Myocardial distribution of coronary blood flow in the isolated supported heart preparation.

The regional distribution of myocardial blood flow was studied by use of radioactive microspheres (15 micro-meters [mum]) under control conditions and during an intracoronary infusion of norepinephrine (2mug/min). In control experiments endocardial blood flow was generally greater than epicardial flow; during administration of norepinephrine the endocardium received significantly less blood flow. It is proposed that normally the endocardium is well perfused, but under conditions of stress, eg, norepinephrine infusion in the presence of a constant coronary blood flow, decreased endocardial blood flow results.

Effects of acebutolol and propranolol on left ventricular performance assessed by echocardiography.

To assess the effects of acebutolol and propranolol on resting left ventricular function, 21 patients with coronary artery disease were studied. A baseline echocardiogram was obtained on day 1, and in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study the patients received 40 mg propranolo every 8 hr for 1 wk, 300 mg acebutolol every 8 hr for 1 wk, and 1 capsule placebo every 8 hr for 1 wk. On days 8, 15, and 22, after an echocardiogram at 7:30 A.M. (i.e., 7.5 hr after the midnight dose), they received double-blind randomized, crossover medications (acebutolol 300 mg, propranolol 40 mg, or placebo). The echocardiogram was repeated at 1.2, and 4 hr after placebo or propranolol and at 2, 3, and 5 hr after acebutolol. The left ventricular end diastolic dimension, left ventricular end systolic dimension, percent systolic shortening of the left ventricular minor axis, and ejection fraction were determined. We found that there was no significant difference between control values for any of the above parameters and those obtained at 1, 2, 4, or 7.5 hr after propranolol or placebo and at 2, 3, 5, or 7.5 hr after acebutolol. We conclude that in the doses used, acebutolol and propranolol do not induce depression of resting left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease who have normal or near normal left ventricular function at rest.

Tolerance and beta-adrenergic blocking activity of flestolol, a short-acting beta blocker.

The tolerance and beta-adrenergic blocking activity of flestolol, a short-acting beta-blocker, was investigated in 30 subjects. Flestolol infused intravenously at doses up to 100 micrograms/kg/min was found to be well tolerated. A dose-dependent attenuation of isoproterenol-induced tachycardia and increase in systolic blood pressure occurred with flestolol at doses ranging from 0.5 to 15.0 micrograms/kg/min. The average percent reduction in isoproterenol-induced tachycardia (beta-blockade) at each dose of flestolol, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 15.0, and 50.0 micrograms/kg/min, was 15.1%, 45.9%, 67.0%, 85.9%, and 90.3%, respectively. The onset of beta-blockade occurred within 30 minutes. After the end of flestolol infusion there was a marked reduction in beta-blockade within 6 minutes, with complete recovery from beta-blockade within 30 to 45 minutes. There was a statistically significant (P less than 0.01) positive correlation between flestolol dosage and its blood levels (r = 0.91) as well as between the flestolol-induced beta-blockade and its dosage (r = 0.62).

Acebutolol and left ventricular function: assessment by radionuclide angiography.

We assessed the effects of acebutolol, a cardioselective beta blocker, on global and regional left ventricular function in 26 patients with chronic angina pectoris. All patients underwent rest and maximal supine bicycle exercise radionuclide angiography while on placebo and oral acebutolol (400 mg three times a day). Resting ejection fraction on placebo was 51 +/- 3% and on acebutolol was 54 +/- 3% (p less than 0.05). No resting ejection fraction decreased greater than or equal to 7%. Only one patient (resting ejection fraction 28% on placebo and 21% on acebutolol) developed signs of fluid retention. Exercise nuclear studies on placebo revealed responses consistent with coronary artery disease (abnormal ejection fraction response to exercise and regional wall motion abnormalities) in 24 of 26 patients. Peak exercise ejection fraction was of the same order on placebo and acebutolol (51 +/- 3% and 54 +/- 3%, p = NS). In four patients the ejection fraction response to exercise became normal and in five patients all regional wall motion abnormalities became normal on acebutolol. Cardioselective beta blockade with acebutolol in effective antianginal doses is safe and may improve resting and exercise ventricular function.

