Assessing Preferences of Facial Appearance in Transgender and Gender Nonbinary Patients.

BACKGROUND: We designed a survey to evaluate preferences of facial appearance in transgender male (TM), transgender female (TF) and gender nonbinary patients to better inform goals of facial gender affirming surgery (FGAS) in gender nonbinary patients. METHODS: TM/TF and nonbinary patients > 18 years old were identified via retrospective chart review and distributed an anonymized survey via email from October 3 to December 31, 2022. To assess facial preferences, AI-generated and open-source portraits were edited to create five image sets with a range of features from masculine to feminine for the forehead, mandible/chin and hairline. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests and ANOVA in R-Studio. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 32% (180 patients identified via chart review, 58 respondents; TM = 5, TF = 39, nonbinary = 14). TM and TF patients as well as TF and nonbinary patients had significantly different preferences for all regions (p < 0.005; all series), while TM and nonbinary patients did not (p => 0.05; all series). TF patients consistently selected 4s with neutral or more feminine features. TM and nonbinary patients, however, demonstrated no consistent preference for either male or female features but rather a range of responses spanning extremes of both masculine and feminine options. When stratified by sex assigned at birth, nonbinary patients consistently identified preferences opposite to their assigned gender. CONCLUSION: Gender nonbinary and TM patients appear to have uniquely individual preferences regarding facial appearance that do not fit into classically masculine or feminine patterns/phenotypes. As a result, we recommend individualized preoperative planning for FGAS to achieve the optimal result in these patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Feminization of the Forehead: A Scoping Literature Review and Cohort Study of Transfeminine Patients.

BACKGROUND: Facial feminization may be performed to alleviate gender dysphoria among transfeminine patients. The upper third of the face has several characteristics, including hairline shape and position, brow position, and forehead protrusion, that may confer feminine identity. The purpose of this study is to conduct a scoping literature review of techniques performed for forehead feminization and to additionally study clinical outcomes within an institutional cohort. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to review articles that discussed techniques and clinical outcomes associated with procedures performed for feminization of the upper third of the face. A retrospective review of patients undergoing such procedures by the senior author was then conducted. Variables collected included demographic factors, operative details, and postoperative outcomes such as complications, revisions, and re-operations. RESULTS: Initial review yielded sixty-seven articles. Title and abstract review followed by standardized application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in a total of twenty-two studies for analysis. Priorities of forehead feminization entail frontal bossing reduction, frontonasal angle widening, orbital contouring, brow lifting, and hairline advancement. Eighty-five patients were included for analysis. The majority were of Caucasian race (56%) and had type 3 forehead classification (92%). The average planned setback of the anterior table was 4.12 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The core tenets of the feminization of the forehead lie in the overall creation of a harmonic curvature of the forehead with other facial features. Our multi-pronged analysis presents an updated review of these principles, which may help plastic surgeons in performing procedures to feminize the upper third of the face. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Effect of Gender-affirming Facial Feminization Surgery on Psychosocial Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of gender-affirming facial feminization surgery (FFS) on psychosocial outcomes in patients with gender dysphoria. BACKGROUND: Comprehensive analyses of psychosocial outcomes after gender-affirming FFS are absent in the literature resulting in a paucity of information on the impact of FFS on quality of life as well as ramifications in health insurance coverage of FFS. METHODS: Scores from 11 validated, quantitative instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) assessing anxiety, anger, depression, global mental health, global physical health, satisfaction with sex life, positive affect, emotional support, social isolation, companionship, and meaning and purpose. Patients within the preoperative group (pre-FFS) were evaluated >30 days before surgery and patients within the postoperative group (post-FFS) were evaluated ≥10 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients [mean (SD) age, 33.5 (10.8) years] were included. Compared with the pre-FFS group (n=107), the post-FFS group (n=62) reported improved scores anxiety (56.8±8.8 vs 60.1±7.9, P =0.01), anger (47.4±7.6 vs 51.2±9.6, P =0.01), depression (52.2±9.2 vs 57.0±8.9, P =0.001), positive affect (46.6±8.9 vs 42.9±8.7, P =0.01), meaning and purpose (49.9±10.7 vs 46.2±10.5, P =0.03), global mental health (46.7±7.6 vs 43.1±9.2, P =0.01), and social isolation (52.2±7.5 vs 55.4±7.4, P =0.01). Multivariable analysis to account for the effects of other gender-affirming surgeries, hormone therapy duration, preexisting mental health diagnoses, socioeconomic disparities, and patient-reported quality of social relationships on psychosocial functioning demonstrated that completion of FFS was independently predictive of improved scores. CONCLUSIONS: Gender-affirming FFS improves the quality of life by multiple psychosocial domains in transfeminine patients.

