'Seeing is believing': a qualitative approach to studying the use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics in Sweden.

AIM: To gain insight into the decision processes of dentists when requesting a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination in endodontic settings. METHODOLOGY: Fourteen dentists (eight female) 33-58 years of age (mean = 44) practising in Sweden were interviewed. Ten of the dentists were specialists in Endodontics. The absolute inclusion criterion was experience of referring patients for CBCT for endodontic reasons. The included dentists comprised a strategically selected diverse sample in terms of gender, age, work experience, educational background, location of practice, service affiliation and accessibility to CBCT. Data were obtained through semistructured interviews exposing the context of their last three self-reported referrals. Dentists were encouraged to describe their experiences of the circumstances in their own words, aided by the interviewer's open-ended questions. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The text was analysed by qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The manifest content was organized into three categories that were defined as visualization as a desire, facilitating tough decisions and allocating responsibility. CONCLUSION: An overall theme (covering the latent content) was identified: A balance between clinical common sense and a 'better safe than sorry' attitude guides the use of CBCT in endodontic settings. Informants had high clinical standards, knowledge concerning radiation risks and good sense, which could compensate for their lack of knowledge of guidelines. The national radiation regulatory system was perceived to work as a slightly porous gatekeeper for over-usage.

The impact of cone beam computed tomography on the choice of endodontic diagnosis.

AIM: To determine whether the outcome of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations performed in accordance with the European Commission guidelines in a clinical setting has an impact on choosing diagnoses in endodontics. METHODOLOGY: A prospective observational study was conducted. Fifty-three consecutive patients (81 teeth) from two different endodontic specialist clinics in Sweden were followed. After performing a thorough clinical examination (based on the history, clinical findings, and diagnostic tests such as intra-oral radiography), the examiner wrote down a preliminary diagnosis before CBCT examination. After the CBCT examination, a new diagnosis was made by the same examiner. Both the pre- and the post-CBCT examination diagnoses were plotted according to patients and teeth. The CBCT examinations were performed using similar equipment and protocols that were standardized amongst the clinics. RESULTS: The diagnoses were changed for at least one tooth in 22 patients (41%); overall, the diagnoses were changed for 28 teeth (35%). CONCLUSION: CBCT has a substantial impact on diagnostic thinking in endodontics when used in accordance with the European Commission guidelines.

The structure of observed learning outcome (SOLO) taxonomy: a model to promote dental students' learning.

Selective memorising of isolated facts or reproducing what is thought to be required - the surface approach to learning - is not the desired outcome for a dental student or a dentist in practice. The preferred outcome is a deep approach as defined by an intention to seek understanding, develop expertise and relate information and knowledge into a coherent whole. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the structure of observed learning outcome (SOLO) taxonomy could be used as a model to assist and promote the dental students to develop a deep approach to learning assessed as learning outcomes in a summative assessment. Thirty-two students, participating in course eight in 2007 at the Faculty of Odontology at Malmö University, were introduced to the SOLO taxonomy and constituted the test group. The control group consisted of 35 students participating in course eight in 2006. The effect of the introduction was measured by evaluating responses to a question in the summative assessment by using the SOLO taxonomy. The evaluators consisted of two teachers who performed the assessment of learning outcomes independently and separately on the coded material. The SOLO taxonomy as a model for learning was found to improve the quality of learning. Compared to the control group significantly more strings and structured relations between these strings were present in the test group after the SOLO taxonomy had been introduced (P < 0.01, one tailed test for both results). The SOLO taxonomy is recommended as a model for promoting and developing a deeper approach to learning in dentistry.

Third molar treatment outcome: a comparison of patients' preferences in Sweden and Wales.

AIM: To elucidate and compare patients' outcome preferences for removal and retention of mandibular third molars in Sweden and Wales. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: The subjects comprised patients referred and scheduled for removal of one or both mandibular third molars in Sweden and Wales. The multi-attribute utility (MAU) methodology was applied to study patients' preferences for outcomes of removal and retention of the mandibular third molar. RESULTS: Relative weighting of domains was similar in the two countries. "Home and social life" received the highest relative weighting in Sweden and "general health and wellbeing" in Wales. "Your appearance" received the lowest relative weighting in both countries. In both Sweden and Wales operative jaw fracture was considered to be the outcome with most impact, and dentigerous cyst and imbricated incisors the least impact. Outcome ranking was similar in both countries and operative outcomes were considered by patients to be more detrimental to health than retention outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This comparison showed that patients' preferences in Sweden and Wales were similar and that the outcomes of surgery were considered worse after third molar removal than retention. Patient-orientated treatment decisions were less subject to variation than clinician-orientated decisions.

