 renally cleared drugs examined in this study. For these patients, details including demographics, medications, medical conditions and pathology test results were extracted. Creatinine clearance was estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing of the 31 drugs was examined on the basis of conformity with the recommendations in the Australian Medicines Handbook. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the factors associated with patients being prescribed one or more potentially inappropriate renally cleared drugs. RESULTS: The mean (± standard deviation) ages of the HMR patients (n = 3315; 59 % female) and RMMR patients (n = 720; 68 % female) were 78.3 ± 7.2 and 86 ± 7.3 years, respectively. Over one quarter of the patients (n = 1135 out of 4035; 28.1 %) prescribed the renally cleared drugs examined in this study had evidence of inappropriate prescribing of at least one of the drugs, with respect to their renal function. The drugs/drug classes most commonly prescribed inappropriately were perindopril, fenofibrate, glibenclamide, gliptins, metformin, olmesartan, bisphosphonates and strontium. The factors independently associated with patients being prescribed one or more potentially inappropriate renally cleared drugs were advancing age [odds ratio (OR) 1.06 per year increase, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.07; P < 0.001], the total number of renally cleared drugs prescribed (OR 1.44 per unit increase, 95 % CI 1.29-1.61; P < 0.001), presence of diabetes (OR 1.51, 95 % CI 1.30-1.76; P < 0.001), presence of heart failure (OR 1.38, 95 % CI 1.13-1.69; P < 0.005) and living in aged care facilities (OR 1.28, 95 % CI 1.06-1.5; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Inappropriate prescribing of renally cleared drugs is common in older Australians. Intervention studies to improve prescribing of renally cleared drugs in the elderly appear to be warranted.