COVID-19 Pandemic Associated With Increased Self-reported Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Congenital Craniofacial Diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: The current study investigated the influence of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on patients with congenital craniofacial diagnoses. METHODS: Patients (n = 66) with craniofacial diagnoses aged between 8 and 17 were prospectively evaluated with longitudinal psychosocial assessments using the anger, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and peer relationships instruments within the pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The COVID-19 cohort (n = 33) included patients with assessments within 2 years prior to the pandemic (t0) and during the pandemic (t1; March 2020 to March 2021). An age-matched comparison cohort (n = 33) with similar demographics and diagnoses included patients assessed twice over 3 years prior to the pandemic. RESULTS: All PROMIS measures were in the average range clinically for both groups across time points. However, the COVID-19 group reported a significant increase in depressive symptoms during the pandemic (t1) compared to pre-pandemic (t0) scores (48.2 ± 10.1 vs 44.3 ± 9.4, P = .04, d = -0.37), while the comparison group did not demonstrate any differences in psychosocial functioning between t0 and t1. For the COVID-19 cohort, only the pandemic timeframe (r = 0.21, P = .03) was significantly associated with increased depressive symptom scores, and no other sociodemographic or medical variables were associated with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported depressive symptoms increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with congenital craniofacial diagnoses. Longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate whether such changes will be persistent or compound known variables associated with psychosocial functioning.

Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction for Adolescents with Cleft Palate and Class III Malocclusion: A Case Series.

To describe the long-term treatment course of bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) and evaluate orthognathic surgical indications after BAMP.Retrospective case series.Craniofacial/Cleft Palate Program at the Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Los Angeles, CA.Twelve male patients with cleft palate (CP), unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), or bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and Class III malocclusion treated with BAMP (mean age: 11.4 ± 2.6 years) were included.BAMP treatment was performed by placement of bone-anchored maxillary and mandibular plates connected with intraoral Class III dental elastics or maxillary plates connected to a facemask.We retrospectively assessed BAMP treatment variables, including age at surgery, revision surgeries, and treatment duration. The primary goal was correction to class I occlusion.Twelve patients underwent BAMP treatment for an average of 4.4 ± 2.4 years. Two patients were corrected to class I occlusion at the time of this report. Le Fort I advancement was no longer required in two patients (16.7%), it was required for nine patients (75.0%) and was completed for one patient following BAMP treatment (8.3%).This preliminary report demonstrated that BAMP treatment may be associated with a minimal reduction in the requirement for Le Fort I advancement at skeletal maturity. Future studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm this association.

Association of Patient-Reported Anxiety and Pain After Alveolar Bone Grafting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of psychosocial well-being on perioperative pain and opioid use among patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) undergoing alveolar bone grafting (ABG). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary level craniofacial clinic. PARTICIPANTS: 34 patients with CLP (median age: 11.7 years), including 25 (73.5%) unilateral CLP and 9 (26.5%) bilateral CLP, who underwent ABG from 2015 to 2022. INTERVENTIONS: ABG using iliac crest bone graft. Patients were prospectively administered four patient-reported psychosocial instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative opioid use in morphine equivalent dosage/kilogram, patient-reported pain scores, and length of hospital stay after ABG. RESULTS: Patient-reported anxiety (r = 0.41, p = 0.02) and depressive symptoms (r = 0.35, p = 0.04) correlated to higher perioperative opioid usage. Multivariable regression models including psychosocial scores, total acetaminophen usage, length of surgery, and other simultaneous surgeries were developed for total opioid usage, patient-reported pain, and length of hospital stay. Patient-reported anxiety was independently predictive of higher perioperative opioid use (ß=0.36, p = 0.01) and higher pain scores (ß=0.39, p = 0.02), but not length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: We identified an association for patient-reported anxiety and perioperative opioid use and pain in a CLP cohort undergoing ABG. Future considerations in preoperative patient and family consultation may be indicated in patients self-reporting higher anxiety in an effort to minimize perioperative opioid usage.