Intravenous nicardipine for the treatment of severe hypertension.

PURPOSE: Severe hypertension responds to treatment with nifedipine given orally or sublingually. Nicardipine hydrochloride, a water soluble dihydropyridine analogue similar to nifedipine, has less of a negative ionotropic effect and produces less reflex tachycardia than nifedipine. Our purpose was to assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of intravenous nicardipine in a group of patients with severe hypertension (defined as a supine diastolic blood pressure of more than 120 mm Hg). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with severe hypertension received treatment with intravenous nicardipine. Nicardipine titration was performed using doses of 4 to 15 mg/hour to achieve therapeutic goal (diastolic blood pressure 95 mm Hg or less or decrease in diastolic blood pressure of more than 25 mm Hg). After this therapeutic end-point was reached, patients received maintainance therapy with nicardipine for varying lengths of time: one hour (Group I), six hours (Group II), or 24 hours. When blood pressure control was lost, patients in Groups I and II entered a second maintenance period lasting a maximum of 24 hours. Onset and offset of action of nicardipine at various infusion rates and times of infusion were measured. RESULTS: Onset time to achieve therapeutic response was rapid at 15 mg/hour (0.31 +/- 0.13 hours) when compared with lower doses (1.11 +/- 0.36 hours at 4 mg/hour; 0.54 +/- 0.09 hours at 5 mg/hour; 0.52 +/- 0.09 hours at 7 to 7.5 mg/hour). Those who showed a therapeutic response received maintenance infusions with nicardipine for one (n = 7), six (n = 6), or 24 (n = 5) hours. Sustained blood pressure control at a constant rate of nicardipine infusion was seen in all patients during the maintenance period. After discontinuation of nicardipine, the time for offset of action (increase in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or more) was independent of duration of infusion. Decreases in both systolic and diastolic pressures correlated well with plasma nicardipine levels. Heart rate increased by about 10 beats/minute, but this increase did not correlate with plasma nicardipine levels. Side effects were minimal, consisting of headache and flushing. In seven patients, local phlebitis developed at the site of infusion. This occurred after at least 14 hours of infusion at a single site, and the incidence can probably be reduced by shortening the infusion time at a single site. CONCLUSION: Nicardipine appears to be a safe and effective drug for intravenous use in the treatment of severe hypertension.

Effects of esmolol on cardiac function: evaluation by noninvasive techniques.

In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study, the effects of esmolol and propranolol were examined at rest and during peak upright exercise in 15 patients. At rest, both esmolol and propranolol significantly decreased heart rate, systolic blood pressure, rate-pressure product, left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac index and right ventricular ejection fraction. During exercise, significant decreases were also found in heart rate, systolic blood pressure and cardiac index in both treatment groups. No significant differences were found between mean esmolol and mean propranolol measurements at rest and during exercise, except for the exercise systolic blood pressure, which was lower during esmolol infusion. Blood levels of esmolol decreased markedly by 30 minutes postinfusion, as did its beta-blocking action. Esmolol was well tolerated with no important local, systemic or laboratory abnormalities. Thus, the effects of esmolol on cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise are similar to those of propranolol.

Comparison of the antiarrhythmic effects of acebutolol and propranolol in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias.

This study was designed to assess the relative antiarrhythmic activity of fixed doses of 2 beta-adrenergic blocking agents, propranolol and acebutolol, in a prospective double-blind crossover trial. Twenty-one patients who had at least 30 premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) per hour while receiving placebo were entered into the study. Ten patients were randomized to initially receive propranolol, 40 mg every 8 hours, and 11 were assigned to receive acebutolol, 300 mg every 8 hours. After 6 weeks of treatment, patients were weaned off medication for 1 week and then placed on placebo for 1 week. Eighteen patients were available and eligible for crossover to the alternative regimen for an additional 6 weeks. All 21 patients completed courses with propranolol and 17 completed courses with acebutolol. The mean number of PVCs per hour during placebo, propranolol and acebutolol treatment were 267, 87 and 119, respectively. Using paired t test statistics on observation differences, both propranolol and acebutolol significantly reduced the number of PVCs per hour compared with placebo, whereas similar analysis revealed no significant difference in the antiarrhythmic effect. However, with the current sample size the power of the test is too low for the latter conclusion to be stated with confidence. Side effects were mild and infrequent, requiring discontinuation of acebutolol in 2 patients and discontinuation of propranolol in 1. Thus, acebutolol is a safe and effective antiarrhythmic agent and compares favorably with propranolol.

