Travelling With Children on Home Parenteral Nutrition.

BACKGROUND: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is an established therapy in children with intestinal failure. Parenteral nutrition (PN) management allows most paediatric patients to participate in age-appropriate activities; however, HPN may lead to significant restrictions, particularly going on holiday. We aimed to identify sociodemographic and illness-specific variables that influence if and how families with children on HPN travel. METHODS: A standardised questionnaire was sent to all 40 children on HPN within a large tertiary intestinal failure centre in the United Kingdom. Depending on whether the family had/had not been on holiday since their child had started HPN, questions were asked to understand the reasons for not travelling or to gather information about individual travel experiences. RESULTS: A total of 30 children were enrolled, 20 of 30 went at least once on holiday, and 5 of 30 travelled more than once per year, 70% travelled outside Britain. Going on vacation was more common, the longer the child had been on HPN (P = 0.022); hours spent on PN tolerance of enteral feeds or the child's age did not influence travel behaviour; 80% of parents who went on vacation had a good/worthy experience, 95% would travel again. The biggest reported obstacle was the transportation of PN bags. Ten families sacrificed a holiday over fear that it may be difficult to arrange or because of the child's unstable medical condition. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of families chose to go on holiday away from home despite their child being on HPN. The experience is considered good by most.

Mediterranean diet and cancer: epidemiological evidence and mechanism of selected aspects.

BACKGROUND: Populations living in the area of the Mediterranean Sea suffered by decreased incidence of cancer compared with those living in the regions of northern Europe and US countries, attributed to healthier dietary habits. Nowadays, we are assisting to a moving away from the traditional Mediterranean dietary pattern, but whether this changing is influencing risk of cancers is still unclear. The aim of the study was to review recent evidence on potential relationship between the adherence to the Mediterranean diet and cancer. DISCUSSION: The most recent pooled analyses of epidemiological studies supported strongly the hypothesis that the Mediterranean diet may play a role in preventing several types of cancers, especially those of digestive tract, whereas contrasting results were reported for hormone-dependent cancers. Specific aspects of the Mediterranean diet such as high fruit and vegetables and low red processed meat intake may explain such protective effects. Moreover, evidence regarding olive oil and whole grains increase the beneficial effects of such dietary pattern against cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Literature evidence actually demonstrates that the increased adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern is beneficial to health across populations and may translate a protective effect with certain cancers.

Nutritional intervention in head and neck cancer patients during chemo-radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Head and neck cancer patients experience unintentional weight loss and malnutrition at diagnosis, during oncologic treatment, and after the end of therapy because of reduction of eating ability. The aim of the present study was to assess nutrition intervention efficacy in maintaining basal nutritional conditions. METHODS: Head and neck cancer patient candidates for chemoradiotherapy and requiring enteral nutrition (EN) support through gastrostomy, according to international guidelines, were included in the study. Nutritional intervention aimed to reach 30 kcal/kg/d, considering both EN and oral intake. Adjustments were made during and after treatment, aiming to maintain stable or improving nutritional indicators. Anthropometry, body composition measured by bioelectrical impedance vector analysis, and oral and EN intake were monitored at baseline (before chemoradiotherapy) and at 1, 3, and 6 mo. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were evaluated; 35 patients completed follow-up at 6 mo and were included in the analysis. At baseline, mean weight loss in the last 6 mo was 12 ± 7.9%; mean body mass index and phase angle were 20.6 ± 3.9 kg/m2 and 4.8 ± 1.2°. Before chemoradiotherapy 21 patients (60%) were able to eat; the percentage decreased during and after treatment to 34.3% (P = 0.026) at 1 and 3 mo and at 51.4% at 6 mo. From the analysis, a mean daily energy intake of 35 ± 10 kcal/kg was needed to maintain stable body weight and phase angle during and after treatment. CONCLUSION: To preserve body weight and composition, we identified an energy requirement greater than expected both during and after chemoradiotherapy.