The Implications of Same-Day Discharge After Primary Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Orofacial clefts are the most common craniofacial anomaly observed in the United States. Permitted by recent advancements in anesthesia and multimodal pain management, there has been a trend toward outpatient cleft lip repair to alleviate hospital burden and minimize healthcare costs. The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates between outpatient and inpatient cleft lip repair from large national samples as well as identify preoperative factors that predicted discharge status. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for pediatrics was used to analyze 30-day outcomes for all patients undergoing cleft lip repair (CPT (current procedural terminology) code 40700) from 2012 to 2019. Complication rates were compared across 3 groups: same day discharge, next day discharge, and later discharge. Preoperative factors, including comorbidities and demographics, were analyzed to determine the impact of discharge date on complications as well as identify independent predictors of discharge timing and perioperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 6689 patients underwent primary cleft lip repair, with 16.8% discharging on day of surgery, and 72.4% discharging 1 day after surgery. Complication rates were statistically equivalent between same day and next day discharge. Preoperative factors predicting complication and postoperative admission included age <6 months and weight less than ten pounds at the time of surgery. Patients discharged after more than 1 day in the hospital had higher rates of complications as well as more preoperative comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates between same day and next day discharge are equivalent, suggesting that same day discharge is a safe option in select patients. Clinical judgment is critical in making these decisions.

Using Big Data to Assess Legitimacy of Plastic Surgery Information on Social Media.

BACKGROUND: The proliferation of social media in plastic surgery poses significant difficulties for the public in determining legitimacy of information. This work proposes a system based on social network analysis (SNA) to assess the legitimacy of information contributors within a plastic surgery community. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantify the centrality of individual or group accounts on plastic surgery social media by means of a model based on academic plastic surgery and a single social media outlet. METHODS: To develop the model, a high-fidelity, active, and legitimate source account in academic plastic surgery (@psrc1955, Plastic Surgery Research Council) appearing only on Instagram (Facebook, Menlo Park, CA) was chosen. All follower-followed relationships were then recorded, and Gephi (https://gephi.org/) was used to compute 5 different centrality metrics for each contributor within the network. RESULTS: In total, 64,737 unique users and 116,439 unique follower-followed relationships were identified within the academic plastic surgery community. Among the metrics assessed, the in-degree centrality metric is the gold standard for SNA, hence this metric was designated as the centrality factor. Stratification of 1000 accounts by centrality factor demonstrated that all of the top 40 accounts were affiliated with a plastic surgery residency program, a board-certified academic plastic surgeon, a professional society, or a peer-reviewed journal. None of the accounts in the top decile belonged to a non-plastic surgeon or non-physician; however, this increased significantly beyond the 50th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: A data-driven approach was able to identify and successfully vet a core group of interconnected accounts within a single plastic surgery subcommunity for the purposes of determining legitimate sources of information.

Planning and Osteotomy Designs in the Correction of Single-Suture Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis is among the abnormalities that are more commonly encountered by craniofacial surgeons. Although the overall concepts for cranial vault remodeling are relatively simple, osteotomy designs and methods for calvarial rearrangement are highly varied. In this work, we present a summary of the known designs for correction of single-suture craniosynostosis. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed of the more frequently used osteotomy designs for single-suture craniosynostosis, as well as their reported results and outcomes. Also reviewed are some of the current available approaches for the diagnosis and surgical planning for single-suture craniosynostosis. RESULTS: There remains a diversity of techniques available for the reconstruction of each fused cranial suture. Certain osteotomy designs are reported in the literature and are used by craniofacial surgeons more frequently. Each has its own benefits and disadvantages, and there is a growing body of outcome data available to guide surgical decision-making. Regarding diagnosis and surgical planning, computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction remains the diagnostic standard of care, and efforts are ongoing to develop and implement new diagnostic modalities like Black Bone MRI to reduce radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS: There has been ongoing evolution of the surgical techniques available to reconstruct single-suture craniosynostosis, leading to ever-improving patient outcomes.