Dentists' judgment strategies on prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars.

The number of molars selected for prophylactic removal varies widely among general dental practitioners and oral surgeons. To understand the basis for such variations, we investigated two hypotheses: (1) Individual judgment strategies will differ concerning the use of cues (items of information), and (2) few dentists will integrate the cues according to evidence in the literature. To analyze 30 general dental practitioners' (GDPs) and 10 oral surgeons' use of cues in the judgment preceding the treatment decision, we used the Brunwik's lens as a conceptual model. The cues were the patient's age, and the angular position and the degree of impaction of the molar. The clinical situation was simulated by written case descriptions. The proportion of variation explained by the cues and their combinations (total model) varied between 61% and 100% and between 4% and 76% as main effects. Two GDPs and one oral surgeon integrated the cues additively, i.e., any of the cues is independent of the other cues in the judgment. In general, the dentists integrated the cues interactively, i.e., the impact of one cue depends on the levels of some other cues. Even though most variations in judgments were accounted for by the cues, the dentists did not integrate the cues according to evidence in the literature and lacked insight into their decision-making thought processes.

Dentists' decisions on prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars: a 10-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: In recent years, several critical outcome studies concerning the prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars have been published. These would appear to motivate a more restrictive approach today as compared with 10 years ago. The aim of the present study was to examine dentists' decisions on the prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars over a 10-year period. METHODS: Thirty-six cases were selected so as to represent an equal distribution of males and females, ages, angular position and degree of impaction of the molar. Twenty-six general dental practitioners (GDPs) and 10 oral surgeons judged the same cases on two occasions 10 years apart. RESULTS: Calculated for each category of dentists, there was no significant difference in the mean number of molars designated for removal between the two occasions. Two GDPs and three oral surgeons presented a higher removal rate, whereas five GDPs presented a lower removal rate on the second occasion as compared to the first one. The dentists presented a considerable interindividual variation in removal rate, between 0 and 22 molars on the first occasion and between 0 and 25 molars on the second occasion. CONCLUSION: In the decisions on prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars, there has been no change over the last 10 years towards a more noninterventionist attitude. Thus, the dentists seem not to have been influenced by the evidence that this intervention is not cost-effective.

General dental practitioners' evaluation of the need for extraction of asymptomatic mandibular third molars.

Thirty general dental practitioners were asked to evaluate the need for extraction of asymptomatic mandibular third molars. Thirty-six mandibular third molars with equal distribution of angular positions, impaction status, males and females and age groups were selected. To estimate the consistency of the evaluation, the 36 cases were duplicated so that, in all, 72 teeth were evaluated. The number of molars proposed to be extracted by the observers varied from 0 to 26. There was no third molar which all observers agreed should be extracted. The two molars which most observers, 25 and 23 of altogether 30 observers, proposed to be extracted were partially covered by soft tissue. The decision not to extract two molars was unanimous. Both of these were completely covered by bone tissue and positioned vertically. The mean overall intra-observer agreement for the therapeutical decision was 92%, with a range of 69-100%. The length of professional experience of the observer did not influence the evaluation whether or not to extract. We conclude that there is a great variation among general dental practitioners regarding their evaluation on the need for removal of asymptomatic mandibular third molars.

Pathoses associated with mandibular third molars subjected to removal.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the prevalence of disease of mandibular third molars referred for removal and to estimate the risk for development of pathoses for two cues. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study on molars subjected to removal was performed. The prevalence of different diseases and the patient's age, angular position, and degree of impaction of the molars were registered. Odds ratio for molars with different positions and impaction states were estimated. RESULTS: Pericoronitis was found in 64% of cases, caries in the third molar in 31%, periodontitis in association with 8%, caries in the second molar in 5%, and root resorption of the second molar with 1% of the molars with pathoses. Odds ratio was highest for distoangular molars (5.8) and for molars partially covered by soft tissue (6.7). CONCLUSIONS: The odds ratio is about 22 and 34 times higher for molars partially covered by soft tissue than for molars completely covered by soft or bone tissue. For distoangular molars the odds ratio is 5 to 12 times higher than for molars in other positions.

