External Fixation and Adjuvant Pins Versus Volar Locking Plate Fixation in Unstable Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized, Controlled Study With a 5-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To determine whether volar locking plates (VLP) are superior to external fixation (EF) with adjuvant pins in unstable distal radius fractures after 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: We randomized 111 unstable distal radius fractures to treatment with either a VLP or EF using adjuvant pins. The patients' mean age was 54 years (range, 20-84 y). Twenty patients were lost to follow-up. At 5 years, 91 patients (82%) were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Mayo wrist score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, range of motion, and radiological evaluation. The QuickDASH score at 5 years was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: The QuickDASH score was not statistically significantly different between the groups (VLP 10 vs EF 13) at 5 years. Patients with VLP had statistically significant better supination (85° vs 81°), better radial deviation (18° vs 16°), and less radial shortening (1 mm vs 2 mm). For AO/OTA type C2 fractures, the VLP had statistically significant better supination (84° vs 78°), flexion (64° vs 56°), grip strength (34 kg vs 28 kg), Mayo wrist score (92 vs 76), and less ulnar shortening (1 mm vs 3 mm). The QuickDASH score in the C2 subset analysis showed a difference of 10 (VLP 8 vs EF 18), but this was not statistically significant. In the VLP group, 11 patients (21%) had their plates removed owing to surgically related complications. In the EF group, 5 patients had proximal radial scar correction surgery owing to skin contracture. CONCLUSIONS: The findings were satisfactory for both groups at 5 years. The VLP provided statistically significantly better results for several clinical outcomes in the C2 subset analysis. However, 21% of the VLPs were removed because of surgical complications. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.

Volar locking plates versus external fixation and adjuvant pin fixation in unstable distal radius fractures: a randomized, controlled study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether volar locking plates are superior to external fixation with adjuvant pins in the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures. METHODS: A total of 111 unstable distal radius fractures were randomized to treatment with external fixation (EF) using adjuvant pins or with a volar locking plate (VLP). The mean age of the patients was 54 years (range, 20-84 y). Seven patients were lost to follow-up. At 1 year, 104 patients were assessed with a visual analog scale pain score, Mayo wrist score, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), range of motion, and radiological evaluation. The QuickDASH score at 52 weeks was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: The operative time in the EF group was 77 minutes, compared with 88 minutes in the VLP group. At 52 weeks, patients with VLPs had a higher Mayo wrist score (90 vs. 85), better supination (89° vs. 85°), and less radial shortening (+1.4 mm vs. +2.2 mm). There were more patients with pain over the ulnar styloid in the EF group (16 vs 6 patients). For AO type C2/C3, the patients with VLPs had better supination (90° vs. 76°) and less ulnar shortening (+1.1 mm vs. +2.8 mm). The complication rate was 30% in the EF group, compared with 29% in the VLP group. Eight (15%) plates were removed due to complications. The QuickDASH score was not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although we did not find a significant difference between the groups for the QuickDASH score, we believe that our results support the use of VLPs for the treatment of unstable distal radius fractures. A serious concern is that some patients will have to have their plates removed; therefore, improving the surgical technique is important. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.

Posttraumatic reconstruction of the hand--a retrospective review of 87 toe-to-hand transfers compared with an earlier report.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the results of 87 toe-to-hand transfers performed in 73 procedures, compare them to the report published by the senior author in 1983, and confirm the hypothesis that results of toe-to-hand transfers at our center have improved over time. METHODS: The results of 87 toe-to-hand transfers performed between 1981 and 2001 were reviewed and compared with the results of 54 toe-to-hand transfers performed between 1974 and 1980. The measured parameters were type of reconstruction performed, anticoagulation therapy, vascular patency, frequency of secondary surgery, and strength of thumb reconstructions. RESULTS: In the recent time period, 11% of the procedures had complications with revascularization of the transferred digit, and long-term survival was seen in 98% of the toe-to-hand transfers. This is a significant improvement over earlier results, in which 33% of the cases had some microvascular compromise and the survival of grafts was lower (91%). Pinch strength for thumb reconstructions improved, and the number of secondary surgeries performed dropped, but neither of these parameters reached a significant level. Toes used for reconstruction changed, with an 18% decrease in use of big toe for thumb reconstruction and a similar increase in use of the second toe. For non-thumb digital reconstructions there was a 60% decrease in use of second and third toe combined, whereas use of the second toe alone increased similarly. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed reduction of the incidence of vascular compromise compared to the previous report. Improved strength of thumb reconstructions and reduced need for secondary surgery was also displayed. These findings are likely attributed to refinements in reconstructive procedures and operative techniques. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Hand transplantation. A future clinical option?

Transplantation of a vascularized limb or its components is defined as composite tissue allotransplantation, and is one of the newest areas in surgery. To date, 24 hands have been transplanted onto 18 recipients. The initial results have been promising, and hand transplantation may become an important procedure for functional restoration of upper limbs. However, the ethical aspects of using chronic immunosuppression for a condition which is not life threatening have been the subject of debate. In this article, we review the field of composite tissue allotransplantation.