Safety and efficacy of flestolol, a new ultrashort-acting beta-adrenergic blocking agent, for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Flestolol, a new ultrashort-acting (half-life 6.9 minutes) beta-blocking drug, was administered by intravenous infusion to 18 patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter and rapid ventricular response (120 beats/min or more for at least 30 minutes). Drug dose of flestolol was progressively increased until at least 1 of 3 endpoints was achieved: at least a 20% reduction in heart rate from baseline, heart rate 100 beats/min or less, or conversion to normal sinus rhythm. Flestolol was then administered as a maintenance infusion up to 24 hours. When flestolol was discontinued, patients were monitored for 1 additional hour. The mean ventricular response at baseline of 133 +/- 12 beats/min decreased to 103 +/- 20 beats/min at the end of flestolol titration (p less than 0.0001). Fourteen patients (78%) achieved defined endpoints. All 14 patients who continued to receive maintenance infusion had a sustained response. When flestolol was discontinued, ventricular response increased 33 +/- 23% within 60 minutes. The only adverse effect seen was hypotension in 2 patients. Flestolol is effective in slowing ventricular response in new-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter, maintains a therapeutic effect during continuous infusion and rapidly loses therapeutic effect when discontinued.

Electropharmacology of flestolol for supraventricular tachycardia without associated structural heart disease.

Flestolol is an ultrashort-acting beta-blocking drug with a half-life of 6.9 minutes. Its antiarrhythmic efficacy was studied in 21 patients with spontaneous and inducible supraventricular tachycardia: atrioventricular (AV) nodal tachycardia in 6 patients and orthodromic AV reciprocating tachycardia in 15. It increased the effective refractory period of the AV node in all patients with AV nodal tachycardia (fast pathway, p less than 0.02; slow pathway, p less than 0.01), but did not alter the anterograde (n = 8) or retrograde (n = 9) refractory periods of accessory pathways. Flestolol prevented initiation of tachycardia by causing block in anterograde AV nodal conduction. It was more effective in patients with AV nodal tachycardia (5 of 6) than in those with AV reciprocating tachycardia (4 of 15, p less than 0.03). In patients in whom it was ineffective, the mean tachycardia cycle length increased by 54 ms because of an increase in AH interval (p less than 0.0001, n = 11). The cycle length of tachycardia induced 30 minutes after infusion was similar to the cycle length in the control state (354 vs 355 ms, n = 16). Flestolol's kinetics permitted clinically indicated electropharmacologic testing of a second antiarrhythmic drug in 8 patients and control of ventricular rate until arrhythmia surgery in 1 patient with incessant tachycardia. No hypotension or toxicity occurred. Our findings indicate that flestolol's principal antiarrhythmic effects are on the AV node, similar to the effects of other beta-blocking drugs. Its ultrashort duration of action is an advantage during electropharmacologic testing.

Electrophysiology of esmolol.

The electrophysiologic characteristics of esmolol were studied in 14 patients. Ten men and 4 women, mean age 57 years, were electrophysiologically evaluated at baseline, and also at 4 to 8 minutes after the administration of a maintenance infusion of esmolol. Plasma samples for esmolol blood levels were drawn at 10 minutes of the maintenance infusion, at the end of the maintenance infusion and 30 minutes after the maintenance infusion was discontinued. Results of this study showed that esmolol has typical beta-blocker electrophysiologic effects. Its major action was on sinus node function; it prolonged this basic sinus cycle length but had no significant effect on intrinsic automaticity as reflected by the corrected sinus node recovery time and sinoatrial conduction. Direct effects on atrioventricular (AV) nodal function were reflected by effects on AV nodal conduction and refractoriness. There was no direct effect on atrial function and, as expected, no effect on His-Purkinje or ventricular function. The intensity of esmolol's electrophysiologic effects on sinus node function, AV nodal conduction and AH interval is comparable to those of other beta blockers.

