Real-life analysis on safety and efficacy of asciminib for ponatinib pretreated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

Failure of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2GTKI) is a challenging situation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Asciminib, recently approved by the US Federal Drug Administration, has demonstrated in clinical trials a good efficacy and safety profile after failure of 2GTKI. However, no study has specifically addressed response rates to asciminib in ponatinib pretreated patients (PPT). Here, we present data on responses to asciminib from 52 patients in clinical practice, 20 of them (38%) with prior ponatinib exposure. We analyzed retrospectively responses and toxicities under asciminib and compared results between PPT and non-PPT patients.After a median follow-up of 30 months, 34 patients (65%) switched to asciminib due to intolerance and 18 (35%) due to resistance to prior TKIs. Forty-six patients (88%) had received at least 3 prior TKIs. Regarding responses, complete cytogenetic response was achieved or maintained in 74% and 53% for non-PPT and PPT patients, respectively. Deeper responses such as major molecular response and molecular response 4.5 were achieved in 65% and 19% in non-PPT versus 32% and 11% in PPT, respectively. Two patients (4%) harbored the T315I mutation, both PPT.In terms of toxicities, non-PPT displayed 22% grade 3-4 TEAE versus 20% in PPT. Four patients (20% of PPT) suffered from cross-intolerance with asciminib as they did under ponatinib.Our data supports asciminib as a promising alternative in resistant and intolerant non-PPT patients, as well as in intolerant PPT patients; the resistant PPT subset remains as a challenging group in need of further therapeutic options.

Relevance of early diagnosis in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: A single center's experience.

OBJECTIVES: This work aims to describe the proportion of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET) and thrombosis prior to the diagnosis who had erythrocytosis or thrombocytosis prior to the thrombosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 63 patients with PV and 130 with ET. RESULTS: In regard to PV, we found prior erythrocytosis in 7 (11.1%) of the 17 cases (27%) with thrombosis prior to diagnosis. In ET, we found prior thrombocytosis in 10 (7.7%) of the 25 cases (19.2%) with thrombosis prior to diagnosis. The median time between the laboratory finding and thrombosis was 8.2 months and 11.8 months for PV and TE, respectively. In both entities, patients with thrombosis prior to diagnosis had significantly lower survival. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with thrombosis prior to the diagnosis of PV and ET present with erythrocytosis or thrombocytosis prior to the episode of thrombosis. This could allow for anticipating diagnosis and treatment.

Kell hemolytic disease of the fetus. Combination treatment with plasmapheresis and intrauterine blood transfusion.

We report the case of a 36-year old pregnant woman with a Kell alloimmunization (anti-K1), probably secondary to a previous blood transfusion, and a severe hemolytic disease of the fetus. Once the first fetal blood transfusion by cordocentesis was performed, we started treatment with repeated plasmapheresis to maintain anti-K1 titer below 1:32. With this scheme we did not need to perform a second intrauterine fetal blood transfusion and only mild anemia was found in the newborn. Taking into account that the rate of serious complications with plasmapheresis is lower than that related with intrauterine blood transfusion, this could be an alternative approach to repeated transfusions.

Importancia del diagnóstico precoz en policitemia vera y trombocitemia esencial. Experiencia de un centro / Relevance of early diagnosis in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: a single center's experience

Objetivos: Describir la proporción de pacientes con policitemia vera (PV) o trombocitemia esencial (TE) y trombosis previa al diagnóstico que presentaban eritrocitosis o trombocitosis antes de la trombosis. Pacientes y métodos: Revisión retrospectiva de 63 pacientes con PV y 130 con TE. Resultados: En PV, encontramos eritrocitosis previa en 7 (11,1%) de los 17 casos (27%) con trombosis previa al diagnóstico. En TE, encontramos trombocitosis previa en 10 (7,7%) de los 25 casos (19,2%) con trombosis previa al diagnóstico. La mediana de tiempo entre el hallazgo analítico y la trombosis fue de 8,2 meses y 11,8 meses para PV y TE, respectivamente. En ambas entidades, los pacientes con trombosis previa al diagnóstico tenían una supervivencia significativamente menor. Conclusión: Una proporción significativa de pacientes con trombosis previa al diagnóstico de PV y TE presenta eritrocitosis o trombocitosis previa al episodio de trombosis, lo que permitiría anticipar el diagnóstico y el tratamiento (AU)

Objectives: This work aims to describe the proportion of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET) and thrombosis prior to the diagnosis who had erythrocytosis or thrombocytosis prior to thrombosis. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective review of 63 patients with PV and 130 with ET. Results: In regard to PV, we found prior erythrocytosis in 7 (11.1%) of the 17 cases (27%) with thrombosis prior to diagnosis. In ET, we found prior thrombocytosis in 10 (7.7%) of the 25 cases (19.2%) with thrombosis prior to diagnosis. The median time between the laboratory finding and thrombosis was 8.2 months and 11.8 months for PV and TE, respectively. In both entities, patients with thrombosis prior to diagnosis had significantly lower survival. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with thrombosis prior to the diagnosis of PV and ET present erythrocytosis or thrombocytosis prior to the episode of thrombosis. This could allow for anticipating diagnosis and treatment (AU)