RESUMEN
The ability to localize the three spinal tracts (corticospinal tract, spinothalamic tract, and dorsal [posterior] columns) involved in incomplete spinal cord syndromes at cross-sectional imaging and knowledge of the classic clinical manifestations of the various syndromes enable optimized imaging evaluation and provide clinicians with information that aids in diagnosis and treatment. The requisite knowledge for localizing these tracts is outlined. The authors review the spinal cord anatomy, blood supply, and course of these tracts and describe the various associated syndromes: specifically, dorsal cord, ventral cord, central cord, Brown-Séquard, conus medullaris, and cauda equina syndromes. In addition, they describe the anatomic basis for the clinical manifestation of each syndrome and the relevant imaging features of the classic causes of these entities. Knowledge of the anatomy and clinical findings of the spinal cord is essential for examining and treating patients with cord abnormalities. ©RSNA, 2018.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Médula Espinal/anomalías , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Médula Espinal/anatomía & histología , SíndromeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Given the differences in size, specific activity, and dosing methods for glass yttrium-90 microspheres ((90)Y-glass) and resin (90)Y microspheres ((90)Y-resin), these therapies may expose the liver to different amounts of radiation, thereby affecting their efficacy and tolerability. We aimed to compare the prescribed activity of (90)Y-glass and (90)Y-resin for real-world patients undergoing selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and to assess efficacy and safety outcomes in these patients. METHODS: We examined the records of 28 consecutive patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated with SIRT between June 2008 and May 2011 at our institution. Using baseline CT and MR images, we calculated a projected activity as if we had used the other product and compared it to the actual prescribed activity of (90)Y-glass and (90)Y-resin for each SIRT treatment per manufacturer guidelines. Progression and adverse events were evaluated at follow up visits. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: For (90)Y-glass treatments with a mean prescribed (90)Y activity of 1.77 GBq, the mean projected (90)Y-resin activity was 0.84 GBq. For (90)Y-resin treatments with a mean prescribed (90)Y activity of 1.05 GBq, the mean projected (90)Y-glass activity was 2.48 GBq. The median survival was 9.3 months versus 18.2 months for (90)Y-glass and (90)Y-resin, respectively (P=0.292). During the second year after SIRT, the hazard ratio of death for patients treated with (90)Y-glass versus (90)Y-resin was 4.0 (95% CI: 1.3, 12.3; P=0.017). No significant difference in progression, adverse events or liver toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Using manufacturer recommended guidelines, (90)Y-resin delivers significantly less activity than (90)Y-glass to patients with liver-dominant mCRC undergoing SIRT with no significant difference in adverse events and a trend toward improved survival.