Effects of intravenous infusion of esmolol and propranolol on biventricular performance at rest and during exercise as assessed by quantitative radionuclide angiography.

This double-blind, randomized, crossover study examined the effects of intravenous infusion of esmolol (a new ultra-short-acting beta-receptor blocking agent) and propranolol on cardiovascular performance at rest and during peak upright exercise in 15 patients. Biventricular function was assessed by means of first-pass radionuclide ventriculography with a computerized multicrystal camera. At rest, significant treatment differences between esmolol and propranolol vs baseline were found for the heart rate, systolic blood pressure, double product, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), systolic blood pressure to end-systolic volume ratio, cardiac index and right ventricular EF. During exercise, significant treatment differences were also found for the heart rate, systolic blood pressure, double product, right ventricular EF and cardiac index. The mean baseline measurements were higher than the mean treatment measurements, but no significant differences were found between mean esmolol and mean propranolol measurements at rest and during exercise except for the exercise systolic blood pressure, which was lower during esmolol infusion. The magnitude of drug effect was greater at the time of exercise than at rest. The blood level of esmolol decreased markedly by 30 minutes after infusion. Esmolol was well tolerated, with no important local, systemic or laboratory abnormalities. Thus, the effects of esmolol on cardiovascular performance at rest and exercise are similar to those of propranolol.

Combined terazosin and verapamil therapy in essential hypertension. Hemodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions.

alpha-Blockers and calcium antagonists are commonly used in the treatment of hypertension, but few data are available concerning first dose or steady state (SS) hemodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects of these drugs when they are used in combination therapy. To examine these interactions, we measured supine and standing blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and cardiac index (CI) for 6 h in 24 hypertensive patients after 2 weeks of placebo, again after the first dose or 3 weeks of therapy (SS) with either 120 mg verapamil (V) twice a day, or 1 mg terazosin (T) titrated weekly to 5 mg daily, and finally when T was added to V (group VT) or V added to T (group TV), acutely and at SS. Changes in supine hemodynamics when T was added to V or when V was added to T were similar and included a further reduction in BP, a transient increase in HR, and little or no change in CI. Both groups experienced significant decreases in standing blood pressure, especially 0.5 to 2 h following initiation of combination therapy despite significant increases in standing HR and CI. Standing BP tended to be lower in group TV after the first dose, but minimum standing systolic BP was not significantly different between groups (group TV 97 mm Hg at 1 h; group VT 109 mm Hg at 1.5 h, P > .05). Four patients in group TV and two in group VT experienced symptomatic orthostatic hypotension with the first dose of double-agent treatment. Pharmacokinetic interactions, including an increase in the bioavailability of T when V was added, did not correlate with the degree of orthostasis. After 3 weeks of combined therapy, the orthostatic change in BP had attenuated and symptoms had improved in all patients. We conclude that T and V represent an effective combination for the treatment of essential hypertension, but that orthostasis may result when initiating combination therapy. The orthostasis seen in some patients appears to be due to the combined vasodilatory effects rather than negative ionotropic or chronotropic effects.

Terazosin: a new alpha adrenoceptor blocking drug.

Terazosin (Hytrin; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) is a new, selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocking agent used on once-a-day basis for therapy of mild-to-moderate hypertension. Its pharmacologic properties are similar to those of prazosin. Terazosin however, differs from prazosin in that its water solubility is 25 times greater than that of prazosin and its elimination half-life is about three times that of prazosin. Greater water solubility facilitates intravenous formulation, and longer half-life allows once-daily administration of terazosin. Terazosin is effective in lowering blood pressure and has a beneficial effect on plasma lipid profile. The major advantage of terazosin compared with prazosin, however, is its long duration of action. Terazosin is safe and effective when used in combination with diuretics and other antihypertensive agents, and in the long-term treatment of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Analysis of adverse events in a dose titration study.

