Subcellular localization of the spindle proteins Aurora A, Mad2, and BUBR1 assessed by immunohistochemistry.

The spindle checkpoint, the primary mechanism to ensure that two daughter cells receive the same amount of DNA, is compromised in many malignant tumors and has been implicated as a contributor to aneuploidy and carcinogenesis. The extent of expression and subcellular localization of the spindle proteins Aurora A, Mad2, and BUBR1 varies considerably in different immunohistochemical (IHC) reports from archival tumor tissues. Given the conflicting reports in the literature about the localization of these proteins, we examined the subcellular localization of Aurora kinase A, Mad2, and BUBR1 in normal and cancerous human tissues by IHC. In normal tissues, Aurora A was mainly localized to the nucleus when monoclonal or purified polyclonal antibodies were used, and Mad2 was localized to the nucleus, whereas BUBR1 was localized to the cytoplasm. In malignant tissues, Aurora A showed additional staining in the cytoplasm in the majority of tumors analyzed. Furthermore, BUBR1 was also localized to both the nucleus and cytoplasm in a significant fraction of tumors. Subcellular localization of Mad2 was similar in normal and malignant tissues. Thus, the validity of some earlier IHC studies of Aurora A, Mad2, and BUBR1 should be reconsidered, indicating that high-quality antibodies and a high-alkaline antigen-retrieval technique are required to achieve optimal results. We conclude that the subcellular localizations of these spindle proteins are different, although they have overlapping biological functions, and that Aurora A and BUBR1 undergo a shift in the subcellular localization during malignant transformation.

Apoptosis, cell cycle progression and gene expression in TP53-depleted HCT116 colon cancer cells in response to short-term 5-fluorouracil treatment.

Loss of TP53 function may contribute to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in colorectal cancer since TP53-deficient cells may be unable to undergo apoptosis in response to 5-FU-induced DNA damage. 5-FU treatment of TP53-deficient cells would provide useful information on the apoptotic response to drug-induced DNA damage in the absence of TP53 and its transcriptional targets. We investigated apoptosis induction and cell cycle alterations in response to short-term treatment with two different 5-FU concentrations following siRNA-mediated knockdown of TP53 in the TP53-proficient HCT116 colon cancer cell line. We focused on high-dose 5-FU treatment to investigate the apoptotic phenotype in 5-FU-treated cultures since this dose resulted in apoptosis induction at 24 h of treatment, whereas clinically-relevant bolus 5-FU treatment of HCT116 cultures did not. Gene expression alterations were also assessed in 5-FU-treated HCT116 cultures using whole genome expression arrays. Compared to 5-FU-treated TP53-proficient HCT116 cultures, 5-FU-treated TP53-depleted HCT116 cultures showed lack of CDKN1A induction, decreased apoptotic levels, decreased FAS and TNFRSF10B transcript levels and cleaved PARP protein levels, G1/S transition arrests, decreased CCND1 protein levels, and smaller intra-S phase arrests. Alterations in gene expression in 5-FU-treated TP53-depleted HCT116 cultures confirmed previously-reported TP53 target genes and suggested potentially novel TP53 target genes (e.g. APOBEC3C, BIRC3, JMJD2B, LAMP3, MYO1E, PRRG1, SULF2, TACSTD2, TncRNA, ZFYVE20) that may play a role in mediating the 5-FU-induced DNA damage response in TP53-proficient cells. Abrogation of TP53 function in 5-FU-treated HCT116 cultures results in reduced apoptosis, TP53- and CDKN1A-independent G1/S phase arrests that may be protective against apoptosis, smaller intra-S phase arrests, and transcript level decreases of both reported TP53 target genes as well as potentially novel TP53 target genes.

