Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Idioma
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Angiol Sosud Khir ; 23(3): 133-139, 2017.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28902823

RESUMEN

The article is a literature review presenting a comparative analysis of 30-day risks of mortality and complications after carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty with stenting. The risks studied were as follows: myocardial infarction, stroke, transitory ischaemic attacks, bradycardia, hypotension, postoperative haematomas, and damages to the craniocerebral nerves. The authors analysed a series of recently published foreign studies and meta-analyses dedicated to the problem concerned. The obtained findings revealed that carotid endarterectomy turned out to be associated with a higher perioperative risk for the development of myocardial infarction, postoperative haematomas and damages to the craniocerebral nerves, whereas carotid angioplasty with stenting appeared to be associated with an increased risk for the development of stroke, bradycardia and hypotension within the first 30 postoperative days. As far as mortality is concerned, it proved to be relatively similar for both methods of revascularization. The use of systems of protection of the brain from embolism during stenting of carotid arteries decreases the perioperative risks, however, it seems difficult to unequivocally affirm which of the methods of cerebral protection demonstrates better results.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia/efectos adversos , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Angioplastia/métodos , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Medición de Riesgo/métodos
2.
Angiol Sosud Khir ; 23(4): 164-170, 2017.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29240071

RESUMEN

The article is a review containing a comparative analysis of the remote results in patients presenting with carotid artery atherosclerosis and treated by means of either stenting or carotid endarterectomy. More than ten international randomized studies have up to now been conducted. Some of them prove the advantage of using either carotid endarterectomy or stenting of carotid arteries, others show equivalence of both methods of treatment. Carotid endarterectomy is currently a preferred operation for carotid artery stenoses, with lower incidence of the development of postoperative strokes and restenoses in the remote period. But stenting is an alternative technique in patients with high operative risk. Therefore, the question of choosing an appropriate type of the intervention should be decided upon for each patient individually. A more definite conclusion to be made on advantages of carotid endarterectomy over endovascular angioplasty, or vice versa, requires further studying therapeutic outcomes during a longer follow-up period.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Angioplastia/efectos adversos , Angioplastia/instrumentación , Angioplastia/métodos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Humanos , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo/etiología , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo/prevención & control , Selección de Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Stents
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda