RESUMEN
Bothrofav, a monospecific antivenom, was introduced in June 1991 and has shown excellent effectiveness against life-threatening and thrombotic complications of Bothrops lanceolatus envenoming. Because of the reoccurrence of cerebral stroke events despite the timely administration of antivenom, new batches of Bothrofav were produced and introduced into clinical use in January 2011. This study's aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Bothrofav generations at treating B. lanceolatus envenoming. During the first period of the study (2000-2010), 107 patients were treated with vials of antivenom produced in June 1991, while 282 envenomed patients were treated with vials of antivenom produced in January 2011 in the second study period (2011-2023). Despite timely antivenom administration, thrombotic complications reoccurred after an interval free of thrombotic events, and a timeframe analysis suggested that the clinical efficacy of Bothrofav declined after it reached its 10-year shelf-life. In of the case of an antivenom shortage due to the absence of regular batch production, no adverse effects were identified before the antivenom reached its 10-year shelf-life, which is beyond the accepted shelf-life for a liquid-formulation antivenom. While our study does not support the use of expired antivenom for potent, life-threatening B. lanceolatus envenoming, it can be a scientific message to public entities proving the necessity of new antivenom production for B. lanceolatus envenoming.
Asunto(s)
Antivenenos , Bothrops , Serpientes Venenosas , Humanos , Animales , Martinica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The French society of clinical biology "Biochemical markers of COVID-19" has set up a working group with the primary aim of reviewing, analyzing and monitoring the evolution of biological prescriptions according to the patient's care path and to look for markers of progression and severity of the disease. This study covers all public and private sectors of medical biology located in metropolitan and overseas France and also extends to the French-speaking world. This article presents the testimonies and data obtained for the "Overseas and French-speaking countries" sub-working group made up of 45 volunteer correspondents, located in 20 regions of the world. In view of the delayed spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the overseas regions and the French-speaking regions have benefited from feedback from the first territories confronted with COVID-19. Thus, the entry of the virus or its spread in epidemic form could be avoided, thanks to the rapid closure of borders. The overseas territories depend very strongly on air and/or sea links with the metropolis or with the neighboring continent. The isolation of these countries is responsible for reagent supply difficulties and has necessitated emergency orders and the establishment of stocks lasting several months, in order to avoid shortages and maintain adequate patient care. In addition, in countries located in tropical or intertropical zones, the diagnosis of COVID-19 is complicated by the presence of various zoonoses (dengue, Zika, malaria, leptospirosis, etc.).