Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Oral Rehabil ; 39(10): 767-75, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22783926

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to use salivary cortisol levels, pressure pain threshold (PPT) and Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC) to assess stress, anxiety and pain during the expansion and retention phase of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in children and investigate to whether this parameters are associated with gender or skeletal maturity stages. STAIC was used to assess the anxiety levels of the children. Salivary samples were collected for stress hormone determination. Visual Analog Scale was used for pain determination. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was measured by using algometer. Data collection was performed a week before RME treatment (T0), at the day of the expansion appliance was bonded (T1), at the days of 1st, 4th, 7th, 14th, 25th, 36th activations of expansion screw (T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7) and after the retention period of 3 months (T8). The results of this study showed that the differences were statistically significant within-day (P < 0·001) and within-hours (P < 0·001) in cortisol levels during treatment. PPT levels were statistically significant within sex differences and skeletal maturity stages (P < 0·05). State-trait anxiety scale scores were similar with respect to gender (P > 0·05). There were statistically significant differences of state-trait anxiety levels between pre and post-treatment stages (P < 0·05). The maximum number of patients reporting pain were days at T3 and T4. From day T5 the percentage of patients reporting pain then gradually reduced. Based on the findings of this study, it has been shown that RME leads to changes in patients' state-trait anxiety and cortisol levels.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad al Tratamiento Odontológico/psicología , Umbral del Dolor/psicología , Técnica de Expansión Palatina/efectos adversos , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/análisis , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Saliva/química , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Clin Anesth ; 12(7): 543-8, 2000 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11137416

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic and side effects of preemptively used epidural ketamine +bupivacaine, neostigmine +bupivacaine, and bupivacaine alone on postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Inpatient anesthesia at the department of surgery of a metropolitan hospital. PATIENTS: 30 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients scheduled for abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Group K received 1 mL (50 mg) ketamine and 5 mL (25 mg) bupivacaine epidurally, Group N received 1 mL (0.5 mg) neostigmine and 5 mL (25 mg) bupivacaine epidurally, and Group B received 1 mL saline and 5 mL (25 mg) bupivacaine epidurally 30 minutes before operation. All patients underwent anesthesia induction with thiopental and vecuronium; anesthesia was maintained with isoflorane and vecuronium. For postoperative analgesia, all patients received epidural morphine for 48 hours postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Standard monitoring included: 48 hours of analgesic requirement, visual analog scale (VAS), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) in the 1st, 2nd, 6th, 12th, 24th, and 48th hours. Data were analyzed using Kruskall-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests, with a p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. No significant differences were observed regarding MAP and HR among the groups during the study period. In Group N, VAS was significantly lower than Group K and Group B. The total opioid consumption in Group N was significantly lower than in Groups K and B in the first 48 hours after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive neostigmine can be a good choice for postoperative analgesia.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Ketamina/uso terapéutico , Neostigmina/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Ketamina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neostigmina/efectos adversos
3.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 70(11): 763-9, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15699912

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the onset time of surgical block, recovery of motor function and duration of post-operative analgesia of combined sciatic-femoral nerve block performed with either mepivacaine or prilocaine. METHODS: With Ethical Committee approval and written informed consent, 30 ASA physical status I-II patients, undergoing elective arthroscopic knee surgery, received a combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 30 ml of either 2% mepivacaine (n=15) or 1% prilocaine (n=15). An independent observer recorded the onset time of sensory and motor blocks, the need for intraoperative analgesia supplementation, recovery of motor function, and first request of post-operative pain medication. RESULTS: Onset time of nerve block required 15+/-5 min with prilocaine and 12+/-7 min with mepivacaine (p=0.33). No patient required general anesthesia to complete surgery; 3 patients receiving prilocaine (20%) and 2 patients receiving mepivacaine (13%) required 0.1 mg fentanyl intravenously to complete surgery (p=0.99). Recovery of motor function and first request of post-operative pain medication occurred after 238+/-36 min and 259+/-31 min with prilocaine, and 220+/-48 min and 248+/-47 min with mepivacaine (p=0.257 and p=0.43, respectively). Patient satisfaction was good in all studied patients. CONCLUSION: Prilocaine 1% provides adequate sensory and motor block for arthroscopic knee surgery, with a clinical profile similar to that produced by 2% mepivacaine, and may be a good option for surgical procedures of intermediate duration and not associated with severe postoperative pain.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales , Artroscopía , Nervio Femoral , Rodilla/cirugía , Mepivacaína , Bloqueo Nervioso , Prilocaína , Nervio Ciático , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Arthroscopy ; 11(6): 660-3, 1995 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8679024

RESUMEN

A randomized study on 30 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy was performed. Group I (n = 15) received 50 mg of 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 mg of morphine, and group II (n = 15) received 50 mg of 0.25% bupivacaine and 100 micrograms of fentanyl. The visual analogue scale was recorded at intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the operation. Supplementary analgesia requirements were also recorded. In group I, pain scores were lower than group II (P < .05) during the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 12th, 24th, and 48th hours. The duration of analgesia on group I was significantly longer than group II. The combination of intraarticular morphine and bupivacaine has a longer analgesic duration and effect than a combination of fentanyl and bupivacaine.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Artroscopía , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Endoscopía , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Respiración/efectos de los fármacos , Método Simple Ciego
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda