Comparison of existing methods of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Introduction: Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is an important risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Direct LDL-C measurement is not widely performed. LDL-C is routinely calculated using the Friedewald equation (FLDL), which is inaccurate at high triglyceride (TG) or low LDL-C levels. We aimed to compare this routine method with other estimation methods in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), who typically have elevated TG levels and ASCVD risk. Method: We performed a retrospective cohort study on T2DM patients from a multi-institutional diabetes registry in Singapore from 2013 to 2020. LDL-C values estimated by the equations: FLDL, Martin/Hopkins (MLDL) and Sampson (SLDL) were compared using measures of agreement and correlation. Subgroup analysis comparing estimated LDL-C with directly measured LDL-C (DLDL) was conducted in patients from a single institution. Estimated LDL-C was considered discordant if LDL-C was <1.8mmol/L for the index equation and ≥1.8mmol/L for the comparator. Results: A total of 154,877 patients were included in the final analysis, and 11,475 patients in the subgroup analysis. All 3 equations demonstrated strong overall correlation and goodness-of-fit. Discordance was 4.21% for FLDL-SLDL and 6.55% for FLDL-MLDL. In the subgroup analysis, discordance was 21.57% for DLDL-FLDL, 17.31% for DLDL-SLDL and 14.44% for DLDL-MLDL. All discordance rates increased at TG levels >4.5mmol/L. Conclusion: We demonstrated strong correlations between newer methods of LDL-C estimation, FLDL, and DLDL. At higher TG concentrations, no equation performed well. The Martin/Hopkins equation had the least discordance with DLDL, and may minimise misclassification compared with the FLDL and SLDL.

High Urinary Sodium Concentrations in Severe SIADH: Case Reports of 2 Patients and Literature Review.

We present two cases of severe hyponatremia secondary to syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) with very high urine sodium concentrations (>130 mmol/L). The first patient had hyponatremia from traumatic brain injury (TBI) while the second case had a history of recurrent SIADH triggered by various causes including gastritis. In both cases, fluid administration and/or consumption worsened the hyponatremia. Although a low urine sodium of <30 mmol/L is highly suggestive of hypovolemic hyponatremia and good response to saline infusion, there is lack of clarity of the threshold of which high urine sodium concentration can differentiate various causes of natriuresis such as SIADH, renal or cerebral salt wasting. Apart from high urine osmolality (>500 mOsm/kg), persistence of high urine sodium concentrations may be useful to predict poor response to fluid restriction in SIADH. More studies are needed to delineate treatment pathways of patients with very high urine osmolality and urine sodium concentrations in SIADH.