IFNL3 (IL28B) polymorphism does not predict long-term response to interferon therapy in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients.

UNLABELLED: The impact of IFNL3 (IL28B) polymorphism on response to interferon (IFN) treatment in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is controversial. We aimed to investigate whether IFNL3 polymorphism (rs12979860) influences the long-term response of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment to conventional IFN. DESIGN: Ninety-seven HBeAg-positive patients treated with IFN were evaluated in this study. Associations were investigated between IFNL3 genotypes and (i) HBeAg seroconversion at the end of treatment (EOT), (ii) sustained virological response (SVR) and (iii) HBsAg seroconversion through long-term follow-up (LTFU). Patients were followed for a median of 14 years. The majority of patients were infected with HBV genotype A (69.6%) and were Caucasian (77.9%). Ninety-five patients were genotyped at rs12979860. Similar IFNL3 distribution was observed among the different ethnicities (P = 0.62) or across HBV genotypes A through G (P = 0.70). Thirty-six patients experienced HBeAg seroconversion at EOT; HBeAg seroconversion rates were 37.0 and 35.5% in patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes, respectively (P = 0.82). Among the 44 patients (45%) who achieved a SVR, SVR rates were 48.9 and 39.6% in patients with CC and CT/TT IL28B genotypes, respectively (P = 0.80). HBsAg seroconversion occurred through LTFU in 28 patients. HBsAg seroconversion rates were 25.5 and 31.2% in patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes, respectively (P = 0.51). No significant relationship between IFNL3 rs12979860 and fibrosis stage was observed (P = 0.85). IFNL3 genotype was neither associated with SVR, nor with HBeAg seroconversion and long-term HBsAg seroconversion in HBeAg-positive CHB patients responding to IFN therapy.

[Treatment of chronic hepatitis B]. / Traitement de l'hépatite chronique B.

SUMMARY: In recent years, marked progress has been made in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Several agents have been approved: interferon alpha-(IFN), pegylated interferon alpha2a (PEG-IFN alpha2a), lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine and recently, tenofovir. Each drug has advantages and limitations. IFN and PEG-IFN alpha2a have the advantage of inducing a sustained virologic response after a defined, limited course of treatment. However, these drugs are only effective in a minority of patients and have frequent side effects. Analogues have the advantage of being administered orally, with good safety profiles and a potent antiviral effect. However, these drugs need to be administered indefinitely since withdrawal of therapy is generally associated with reactivation, and a sustained response is uncommon except in HBeAg positive patients who develop HBe seroconversion. In case of HBe seroconversion, therapy should usually be continued for at least another 24 weeks. The efficacy of lamivudine is limited by the emergence of lamivudine-resistant HBV. Adefovir is associated with a moderate incidence of resistance but its antiviral effect is not optimal. Entecavir has shown to be more effective with a favourable safety profile and a low incidence of resistance. Telbivudine is more potent and has a lower rate of resistance than lamivudine but the resistance rate is significantly higher than other approved drugs. Tenofovir has a potent antiviral effect with a good resistance profile. The future of chronic hepatitis B therapy appears to be different drug combinations. Normally the advantage of drug combinations versus monotherapy should be additive or synergistic antiviral effects and a decrease in viral resistance. Unfortunately, there are few data available and none of the evaluated analogue combinations have been shown to be better than monotherapy. The only combination which has shown a synergistic effect is of pegylated interferon alpha2a with lamivudine. Therefore, combinations of pegylated interferon with the most potent analogues need to be evaluated. The ultimate goal of therapy is HBsAg seroconversion which is more often observed with interferon. Indeed, quantification of serum HBsAg will be a useful tool to predict the treatment outcome. More potent drugs and new combinations as well as understanding the mechanisms of viral resistance should be evaluated to improve the efficacy of treatment.

A Model-Based Illustrative Exploratory Approach to Optimize the Dosing of Peg-IFN/RBV in Cirrhotic Hepatitis C Patients Treated With Triple Therapy.

Hézode et al. recently reported the frequent occurrence of anemia and thrombocytopenia in the ANRS-CO20-CUPIC cohort of hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhotic experienced patients treated with pegylated-interferon (Peg-IFN), ribavirin (RBV), and telaprevir or boceprevir.1,2 Using frequent measurements of serum drug concentrations, hemoglobin, and platelet concentrations obtained in 15 patients of this cohort, we show how an on-treatment model-based approach could be used to individualize dose regimen and avoid the occurrence of RBV-induced anemia and Peg-IFN-induced thrombocytopenia.