RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence on the cleaning and disinfection of root canals and the healing of apical periodontitis when ultrasonic irrigant activation is applied during primary root canal treatment of mature permanent teeth compared with syringe irrigation. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted of the Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, SciELO, and Scopus databases using both free-text key words and controlled vocabulary. Additional studies were sought through hand searching of endodontic journals and textbooks. The retrieved studies were screened by 2 reviewers according to predefined criteria. The included studies were critically appraised, and the extracted data were arranged in tables. RESULTS: The electronic and hand search retrieved 1966 titles. Three clinical studies and 45 in vitro studies were included in this review. Ultrasonic activation did not improve the healing rate of apical periodontitis compared with syringe irrigation after primary root canal treatment of teeth with a single root canal. Conflicting results were reported by the in vitro microbiological studies. Ultrasonic activation was more effective than syringe irrigation in the removal of pulp tissue remnants and hard tissue debris based on both clinical and in vitro studies. Ultrasonic activation groups were possibly favored in 13 studies, whereas syringe irrigation groups may have been favored in 3 studies. CONCLUSIONS: The level of the available evidence was low, so no strong clinical recommendations could be formulated. Future studies should focus on the antimicrobial effect and healing of apical periodontitis in teeth with multiple root canals.