Facial Suture Pathology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Human and Animal Studies.

BACKGROUND: Facial deformities in syndromic craniosynostosis are not only functionally, psychosocially, and aesthetically impairing but also notoriously challenging to reconstruct. Whether facial suture synostosis plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of these deformities is inadequately studied in human patients. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was queried using a methodologically generated search term inventory. Article inclusion was adjudicated by 2 authors after independent review. Articles provided insight into facial suture involvement in either syndromic craniosynostosis patients or animal models of disease. RESULTS: Comprehensive review yielded 19 relevant articles meeting inclusion criteria. Mid-20th century craniofacial biologists characterized how patent facial sutures are essential for normal postnatal facial development. They also posited that premature ossification disrupts growth vectors, causing significant dysmorphologies. Recently, facial suture synostosis was found to cause midfacial deformities independent of cranial base pathology in mouse models of syndromic craniosynostosis. Few recent studies have begun exploring facial suture involvement in patients, and although they have paved the way for future research, they bear significant limitations. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that facial suture synostosis acts in conjunction with cranial base pathology to produce the prominent, multifocal facial deformities in syndromic craniosynostosis may fundamentally alter surgical management and warrants further investigation. Methodically evaluating the literature, this review synthesizes all basic science and human clinical research thus far on the role of facial sutures in syndromic craniosynostosis and elucidates important topics for future research. We ultimately identify the need for rigorous imaging studies that longitudinally evaluate facial osteology across patients with various craniosynostosis syndromes.

Effect of Cross-Sex Hormone Therapy on Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Male-to-Female Gender-Affirming Surgery.

Individuals with gender dysphoria often seek medical interventions, such as hormone treatment and surgery, to live as their identified gender. Cross-sex hormone therapy typically consists of various estrogen formulations which confer varying risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Currently, there is no standard practice by surgeons regarding the preoperative gender-affirming surgery (GAS) hormone regimen of male-to-female (MTF) patients to minimize thromboembolic postoperative complications. The aim of this review is to examine the current literature on VTE occurring in MTF transgender patients on cross-sex hormone therapy (CSHT) when undergoing various gender-affirming surgeries-facial feminization surgery (FFS), top surgery (TS), and bottom surgery (BS)-to understand how evidence-based recommendations regarding perioperative hormone regimens can be established to improve clinical outcomes. Within the past 25 years, 7 published studies have examined the incidence of VTE in MTF patients undergoing GAS procedures. Two of these articles examined MTF patients undergoing FFS, 1 article reported a patient who had undergone BS and FFS during the same hospitalization, and the remaining 4 articles investigated VTE risk in BS. Our review supports that plastic surgeons who perform GAS are divided on their preferred CSHT protocols, with some requiring patients to suspend their CSHT weeks before surgery and others allowing patients to continue CSHT through the day of surgery. Three of the 7 studies detailed a CSHT perioperative regimen which instructed patients to suspend CSHT sometime before surgery; 1 study tapered CSHT to lower levels before surgery; the remaining 3 studies did not specify a CSHT perioperative regimen. This review highlights the paucity of data failing to support that continuing CSHT through GAS elevates VTE risk. We conclude that in the absence of definitive VTE risk factors (e.g., smoking, clotting disorders, or malignancy), surgeons may engage MTF patients in joint decision-making process to determine the most optimal perioperative CSHT management plan on a case-by-case basis. Future studies are warranted to evaluate VTE risk based on patient age, type of surgery, operating time, prophylactic measures, follow-up time, and CSHT perioperative regimens.

Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Craniofacial Microsomia: Prevalence, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to analyze the prevalence, diagnosis, and management of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in patients with craniofacial microsomia (CFM).Craniofacial microsomia patients 13 years of age and above treated at 2 centers from 1997 to 2019 were reviewed retrospectively for demographics, prevalence of VPI, and management of VPI. Patients with isolated microtia were excluded. Comparisons were made between patients with and without VPI using chi-square and independent samples t tests.Among 68 patients with CFM (63.2% male, mean 20.7 years of age), VPI was diagnosed in 19 patients (27.9%) at an average age of 7.2 years old. Among the total cohort, 61 patients had isolated CFM, of which 12 (19.6%) were diagnosed with VPI. Of the patients with isolated CFM and VPI, 8 patients (66.7%) were recommended for nasoendoscopy, of which only 2 patients completed. Seven isolated CFM patients (58.3%) underwent speech therapy, whereas none received VPI surgery. In contrast, 7 patients were diagnosed with both CFM and cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), all of whom had VPI and were recommended for nasoendoscopy, with 5 (71.4%) completing nasoendoscopy, 6 (85.7%) undergoing speech therapy, and 6 (85.7%) undergoing corrective VPI surgery. Overall, we demonstrated that VPI was present in 27.9% of all CFM patients. On subset analysis, VPI was diagnosed in 20% of patients with isolated CFM and 100% of patients with CFM and CL/P. In addition, despite clinical diagnosis of VPI, a sizeable proportion of isolated CFM patients did not undergo therapy or surgical interventions.

Oral Flora and Perioperative Antimicrobial Interventions in Cleft Palate Surgery: A Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: The role of perioperative antibiotics in cleft palate remains a topic of debate. Advocates stress their importance in preventing local and systemic infections and decreasing the incidence of oronasal fistula formation. However, few studies to date have directly evaluated the role of antibiotics and other antimicrobial measures in cleft palate surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence surrounding the use of perioperative antibiotics and other antimicrobial interventions in cleft palate surgery. Additionally, we review the literature on the oral flora unique to the cleft palate patient population. METHODS: This was accomplished utilizing PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library with MeSH and generic terms. Articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: This review highlights the lack of higher level evidence on perioperative antibiotic use and other antimicrobial interventions in cleft palatoplasty and calls for further research on the matter. CONCLUSIONS: The literature appears to support the use of preoperative antibiotics for cleft palatoplasty, but the benefits of prolonged postoperative antibiotic use remain questionable.

The Effect of Multiple Surgeries on Psychosocial Outcomes in Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Birth defects affect 3% of all babies born in the United States each year. Unlike reconstruction for many acquired deformities, one hallmark of reconstruction for complex congenital conditions is the requirement of multiple surgeries, procedures, and therapies from birth to maturity. These interventions often result in significant medical burden on children during development with potential long-term psychosocial consequences. The aim of this study was therefore to better define the psychosocial impact of repetitive operations on the pediatric patient. METHODS: A scoping review was performed under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review guidelines. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases using key words "number of surgeries," "psychosocial," "pediatric," and related terms. Primary articles published in English describing psychosocial outcomes in pediatric patients who underwent more than one procedure or surgery were included (n = 25). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of each study. RESULTS: We included 25 articles published between 1995 and 2019, which included 6520 patients. The most common diagnosis across all studies was congenital heart disease (CHD) (n = 4169, 63.9%), followed by cleft lip and palate (n = 1196, 18.3%). The average number of operations and procedures was 3.4 (range = 1-18) and 32.1 (range = 6-89), respectively. The association between repetitive surgeries and poorer psychosocial outcomes was demonstrated in children with early-onset scoliosis, CHD, hydrocephalus, bladder exstrophy, posterior urethral rupture, anorectal anomalies, and conditions requiring numerous nonsurgical procedures. There were also a few CHD, cleft lip and/or palate, and hydrocephalus studies that did not find a significant correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The studies here suggest that certain pediatric patient populations are at risk for impaired psychosocial functioning as a result of repetitive procedures. However, it is important to differentiate whether the association with poorer psychosocial outcomes is from the number of surgical procedures or whether the number if just a surrogate for increased disease complexity. Standardized psychosocial outcomes measures and future prospective, long-term, randomized clinical trials are also warranted.

Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome: A Report of 7 Patients and Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Saethre-Chotzen syndrome is a genetic condition characterized by craniofacial and limb anomalies, with craniosynostosis (mainly coronal) being the most frequent craniofacial finding. Cranial and facial deformities can be extremely variable requiring individualization of treatment strategies. We present our case series to highlight clinical findings, treatment philosophy, and challenges facing Saethre-Chotzen patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on records of patients given a diagnosis of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Craniofacial Clinic (n = 7) between 1980 and 2010. Patients with complete records were included in this study, and review of demographic data, clinical findings, surgical interventions and postoperative follow-up, and stability were performed. RESULTS: Seven patients (1 male and 6 female) were included in this study. The average age at which the patients were first seen was 6.5 years. Suture involvement was bicoronal (n = 6) and unicoronal (n = 1). There was 1 patient having superimposed metopic synostosis, and there was another patient having Kleeblattschädel deformity. Previous procedures performed for patients before establishing care at UCLA were strip craniectomy (n = 2) and fronto-orbital advancement (n = 2). All patients (n = 7) had fronto-orbital advancements at UCLA. Other skeletal operations included the following: redo forehead advancement and contouring (n = 3), monobloc advancement (n = 1), and LeFort III distraction (n = 1). Five patients reached skeletal maturity, and 2 patients received LeFort I advancement for class III malocclusion, one of which also required a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. CONCLUSION: Clinical presentation and severity of deformity in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome are variable. Our current report reviews our treatment strategies and illustrates the predominance of cranial and upper face deformities and frequent need for redo surgeries to address forehead asymmetry in this group of syndromic craniosynostosis patients.

Virtual Surgical Planning for Mandibular Reconstruction With the Fibula Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The fibula free flap (FFF) remains the criterion standard for complex mandibular reconstruction. Surgeons have incorporated virtual surgical planning (VSP) into the reconstructive algorithm with the assertion that VSP increases operative efficiency and may improve clinical outcomes. To date, no large-scale studies have analyzed these claims. This study examines the literature and tests the hypothesis that VSP improves operative efficiency, clinical outcomes, and accuracy when compared with traditional techniques. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify articles utilizing VSP and traditional techniques for FFF-based mandibular reconstruction. Two reviewers independently assessed all articles for methodological quality using a validated instrument (weighted Cohen κ for interrater reliability = 0.70). Outcomes included operative time, length of stay, complications, and accuracy. Meta-analytic comparisons were performed using data from comparative studies using a random-effects model and differences of means analysis for outcomes measured on identical scales. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one articles were identified, and 25 met the inclusion criteria: 12 were VSP only, whereas 13 were comparative. There were 241 VSP patients and 214 traditional patients available for meta-analysis. Patients undergoing reconstruction with VSP had a significant reduction in operative time by 44.64 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], -74.69 to -14.58 minutes; P < 0.01) and demonstrated a mean trend toward shorter hospital admission (mean difference, -1.24 days; 95% CI, -4.00 to 1.52 days; P = 0.38). There was no statistical difference between cohorts for major (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.46-2.31; P = 0.95) or minor complications (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.54-1.71; P = 0.90). Insufficient data were available for cost analysis and accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual surgical planning-guided mandibular reconstruction with FFF is associated with significantly decreased operative time and a mean trend toward shorter hospital admission. While multiple studies reported a high degree of accuracy, no standard measurement was available for meta-analysis.

Orthodontic and surgical treatment of facial asymmetry in a patient with unicoronal craniosynostosis.

