Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Determinants and Relationship with Patient-Reported Health Status.

BACKGROUND: Accelerometer-measured physical activity is an increasingly used endpoint in heart failure (HF) trials. We investigated the determinants of accelerometer-measured physical activity and the relationship with patient-reported health status. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of the Empire HF trial, including outpatients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Physical activity was quantified as average accelerometer counts per minute (CPM) with higher values representing higher activity. We investigated associations between activity level and clinical variables, including age, sex, and body mass index, as well as patient-reported health status assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). RESULTS: Complete data were available in 180 (95%) patients (86% male, mean age 65 year). Baseline median physical activity level was 1318 CPM (Q1-Q3 1111-1585). Age and anemia were independently associated with activity level (ß-coefficients: -10 CPM per year age increase [95% CI -16 to -5.1], p=0.00015, and -126 CPM for anemia [95% CI -9.1 to -244], p=0.035). Significant independent associations were observed between activity level and all KCCQ summary scores (ß-coefficient point estimates of 3.7, 4.6, and 4.9 CPM, all p<0.02). For 12-week changes in KCCQ-summary scores, only the KCCQ-CSS was associated with activity level; mean increase of 17.5 CPM [95% CI 1.5 to 34.0], p=0.032, per 5-point increase in KCCQ-CSS. Associations were not modified by treatment allocation (interaction p-values>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFrEF, older age and anemia were independently associated with lower activity. Moreover, physical activity only weakly increased with better health status, suggesting that changes in physical activity reflect improvements in patients' health status to a limited degree. This highlights the need to better understand the endpoint with regards to all other health parameters to ease interpretation in future HF trials.

Empagliflozin to elderly and obese patients with increased risk of developing heart failure: Study protocol for the Empire Prevent trial program.

INTRODUCTION: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have previously demonstrated cardioprotective properties in patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting a preventive effect on heart failure (HF). The Empire Prevent trial program investigates the therapeutic potential for HF prevention by evaluating the cardiac, metabolic, and renal effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in patients with increased risk of developing HF, but without diabetes or established HF. METHODS: The Empire Prevent trial program is an investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized clinical trial program including elderly and obese patients (60-84 years, body mass index >28 kg/m2) with at least one manifestation of hypertension, cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease, but no history of diabetes or HF. The aims are to investigate the effects of empagliflozin on 1) physical capacity and left ventricular and atrial structural changes with peak oxygen consumption and left ventricular mass as primary endpoints (Empire Prevent Cardiac), and 2) cardiac-adipose tissue interaction and volume homeostasis with primary endpoints of changes in epicardial adipose tissue and estimated extracellular volume (Empire Prevent Metabolic). At present, 138 of 204 patients have been randomized in the Empire Prevent trial program. Patients are randomized 1:1 to 180 days treatment with empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo, while undergoing a comprehensive examination program at baseline and follow-up. DISCUSSION: The Empire Prevent trial program will mark the first step towards elucidating the potential of SGLT2 inhibition for HF prevention in an outpatient setting in elderly and obese patients with increased risk of developing HF, but with no history of diabetes or established HF. Furthermore, the Empire Prevent trial program will supplement the larger event-driven trials by providing mechanistic insights to the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Both parts of the trial program have been registered on September 13th 2021 (Clinical Trial Registration numbers: NCT05084235 and NCT05042973) before enrollment of the first patient. All patients will provide oral and written informed consent. The trial is approved by The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics and the Danish Medicines Agency. Data will be disseminated through scientific meetings and peer-reviewed journals irrespective of outcome.

Influence of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition on the efficacy of Empagliflozin on cardiac structure and function in patients with chronic heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction: The Empire HF trial.

Study objective: The objective was to assess the effect of ongoing angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor(ARNI) on the effect of the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin on left ventricular (LV) size and function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF). Design: Post hoc analysis of the Empire HF trial, an investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Participants: 190 patients with HFrEF with New York Heart association class I-III symptoms with an ejection fraction of 40 % or below. Patients were stratified according to ongoing ARNI treatment at baseline. Intervention: Empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Echocardiography at baseline and follow-up. Main outcome measures: Left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), left atrial volume index (LAVI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results: A total of 58 patients (31 %) received ARNI at baseline. Compared to with placebo, empagliflozin reduced the LVESVI ([-6.2 (-14.1 to 1.6); p = 0.12] and [-3.3 (-8.2 to 1.6); p = 0.19], interaction P = 0.49), LVEDVI ([-11.2 (-21.2 to -1.2); p = 0.03] and [-2.9 (-8.7 to 2.9); p = 0.32], interaction P = 0.13), and LAVI ([-3.9 (-9.1 to 1.2); p = 0.14] and. [-1.8 (-4.4 to 0.7); p = 0.16], respectively, interaction P = 0.9) in patients treated with and without ARNI at baseline, respectively. No treatment-by-ARNI subgroup interaction were found. Unaffected by baseline ARNI treatment, empagliflozin did not improve LVEF. Conclusion: The effect of empagliflozin on cardiac structure and function compared to placebo was not affected by background treatment with ARNI.