Immunohistochemical staining with CD117 and PGP9.5 of excised vestibular tissue from patients with neuroproliferative vestibulodynia.

BACKGROUND: Neuroproliferative vestibulodynia (NPV), a provoked genital pain characterized by severe allodynia and hyperalgesia, is confirmed in excised vestibular tissue by immunohistochemical staining (>8 CD117-positive immunostained cells/100× microscopic field) rather than by hematoxylin and eosin staining. AIM: In this study we sought to assess immunostaining of tissue samples obtained during vestibulectomy surgery and to correlate results with patient outcomes. METHODS: Patients (n = 65) meeting criteria for NPV who underwent vestibulectomy during the period from June 2019 through December 2022 formed the study cohort. We performed assessment of pathology of vestibular tissues by use of immunohistochemical staining, including quantitation of mast cells by CD117 (mast cell marker) and nerve fibers by protein gene product (PGP) 9.5 (neuronal marker). We analyzed 725 photomicrographs of immunostained tissue sections (100× and 200×) by manual counting and computer-assisted histometry and correlated these data to clinical assessments. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included density of CD117 and PGP9.5 immunostaining in the 1:00-11:00 o'clock and 12:00 o'clock vestibular regions, and patient-reported outcomes assessing sexual function, pain, distress, and symptom improvement. RESULTS: All 65 NPV patients (median age 26 years), 45 with lifelong and 20 with acquired NPV, had severe pain documented by PROs and vulvoscopy and had >8 CD117-immunopositive cells/100× microscopic field. Median cell count values were similar in the 1:00-11:00 o'clock and 12:00 vestibular regions (28.5 and 29.5/100× field, respectively). Likewise, the marker) and nerve fibers by protein gene product (PGP) 9.5 (neuronal marker). We analyzed 725 photomicrographs of immunostained tissue sections (100× and 200×) by manual counting and computer-assisted histometry and correlated these data to clinical assessments. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included density of CD117 and PGP9.5 immunostaining in the 1:00-11:00 o'clock and 12:00 o'clock vestibular regions, and patient-reported outcomes assessing sexual function, pain, distress, and symptom improvement. RESULTS: All 65 NPV patients (median age 26 years), 45 with lifelong and 20 with acquired NPV, had severe pain documented by PROs and vulvoscopy and had >8 CD117-immunopositive cells/100× microscopic field. Median cell count values were similar in the 1:00-11:00 o'clock and 12:00 vestibular regions (28.5 and 29.5/100× field, respectively). Likewise, the median area of CD117 immunostaining was similar in both regions (0.69% and 0.73%). The median area of PGP9.5 immunostaining was 0.47% and 0.31% in these same regions. Pain scores determined with cotton-tipped swab testing were nominally higher in lifelong vs acquired NPV patients, reaching statistical significance in the 1:00-11:00 o'clock region (P < .001). The median score for the McGill Pain Questionnaire affective subscale dimension was also significantly higher in lifelong vs acquired NPV patients (P = .011). No correlations were observed between hematoxylin and eosin results and density of mast cells or neuronal markers. Of note, 63% of the patient cohort reported having additional conditions associated with aberrant mast cell activity. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The pathology of NPV is primarily localized to the vestibular epithelial basement membrane and subepithelial stroma with no visible vulvoscopic findings, making clinical diagnosis challenging. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study include the large number of tissues examined with what is to our knowledge the first-ever assessment of the 12:00 vestibule. Major limitations are specimens from a single timepoint within the disease state and lack of control tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Performing immunohistochemical staining of excised vestibular tissue with CD117 and PGP9.5 led to histometric confirmation of NPV, indications that NPV is a field disease involving all vestibular regions, validation for patients whose pain had been ignored and who had experienced negative psychosocial impact, and appreciation that such staining can advance knowledge.

Safety of topical sildenafil cream, 3.6% in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial for the treatment of female sexual arousal disorder.