This case report presents the unique treatment of a patient with varying asymmetries at different levels within the face. The patient was a 17-year-old male with a diagnosis of right unilateral coronal synostosis. He had frontal and superior orbital retrusion on the fused side, and bossing of the contralateral side. The middle and lower portions of his face were rotated toward the nonfused side. This unique diagnosis presented particular challenges to surgical and orthodontic correction. The treatment approach, which included a combination of Le Fort I and II osteotomies, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, and orthodontic treatment with 4 premolar extractions, enabled simultaneous correction of nasal, midfacial, lower facial, and dental asymmetries. The orthodontist and surgeon integrated their efforts to correct dentofacial asymmetry in all 3 planes of space. Facial esthetics and dental function were significantly improved with no appreciable relapse occurring over a 2-year retention period.

Management of the Cleft Nasal Tip: An Overview of Classic Techniques and Strategies.

The challenges of cleft reconstruction have been present for centuries. However, understanding of the cleft nasal tip and the evolution of techniques decidedly began in the 20th century and refinement continues into the present day. Although a multitude of technical descriptions and case series have been published, a compendium of seminal techniques, which have shaped modern thought, has not been compiled in the literature. In this review, we discuss the anatomical disturbances in the cleft nasal tip anomaly, the timing and strategy of tip correction, and the major classic techniques for management of the cleft nasal tip. In addition, we have categorized the classic techniques into concepts that they embody.

Evaluation of the Integrated Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Prerequisite Core Surgical Training Experience: A Residents' Perspective.

BACKGROUND: A key educational component of the integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) training model is the prerequisite, or core, experiences. The aim of this study is to assess the integrated PRS residents' experience with this early part of training. METHODS: A 20-question survey was developed and piloted before deployment to integrated PRS training programs from 4 United States Census regions. Respondents were asked to characterize their prerequisite clinical and operative experiences. Results were analyzed using pairwise correlation statistics and logistic regression modeling following Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing. RESULTS: One hundred ninety six residents (22 programs) participated in the study (response rate, 65.3%). The majority of residents were satisfied with their prerequisite experiences. Most did not take the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, which was perceived as noncontributory to PRS training. The majority of residents preferred to have fewer prerequisite experiences. Operative hours per week were predictive of resident satisfaction with the clinical and operative prerequisite experiences (both P < 0.001). Perception of general surgery program director investment in PRS education was also predictive of resident satisfaction with clinical and operative experiences (P = 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that PRS residents are satisfied with the quality of prerequisite training but prefer less overall. Reevaluation of the benefits of the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination and individual essential rotations for resident education would be welcomed. Furthermore, this study identifies the residents' clinical and operative experience and perceived general surgery program director involvement as important determinants of integrated resident satisfaction with prerequisite training.

Internal Distraction Resulted in Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes for Midface Hypoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Both internal and external distraction devices have been used successfully in correcting midface hypoplasia. Although the indication for surgery and the osteotomy techniques may be similar, deciding when to use internal versus external devices has not been studied. The authors studied patient-reported outcomes with FACE-Q and functional surveys for internal and external devices for midface distraction patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent distraction advancement after Le Fort I and Le Fort III were surveyed using the FACE-Q survey and a functional survey. Equal groups of internal and external device patients were compared (n = 64). Data recorded included: sex, age, follow-up, diagnosis, operating room time, expected blood loss, length of stay, distraction length, consolidation time, and complications. RESULTS: Internal and external device groups were similar with regards to patient diagnosis, operative time, expected blood loss, distraction length but consolidation times differed (internal = 3.6 versus external = 1.1 months). For FACE-Q appearance appraisal, there were similarities in domain and scale. For the functional survey (airway/breathing, ocular/vision, occlusion/eating, speech/articulation), there was also similar scoring. However, internal device patients had superior FACE-Q scores for Quality of Life: Social Function (80.9 versus 68.9), Early Life Impact (92.9 versus 62.4), Dental Anxiety (70.2 versus 48.3), Psychological Well-being (87.8 versus 68.6); and Decision Satisfaction (81.2 versus 56.9) and Outcome Satisfaction (91.0 versus 84.7). CONCLUSIONS: Internal and external midface distraction patients had similar patient-reported outcomes for appearance and functional improvement; however, internal device patients were more satisfied with their quality of life and their decision to undergo the procedure.