Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 80: 107-113, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537339

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether initiation of oral enteral nutrition in the emergency department (ED) for patients with bronchiolitis hospitalized on humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) was associated with a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) without an increase in return ED visits or hospital readmissions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included children ≤24 months of age with bronchiolitis hospitalized to the general pediatric floor on HHFNC in two time periods: October 1, 2018 - April 30, 2019, and following implementation of a revised institutional bronchiolitis pathway that encouraged enteral nutrition initiation in the ED, October 1, 2021 - April 30, 2022. The primary outcome of interest was hospital LOS where the exposure was enteral feeding in the ED. RESULTS: We included 391 'fed', 114 'not fed' and 304 'unknown' patients. HHFNC treatment time (25 h for 'fed' vs. 43 h for 'not fed' vs. 35 h for'unknown', p = 0.0001) and hospital LOS (39 h for 'fed' vs. 56 h for 'not fed' vs. 48 h for 'unknown', p = 0.0001) was shorter in the 'fed' group. There were no significant differences in return ED visits or hospital readmissions. Using our median LOS (45.1 h, inter-quartile range 30.2, 64.4 h) while controlling for age, sex, initial HHFNC flow rate, the respiratory oxygenation (ROX) index, viral etiology, and time period, an adjusted logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients fed in the ED were 1.8 times more likely to have a hospital LOS of <45 h (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.11-3.18, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of oral enteral nutrition in the ED for patients with bronchiolitis on HHFNC is associated with a shorter hospital LOS without an increase in return ED visits or hospital readmissions. Future prospective studies are needed to develop feeding recommendations for children with bronchiolitis receiving HHFNC support.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Nutrición Enteral , Tiempo de Internación , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Bronquiolitis/terapia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Cánula , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(22): 725-729, 2022 06 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35653284

RESUMEN

Melatonin is an endogenous neurohormone that regulates the sleep-wake cycle (1). It is used therapeutically for insomnia in adults and for primary sleep disorders in children (2). Melatonin is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a dietary supplement. Various synthetic melatonin preparations are widely available over the counter (OTC) in the United States with sales increasing from $285 million in 2016 to $821 million in 2020 (3). Children are at increased risk for melatonin exposure because of the supplement's widespread use and growing popularity as a sleep aid. In 2020, melatonin became the most frequently ingested substance among children reported to national poison control centers (4); however, more research is needed to describe the toxicity and outcomes associated with melatonin ingestions in children. This study assessed isolated melatonin ingestions among the pediatric population (defined here as children, adolescents, and young adults aged ≤19 years) during January 1, 2012-December 31, 2021, using the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS). During the 10-year study period, 260,435 pediatric melatonin ingestions were reported to NPDS, and the annual number of ingestions increased 530%. In addition, pediatric melatonin ingestions accounted for 4.9% of all pediatric ingestions reported to poison control centers in 2021 compared with 0.6% in 2012. Pediatric hospitalizations and more serious outcomes due to melatonin ingestions increased during the study period, primarily related to an increase in unintentional ingestions among children aged ≤5 years. Five children required mechanical ventilation, and two died. Consumers and health care professionals should be encouraged to report any melatonin product-related adverse events to MedWatch, the FDA's medical product safety reporting program. Public health initiatives should focus on raising awareness of increasing numbers of melatonin ingestions among children and on the development of preventive measures to eliminate this risk.


Asunto(s)
Melatonina , Adolescente , Niño , Ingestión de Alimentos , Humanos , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Food and Drug Administration
3.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 59(5): 1281-1287, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353397

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of the initial high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) flow rate on clinical outcomes in children with bronchiolitis. METHODS: This secondary analysis of retrospective data included children <2 years who required HFNC for bronchiolitis between 10/01/2018-04/20/2019, and following implementation of a revised institutional bronchiolitis pathway between 10/01/2021-04/30/2022. The new pathway recommended weight-based initiation of HFNC at 1.5-2 L/kg/min. We evaluated the effect of low (<1.0 L/kg/min), medium (1-1.5 L/kg/min) and high (>1.5 L/kg/min) HFNC flow rates on need for positive pressure ventilation (PPV), intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, HFNC treatment time, and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: The majority of the 885 included children had low initial flow rates (low [n = 450, 50.8%], medium [n = 332, 37.5%] and high [n = 103, 11.7%]). There were no significant differences in PPV (high: 7.8% vs. medium: 9.3% vs. low: 8.2%, p = 0.8) or ICU transfers (high: 4.9% vs. medium: 6.0% vs. low: 3.8%, p = 0.3). The low flow group had a significantly longer median HFNC treatment time (High: 29 [18, 45] vs. medium: 29 [16, 50] vs. low: 39 [25, 63], p < .001) and hospital LOS (High: 41 [27, 59] vs. medium: 42 [29, 66] vs. low: 50 (39, 75), p < .001). Logistic and linear regression models did not demonstrate any associations between HFNC flow rates and PPV or hospital LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Initial HFNC flow rates were not associated with significant changes in clinical outcomes in children in children with bronchiolitis.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis , Cánula , Tiempo de Internación , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Bronquiolitis/terapia , Bronquiolitis/fisiopatología , Lactante , Masculino , Femenino , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Recién Nacido
4.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 61(6): 463-469, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37358035

