RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the strength of 6-strand Lim-Tsai repair with 4-strand cruciate and Becker repair, which were done using braided polyblend. We hypothesized that the biomechanical strength of 4-strand repair could be as strong as 6-strand repair because of different flexor tendon repair configurations and uneven load bearing. METHODS: We harvested 60 porcine flexor tendons. A transverse cut at the middle of the tendons was made to perform tendon repair. Six-strand Lim-Tsai repair (consisting of 2 Lim-Tsai locking loops), 4-strand cruciate repair (with 3 cross-stitch loops), and 4-strand Becker repair (with 2 double cross-stitch locking loops) were used for the repairs. The repaired tendons were pulled until failure using a mechanical tester. We recorded ultimate tensile strength, load to 2-mm gap force, stiffness, and mechanism of failure. RESULTS: The Becker repairs had significantly greater tensile strength than the cruciate and Lim-Tsai repairs. The load to 2-mm gap force and stiffness were significantly greater for cruciate repairs and Becker repairs than Lim-Tsai repairs. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical strength of 4-strand and Becker repairs could be as strong as 6-strand Lim-Tsai repairs. This study implies that the number of strands crossing the repair site of tendons may not be proportional to the biomechanical strength of flexor tendon repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hand surgeons are urged to be aware of the biomechanic characteristics of different flexor tendon repair techniques used in the clinical setting.