HIV infection is associated with a less aggressive phenotype of inflammatory bowel disease. A multicenter study of the ENEIDA registry.

BACKGROUND: The coexistence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is uncommon. Data on the impact of HIV on IBD course and its management is scarce. AIM: To describe the IBD phenotype, therapeutic requirements and prevalence of opportunistic infections (OI) in IBD patients with a coexistent HIV infection. METHODS: Case-control, retrospective study including all HIV positive patients diagnosed with IBD in the ENEIDA registry. Patients with positive HIV serology (HIV-IBD) were compared to controls (HIV seronegative), matched 1:3 by year of IBD diagnosis, age, gender and type of IBD. RESULTS: A total of 364 patients (91 HIV-IBD and 273 IBD controls) were included. In the whole cohort, 58% had ulcerative colitis (UC), 35% had Crohn's disease (CD) and 7% were IBD unclassified. The HIV-IBD group presented a significantly higher proportion of proctitis in UC and colonic location in CD but fewer extraintestinal manifestations than controls. Regarding treatments, non-biological therapies (37.4% vs. 57.9%; P=0.001) and biologicals (26.4% vs. 42.1%; P=0.007), were used less frequently among patients in the HIV-IBD group. Conversely, HIV-IBD patients developed more OI than controls regardless of non-biological therapies use. In the multivariate analysis, HIV infection (OR 4.765, 95%CI 2.48-9.14; P<0.001) and having ≥1 comorbidity (OR 2.445, 95%CI 1.23-4.85; P=0.010) were risk factors for developing OI, while CD was protective (OR 0.372, 95%CI 0.18-0.78;P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: HIV infection appears to be associated with a less aggressive phenotype of IBD and a lesser use of non-biological therapies and biologicals but entails a greater risk of developing OI.

Frecuencia, factores predictores y consecuencias de la intensificación del tratamiento de mantenimiento con infliximab en la colitis ulcerosa / Frequency, predictors, and consequences of maintenance infliximab therapy intensification in ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCCIÓN: la intensificación del tratamiento con infliximab (IFX) en la colitis ulcerosa (CU) es más frecuente de lo establecido en estudios pivotales. OBJETIVOS: establecer la frecuencia y forma con la que intensificamos en CU en práctica clínica, los factores predictores y comparar la evolución entre los pacientes con tratamiento intensificado y no intensificado. MÉTODOS: estudio retrospectivo de 10 hospitales y 144 pacientes con respuesta a la inducción con IFX. Se analizaron variables predictoras de la intensificación con análisis de regresión de Cox. Se comparó la evolución, pérdida de respuesta a IFX y colectomía según tratamiento intensificado o no intensificado. RESULTADOS: tiempo de seguimiento desde la inducción hasta la recogida de datos: 38 meses [rango intercuartil (RIC) 20-62]. Tiempo de tratamiento con IFX: 24 meses (RIC, 10-44). El 37% de los pacientes requirió intensificación. Se acortó el intervalo en 36 pacientes, se aumentó la dosis en 7, ambas en 10. La introducción simultánea de inmunosupresores tiopurínicos (INM) e IFX predijo la intensificación de forma independiente [Hazard ratio (HR) 0,034 p 0,006 IC 0,003-0,371]. En los pacientes con tratamiento intensificado fue más frecuente la suspensión de IFX por pérdida de respuesta (30,4% vs. 10,2% p 0,002), la reintroducción de corticoides (35% vs. 18%, p 0,018) y la colectomía (22% vs. 6,4% p 0,011). El 17% de los pacientes intensificados volvió a recibir 5 mg/kg cada 8 semanas. CONCLUSIONES: la intensificación es frecuente y en ocasiones reversible. La introducción del INM en el momento de la inducción con IFX predice la no intensificación. La intensificación, aunque eficaz, se asocia a una peor evolución

