Quality Management System in Clinical Digital Pathology Operations at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Digital pathology workflows can improve pathology operations by allowing reliable and fast retrieval of digital images, digitally reviewing pathology slides, enabling remote work and telepathology, use of computer-aided tools, and sharing of digital images for research and educational purposes. The need for quality systems is a prerequisite for successful clinical-grade digital pathology adoption and patient safety. In this article, we describe the development of a structured digital pathology laboratory quality management system (QMS) for clinical digital pathology operations at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK). This digital pathology-specific QMS development stemmed from the gaps that were identified when MSK integrated digital pathology into its clinical practice. The digital scan team in conjunction with the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine quality team developed a QMS tailored to the scanning operation to support departmental and institutional needs. As a first step, systemic mapping of the digital pathology operations identified the prescan, scan, and postscan processes; instrumentation; and staffing involved in the digital pathology operation. Next, gaps identified in quality control and quality assurance measures led to the development of standard operating procedures and training material for the different roles and workflows in the process. All digital pathology-related documents were subject to regulatory review and approval by departmental leadership. The quality essentials were developed into an extensive Digital Pathology Quality Essentials framework to specifically address the needs of the growing clinical use of digital pathology technologies. Using the unique digital experience gained at MSK, we present our recommendations for QMS for large-scale digital pathology operations in clinical settings.

Validation of a digital pathology system including remote review during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Remote digital pathology allows healthcare systems to maintain pathology operations during public health emergencies. Existing Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments regulations require pathologists to electronically verify patient reports from a certified facility. During the 2019 pandemic of COVID-19 disease, caused by the SAR-CoV-2 virus, this requirement potentially exposes pathologists, their colleagues, and household members to the risk of becoming infected. Relaxation of government enforcement of this regulation allows pathologists to review and report pathology specimens from a remote, non-CLIA certified facility. The availability of digital pathology systems can facilitate remote microscopic diagnosis, although formal comprehensive (case-based) validation of remote digital diagnosis has not been reported. All glass slides representing routine clinical signout workload in surgical pathology subspecialties at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were scanned on an Aperio GT450 at ×40 equivalent resolution (0.26 µm/pixel). Twelve pathologists from nine surgical pathology subspecialties remotely reviewed and reported complete pathology cases using a digital pathology system from a non-CLIA certified facility through a secure connection. Whole slide images were integrated to and launched within the laboratory information system to a custom vendor-agnostic, whole slide image viewer. Remote signouts utilized consumer-grade computers and monitors (monitor size, 13.3-42 in.; resolution, 1280 × 800-3840 × 2160 pixels) connecting to an institution clinical workstation via secure virtual private network. Pathologists subsequently reviewed all corresponding glass slides using a light microscope within the CLIA-certified department. Intraobserver concordance metrics included reporting elements of top-line diagnosis, margin status, lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion, pathology stage, and ancillary testing. The median whole slide image file size was 1.3 GB; scan time/slide averaged 90 s; and scanned tissue area averaged 612 mm2. Signout sessions included a total of 108 cases, comprised of 254 individual parts and 1196 slides. Major diagnostic equivalency was 100% between digital and glass slide diagnoses; and overall concordance was 98.8% (251/254). This study reports validation of primary diagnostic review and reporting of complete pathology cases from a remote site during a public health emergency. Our experience shows high (100%) intraobserver digital to glass slide major diagnostic concordance when reporting from a remote site. This randomized, prospective study successfully validated remote use of a digital pathology system including operational feasibility supporting remote review and reporting of pathology specimens, and evaluation of remote access performance and usability for remote signout.