Agreement between practitioners concerning removal of asymptomatic third molars.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare agreement within two groups of dental practitioners, family dentists and oral surgeons, in their decisions regarding removal of asymptomatic mandibular third molars. SUBJECTS: Ten oral surgeons and 18 family dentists from South Wales with experience ranging from 5 to 28 years. METHODOLOGY: Participants were presented with periapical radiographs of 36 asymptomatic, mandibular third molars and were informed of the age and gender of the patients and the degree of eruption of the third molars. Participants were asked to indicate whether they thought that the third molar should be removed or not. The degree of agreement between participants was measured by kappa indices for multiple raters. RESULTS: The kappa indices were 0.14 for the oral surgeons and 0.09 for the family dentists, indicating poor agreement beyond chance. Although in most cases the participants decided not to remove the third molar, they did so inconsistently, that is, they did not make this decision on the same cases. There were also differences in the inclination of the participants to suggest removal of the 36 third molars. CONCLUSION: Poor inter-observer agreement suggested that treatment decisions regarding asymptomatic third molars are based more on subjective beliefs and habitual practices than on rational decision making.

Comparison of decisions regarding prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars in Sweden and Wales.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that Swedish dentists schedule more mandibular third molars for prophylactic removal compared with UK dentists and oral surgeons. DESIGN: Clinical and radiographic information relating to a stratified sample of 36 disease-free mandibular third molars (equal distribution of males and females, patients' age, angular position and degree of impaction) was presented to 26 general dental practitioners (GDPs) and 10 oral surgeons in Sweden and 18 GDPs and 10 oral surgeons in Wales who were asked to decide whether or not the third molars should be removed. RESULTS: There was no evidence of any difference in mean number of molars scheduled for removal by the GDPs, but the Swedish oral surgeons scheduled significantly more third molars for removal than oral surgeons in Wales. CONCLUSION: The less interventionist approach among oral surgeons in the UK may reflect the development and application of authoritative guidelines in the UK and an extensive debate concerning appropriateness of prophylactic removal there.

Intra-observer reliability regarding removal of asymptomatic third molars.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate reliability of practitioners' removal decisions and judgements of risk of pathology associated with asymptomatic third molars. SUBJECTS: 10 oral surgeons and 18 family dentists from South Wales with experience ranging from 5 to 28 years. METHOD: Participants were presented with periapical radiographs of 36 asymptomatic, mandibular third molars and were informed of the age and sex of the patients and the degree of eruption of the third molars. Participants were asked to assess, using visual analogue scales, the likelihood of future pathology if the third molars were left in situ and to indicate if they should be removed or not. To assess intra-observer reliability, the 36 cases were duplicated and presented to the participants on a different occasion, a month later. The same questions were asked as on the first occasion. RESULTS: Significant correlations (Pearsons correlation coefficients) were found between initial and repeat assessments of all measures but there was little agreement about the need for removal (Kappa values: 0.54 for oral surgeons and 0.41 for the family dentists). For every item studied, changes in position on the visual analogue scale of two-thirds or more of the total length occurred from the first to the second assessment. CONCLUSION: Treatment decisions about whether or not to remove asymptomatic third molars were not made on a rational basis. Since similar conclusions were recorded in a previous Swedish study, it is inferred that until further high quality evidence of disease prediction is published, decisions to remove third molars prophylactically cannot be made reliably.

Mandibular third molars: oral surgeons' assessment of the indications for removal.

The aim was to examine oral surgeons' assessment of the indications for removal of mandibular third molars. Questionnaires were distributed to seven oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics. The oral surgeons were asked to record whether or not there was associated disease. Three other factors were recorded: patient's age, and angular position and extent of eruption of the molars. The strength of the indication for removal was rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0= weakest and 100= strongest indication for removal. The results were based on data from 666 molars: 118 (18%) had no disease, 465 (70%) had one associated disease, 77 (11%) had two and 6 (1%) had three. The indication for removal as expressed by the mean VAS for molars with no disease was assessed to be weaker (P<0.05) than that for molars with one, two, or three diseases. The only factor that influenced the indication for removal in molars with no disease was the patient's age.

Postoperative status after partial removal of the mandibular third molar.

