Solvent-cast 3D printing with molecular weight polymer blends to decouple effects of scaffold architecture and mechanical properties on mesenchymal stromal cell fate.

The biochemical and physical properties of a scaffold can be tailored to elicit specific cellular responses. However, it is challenging to decouple their individual effects on cell-material interactions. Here, we solvent-cast 3D printed different ratios of high and low molecular weight (MW) poly(caprolactone) (PCL) to fabricate scaffolds with significantly different stiffnesses without affecting other properties. Ink viscosity was used to match processing conditions between inks and generate scaffolds with the same surface chemistry, crystallinity, filament diameter, and architecture. Increasing the ratio of low MW PCL resulted in a significant decrease in modulus. Scaffold modulus did not affect human mesenchymal stromal cell (hMSC) differentiation under osteogenic conditions. However, hMSC response was significantly affected by scaffold stiffness in chondrogenic media. Low stiffness promoted more stable chondrogenesis whereas high stiffness drove hMSC progression toward hypertrophy. These data illustrate how this versatile platform can be used to independently modify biochemical and physical cues in a single scaffold to synergistically enhance desired cellular response.

Characterizing properties of scaffolds 3D printed with peptide-polymer conjugates.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a popular biomaterials fabrication technique because it enables scaffold composition and architecture to be tuned for different applications. Modifying these properties can also alter mechanical properties, making it challenging to decouple biochemical and physical properties. In this study, inks containing peptide-poly(caprolactone) (PCL) conjugates were solvent-cast 3D printed to create peptide-functionalized scaffolds. We characterized how different concentrations of hyaluronic acid-binding (HAbind-PCL) or mineralizing (E3-PCL) conjugates influenced properties of the resulting 3D-printed constructs. The peptide sequences CGGGRYPISRPRKR (HAbind-PCL; positively charged) and CGGGAAAEEE (E3-PCL; negatively charged) enabled us to evaluate how conjugate chemistry, charge, and concentration affected 3D-printed architecture, conjugate location, and mechanical properties. For both HAbind-PCL and E3-PCL, conjugate addition did not affect ink viscosity, filament diameter, scaffold architecture, or scaffold compressive modulus. Increasing conjugate concentration in the ink prior to printing correlated with an increase in peptide concentration on the scaffold surface. Interestingly, conjugate type affected final conjugate location within the 3D-printed filament cross-section. HAbind-PCL conjugates remained within the filament bulk while E3-PCL conjugates were located closer to the filament surface. E3-PCL at all concentrations did not affect mechanical properties, but an intermediate HAbind-PCL concentration resulted in a moderate decrease in filament tensile modulus. These data suggest final conjugate location within the filament bulk may influence mechanical properties. However, no significant differences were observed between PCL filaments printed without conjugates and filaments printed with higher HAbind-PCL concentrations. These results demonstrate that this 3D printing platform can be used to functionalize the surface without significant changes to the physical properties of the scaffold. The downstream potential of this strategy will enable decoupling of biochemical and physical properties to fine-tune cellular responses and support functional tissue regeneration.