RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No standard, optimal treatment exists for severe intermittent (ie, episodic) asthma in children. However, evidence suggests that both daily and episode-driven montelukast are effective for this phenotype. OBJECTIVE: To assess the regimen-related efficacy of montelukast in treating pediatric episodic asthma. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, 52-week study was performed in children 6 months to 5 years of age comparing placebo with two regimens of montelukast 4 mg: (1) daily; or (2) episode-driven for 12 days beginning with signs/symptoms consistent with imminent cold or breathing problem. The main outcome measure was the number of asthma episodes (symptoms requiring treatment) culminating in an asthma attack (symptoms requiring physician visit, emergency room visit, corticosteroids, or hospitalization). RESULTS: Five hundred eighty-nine patients were randomized to daily montelukast, 591 to intermittent montelukast, and 591 to placebo. Compared with placebo, no significant difference was seen between daily montelukast (P = .510) or intermittent montelukast (P = .884) in the number of asthma episodes culminating in an asthma attack over 1 year. Daily montelukast reduced symptoms over the 12-day treatment period of asthma episodes compared with placebo (P = .045). Beta-agonist use was reduced with both daily (P = .048) and intermittent montelukast (P = .028) compared with placebo. However, because of prespecified rules for multiplicity adjustments (requiring a positive primary endpoint), statistical significance for secondary endpoints cannot be concluded. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast did not reduce the number of asthma episodes culminating in an asthma attack over 1 year in children 6 months to 5 years of age, although numerical improvements occurred in some endpoints.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Ciclopropanos , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Placebos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Sulfuros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Single-dose montelukast attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in adults within 2 hours postdose and lasting through 24 hours. This study evaluated the onset and duration of EIB attenuation in children after a single dose of montelukast. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study was performed. Patients (n = 66) aged 4-14 years, with preexercise forced expiratory volume in 1 second of (FEV(1)) ≥70% predicted and maximum percentage fall in FEV(1) of ≥20% at two screening exercise challenges were eligible. Patients were to receive single-dose montelukast (4 or 5 mg) or placebo before performing standardized exercise challenges at 2 and 24 hours postdose. A 3- to-7-day washout separated the two crossover periods. The primary end point was maximum percentage fall in FEV(1) after exercise challenge 2 hours postdose. Secondary end points included maximum percentage fall in FEV(1) after the 24-hour postdose challenge; each of the following at 2 and 24 hours postdose-maximum percentage fall in FEV(1) categorized as <10%, 10-20%, or >20%; area under the curve (AUC) during 60 minutes postchallenge; time to recovery of FEV(1) to within 5% of preexercise baseline; and need for rescue medication. The mean maximum percentage fall in FEV(1) after the 2-hour postdose exercise challenge was significantly attenuated after single-dose montelukast compared with placebo (15.35% versus 20.00%; p = 0.020). Montelukast was also significantly more effective than placebo for maximum percentage fall after the 24-hour challenge (12.92% versus 17.25%; p = 0.005), the categorized maximum percent fall in FEV(1) at 2 hours (p = 0.034), and AUC at 2 hours (p = 0.022) and 24 hours (p = 0.013). Single-dose montelukast provided rapid and sustained EIB attenuation in children. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00534976.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Asma Inducida por Ejercicio/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Acetatos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Niño , Estudios Cruzados , Ciclopropanos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Sulfuros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current treatments for acute asthma provide inadequate benefit for some patients. Intravenous montelukast may complement existent therapies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy of intravenous montelukast as adjunctive therapy for acute asthma. METHODS: A total of 583 adults with acute asthma were treated with standard care during a < or = 60-minute screening period. Patients with FEV(1) < or =50% predicted were randomly allocated to intravenous montelukast 7 mg (n = 291) or placebo (n = 292) in addition to standard care. This double-blind treatment period lasted until a decision for discharge, hospital admission, or discontinuation from the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time-weighted average change in FEV(1) during 60 minutes after drug administration. Secondary endpoints included the time-weighted average change in FEV(1) at various intervals (10-120 minutes) and percentage of patients with treatment failure (defined as hospitalization or lack of decision to discharge by 3 hours postadministration). RESULTS: Montelukast significantly increased FEV(1) at 60 minutes postdose; the difference between change from baseline for placebo (least-squares mean of 0.22 L; 95% CI, 0.17, 0.27) and montelukast (0.32 L; 95% CI, 0.27, 0.37) was 0.10 L (95% CI, 0.04, 0.16). Similar improvements in FEV(1)-related variables were seen at all time points (all P <.05). Although treatment failure did not differ between groups (OR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.63, 1.34), a prespecified subgroup analysis suggests likely benefit for intravenous montelukast at US sites. CONCLUSION: Intravenous montelukast added to standard care in adults with acute asthma produced significant relief of airway obstruction throughout the 2 hours after administration, with an onset of action as early as 10 minutes.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ciclopropanos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Sulfuros , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
RATIONALE: A pilot study (Bisgaard H; Study Group on Montelukast and Respiratory Syncytial Virus. A randomized trial of montelukast in respiratory syncytial virus postbronchiolitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:379-383) reported the efficacy of montelukast in post-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitic respiratory symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of montelukast, 4 and 8 mg, in treating recurrent respiratory symptoms of post-RSV bronchiolitis in children in a large, multicenter study. METHODS: This was a double-blind study of 3- to 24-month-old children who had been hospitalized for a first or second episode of physician-diagnosed RSV bronchiolitis and who tested positive for RSV. Patients (n = 979) were randomized to placebo or to montelukast at 4 or 8 mg/day for 4 weeks (period I) and 20 weeks (period II). The primary end point was percentage symptom-free days (%SFD; day with no daytime cough, wheeze, and shortness of breath, and no nighttime cough). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between montelukast and placebo in %SFD over period I: mean +/- SD for placebo and for montelukast at 4 and 8 mg were 37.0 +/- 30.7, 38.6 +/- 30.4, and 38.5 +/- 29.9, respectively. Least-squares mean differences (95% confidence interval) between montelukast (4 mg) and placebo and between montelukast (8 mg) and placebo were 1.9% (-2.9, 6.7) and 1.6% (-3.2, 6.5), respectively. Secondary end points were similar across treatments. Both doses were generally well tolerated. During the first two treatment weeks, average %SFD was approximately 29%. In post hoc analyses of patients (n = 523) with persistent symptoms (%SFD < or = 30% over Weeks 1-2), differences in %SFD were seen between montelukast and placebo over Weeks 3-24: difference were 5.7 (0.0, 11.3) for montelukast (4 mg) minus placebo and 5.9 (0.1, 11.7) for montelukast (8 mg) minus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, montelukast did not improve respiratory symptoms of post-RSV bronchiolitis in children.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Bronquiolitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios/aislamiento & purificación , Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Bronquiolitis/diagnóstico , Bronquiolitis/virología , Preescolar , Ciclopropanos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sulfuros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited clinical data are available on the long-term effects of asthma controller therapy on the utilization of health care resources in pediatric patients with asthma. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the effects of long-term treatment with montelukast and usual care on health care resource use in children with asthma. METHODS: Pediatric patients aged 2 to 5 years with asthma who had completed a 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial comparing montelukast 4 mg and placebo were asked to participate in an open-label, controlled extension study comparing montelukast 4 mg and usual care. Usual care was defined as cromolyn or inhaled corticosteroid therapy Health care resource utilization was measured in terms of oral corticosteroid use and numbers of physician visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. RESULTS: Of 618 patients who completed the primary phase of the study, 516 (83.5%) participated in the extension study Data from 506 patients (302 without previous asthma maintenance therapy, 204 with) were included in the analysis. During the extension phase, patients who received montelukast and had not used previous asthma maintenance therapy were followed for a mean of 329.5 days; those who received usual care and CONCLUSION: In this open-label study, pediatric patients aged 2 to 5 years with mild to moderate persistent asthma receiving long-term therapy with montelukast had similar rates of asthma-related health care resource utilization compared with those receiving usual care with cromolyn or inhaled corticosteroids.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Administración Oral , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Cromolin Sódico/administración & dosificación , Cromolin Sódico/uso terapéutico , Ciclopropanos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , SulfurosRESUMEN