INTRODUCTION: Infliximab (IFX) therapy intensification in ulcerative colitis (UC) is more common than established in pivotal studies. OBJECTIVES: To establish the frequency and form of intensification for UC in clinical practice, as well as predictors, and to compare outcomes between intensified and non-intensified treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study of 10 hospitals and 144 patients with response to infliximab (IFX) induction. Predictive variables for intensification were analyzed using a Cox regression analysis. Outcome, loss of response to IFX, and colectomy were compared between intensified and non-intensified therapy. RESULTS: Follow-up time from induction to data collection: 38 months [interquartile range (IQR), 20-62]. Time on IFX therapy: 24 months (IQR, 10-44). In all, 37% of patients required intensification. Interval was shortened for 36 patients, dose was increased for 7, and 10 subjects received both. Concurrent thiopurine immunosuppressants (IMM) and IFX initiation was an independent predictor of intensification [Hazard ratio, 0.034; p, 0.006; CI, 0.003-0.371]. In patients on intensified therapy IFX discontinuation for loss of response (30.4% vs. 10.2%; p, 0.002), steroid reintroduction (35% vs. 18%; p, 0.018), and colectomy (22% vs. 6.4%; p, 0.011) were more common. Of patients on intensification, 17% returned to receiving 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Intensification is common and occasionally reversible. IMM initiation at the time of induction with IFX predicts non-intensification. Intensification, while effective, is associated with poorer outcome

Alteraciones del metabolismo óseo en 100 pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal / Bone metabolism changes in 100 patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Objetivos Evaluar la prevalencia de osteopenia y osteoporosis en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) y estudiar los diversos factores que influyen en su patogenia.MétodosSe incluyeron 100 pacientes consecutivos con EII (57 mujeres, edad media 41 años), recogiéndose datos acerca de sus hábitos de vida, características de su enfermedad y empleo de fármacos (principalmente corticoides). Se realizaron determinaciones analíticas incluyendo marcadores bioquímicos de recambio óseo y se determinó la presencia de osteoporosis u osteopenia mediante densitometría ósea (DXA) total de cadera y columna lumbar.ResultadosLos porcentajes de osteopenia oscilaron entre el 37% (evaluada mediante el t-score de DXA columna lumbar) y el 39% (t-score DXA cadera). Por su parte, la presencia de osteoporosis se situó entre el 2% (t-score DXA cadera) y el 15% (t-score DXA columna lumbar). El análisis multivariante demostró que la enfermedad de Crohn (vs. colitis ulcerosa; odds ratio 2,9, IC 95% 1-8,7) y el número de brotes ajustado por la dosis total acumulada de corticoides (n.° de brotes ≥ 3: odds ratio 8,7; IC 95% 1,6-45) se asociaba con una mayor frecuencia de osteopenia/osteoporosis. Ninguna de las variables analíticas se correlacionó con las alteraciones de la densidad mineral ósea.ConclusionesExiste una mayor prevalencia de osteopenia/osteoporosis en los pacientes con EII (fundamentalmente con enfermedad de Crohn) con respecto a la población general. La propia actividad inflamatoria de la enfermedad, más que la dosis de corticoides per se, parece relacionarse con la alteración del metabolismo óseo. Los marcadores bioquímicos de resorción y osteoformación no presentaron correlación con la presencia de osteopenia y osteoporosis (AU)

Objectives To evaluate the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to study the factors involved in their pathogenesis.MethodsOne hundred consecutive patients with IBD (57 women, mean age 41 years) were included in this study. Data were collected about their life habits, disease characteristics of medication use (mainly corticosteroids). Bone turnover markers were analyzed and the presence of osteoporosis or osteopenia was assessed with total hip and lumbar spine bone densitometry (DXA).ResultsOsteopenia percentages ranged from 37% (t-score measured by lumbar spine DXA) to 39% (hip DXA t-score). The prevalence of osteoporosis ranged from 2% (t-score measured by hip DXA) to 15% (lumbar spine DXA t-score). In the multivariate analysis, diagnosis of Crohn's disease (vs. ulcerative colitis; odds ratio 2.9, 95% CI 1-8.7) and the number of flares controlled by the cumulative dose of steroids (number of flares ≥3: odds ratio 8.7; 95%CI 1.6-45) were associated with a higher risk of osteopenia/osteoporosis. None of the analytical parameters significantly correlated with bone mineral density values.ConclusionsThe prevalence of osteopenia/osteoporosis is higher in patients with IBD (mainly those with Crohn's disease) than in the general population. Changes in bone metabolism seem to be more closely related to the inflammatory activity of IBD than to the steroid dose per se. Bone turnover markers did not correlate with the presence of osteopenia and osteoporosis (AU)