The aim of the study was to examine the postoperative status one year after partial removal of the third mandibular molar. Thirty-three third molars were selected because of the proximity of the apices to the mandibular canal and/or complicated root anatomy. At a follow-up examination one year postoperatively, clinical and radiological findings were recorded. A definition based on both clinical and radiological findings for healing and unsatisfactory healing, respectively, is suggested. Twenty-seven root fragments migrated between 1 and 7 mm coronally in the length axis of the tooth. Nine patients had subjective symptoms or objective findings. Three of these patients had dysesthesia. The findings indicated healing around 24 root fragments (73%) and unsatisfactory healing around 9 root fragments (27%). This findings of healing around most of the root fragments indicates that partial removal might be considered as an alternative method in certain cases of complicated root anatomy.

The effect of cone beam CT (CBCT) on therapeutic decision-making in endodontics.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess to what extent cone beam CT (CBCT) used in accordance with current European Commission guidelines in a normal clinical setting has an impact on therapeutic decisions in a population referred for endodontic problems. METHODS: The study includes data of consecutively examined patients collected from October 2011 to December 2012. From 2 different endodontic specialist clinics, 57 patients were referred for a CBCT examination using criteria in accordance with current European guidelines. The CBCT examinations were performed using similar equipment and standardized among clinics. After a thorough clinical examination, but before CBCT, the examiner made a preliminary therapy plan which was recorded. After the CBCT examination, the same examiner made a new therapy plan. Therapy plans both before and after the CBCT examination were plotted for 53 patients and 81 teeth. As four patients had incomplete protocols, they were not included in the final analysis. RESULTS: 4% of the patients referred to endodontic clinics during the study period were examined with CBCT. The most frequent reason for referral to CBCT examination was to differentiate pathology from normal anatomy, this was the case in 24 patients (45% of the cases). The primary outcome was therapy plan changes that could be attributed to CBCT examination. There were changes in 28 patients (53%). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT has a significant impact on therapeutic decision efficacy in endodontics when used in concordance with the current European Commission guidelines.

Intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularisation in serpiginous choroiditis.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in the treatment of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to serpiginous choroiditis (SC). DESIGN: Non-randomised, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Seven patients (seven eyes) affected by juxtafoveal CNV (six eyes) and subfoveal CNV (one eye) associated with SC were recruited. METHODS: Each patient underwent an ophthalmological examination, including measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). After a first IVB injection (1.25 mg), patients were evaluated monthly over a 12-month follow-up. Further re-treatments were performed on the basis of detection of any type of fluid on OCT and/or presence of leakage on FA. The primary outcome considered was the median change in BCVA, as well as the proportion of eyes gaining at least 5 and 10 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at the end of the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included median changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and number of injections over the planned follow-up. RESULTS: Median BCVA changed from 0.3 to 0.4 LogMAR. A functional improvement of at least 5 and 10 ETDRS letters was obtained in two eyes (28%) and one eye (14%), respectively, at the 12-month examination. Four eyes (57%) had stable BCVA, whereas one eye (14%) experienced a two-line decrease. Median CMT at baseline was 261 µm, decreasing to 196 µm at the 12-month examination. The median number of IVB injections was 1 in 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: IVB can achieve anatomical stabilisation of CNV secondary to SC, avoiding a decline in visual acuity, in almost 90% of cases over a 12-month follow-up.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in oral healthcare - the agreement between Swedish recommendations and evidence.

BACKGROUND: Almost all (17/20) Swedish counties have pharmaceutical committees that establish recommendations for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in oral healthcare.Objective To evaluate the evidence for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in oral healthcare and the agreement between Swedish recommendations and evidence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The MeSH terms 'antibiotic prophylaxis' and 'dentistry' were used in the database search. Abstracts were reviewed according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 186 articles were read in full text by the four authors independently. Data extraction and interpretation of data was carried out using a pre-defined protocol. In the end, one case-control study was included for evaluation of evidence. RESULTS: The case-control study included patients with specific cardiac conditions. The study reported a 49% protective efficacy (odds ratio: 0.51) of antibiotic prophylaxis for first-time episodes of endocarditis within 30 days of procedure. This result was not statistically significant. The quality of the evidence was low. No studies were evaluated on patients with other medical conditions. The recommendations included several cardiac and other medical conditions for which there is a lack of evidence or no evidence to support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of evidence to support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis. To avoid the risk of adverse events from antibiotics and the risk of developing resistant bacterial strains, the use of antibiotic prophylaxis should be minimised and recommendations in Sweden should be revised to be more evidence-based.