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic increased demand for alcohol-based hand sanitizers. We aimed to describe the epidemiological trends in pediatric alcohol-based hand sanitizer cases reported to United States poison centers. We characterized clinically significant pediatric reports involving alcohol-based hand sanitizer products before and during the pandemic and methanol-containing hand sanitizers during the pandemic. METHODS: We included all single-substance cases involving alcohol-based hand sanitizers reported to the National Poison Data System among children ≤ 19 years from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021, and methanol-containing hand sanitizers from 23 June 2020 to 31 December 2021. Multiple product exposures and non-human exposures were excluded. Clinically significant outcomes included moderate or major effects or death. RESULTS: There were 95,718 alcohol-based hand sanitizer pediatric cases during the study period. Most (n = 89,521; 94%) were unintentional, occurred by ingestion (n = 89,879; 93.9%), occurred at home, and were managed at the exposure site (n = 89,774; 93.8%). Common symptoms were vomiting (n = 2,969; 3.1%), coughing (n = 1,102; 1.2%), ocular irritation (n = 1,244; 1.3%), and drowsiness (n = 981; 1.0%). Most children (n = 3,937; 66.2%) managed at a health care facility were treated and released; a minority were admitted (n = 527; 9.0%). Few children (n = 81; 1.4%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. The prevalence of clinically significant cases increased in 2020 and 2021, compared to 2017. Population-adjusted rates, by state, of alcohol-based hand sanitizer cases ranged from 280 to 2,700 per million children. Of the 540 reported cases involving methanol-containing hand sanitizers, the majority (n = 255) occurred in July 2020. Thirteen cases (2.4%) had clinically significant outcomes. The prevalence of clinically significant cases remained similar in 2020 and 2021 and exhibited lower prevalence compared to alcohol-based products. Population-adjusted rates, by state, ranged from fewer than 0.9 to 40 per million children. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant pediatric cases involving alcohol-based hand sanitizers increased during the pandemic and remained elevated in 2021. Cases involving methanol-containing products were less frequent. Our findings may inform heightened product quality control and regulatory oversight.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Desinfectantes para las Manos , Venenos , Humanos , Niño , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Metanol , Pandemias , Etanol , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones
5.
MedEdPORTAL ; 17: 11180, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34466658

RESUMEN

Introduction: A rare but serious condition often requiring intensive care, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is characterized by hyperinflammatory shock related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This resource teaches residents, pediatric emergency medicine fellows, and advanced practice providers who care for children to recognize and manage MIS-C and associated sequelae while applying the basic principles of pediatric resuscitation. Methods: The simulation case was based on a real patient who presented to the emergency department with fever, rash, and cardiogenic shock. We designed the scenario to be used with a high-fidelity school-age mannequin in an emergency center resuscitation room or simulation lab. The case took 25 minutes to run, followed by a 15- to 20-minute debrief session. Personnel required for the case included a simulation technician, case instructor, emergency department nurse, parent, and consultant. Learners had to recognize the syndrome and treat the resultant shock and arrhythmia with a combination of vasopressors, antiarrhythmics, and defibrillation. Afterward, learners participated in a formal debriefing session and completed a written evaluation. Results: Twenty-five learners (six pediatric emergency medicine fellows, 12 residents, and seven advanced practice providers) participated in the scenario over a 3-month period. The written evaluation was completed by 20 of the 25 participants; all 20 felt their confidence, comfort, and knowledge regarding the topic had increased, with an average score of 5 (strongly agree) on a 5-point Likert scale. Discussion: This simulation case offers an effective experience for learners to become comfortable and confident in recognizing and managing MIS-C.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica , Niño , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda