RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Social functioning deficits (SFDs) during adolescence represent potential vulnerability indicators to schizophrenia spectrum disorders, but little is known about how both family environmental and genetic factors contribute to SFDs. The aim of this study was to examine the association of adoptees' adolescent social functioning with adoptive family functioning and adoptees' high (HR) or low (LR) genetic risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The present subsample from the nationwide Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia included 88 HR and 83 LR adoptees. Adolescent social functioning was assessed using UCLA Social Attainment Survey. Assessment of adoptive family functioning was based on Global Family Ratings. Results indicated that dysfunctional family processes and high genetic risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders contributed approximately equally to adoptees' adolescent social functioning. Our findings underscore the importance of functional family processes in adolescent social functioning, particularly in individuals at high genetic risk for severe psychiatric disorder.
Asunto(s)
Esquizofrenia , Adolescente , Adopción , Finlandia , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/genética , Interacción SocialRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Earlier findings indicate that socioeconomic status (SES) of family associates with family functioning. This study examined the impacts of family functioning and genetic risk for schizophrenia on psychiatric morbidity of adoptees in families of high SES (HSES) and low SES (LSES). METHODS: The study population is a subgroup of the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia. Of the adoptees, 152 had high genetic risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (HR) and 151 adoptees had low risk (LR). Of the adoptees, 185 (HR = 94, LR = 91) were raised in high-SES (HSES) families and 118 (HR = 58, LR = 60) in low-SES (LSES) families. The family SES was determined by the occupational status of the main provider of the family. The functioning of adoptive families was assessed based on Global Family Ratings (GFRs) and psychiatric disorders on DSM-III-R criteria. RESULTS: In the HSES families, the psychiatric morbidity of the adoptees was emphasized by HR (OR = 4.28, CI 2.14-8.56) and dysfunctional family processes (OR = 6.44, CI 2.75-15.04). In the LSES families, the adoptees´ psychiatric morbidity was almost significantly increased by HR (OR = 2.10, CI 0.99-4.45), but not by dysfunctional family processes (OR = 1.33, CI 0.53-3.34). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that in HSES families, dysfunctional family processes and HR for schizophrenia increased the likelihoods for the development of psychiatric disorders in adoptees. The results can be utilized in identifying risk factors in the development of psychiatric disorders and focusing preventative strategies on risk groups with acknowledging the importance of family functioning.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Esquizofrenia , Adopción/psicología , Finlandia/epidemiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/genética , Clase SocialRESUMEN
The objective was to examine the impacts of duration of preadoption out-of-home care and adoptive family functioning on later psychiatric morbidity of adoptees with high (HR) and low (LR) genetic risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The study uses nationwide data from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia. The study population in this substudy consisted of 43 h adoptees and 128 LR adoptees. Of these adoptees, 90 had spent 0-6 months and 81 over 6 months in preadoption out-of-home care. The family functioning of adoptive families was assessed based on Global Family Ratings and psychiatric disorders on DSM-III-R criteria. The results showed that among the adoptees with over 6 months in preadoption out-of-home care, the likelihood for psychiatric disorders was significantly increased in HR adoptees compared to LR adoptees. In adoptees with 6 months or less in preadoption out-of-home care, an increased likelihood for psychiatric disorders was found among those living in adoptive families with dysfunctional processes. These findings indicate that especially for HR children, a well-functioning early caregiving environment is crucial in terms of subsequent mental wellbeing. The results emphasize that when adoption is necessary, early placement and well-functioning adoptive family environment are beneficial to children.
RESUMEN
Physical symptoms often occur in the absence of physical illness. This is termed somatization when the symptoms are caused by psychic factors. When abundant symptoms affect the functional capacity and cause subjective harm and seeking healthcare services, a psychic disorder may be in question. Somatization may be associated with numerous psychic disorders. It may, however, also be a question of a somatoform disorder having a physical symptom picture. Somatization disorder is one of the somatoform disorders. Recognition of the disorder is often the problem in its treatment. Establishing a long-term treatment relationship actually forms the basis for therapy.
Asunto(s)
Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud , Trastornos Somatomorfos/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Research on interventions improving psychological adjustment has suggested that sense of coherence (SOC) could be improved. AIMS: In the present study, we measured the impact of an intervention on the SOC among adults with first-episode depression. We also examined whether rehabilitation, depression, occupational stressors, life situation stressors and socio-demographic characteristics are associated with a change in the SOC. METHODS: Occupational health care clients were screened for depression using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and a structured clinical interview (the The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV: SCID-I). The participating subjects were randomized into a rehabilitation group (n = 134) and control group (n = 100) receiving treatment as usual. The Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-13) was used at the baseline and in a 1-year follow-up to compare the change of the SOC between the groups. RESULTS: The increase in the mean SOC score was statistically significant both in the rehabilitation group (54.91 compared with 62.85, P < 0.001) and in the control group (55.29 compared with 61.64, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean SOC scores between the groups at the follow-up. The improved SOC was associated with less severe depression (P = 0.003) and greater decreasing in BDI (P = 0.041) in the rehabilitation group. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that both rehabilitation and conventional depression treatment in a first episode of depression may enhance the SOC and that rehabilitation itself enhances the SOC more effectively among those with less severe depression or those whose BDI scores had further decreased at the 1-year follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/terapia , Intervención Médica Temprana/métodos , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador/métodos , Sentido de Coherencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Depresión/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inventario de Personalidad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Social functioning deficits during adolescence are associated with later psychiatric morbidity, particularly in offspring at high genetic risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. However, a shortcoming of earlier study findings is the lack of control of the impact of the family rearing environment. The study was aimed to examine the association of adoptees' social functioning during adolescence, adoptive family functioning, and adoptees' high (HR) or low (LR) genetic risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders with adoptees' later psychiatric morbidity. The present subsample from the nationwide Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia included 57 HR and 60 LR adoptees. Adolescent social functioning was assessed using UCLA Social Attainment Survey (UCLA SAS). Adoptive family functioning was based on Global Family Ratings (GFRs) and psychiatric disorders on DSM-III-R criteria. The results indicated that, after controlling for adoptive family functioning and genetic risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, deficits in peer relationships during adolescence were associated with an increased likelihood of psychiatric morbidity of adoptees. Our findings highlight social functioning deficits during adolescence, specifically in peer relationships, as plausible independent risk factors for later psychiatric disorders. These results can be utilized in identifying possible at-risk groups and targets for prevention and in developing preventive strategies.
Asunto(s)
Esquizofrenia , Adolescente , Adopción/psicología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Morbilidad , Factores de Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/genética , Interacción SocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Children and adolescents with a genetic risk for schizophrenia are often found to have poorer social functioning compared to their controls. However, less is known about high-risk offspring who have not been reared by a biological parent with schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to examine deficits in social functioning in adolescence as a possible factor related to genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and also to examine possible gender differences in these associations. METHOD: The present sample consisted of 88 genetic high-risk (HR) adoptees whose biological mothers were diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and 83 genetic low-risk (LR) adoptees with biological mothers with non-schizophrenia spectrum disorders or no psychiatric disorders. Adoptees' social functioning at ages 16-20 was assessed using the UCLA Social Attainment Survey. RESULTS: Compared to LR adoptees, HR adoptees displayed statistically significant deficits in their peer relationships, involvement in activities and overall social functioning during adolescence. HR males were distinguished from LR males by their significantly poorer overall social functioning. Compared to HR females, HR males showed significant deficits in their romantic relationships. Of marginal significance was that HR females displayed more social functioning deficits relative to LR females, mainly in the areas of peer relationships, involvement in activities and overall social functioning. CONCLUSIONS: These results from the adoption and high-risk study design suggest that deficits in social functioning in adolescence may be related to genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia spectrum disorders and that some of these deficits may be gender-specific.
Asunto(s)
Niño Adoptado , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Funcionamiento Psicosocial , Trastornos Psicóticos/fisiopatología , Esquizofrenia/fisiopatología , Conducta Social , Interacción Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Masculino , Madres , Factores Sexuales , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the association of family functioning to psychiatric disorders of adoptees with and without genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia. METHODS: The data is based on the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia. The study sample consisted of 346 adoptive families, of which 175 adoptees had high (HR) and 171 low (LR) genetic risk for schizophrenia. DSM-III-R was used for diagnostic criteria. Family functioning was assessed using the Global Family Ratings. Childhood adversities covered early parental divorce and death occurring before 18 years of age of the adoptees. RESULTS: Approximately two thirds of the adoptees had lived in families with mildly dysfunctional processes (30%) or dysfunctional processes (28.4%). An increased likelihood for psychiatric disorders of the adoptees was related to dysfunctional family processes both in HR (ORâ¯=â¯4.8, 95% CI 2-11.4) and LR (ORâ¯=â¯2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.3) adoptees, but not to early parental death or divorce. CONCLUSIONS: The risk for psychiatric disorders was increased for adoptees in families with dysfunctional processes, especially for those adoptees with genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia. These results emphasize the importance of policies and practices that aim to strengthen and support family functioning.
Asunto(s)
Niño Adoptado/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Familiares , Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/epidemiología , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/etiología , Esquizofrenia/genética , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
The DSM-III-R diagnoses of a group of adoptees were predicted by the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) schizophrenia-related scales in the Finnish Adoptive Family Study. The sample consisted of 60 high-risk (HR) adopted-away offspring of biologic mothers with a diagnosis of broad schizophrenia spectrum and 76 low-risk (LR) control adoptees. They were assessed with the MMPI before the onset of any psychiatric disorder at a mean age of 24 years. High scores on the Psychopathic Deviate scale predicted psychiatric disorder at 11-year follow-up. Furthermore, LR adoptees', but not HR adoptees', mental disorders could be predicted with the MMPI scales Psychopathic Deviate and Golden-Meehl Indicators. These scales measure schizophrenia-related personality traits, including a social behavior, anhedonia, ambivalence, interpersonal aversiveness, and formal thought disturbances.
Asunto(s)
Adopción/psicología , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados/psicología , MMPI/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Adolescente , Adulto , Síntomas Afectivos/diagnóstico , Síntomas Afectivos/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Niño , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados/estadística & datos numéricos , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/epidemiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/psicología , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/genética , Determinación de la Personalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/genética , Conducta Social , Clase SocialRESUMEN
The aim of the study was to explore whether there is an association between body size at birth measured by birth weight and ponderal index and later depression at the age of 31 years. The analyses were based on 4,007 males and 4,332 females born in 1966 in the two northernmost provinces of Finland with data on current depression measured by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 questionnaire (HSCL-25) and self-reported physician-diagnosed lifetime depression at 31 years and childhood characteristics. The associations between birth measures and later depression were analysed with several confounding factors including maternal depression during pregnancy. Low birth measures did not associate with adult depression in men or women. Women with high birth weight (>or=4,500 g) had a higher risk for current depression compared to women with birth weight 3,000 g-3,499 g. Women with high ponderal index (the highest 90-95 percentiles and >or=95 percentiles) had a 1.53-1.55 higher likelihood for current depression compared with women with normal ponderal index. Based on this study, large body size at birth may be a risk factor for later depression.
Asunto(s)
Peso al Nacer , Tamaño Corporal , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Edad Materna , Inventario de Personalidad , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/psicología , Clase Social , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to describe the temperament dimension profiles assessed by the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) among young adults with the DSM-III-R personality disorder (PD). Our hypothesis was that PD clusters and separate PDs can be distinguished from one another by their specific temperament profiles. As a part of the 31-year follow-up survey of the prospective Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort, the cohort members living in the city of Oulu at the age of 31 years (n=1609) were invited to participate in a two-phase field study. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R for PDs (SCID-II) was used as diagnostic instrument. The final study sample consisted of the 1311 subjects who had completed the Hopkins Symptom Check List-25 questionnaire for screening and had given a written informed consent. Of the 321 SCID interviewed subjects, 74 met the criteria for at least one PD and had completed the TCI. The mean TCI scores of subjects with PD and control subjects without PD (n=910) were compared. Low Novelty Seeking, high Harm Avoidance and low Reward Dependence characterized cluster A and C PDs. Subjects with a cluster B PD did not differ from controls, except for Novelty Seeking, which was high. The temperament dimensions could not distinguish different PDs very well, with the only exception of persons with obsessive-compulsive PD. PD clusters were associated with different profiles of temperament, lending some support for Cloninger's typology.
Asunto(s)
Carácter , Trastornos de la Personalidad/diagnóstico , Inventario de Personalidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Temperamento , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastorno de Personalidad Compulsiva/clasificación , Trastorno de Personalidad Compulsiva/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Personalidad Compulsiva/psicología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Conducta Exploratoria , Finlandia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Reducción del Daño , Humanos , Motivación , Trastornos de la Personalidad/clasificación , Trastornos de la Personalidad/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Psicometría , Recompensa , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to establish possible genotype-environment interaction in high-risk and low-risk adoptees' vulnerability to schizophrenia. The study population consisted of a subgroup of 41 adoptive families with a high genetic risk adoptee and 58 families with a low genetic risk adoptee from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia. Communication style was assessed based on the Communication Deviance (CD) of the adoptive parents, and the adoptees' vulnerability indicators were measured with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). Taken separately, only the genetic liability to schizophrenia, but not the communication style of the adoptive parents, was significantly associated with the Lie, Correction and Hostility scales in the MMPI of the adoptees. Analyses of the genotype-environment interactions showed that the high-risk adoptees with high-CD rearing parents had an increased risk of vulnerability on the MMPI Social Maladjustment scale compared with the corresponding low-risk adoptees. Genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia and genotype-environment interaction are manifested in adoptees' MMPI.
