RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Chat generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) is a novel large pre-trained natural language processing software that can enable scientific writing amongst a litany of other features. Given this, there is a growing interest in exploring the use of ChatGPT models as a modality to facilitate/assist in the provision of clinical care. METHODS: We investigated the time taken for the composition of neurosurgical discharge summaries and operative reports at a major University hospital. In so doing, we compared currently employed speech recognition software (i.e., SpeaKING) vs novel ChatGPT for three distinct neurosurgical diseases: chronic subdural hematoma, spinal decompression, and craniotomy. Furthermore, factual correctness was analyzed for the abovementioned diseases. RESULTS: The composition of neurosurgical discharge summaries and operative reports with the assistance of ChatGPT leads to a statistically significant time reduction across all three diseases/report types: p < 0.001 for chronic subdural hematoma, p < 0.001 for decompression of spinal stenosis, and p < 0.001 for craniotomy and tumor resection. However, despite a high degree of factual correctness, the preparation of a surgical report for craniotomy proved to be significantly lower (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: ChatGPT assisted in the writing of discharge summaries and operative reports as evidenced by an impressive reduction in time spent as compared to standard speech recognition software. While promising, the optimal use cases and ethics of AI-generated medical writing remain to be fully elucidated and must be further explored in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Hematoma Subdural Crónico , Neurocirugia , Humanos , Inteligencia Artificial , Alta del Paciente , Procedimientos NeuroquirúrgicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in patients undergoing major elective cranial surgery is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aims to identify the clinical outcome of transfused glioblastoma patients undergoing primary surgical tumor resection and identify risk factors for RBC transfusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, 406 patients underwent elective primary glioblastoma resection. For multivariate analysis to assess risk factors for RBC transfusion, logistic regression was conducted. The impact of RBC transfusion on overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: In total, 36 (8.9%) patients received RBC transfusion. Preoperative anemia rate was significantly higher in transfused patients compared to patients without RBC transfusion (33.3 vs 6.5%; p<0.0001). Postoperative complications as well as hospital length of stay (LOS) (p<0.0001) were significantly increased in transfused patients compared to non-transfused patients. After multivariate analysis, risk factors for RBC transfusion were preoperative anemia (p<0.0001), intraoperative blood loss (p<0.0001), female gender (p=0.0056) and radiation (p=0.0064). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that RBC transfusion and being elderly (age ≥75 years) were relevant for overall survival. DISCUSSION: RBC transfusion is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective primary glioblastoma resection. Preoperative anemia and intraoperative blood loss are major risk factors for RBC transfusion. Preoperative anemia management and blood conservation strategies are crucial in patients undergoing elective primary glioblastoma resection.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Recent work on ischemic cerebellar stroke has suggested that the resection of infarcted tissue may lead to improved functional outcomes compared with decompressive surgery alone. Nonetheless, no studies have assessed the extent to which necrotic tissue should be resected or if there are any volumetric thresholds capable of predicting functional outcomes in this patient population. In this study, the authors aimed to determine potential thresholds for volume reduction in ischemic cerebellar stroke in an effort to optimize the management of ischemic cerebellar stroke and, in so doing, improve functional outcomes. METHODS: This study is a multicentric retrospective study of patients who underwent surgery for the management of ischemic cerebellar stroke. Volumetric analyses of infarcted tissue present on CT scans were performed before and after surgical intervention(s). The final infarct volume (FIV) was computed as a percentage of the initial infarct volume (postoperative infarct volume/preoperative infarct volume × 100). The primary endpoint was functional outcome at 3 months, as determined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score; mRS scores 0-2 were considered as favorable and mRS scores 3-6 as unfavorable. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to explore the relationship between postoperative infarct volumes and FIV versus mRS score, and Youden's index was used to estimate potential volumetric thresholds. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients were included in the study. The mean pre- and postoperative infarct volumes were 45.25 (SD 18.32) cm3 and 29.56 (SD 26.61) cm3, respectively. Patients undergoing necrosectomy, regardless of whether via craniotomy or craniectomy, were more likely to have a favorable outcome at discharge (OR 16.62, 95% CI 2.12-130.33; p = 0.008) and at 3 months (OR 24.12, 95% CI 3.03-192.18; p = 0.003) postoperatively. Postoperative infarct volumes ≤ 17 cm3 yielded a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 68% with regard to the prediction of favorable outcome at 3 months. The resection ≥ 50% of infarcted tissue was also predictive of favorable outcomes at 3 months (OR 7.7, 95% CI 2.7-21.8; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of necrotic tissue volumes by at least 50% and/or the reduction of the infarct volume by ≤ 17 cm3 appear to be associated with favorable outcomes in patients with surgically managed ischemic cerebellar strokes.
RESUMEN
Importance: According to the current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines, decompressive surgery is indicated in patients with cerebellar infarcts that demonstrate severe cerebellar swelling. However, there is no universal definition of swelling and/or infarct volume(s) available to support a decision for surgery. Objective: To evaluate functional outcomes in surgically compared with conservatively managed patients with cerebellar infarcts. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, patients with cerebellar infarcts treated at 5 tertiary referral hospitals or stroke centers within Germany between 2008 and 2021 were included. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to November 2023. Exposures: Surgical treatment (ie, posterior fossa decompression plus standard of care) vs conservative management (ie, medical standard of care). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome examined was functional status evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the predicted probabilities for favorable outcome (mRS score of 0 to 3) stratified by infarct volumes or Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission and treatment modality. Analyses included propensity score matching, with adjustments for age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission, brainstem involvement, and infarct volume. Results: Of 531 included patients with cerebellar infarcts, 301 (57%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 68 (14.4) years. After propensity score matching, a total of 71 patients received surgical treatment and 71 patients conservative treatment. There was no significant difference in favorable outcomes (ie, mRS score of 0 to 3) at discharge for those treated surgically vs conservatively (47 [66%] vs 45 [65%]; odds ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.5-2.2; P > .99) or at follow-up (35 [73%] vs 33 [61%]; odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.7-4.2; P > .99). In patients with cerebellar infarct volumes of 35 mL or greater, surgical treatment was associated with a significant improvement in favorable outcomes at 1-year follow-up (38 [61%] vs 3 [25%]; odds ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.2-19.3; P = .03), while conservative treatment was associated with favorable outcomes at 1-year follow-up in patients with infarct volumes of less than 25 mL (2 [34%] vs 218 [74%]; odds ratio, 0.2; 95% CI, 0-1.0; P = .047). Conclusions and Relevance: Overall, surgery was not associated with improved outcomes compared with conservative management in patients with cerebellar infarcts. However, when stratifying based on infarct volume, surgical treatment appeared to be beneficial in patients with larger infarct volumes, while conservative management appeared favorable in patients with smaller infarct volumes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Temporal muscle thickness (TMT) on cranial CT scans has recently been identified as a prognostic imaging parameter for assessing a patient's baseline frailty. Here, we analyzed whether TMT correlates with Traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity and whether it can be used to predict outcome(s) after TBI. METHODS: We analyzed the radiological and clinical data sets of 193 patients with TBI who were admitted to our institution and correlated the radiological data with clinical outcomes after stratification for TMT. RESULTS: Our analyses showed a significant association between high TMT and increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage (p = 0.0135) but improved mRS at 6 months (p = 0.001) as compared to patients with low TMT. Congruent with such findings, a lower TMT was associated with falls and reduced outcomes at 6 months (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: High TMT was robustly associated with head trauma sequelae but was also associated with good clinical outcomes in TBI patients. These findings consolidate the significance of TMT as an objective marker of frailty in TBI patients; such measurements may ultimately be leveraged as prognostic indicators.