Cellular response to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in 5-FU-resistant colon cancer cell lines during treatment and recovery.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of cells with the anti-cancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) causes DNA damage, which in turn affects cell proliferation and survival. Two stable wild-type TP53 5-FU-resistant cell lines, ContinB and ContinD, generated from the HCT116 colon cancer cell line, demonstrate moderate and strong resistance to 5-FU, respectively, markedly-reduced levels of 5-FU-induced apoptosis, and alterations in expression levels of a number of key cell cycle- and apoptosis-regulatory genes as a result of resistance development. The aim of the present study was to determine potential differential responses to 8 and 24-hour 5-FU treatment in these resistant cell lines. We assessed levels of 5-FU uptake into DNA, cell cycle effects and apoptosis induction throughout treatment and recovery periods for each cell line, and alterations in expression levels of DNA damage response-, cell cycle- and apoptosis-regulatory genes in response to short-term drug exposure. RESULTS: 5-FU treatment for 24 hours resulted in S phase arrests, p53 accumulation, up-regulation of p53-target genes on DNA damage response (ATF3, GADD34, GADD45A, PCNA), cell cycle-regulatory (CDKN1A), and apoptosis-regulatory pathways (FAS), and apoptosis induction in the parental and resistant cell lines. Levels of 5-FU incorporation into DNA were similar for the cell lines. The pattern of cell cycle progression during recovery demonstrated consistently that the 5-FU-resistant cell lines had the smallest S phase fractions and the largest G2(/M) fractions. The strongly 5-FU-resistant ContinD cell line had the smallest S phase arrests, the lowest CDKN1A levels, and the lowest levels of 5-FU-induced apoptosis throughout the treatment and recovery periods, and the fastest recovery of exponential growth (10 days) compared to the other two cell lines. The moderately 5-FU-resistant ContinB cell line had comparatively lower apoptotic levels than the parental cells during treatment and recovery periods and a recovery time of 22 days. Mitotic activity ceased in response to drug treatment for all cell lines, consistent with down-regulation of mitosis-regulatory genes. Differential expression in response to 5-FU treatment was demonstrated for genes involved in regulation of nucleotide binding/metabolism (ATAD2, GNL2, GNL3, MATR3), amino acid metabolism (AHCY, GSS, IVD, OAT), cytoskeleton organization (KRT7, KRT8, KRT19, MAST1), transport (MTCH1, NCBP1, SNAPAP, VPS52), and oxygen metabolism (COX5A, COX7C). CONCLUSION: Our gene expression data suggest that altered regulation of nucleotide metabolism, amino acid metabolism, cytoskeleton organization, transport, and oxygen metabolism may underlie the differential resistance to 5-FU seen in these cell lines. The contributory roles to 5-FU resistance of some of the affected genes on these pathways will be assessed in future studies.

Comparison of gene expression in HCT116 treatment derivatives generated by two different 5-fluorouracil exposure protocols.

BACKGROUND: Established colorectal cancer cell lines subjected to different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment protocols are often used as in vitro model systems for investigations of downstream cellular responses to 5-FU and to generate 5-FU-resistant derivatives for the investigation of biological mechanisms involved in drug resistance. We subjected HCT116 colon cancer cells to two different 5-FU treatment protocols in an attempt to generate resistant derivatives: one that simulated the clinical bolus regimens using clinically-achievable 5-FU levels, the other that utilized serial passage in the presence of increasing 5-FU concentrations (continuous exposure). HCT116 Bolus3, ContinB, and ContinD, corresponding to independently-derived cell lines generated either by bolus exposure or continuous exposure, respectively, were characterized for growth- and apoptosis-associated phenotypes, and gene expression using 8.5 K oligonucleotide microarrays. Comparative gene expression analyses were done in order to determine if transcriptional profiles for the respective treatment derivatives were similar or substantially different, and to identify the signaling and regulatory pathways involved in mediating the downstream response to 5-FU exposure and possibly involved in development of resistance. RESULTS: HCT116 ContinB and ContinD cells were respectively 27-fold and >100-fold more resistant to 5-FU and had reduced apoptotic fractions in response to transient 5-FU challenge compared to the parental cell line, whereas HCT116 Bolus3 cells were not resistant to 5-FU after 3 cycles of bolus 5-FU treatment and had the same apoptotic response to transient 5-FU challenge as the parental cell line. However, gene expression levels and expression level changes for all detected genes in Bolus3 cells were similar to those seen in both the ContinB (strongest correlation) and ContinD derivatives, as demonstrated by correlation and cluster analyses. Regulatory pathways having to do with 5-FU metabolism, apoptosis, and DNA repair were among those that were affected by 5-FU treatment. CONCLUSION: All HCT116 derivative cell lines demonstrated similar transcriptional profiles, despite the facts that they were generated by two different 5-FU exposure protocols and that the bolus exposure derivative had not become resistant to 5-FU. Selection pressures on HCT116 cells as a result of 5-FU challenge are thus similar for both treatment protocols.