BACKGROUND: There are currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), which is physiologically analogous to male erectile dysfunction. AIMS: The study sought to test the systemic and local genital safety of topical sildenafil cream, 3.6% (sildenafil cream) among healthy premenopausal women with FSAD and their sexual partners over a 12-week treatment period. METHODS: This was a phase 2b, exploratory, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of sildenafil cream among healthy premenopausal women with FSAD. Safety was assessed by the frequency and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among participants and their sexual partners. Participants recorded the incidence of TEAEs in a daily eDiary (electronic diary). Sexual partners were contacted within 72 hours of each sexual event in which investigational product was used. All participants used placebo cream for 1 month, during a single-blind run-in period, and then if eligible, were randomized 1:1 to sildenafil cream or placebo cream. Participants used their assigned investigational product over a 12-week double-blind dosing period. They attended monthly follow-up visits, in which their eDiary TEAE data were reviewed by the study staff and graded for severity and relationship to study product. OUTCOMES: The frequency and incidence of TEAEs among participants and their sexual partners. RESULTS: During the 12-week double-blind dosing period, there were 78 TEAEs reported by 29 of 99 sildenafil-assigned participants and 65 TEAEs reported by 28 of 94 placebo-assigned participants (P = .76). All TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. The most common treatment-related TEAE among active and placebo-assigned participants was application site discomfort. There were no differences in the number of treatment-related TEAEs among sildenafil cream vs placebo cream users (P > .99). Four sildenafil cream participants and 3 placebo cream participants discontinued the study due to TEAEs involving application site discomfort (P > .99). There were 9 TEAEs reported by 7 of 91 sexual partners exposed to sildenafil cream vs 4 TEAEs reported by 4 of 84 sexual partners exposed to placebo cream (P = .54). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These data support further clinical development of topical sildenafil cream for the treatment of FSAD. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Safety was assessed among participants and their sexual partners after 1357 and 1160 sexual experiences in which sildenafil cream or placebo cream were used, respectively. The phase 2b study was powered for the primary objectives of efficacy, rather than safety. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that topically applied sildenafil cream was safe and well tolerated by exposed users and their sexual partners.

Princeton IV consensus guidelines: PDE5 inhibitors and cardiac health.

BACKGROUND: In 1999, 1 year after the approval of the first oral phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), the first Princeton Consensus Conference was held to address the clinical management of men with ED who also had cardiovascular disease. These issues were readdressed in the second and third conferences. In the 13 years since the last Princeton Consensus Conference, the experience with PDE5 inhibitors is more robust, and recent new data have emerged regarding not only safety and drug-drug interactions, but also a potential cardioprotective effect of these drugs. AIM: In March 2023, an interdisciplinary group of scientists and practitioners met for the fourth Princeton Consensus Guidelines at the Huntington Medical Research Institutes in Pasadena, California, to readdress the cardiovascular workup of men presenting with ED as well as the approach to treatment of ED in men with known cardiovascular disease. METHOD: A series of lectures from experts in the field followed by Delphi-type discussions were developed to reach consensus. OUTCOMES: Consensus was reached regarding a number of issues related to erectile dysfunction and the interaction with cardiovascular health and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. RESULTS: An algorithm based on recent recommendations of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, including the use of computed tomography coronary artery calcium scoring, was integrated into the evaluation of men presenting with ED. Additionally, the issue of nitrate use was further considered in an algorithm regarding the treatment of ED patients with coronary artery disease. Other topics included the psychological effect of ED and the benefits of treating it; the mechanism of action of the PDE5 inhibitors; drug-drug interactions; optimizing use of a PDE5 inhibitors; rare adverse events; potential cardiovascular benefits observed in recent retrospective studies; adulteration of dietary supplements with PDE5 inhibitors; the pros and cons of over-the-counter PDE5 inhibitors; non-PDE5 inhibitor therapy for ED including restorative therapies such as stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and shock therapy; other non-PDE5 inhibitor therapies, including injection therapy and penile prostheses; the issue of safety and effectiveness of PDE5 inhibitors in women; and recommendations for future studies in the field of sexual dysfunction and PDE5 inhibitor use were discussed. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Algorithms and tables were developed to help guide the clinician in dealing with the interaction of ED and cardiovascular risk and disease. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths include the expertise of the participants and consensus recommendations. Limitations included that participants were from the United States only for this particular meeting. CONCLUSION: The issue of the intersection between cardiovascular health and sexual health remains an important topic with new studies suggesting the cardiovascular safety of PDE5 inhibitors.

The Princeton IV Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease.

The Princeton Consensus (Expert Panel) Conference is a multispecialty collaborative symposium dedicated to optimizing sexual function and preserving cardiovascular health. The Fourth Princeton Consensus Conference was convened on March 10-11, 2023, at the Huntington Medical Research Institutes in Pasadena, California. Princeton panels I to III addressed the clinical management of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who also had cardiovascular disease. Thirteen years since Princeton III, Princeton IV builds on previous foundations in several key areas. Mounting evidence supports the need for providers to treat men with ED as being at risk for cardiac events until proven otherwise. Algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of ED are updated with new recommendations for coronary artery calcium scoring for advanced cardiovascular risk stratification. Optimization of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of men with ED and cardiovascular disease is thoroughly explored, including recent evidence of potential cardioprotective effects of these drugs.