Low-dose aspirin, statins, and metformin and survival in patients with breast cancers: a Norwegian population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies assessed the prognostic effect of aspirin, statins, and metformin in breast cancer (BC) patients, with inconclusive results. METHODS: We performed a nationwide population-based cohort study to evaluate if post-diagnostic use of low-dose aspirin, statins, and metformin was associated with BC-specific survival. Women aged ≥ 50 years and diagnosed with BC in 2004-2017, who survived ≥ 12 months after diagnosis (follow-up started 12 months after diagnosis), were identified in the Cancer Registry of Norway. The Norwegian Prescription Database provided information on prescriptions. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between post-diagnostic use and BC-specific survival, overall and by oestrogen receptor (ER) status. RESULTS: A total of 26,190 patients were included. Of these, 5324 (20%), 7591 (29%), and 1495 (6%) were post-diagnostic users of low-dose aspirin, statins, and metformin, respectively. The median follow-up was 6.1 years, and 2169 (8%) patients died from BC. HRs for use, compared to no use, were estimated at 0.96 (95% CI 0.85-1.08) for low-dose aspirin (ER+: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.83-1.13; ER-: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.29, p value for interaction = 0.562), 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.94) for statins (ER+: HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.09; ER-: HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-1.00, p value for interaction = 0.259), and 0.70 (95% CI 0.51-0.96) for metformin (compared to use of non-metformin antidiabetics) (ER+: HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-1.01; ER-: HR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.72-3.62, p value for interaction = 0.077). CONCLUSION: We found evidence supporting an association between post-diagnostic use of statins and metformin and survival, in patients with BC. Our findings indicate potential differences according to ER status.

Lung cancer registries in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden: a comparison and proposal for harmonization.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in all Nordic countries which, though similar in demographics and healthcare systems, have noticeable differences in lung cancer survival. Historically, Denmark and Finland have had higher lung cancer incidences and lower survival than Norway and Sweden. All four countries have national cancer registries. Data in these registries are often compared, but their full potential as a source of learning across the Nordic countries is impeded by differences between the registries. In this paper, we describe and compare the Nordic registries on lung cancer-specific data and discuss how a more harmonized registration practice could increase their usefulness as a source for mutual learning and quality improvements. METHODS: We describe and compare the characteristics of data on lung cancer cases from registries in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Moreover, we compare the results from the latest annual reports and specify how data may be acquired from the registries for research. RESULTS: Denmark has a separate clinical lung cancer registry with more detailed data than the other Nordic countries. Finland and Norway report lung cancer survival as relative survival, whereas Denmark and Sweden report overall survival. The Danish Lung Cancer Registry and the Swedish Cancer Registry do not receive data from the Cause of Death registries in contrast to the Finnish Cancer Registry and the Cancer Registry of Norway. CONCLUSION: The lung cancer registries in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden have high level of completeness. However, several important differences between the registries may bias comparative analyses.

ß-blockers and breast cancer survival by molecular subtypes: a population-based cohort study and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The association between use of ß-blockers and breast cancer (BC) prognosis has been investigated in several observational studies, with conflicting results. We performed a nationwide cohort study and a meta-analysis to investigate the association, and assess if it varied between molecular subtypes of BC. METHODS: We identified women aged ≥50 years with BC diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 in Norway. We used Cox regression models to estimate the association between ß-blocker use at diagnosis and BC-specific survival, overall and by molecular subtype. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies that reported molecular subtype-specific estimates of this association. RESULTS: We included 30,060 women, of which 4461 (15%) used ß-blockers. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 2826 (9%) died of BC. Overall, ß-blocker use was not associated with BC-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.19). We found an association only in triple-negative BC (TNBC) patients (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47-0.91). This was confirmed in the meta-analysis: ß-blocker use was associated with progression/recurrence-free (HR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.38-0.89) and BC-specific survival (HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55-1.00) in TNBC patients only. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of BC patients and in the meta-analysis, ß-blocker use was associated with prolonged BC-specific survival only in TNBC patients.

Antimuscarinics and lung cancer survival: A Norwegian population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies have reported an association between antimuscarinics and reduced risk of cancer, including lung cancer (LC). However, the potential association between antimuscarinic use and LC prognosis has not previously been assessed. In a large population-based cohort, we aimed to investigate the association between the use of antimuscarinics and LC-specific survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Norwegian residents, aged ≥ 50 years, and diagnosed with LC between 2005 and 2018, were identified in the Cancer Registry of Norway, and information on filled prescriptions was obtained from the Norwegian Prescription Database. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the association between peri-diagnostic and post-diagnostic use of antimuscarinics and LC-specific survival. RESULTS: We included 26,693 patients with incident primary invasive LC. Of these, 466 (1.7 %) were peri-diagnostic users, and 877 (3.3 %) were post-diagnostic users of antimuscarinics, respectively. During a median follow-up of nine months, 18,088 (67.8 %) patients died due to LC. In the overall LC population, the HRs for the association between the use of antimuscarinics, compared to no use, were estimated at 1.01 (95 %CI: 0.90-1.12) for peri-diagnostic use, and 0.84 (95 %CI: 0.77-0.92) for post-diagnostic use. The association with post-diagnostic use was observed in many subgroups defined by sex, age, smoking status, histopathology, and stage, except for patients with unspecified or other histopathology than small cell LC and non-small cell LC, and for patients with local disease. The association was observed in patients treated with chemotherapy (HR = 0.75, 95 %CI: 0.64-0.88), but not in those not treated with chemotherapy (HR = 1.00, 95 %CI: 0.86-1.17; p for interaction: 0.007). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a possible association between use of antimuscarinics and longer LC-specific survival. More studies are warranted to investigate the use of antimuscarinics to possibly prolong LC prognosis.