The authors have examined the analysis of adverse event data from an efficacy dose escalation trial. Unlike the analysis of efficacy data, the assumption that when a patient experiences an adverse event at a given dose, he or she will experience the same at a greater dosage level was not applicable in the analysis of adverse event data. Because the time effect is confounded with the dose effect in a dose escalation design, any assessment of a dose-effect relationship from such a scheme is found to be preliminary and suspect. For drugs that need to be dosed with a titration schedule, a time-dose-specific incidence of an adverse event provides more useful information than a dose-specific incidence. The pace of dose titration, which was found to be important in the manifestation of an adverse event, also needs to be specified. These aspects are illustrated with data from a specially designed trial. The entire study contained a placebo arm and three arms of an active drug randomized in a parallel comparative fashion. Within each of the three active drug arms, a forced titration scheme was used to raise the dose to different levels, which distinguished the three arms. With an efficacy dose titration design, the dose-response relationship for adverse events cannot be determined without incorporating a placebo arm and other arms with different maximum allowable doses. For drugs that need to be administered with a titration scheme, incidence of adverse events needs to be presented with the dosage, the time, and the pace of titration.

Flestolol: an ultra-short-acting beta-adrenergic blocking agent.

Flestolol (ACC-9089) is a nonselective, competitive, ultra-short-acting beta-adrenergic blocking agent, without any intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Flestolol is metabolized by plasma esterases and has an elimination half-life of approximately 6.5 minutes. This agent was well tolerated in healthy volunteers at doses up to 100 micrograms/kg/min. In long-term infusion studies, flestolol was well tolerated at the effective beta-blocking dose (5 micrograms/kg/min) for up to seven days. Flestolol blood concentrations increased linearly with increasing dose and good correlation exists between blood concentrations of flestolol and beta-adrenergic blockade. Flestolol produced a dose-dependent attenuation of isoproterenol-induced tachycardia. Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic effects of flestolol are similar to those of other beta blockers. In contrast with other beta blockers, flestolol-induced effects reverse rapidly (within 30 minutes) following discontinuation because of its short half-life. Flestolol effectively reduced heart rate in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. In patients with unstable angina, flestolol infusion was found to be safe and effective in controlling chest pain. It is concluded that flestolol is a potent, well-tolerated, ultra-short-acting beta-adrenergic blocking agent. Use of flestolol in the critical care setting is currently undergoing investigation.

Effect of age and dose on the incidence of adverse events in the treatment of hypertension in patients receiving terazosin.

Selected adverse events were evaluated from the combined randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials (once-a-day or twice-a-day; monotherapy or combination therapy) of terazosin in hypertensive patients. The designs of these clinical trials were either titration to response or titration to a fixed dose. A grouped survival methodology using logistic regression, developed by Hosmane et al, was used to study the effects of age and dose on the incidence of adverse events. The analysis indicated that except for palpitations, nausea, headache, and dizziness the incidence of adverse events was not significantly related to either age or dose. Palpitations and headache decreased with increasing age and increasing dose and age, respectively. Dizziness and nausea increased at the maximum dose of 20 mg, but not at the 5- or 10-mg doses.

Effects of esmolol on airway function in patients with asthma.

In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study in ten patients with asthma, the effects on specific airway resistance of esmolol, a new ultra-short-acting beta 1-selective adrenoceptor blocker, were compared with those of placebo. Specific airway resistance was measured during increasing doses of esmolol infusion, during dry air provocation tests, and following isoproterenol inhalation. These same studies were later carried out on six of ten patients following intravenous propranolol infusion. All patients were able to tolerate the maximum dose of esmolol (300 micrograms/kg/min); treatment differences between esmolol and placebo were not found. In contrast, intravenous propranolol produced marked symptomatic bronchoconstriction after the lowest dose (1 mg) in two of six patients. Esmolol produced slight but statistically significant enhancement of patients' sensitivity to dry air provocation. Similarly, a slight but significant inhibition of bronchomotor sensitivity to isoproterenol was noted during esmolol infusion. After infusion of 5 mg of intravenous propranolol, one of four patients had a clinically significant increase in sensitivity to dry air. It is concluded that esmolol, because of its short duration of action and relative lack of effect on airway resistance, may be preferred over propranolol in patients with asthma who require treatment with an intravenous beta-blocking agent.

Clinical experience with esmolol, a short-acting beta-adrenergic blocker in cardiac arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia.

