RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of treatment of early childhood caries (ECC) using general anesthesia (GA) in children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of children followed by the Manitoba Cleft Lip and Palate Program (MCLPP) to determine the frequency of treatment for ECC under GA. SETTING: Children's Hospital, Winnipeg, Canada (a tertiary care centre). PATIENTS: Children registered with MCLPP between January 1, 2008- December 31, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: The chart review collected data on the following variables: sex, date of birth, postal code, type of cleft, whether child had treatment of ECC using GA, age at the time of GA, and cost of treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association of CL/P with ECC. RESULTS: Overall, 441 children had CL/P. 17% had isolated cleft lip (CL), 46% had isolated cleft palate (CP), and 37% had both cleft lip and palate (CLP). Overall, 24.3% of children with CL/P underwent dental surgery using GA while 14.5% underwent dental surgery to treat ECC between 12-59 months of age. When compared to a reference of Canadian healthy children 12-59 months of age, a child with CL/P was 15 times more likely to require GA to treat ECC. CONCLUSION: Treatment for caries under GA in children with CL/P is common. In the children with CL/P the rates of GA for treatment of ECC are significantly higher when compared to the general population. Children with CL/P require comprehensive oral health prevention to reduce the risk for caries and the need for treatment under GA.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) with 5% fluoride varnish (FV) in treating cavitated caries in young children and to explore the association between SDF treatment and oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). METHODS: Children with active dentinal caries in primary teeth underwent treatment with 38% SDF and 5% FV at baseline and 4 months later. Treated lesions were assessed 4 and 8 months after baseline. Child-level analysis focused on classifying SDF treatment as completely successful if all of a child's treated lesions were arrested or incompletely successful if at least 1 lesion was not arrested. The Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale questionnaire was completed at second and third visits. Statistical analyses included descriptive and bivariate methods. A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: This pilot study enrolled 40 children with 239 caries lesions; mean age 40.2 ± 14.9 months and 45% male. Lesion arrest rates after 1 and 2 applications of SDF were 74.1% and 96.2%, respectively. Children who reportedly brushed twice daily were more likely to be in the completely successful group compared with those who brushed less (p = 0.006). Those in the completely successful group had a significantly lower mean baseline dmft score than those in the incompletely successful group (p = 0.048). No significant difference in OHRQoL was observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: SDF with 5% FV is an effective approach to the management of early childhood caries; more than 1 application is recommended, along with regular follow up of patients and twice daily brushing. OHRQoL was not found to be affected by the level of success of SDF treatment.