Asunto(s)
Adopción , Comunicación , MMPI , Padres , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Ambiente , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Only a few studies have dealt with the association of metabolic syndrome with depression and anxiety. We studied whether metabolic syndrome and its components are associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms in a young adult population cohort. METHODS: This study forms part of the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort Study. The study sample consists of 5,698 members of the cohort who participated in the field study in 1997 to 1998. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the five criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were defined by the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 questionnaire. RESULTS: Metabolic syndrome was not associated with depression or anxiety. The correlations between the components of the metabolic syndrome and psychological distress as continuous measures were low. High waist circumference (>102 cm in males and >88 cm in females) associated with depression (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.61), but this association vanished when adjusted for gender, smoking, alcohol consumption, marital status, level of education, and physical activity. CONCLUSION: No clear association was found between the metabolic syndrome and psychological distress.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estrés PsicológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the temperament profiles of young adult somatizers in an epidemiological setting. We hypothesized that somatizers would have a characteristic temperament profile. METHODS: The sample consisted of 984 subjects at the age of 31 years. Data on somatization were gathered from a review of all public health outpatient records. Subjects with four or more somatization symptoms according to the DSM-III-R criteria were classified as somatizers. Temperament profiles were assessed using the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). RESULTS: Six males (1.3%) and 61 females (11.5%) met our criteria for somatization. Harm avoidance and reward dependence of the TCI profiles were associated with somatization symptoms in the whole sample. In logistic regression analysis, sex and psychological distress were associated with somatization but not with temperament profiles. CONCLUSION: We did not find a characteristic temperament profile for somatizers. This finding is in contrast to suggestions that somatization is associated with temperament profiles.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Estrés Fisiológico/psicología , Temperamento/fisiología , Adulto , Reacción de Prevención , Estudios de Cohortes , Escolaridad , Femenino , Finlandia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Civil , RecompensaRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to determine the co-occurrence of DSM- III-R personality disorders (PDs) with mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders in a young adult population. The members of the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort Project, living in the city of Oulu with an age of 31 years (N = 1,609) were invited to participate in a two-phase field study. The SCID I and II were used as diagnostic instruments. One hundred and seventy-seven out of 321 interviewed subjects met the criteria for mood, anxiety, or substance use disorders. Altogether 72 (41%) of the subjects with an Axis I disorder met the criteria for at least one PD. The weighted co-occurrence rate of any PD varied from 28% for mood disorders to 47% for anxiety disorders. PDs, especially those in Cluster C, are highly associated with Axis I psychiatric disorders in population.
Asunto(s)
Afecto , Ansiedad , Trastornos de la Personalidad/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adulto , Áreas de Influencia de Salud , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos de la Personalidad/diagnóstico , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnósticoRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to find potential signs of genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia. The differences between adoptees at high genetic risk for schizophrenia (their biological mother had a schizophrenia spectrum disorder) and control adoptees of non-schizophrenia spectrum biological mothers were assessed. The comparisons between these groups were based on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) test's subscale scores adjusted by gender, age at MMPI assessment, age at placement into the adoptive family and social class. The subjects were a subsamples of a total of 182 tested adoptees and 136 mentally healthy adoptees in the Finnish Adoptive Family Study. The high-risk group was found to be distinguishable from the low-risk group based on deviant scores on the Hostility, Hypomania and Lie scales. These scales may measure genetic vulnerability and also possibly be indicative of psychometric deviance predicting future onset of schizophrenia.