RATIONALE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of mometasone furoate/formoterol fumarate (MF/F) administered via a metered-dose inhaler in subjects with moderate-to-very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial had a 26-week treatment period and a 26-week safety extension. Subjects (n = 1196), at least 40 years old, were current or ex-smokers randomized to twice-daily inhaled MF/F 400/10 µg, MF/F 200/10 µg, MF 400 µg, F 10 µg, or placebo. The trial's co-primary endpoints were mean changes from baseline, as area under the curve (AUC), in forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)) over 0-12 hours (AUC(0-12 h) FEV(1)) with MF/F versus MF, and in morning (AM) pre-dose (trough) FEV(1) with MF/F versus F after 13 weeks of treatment. Key secondary endpoints were the effects of MF/F on respiratory health status using the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), symptom-free nights, partly stable COPD at 26 weeks, and time to first COPD exacerbation. RESULTS: The largest improvements in AUC(0-12 h) FEV(1) were observed with MF/F 400/10 µg and MF/F 200/10 µg. Serial spirometry results demonstrated that bronchodilator effects with MF/F occurred rapidly (within 5 minutes), persisted for 12 hours after dosing, and were sustained over the 26-week treatment period. Similar findings were observed for AM pre-dose FEV(1), for which effects were further investigated, excluding subjects whose AM FEV(1) data were incorrectly collected after 2 days from the last dose of study treatment. Improvements in SGRQ scores surpassed the minimum clinically important difference of more than four units with both MF/F treatments. At 26 weeks, no notable between-treatment differences in the occurrence and nature of adverse events (AEs) were reported. No unexpected AEs were observed. Overall, 90 subjects reported AEs considered to be treatment-related, the most common of which were lenticular opacities, dysphonia, and oral candidiasis. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, MF/F treatments improved lung function and respiratory health status, reduced exacerbations, and were well tolerated in subjects with moderate-to-very severe COPD.
Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Etanolaminas/administración & dosificación , Pregnadienodioles/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Fumarato de Formoterol , Humanos , Masculino , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Furoato de Mometasona , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/patología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Espirometría , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Leukotriene B4 (LTB(4)) is a potent inflammatory mediator in asthma, and is increased in more severe asthma. Targeting LTB(4), in addition to cysteinyl leukotrienes, could be beneficial in asthma. This was a randomized, double-blind trial of once-daily MK-0633, a potent 5-lypoxygenase inhibitor, 10 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg, and placebo in patients 18-70 years with a history of chronic asthma, and FEV(1) ≥45 and ≤85% predicted. There was a 6-week main period and optional 18-week and 34-week periods (52 weeks total), the latter two comparing only MK-0633 100 mg and placebo. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in FEV(1) over the last 4 weeks of the 6-week primary treatment period. Secondary endpoints included symptom scores, ß-agonist use, peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ), asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), asthma attacks, exacerbations, days with asthma control, post-ß-agonist FEV(1), and blood eosinophils. MK-0633 100 mg was significantly more effective than placebo for the change from baseline in FEV(1) (0.20 L vs. 0.13 L; p = 0.004). The other MK-0633 doses were not significantly more effective than placebo. MK-0633 (at various doses) was also more effective than placebo for ß-agonist use, AQLQ, AM and PM PEFR, ACQ, and post-ß-agonist FEV(1) (p < 0.05 for all). MK-0633 was associated with a dose-dependent increase in elevated aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase. Because of the relative benefit-risk ratio, the optional study periods were terminated after unblinding for the main study period. Overall, the benefit-risk ratio did not support the clinical utility of MK-0633 in asthma.
Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Bencenosulfonatos/uso terapéutico , Benzopiranos/uso terapéutico , Leucotrieno B4/agonistas , Inhibidores de la Lipooxigenasa/uso terapéutico , Oxadiazoles/uso terapéutico , Espirometría/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Asma/sangre , Asma/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Crónica , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Classifying disease activity in asthma relies on clinical and physiological variables, but these variables do not capture all aspects of asthma that distinguish levels of disease activity. We used data from two pivotal trials of montelukast in asthma to classify disease activity as "high" or "low". We performed a principal component analysis (PCA) of disease activity using 21 efficacy outcome variables, including several novel derived outcome variables reflecting clinical and airway obstruction lability. Then we performed discriminant analysis (DA) based on disease activity classification. PCA revealed 6 factors (daytime asthma control, nighttime-predominant asthma control, airway obstruction, exacerbations, clinical lability, airway obstruction lability) that explained 76% of the variance between outcome variables. Although airway obstruction lability (comprising both diurnal variability in peak expiratory flow and diurnal variability in ß-agonist use) accounted for only 6% of the explained variance in PCA, in DA it was more accurate (canonical coefficient 0.75) than traditional measures of asthma severity such as obstruction (-0.54) and daytime control (-0.56) in distinguishing between high and low disease activity. We conclude that airway obstruction lability, a parameter not typically captured in clinical trials, may contribute to more complete assessment of asthma disease activity and may define an emerging clinical target of future therapy.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Asma/fisiopatología , Beclometasona/uso terapéutico , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiología , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Ciclopropanos , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ápice del Flujo Espiratorio/efectos de los fármacos , Ápice del Flujo Espiratorio/fisiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sulfuros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with neutrophil-mediated inflammation, a potential target for treatment in COPD. We evaluated MK-0633, a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor in patients with COPD. This was a 12 week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing MK-0633 100 mg and placebo in patients 40-75 years of age (N = 266) with COPD, post-ß-agonist forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 25%-75% predicted, and an FEV(1)/forced vital capacity ratio (FVC) ≤ 70%. Long-acting inhaled bronchodilators were permitted for approximately 50% of patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in pre-dose (trough) FEV(1) measured over the last 2 weeks of the 12 week treatment period. The change in FEV(1) over the last 2 weeks of the 12 weeks treatment period compared to baseline was 0.015 L for MK-0633 and 0.0002 for placebo (p = 0.556). For COPD Global Evaluation, 75.4% of patients receiving MK-0633 reported feeling better vs. 59.8% of patients receiving placebo (p = 0.032). There were no other significant differences between treatments. MK-0633 was well-tolerated and comparable to placebo. The 5-LO inhibitor MK-0633 was not significantly more effective than placebo in improving FEV(1) from baseline in patients with COPD, although more patients reported feeling improved with MK-0633. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00418613.
Asunto(s)
Bencenosulfonatos/administración & dosificación , Benzopiranos/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Oxadiazoles/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/efectos de los fármacos , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Espirometría , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors have potential utility as a new therapeutic approach to improving symptoms and pulmonary function in asthma and COPD. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of MK-0359, a selective and potent oral PDE4 inhibitor, in chronic asthma. METHODS: Adults (N=88) with > or =1 year asthma history and an FEV(1) 50-80% predicted were randomized to double-blind treatment with MK-0359 (15mg/day) or placebo for 14 days, then crossed-over to the other treatment for 14 days. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in FEV(1) at the end of each 2-week treatment period. Secondary and other endpoints included the changes from baseline in Daytime asthma symptom score, Nighttime asthma symptom score, Total daily beta-agonist use (puffs/day), AM and PM peak expiratory flow (PEF) and overall asthma-specific quality-of-life. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical adverse experiences. RESULTS: MK-0359 significantly improved the primary endpoint (versus placebo): the least-squares mean difference in change from baseline in FEV(1) (L) was 0.09L (95% CI 0.01, 0.18). Endpoints of Daytime asthma symptom score, Nighttime asthma symptom score, Total daily beta-agonist use, AM PEF, PM PEF, and quality-of-life were also significantly improved. Nineteen patients (24.1%) on MK-0359 and 8 patients (10.4%) on placebo reported gastrointestinal clinical adverse experiences. Serious gastrointestinal clinical adverse experiences were reported in 3 patients while receiving MK-0359. CONCLUSION: Over a 14-day treatment period, the oral PDE4 inhibitor MK-0359 improved lower airway function, symptoms and rescue medication use in chronic asthma, although at the expense of gastrointestinal adverse experiences. (Clinical trial registry number: NCT00482898.).
Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4 , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/uso terapéutico , Dolor Abdominal/inducido químicamente , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Cruzados , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Ápice del Flujo Espiratorio , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/efectos adversos , Tamaño de la Muestra , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antileukotrienes and inhaled corticosteroids are asthma controller agents widely used in the treatment of pediatric asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of montelukast and beclomethasone on linear growth in prepubertal asthmatic children for 1 year. METHODS: This was a 30-center study of boys (6.4-9.4 years old) and girls (6.4-8.4 years old) at Tanner stage I with mild, persistent asthma. After a placebo run-in period, 360 patients were randomized in equal ratios to double-blind, double-dummy treatment with 5 mg of montelukast, 200 microg of beclomethasone twice daily (positive control), or placebo for 56 weeks; 90% of the patients completed the study. The primary end point was linear growth velocity, measured using a stadiometer. RESULTS: Linear growth rates were similar between the montelukast and placebo groups; the mean difference for the year was 0.03 cm. The mean growth rate with beclomethasone was significantly less than with placebo (-0.78 cm) or montelukast (0.81 cm) (P < .001 for both). Median percentage of days with beta-agonist use was greater with placebo (14.58%) vs montelukast (10.55%) or beclomethasone (6.65%) (P < .05 for all). More patients used oral corticosteroid rescue with placebo (34.7%) than with montelukast (25.0%) or beclomethasone (23.5%). An imbalance in bone marker levels was seen with beclomethasone but not with montelukast. CONCLUSION: In prepubertal asthmatic children, montelukast did not affect linear growth, whereas the growth rate with beclomethasone was significantly decreased during 1 year of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos/farmacología , Antiasmáticos/farmacología , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Estatura/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/farmacología , Quinolinas/farmacología , Beclometasona/efectos adversos , Beclometasona/farmacología , Niño , Ciclopropanos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , SulfurosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) is a persistent allergic inflammation of the upper respiratory tract due to year-round allergen exposure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast for the treatment of PAR. METHODS: Protocol 265 was a 2-arm study performed during the winter. After a placebo run-in period, adults with perennial allergen sensitivity and active symptoms of PAR were randomized to receive 10 mg of montelukast (n=1002) or placebo (n=990) once daily during a 6-week, double-blind, active-treatment period. The primary end point was the daytime nasal symptoms score, defined as the average of scores for nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and sneezing rated daily by patients. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in PAR symptoms were seen in patients treated with montelukast. Their daytime nasal symptoms scores were reduced during treatment compared with those of the placebo group: the difference between treatments in least squares mean change from baseline was -0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.12 to -0.04; P < .001). Montelukast treatment also improved global evaluations of allergic rhinitis by patients and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores: differences vs the placebo group were -0.15 (95% CI, -0.27 to -0.04; P < .01) and -0.15 (95% CI, -0.24 to -0.06; P < .001), respectively. Other end points that showed statistically significant improvement with montelukast treatment were nighttime symptoms and each of the 4 nasal symptoms (congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching). The treatment effects of montelukast were stable and persistent during the entire 6 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Montelukast provided statistically significant relief of PAR symptoms during 6 weeks of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ciclopropanos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne , Sulfuros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Determining who responds to asthma therapies, particularly leukotriene modifiers, continues to be explored. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify patient characteristics predictive of response to montelukast. METHODS: We used data from 2 clinical trials in which children with asthma received either montelukast or placebo. Symptoms, beta-agonist use, and unanticipated health resource use caused by asthma were recorded in validated daily diaries for children 2 to 5 (n = 689) and 6 to 14 (n = 336) years old. We defined primary end points of days without asthma in 2- to 5-year-old patients (24 hours without symptoms, beta-agonist use, or asthma attack) and change in percent predicted FEV(1) in 6- to 14-year-old children. Asthma attack was defined by the use of rescue oral corticosteroids or by an unscheduled visit to a medical provider. Patients were grouped according to baseline characteristics, such as family history of asthma, personal history of allergy, frequency of asthma symptoms, eosinophilia, and concomitant use of inhaled corticosteroids or cromolyn. We examined the stratum-specific effects of montelukast on the percentage of days without asthma, change in percent predicted FEV(1), asthma attack, and a variety of secondary symptom and FEV(1) end points. RESULTS: We did not identify characteristics that predicted response to montelukast in either preschool or 6- to 14-year-old children. These findings were consistent across all symptom and FEV(1) outcomes. There was also no differential response to montelukast in either age group when asthma attack was the outcome. CONCLUSION: The patient characteristics studied do not appear to provide an indication of who will benefit most from treatment with montelukast.