Molecular characterizations of derivatives of HCT116 colorectal cancer cells that are resistant to the chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the chemotherapeutic drug of choice for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, but resistance to 5-FU remains a major obstacle to successful therapy. We generated 5-FU-resistant derivatives of the HCT116 human colon cancer cell line by serial passage of these cells in the presence of increasing 5-FU concentrations in an attempt to elucidate the biological mechanisms involved in resistance to 5-FU. Two resultant resistant derivatives, HCT116 ResB and ResD, were characterized for resistance phenotypes, genotypes, and gene expression using cells maintained long-term in 5-FU-free media. Compared to parental HCT116 cells that respond to 5-FU challenge by inducing high levels of apoptosis, ResB and ResD derivatives had significantly reduced apoptotic fractions when transiently challenged with 5-FU. ResB and ResD cells were respectively 27- and 121-fold more resistant to 5-FU, had increased doubling times, and significantly increased plating efficiencies compared to the parental cells. Both resistant derivatives retained the wild-type TP53 genotype, TP53 copy number and CGH profile characteristic of the parental line. Alterations in gene expression in the resistant derivatives compared to the parental line were assessed using oligonucleotide microarrays. Overall, the 5-FU-resistant derivatives were characterized by reduced apoptosis and a more aggressive growth phenotype, consistent with the observed up-regulation of apoptosis-inhibitory genes (e.g., IRAK1, MALT1, BIRC5), positive growth-regulatory genes (e.g., CCND3, CCNE2, CCNF, CYR61), and metastasis genes (e.g., LMNB1, F3, TMSNB), and down-regulation of apoptosis-promoting genes (e.g., BNIP3, BNIP3L, FOXO3A) and negative growth-regulatory genes (e.g., AREG, CCNG2, CDKN1A, CDKN1C, GADD45A). 5-FU metabolism-associated genes (e.g., TYMS, DTYMK, UP) and DNA repair genes (e.g., FEN1, FANCG, RAD23B) were also up-regulated in one or both resistant derivatives, suggesting that the resistant derivatives might be able to overcome both 5-FU inhibition of thymidylate synthase and the DNA damage caused by 5-FU, respectively. Development of 5-FU resistance thus appears to encompass deregulation of apoptosis-, proliferation-, DNA repair-, and metastasis-associated regulatory pathways.

DNA damage signaling in response to 5-fluorouracil in three colorectal cancer cell lines with different mismatch repair and TP53 status.

We studied patterns of DNA damage signaling and cell cycle response to clinically-relevant (bolus) and high doses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in three colorectal cancer cell lines with differing MMR and TP53 status in an attempt to better understand how 5-FU exerts its cytotoxicity. The ATM/CHEK2/ CHEK1 signaling pathway was not activated in response to bolus 5-FU in the MMR-deficient cell lines HCT116 (TP53-proficient or TP53-depleted) and HCT15 (TP53-deficient), consistent with negligible/reparable DNA damage and no cell death. The pattern of DNA damage checkpoint activation in bolus 5-FU-treated HT29 (TP53-deficient/MMR-proficient) cultures suggested SSB formation (CHEK1 activation) followed by DSB formation (CHEK2 activation and increased phospho-H2AX levels), but no cell death suggested that DNA repair capacity was not overwhelmed. High-dose 5-FU treatment led to activation of ATM/CHEK2/TP53 (not CHEK1) in TP53-proficient and TP53-depleted HCT116 (later CHEK2 activation relative to TP53-proficient) cultures; HCT15 cultures had ATM activation only. These data and increased phospho-H2AX levels indicated DSB formation; apoptosis was induced in both cell lines indicating irreparable DNA damage. TP53-depleted HCT116 cultures also had DSBs after high-dose 5-FU treatment but experienced a (transient) G1/S cell cycle arrest that protected them from apoptosis. TP53 phosphorylation at Ser20/33/37 was seen in TP53-proficient HCT116 cultures regardless of 5-FU concentration at ≥4 h following treatment, indicating TP53 stabilization/transcriptional activation. Overall, activation of ATM, CHEK1 and/or CHEK2 and phospho-H2AX levels reflected the nature of 5-FU-induced DNA damage and indi-cated when DNA damage was significant (5-FU-dose-dependent). DNA repair and cell cycle responses to 5-FU-induced DNA damage were distinctly affected by MMR and TP53 (role in BER/NER) functionalities, but MMR deficiency especially seemed to confer less overall sensitivity to 5-FU.