Asunto(s)
Adopción/psicología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/psicología , MMPI , Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/genética , Adulto , Femenino , Finlandia , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Madres/psicología , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Valores de Referencia , Psicología del EsquizofrénicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We assessed alexithymia and alexithymic features among young adult subjects with and without somatization symptoms in an epidemiological setting with a sample of young adults. METHODS: The sample consisted of urban 31-year-old subjects (N=1002). Data on somatization were gathered from a review of all public health outpatient records. Subjects with four or more somatization symptoms according to the DSM-III-R criteria were considered somatizers. The 20-item version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) was used to measure alexithymia. Subjects with a total TAS score over 60 were considered as being alexithymic, and those with a score under 52 were considered nonalexithymic. Subjects with a total TAS score from 52 to 60 were considered as having alexithymic features. RESULTS: The prevalence of alexithymia was 6.0% among somatizers and 4.8% among subjects without somatization symptoms, and the prevalence of alexithymic features was 7.5% and 12.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No association was found between alexithymia and somatization in young adult general population. The earlier theory of the association between alexithymia and somatization may be questionable.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas Afectivos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Somatomorfos/diagnóstico , Adulto , Síntomas Afectivos/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Prevalencia , Trastornos Somatomorfos/epidemiología , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Identification of the genetically related disorders in the putative schizophrenia spectrum is an unresolved problem. Data from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia, which was designed to disentangle genetic and environmental factors influencing risk for schizophrenia, were used to examine clinical phenotypes of schizophrenia spectrum disorders in adopted-away offspring of mothers with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. METHOD: Subjects were 190 adoptees at broadly defined genetic high risk who had biological mothers with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, including a subgroup of 137 adoptees at narrowly defined high risk whose mothers had DSM-III-R schizophrenia. These high-risk groups, followed to a median age of 44 years, were compared diagnostically with 192 low-risk adoptees whose biological mothers had either a non-schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis or no lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. RESULTS: In adoptees whose mothers had schizophrenia, the mean lifetime, age-corrected morbid risk for narrowly defined schizophrenia was 5.34% (SE=1.97%), compared to 1.74% (SE=1.00%) for low-risk adoptees, a marginally nonsignificant difference. In adoptees whose mothers had schizophrenia spectrum disorders, the mean age-corrected morbid risk for a schizophrenia spectrum disorder was 22.46% (SE=3.56%), compared with 4.36% (SE=1.51%) for low-risk adoptees, a significant difference. Within the comprehensive array of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, schizotypal personality disorder was found significantly more often in high-risk than in low-risk adoptees. The frequency of the group of nonschizophrenic nonaffective psychoses collectively differentiated high-risk and low-risk adoptees, but the frequencies of the separate disorders within this category did not. The two groups were not differentiated by the prevalence of paranoid personality disorder and of affective disorders with psychotic features. CONCLUSIONS: In adopted-away offspring of mothers with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, the genetic liability for schizophrenia-related illness (with the rearing contributions of the biological mothers disentangled) is broadly dispersed. Genetically oriented studies of schizophrenia-related disorders and studies of genotype-environment interaction should consider not only narrowly defined, typical schizophrenia but also schizotypal and schizoid personality disorders and nonschizophrenic nonaffective psychoses.
Asunto(s)
Adopción , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados , Esquizofrenia/genética , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Trastorno de Personalidad Paranoide/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Personalidad Paranoide/epidemiología , Trastorno de Personalidad Paranoide/genética , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Trastorno de la Personalidad Esquizotípica/diagnóstico , Trastorno de la Personalidad Esquizotípica/epidemiología , Trastorno de la Personalidad Esquizotípica/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We studied the association between alexithymia in adulthood and social situation of the child's family at the time of the child's birth. METHODS: The study forms part of the prospective Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort Project. The original material consisted of all 12,058 live-born children in the provinces of Lapland and Oulu in Finland with an expected delivery date during 1966. The material represents 96% of all births in the region. In 1997 a 31-year follow-up study was made on part of the initial sample. The 20-item version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) was given to 5983 participants of the field study. Of them, 85% returned the questionnaire properly completed. Factors indicative of the social situation of the child's family were already gathered during pregnancy and the time of birth from the mothers, thus eliminating recall bias. RESULTS: Alexithymia was more common in subjects from rural than urban dwelling areas. Unwanted children or subjects born into families with many children also exhibited an association with alexithymia in adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal social situation and environment predict alexithymia in the offspring.
Asunto(s)
Síntomas Afectivos/psicología , Clase Social , Síntomas Afectivos/epidemiología , Niño , Niño no Deseado , Estudios de Cohortes , Demografía , Relaciones Familiares , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Cuidado del Lactante , Masculino , Madres , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Pruebas Psicológicas , Población Rural , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
Somatization is a widespread problem in health care. We estimated the occurrence of Somatization Disorder (SD) using three different case-finding methods in a general population cohort. The sample consists of 1,598 subjects born in 1966. The case-finding methods according to the DSM-III-R criteria for SD were: 1) Finnish Hospital Discharge Register (FHDR) data, 2) analysis of the patient records in public outpatient care 1982-1997, and 3) Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) for 321 selected cases. The prevalence of SD was 1.1% (N = 18), giving a female-to-male ratio of 5:1. All cases were found among the public outpatient care records. No cases appeared in the FHDR or were recognized in the psychiatric interview. The lifetime prevalence of SD was comparable with previous western population studies. Methodologically, information from outpatient records may be more sensitive in detecting SD than hospital diagnosis or even psychiatric interview. Clinically we stress the importance of recognizing these cases by liaison psychiatrists especially because SD has been recognized as being difficult to treat among somatic and primary health service providers and because some promising treatment alternatives such as cognitive-behavioral therapy and antidepressants have emerged for SD patients.