The efficacy and safety of esmolol, an ultra-short-acting beta-adrenergic blocking agent (elimination half-life, 9 min), was investigated in 358 patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs) in three multicenter studies (placebo-controlled, propranolol-controlled, and open-label baseline-controlled) and in 19 patients with myocardial ischemia (acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina) in a single-center, open-label study. Esmolol was infused intravenously in doses ranging from 25 micrograms/kg/min to 300 micrograms/kg/min. In SVT studies, efficacy was judged by one or more of the following: a reduction of at least 15% to 20% from the average baseline heart rate, heart rate less than 100 beats/min, or conversion to normal sinus rhythm (NSR). Results revealed that esmolol was superior to placebo and equal to propranolol in controlling heart rate in SVT patients. Conversion to NSR was comparable in patients treated with esmolol (14%) and in those treated with propranolol (16%). The majority of patients achieved therapeutic response at esmolol doses of 200 micrograms/kg/min or less. Among esmolol-treated patients, recovery from beta blockade (i.e., heart rate approaching baseline levels) was achieved within ten minutes after discontinuation of infusion, indicating a brief duration of action of esmolol. In contrast, beta blockade persisted 4.5 hours after discontinuation of propranolol. In patients with myocardial ischemia, esmolol effectively reduced heart rate and blood pressure, thereby decreasing rate-pressure product. The most frequent adverse effect in patients treated with esmolol was hypotension. No clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were reported in esmolol-treated patients. Esmolol was well tolerated in patients infused for durations of up to 24 hours and in patients with conditions for which treatment with beta blockers is inappropriate. These results suggest that esmolol effectively and rapidly controls the heart rate in patients with SVT and in patients with acute myocardial ischemia. Furthermore, because of its short half-life, esmolol offers excellent benefits as compared with the currently available beta-adrenergic blockers in the treatment of critically ill patients. Esmolol was well tolerated by patients for whom beta blockers in general would be unsuitable.

Esmolol and the adrenergic response to perioperative stimuli.

Esmolol, an ultra-short-acting, cardioselective, beta-receptor blocking agent, has been developed for use in clinical conditions requiring controlled beta-receptor blockade. Its esterase-induced rapid metabolic inactivation and resulting brief pharmacologic effect provides control over the magnitude and duration of beta-receptor blockade. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, the effects of infusion of esmolol on the sympathetically mediated hemodynamic responses to stressful events during the perioperative period were evaluated in patients scheduled for surgical procedures under general anesthesia. In patients undergoing either noncardiac or cardiac surgical procedures, esmolol was effective in attenuating tachycardia that is normally seen during induction of anesthesia, laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, or sternotomy and aortic dissection by reducing the hemodynamic stress on the heart with negligible adverse effects. This much-desired cardioprotective effect of esmolol will be of special value to patients with coronary artery disease and patients with an unstable cardiovascular status who are undergoing major surgical procedures with general anesthesia.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of flestolol, a new short-acting, beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of flestolol, a new short-acting, beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist, were examined in nine healthy subjects after a constant intravenous infusion of 5 micrograms/kg/min for 72 hours. Flestolol blood levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. In all subjects, flestolol blood concentration attained steady state 30 minutes after initiation of infusion. The mean +/- standard deviation steady-state concentration of flestolol was 31.1 +/- 12.0 ng/mL. The elimination half-life averaged 7.2 minutes. The mean +/- standard deviation total body clearance was 181 +/- 66 mL/min/kg. The apparent volume of distribution and the area under the curve averaged 1.89 L/kg and 2.23 micrograms-hr/mL, respectively. Flestolol did not cause any significant change (P greater than .05) in the heart rate or systolic or diastolic blood pressure from the baseline. Flestolol significantly (P less than .05) attenuated the isoproterenol-induced increase in heart rate and systolic blood pressure and decrease in diastolic blood pressure in comparison with baseline. The average maximum reduction in isoproterenol tachycardia was in the range of 63% to 79% during flestolol infusion. There was a rapid recovery from beta blockade after termination of flestolol infusion; the recovery averaged 96% 20 minutes after the infusion was stopped. We conclude that flestolol exhibits a very short half-life and is cleared mainly by extrahepatic routes. It is an effective beta blocker and possesses a short duration of action.