Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores for Children With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for pediatrics is a validated patient-reported or parent-proxy-reported outcomes assessment tool used to evaluate health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic medical conditions. The health-related quality of life of children with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) as measured by PROMIS is not well understood. We hypothesized that children with BPBI would report impaired upper extremity (UE) function but normal mobility, pain interference, and peer relationships compared with a reference pediatric population, and that UE function PROMIS scores would be associated with BPBI severity and patient age. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 180 children with BPBI ages 5 to 17 years old who responded to 4 pediatric PROMIS domains (mobility, pain interference, peer relationships, and UE function) between April 2017 and April 2019. Responses were converted to a T score, which allows comparison with a reference pediatric population (mean reference score=50). Multivariable linear regression was used to quantify the association between PROMIS scores and age, sex, Narakas type, and composite Mallet score. RESULTS: Children with BPBI had normal PROMIS mobility (49.6±8.5), pain interference (44.6±9.7), and peer relationships (52.4±10.6) scores, but reported mild impairment in UE function (40.8±12.1). Age (P<0.0001) and Narakas type (P=0.02) were associated with PROMIS UE function scores, but sex and composite Mallet scores were not. There were no significant associations between the other PROMIS domains and age, sex, Narakas Type, or composite Mallet scores. CONCLUSIONS: Children with BPBI reported PROMIS scores for mobility, pain interference, and peer relationships similar to the reference population but impairment in UE function. Reported UE function decreased with increasing disease severity and increased with age. These PROMIS domains seem to be useful tools for the clinician to evaluate children with BPBI and better understand the challenges they face. Further study is needed to assess their utility in measuring the effects of treatment interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

LGBTQ+ Perspective in Hand Surgery: Surgeon and Patient.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) individuals and patients face high levels of discrimination both in the workplace and in the clinic setting, with more than 25% of LGBTQ+ people experiencing discrimination in the workplace due to their sexual orientation. Hand Surgery stands to continue to advance by encouraging the brightest students into the field no matter their background. LGBTQ+ patients also have specific needs within the field of Hand Surgery, where we are uniquely positioned to treat them or guide them by being well versed in the needs of the community.

Hand Function Following Simulated Fusion of Thumb Metacarpophalangeal and Interphalangeal Joints.

Background: There is poor understanding regarding functional limitation of thumb strength and dexterity following thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and interphalangeal (IP) arthrodesis. The purpose of this investigation was to quantitatively evaluate the functional limitations of MCP and IP joint fusion using an orthosis to simulate fusion. Methods: Thirty-two healthy volunteers underwent simulated MCP and IP thumb arthrodesis using custom-molded orthoses. Each volunteer was independently assessed for hand and thumb function using the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test, lateral pinch strength, tip pinch strength, and Grooved Pegboard test. Comparisons between the 3 groups in all functional tests were carried out. Results: The mean lateral pinch strength was significantly greater in the unsplinted group (8.3 kg) compared with the MCP- (6.3 kg) and IP-splinted (5.7 kg) groups. Mean tip pinch strength was also significantly higher in the unsplinted group than in MCP- and IP-splinted thumbs (4.6 kg vs 4.1 and 3.9 kg). There was no difference in the Jebsen-Taylor or Grooved Pegboard test between the 3 groups. Conclusion: Our study suggests that with a fused MCP joint the lateral and tip pinch strength will decrease by 24% and 10%, respectively, compared with a healthy nonsplinted thumb. A fused IP joint will decrease lateral and tip pinch by 31% and 16%, respectively. This information does not take into account an arthritic thumb. We found that the Jebsen-Taylor test and Grooved Pegboard test were not affected by simulated thumb MCP and IP fusion.

Dorsal Dislocation of the Trapezoid with Metacarpal Instability: A Boxing Injury.

Background The second and third metacarpals are firmly attached, immobile structures which for the stable pillar of the hand. The trapezoid has been described as the keystone of the wrist, allowing a wide range of functional motion as well as inherent anatomic and biomechanical stability to the carpus. Case Description We describe a novel boxing injury with a 180-degree in situ dislocation of the right trapezoid with concomitant second and third carpometacarpal (CMC) joint dislocations. Open anatomic reduction of the trapezoid was obtained, and subsequent percutaneous pinning of the metacarpals allowed for a full functional recovery and return to sports at 6 months. Literature Review Combined trapezoid and CMC dislocations are extremely rare and have only been previously described in high-energy mechanism injuries, involving a direct dorsal force such as from the steering wheel in a motor vehicle collision. There are no previous reports of this injury occurring in the setting of direct axial load along the metacarpals in a clenched fist such as in a punch or fighting injury. Clinical Relevance The rare nature of this combined injury, its novel mechanism, and the difficulty in interpreting acute injury and postreduction radiographs require that the treating physician have a high degree of clinical suspicion for associated injuries when CMC dislocations are identified. Treatment strategies incorporating intraoperative fluoroscopy, open anatomic reduction of the trapezoid under direct visualization along with closed reduction, and pinning of the metacarpals reestablish carpal stability and provide excellent long-term results.

An Overview of Skin Antiseptics Used in Orthopaedic Surgery Procedures.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) in orthopaedics are a common complication, with more than half a million SSIs occurring in the United States each year. SSIs can carry a notable burden for patients and physicians alike. Skin antiseptic solution plays an important role in preventing SSI. Many studies have looked at different skin antiseptic solution in preventing SSIs. Different surgical preps can decrease bacterial loads at surgical sites in varying degrees. Yet, the amount of bacterial load does not always correlate with a lower risk of infection.Chlorhexidine, for example, has been shown to cause markedly less SSIs compared with povidone-iodine prep in general surgery cases. Whereas chlorhexidine with alcohol may best work in the forefoot, iodine povacrylex with alcohol is equivalent in the spine. Conversely, joint arthroplasty SSIs were markedly decreased with a combination of preps. Because of all these differences, understanding which prep solution to use and when can be invaluable to the orthopaedic surgeons.

Driving after orthopedic surgery.

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES: As a result of reading this article, physicians should be able to: (1) Identify preoperative factors that may contribute to a patient's ability to return to driving after orthopedic surgery. (2) Understand the role of upper-extremity immobilization and how it may impair a patient's ability to operate a motor vehicle. (3) Recognize how various forms of lower-extremity immobilization (e.g., controlled ankle-motion boot, cast, and Aircast Walker) affect braking reaction times and total braking times. (4) Be aware of current guidelines about when it is appropriate to return to driving following arthroscopy, lower-extremity fracture, and hip and knee arthroplasty. Few guidelines are available to assist orthopedic surgeons in advising patients about when to return to driving after orthopedic surgery. A patient's surgical procedure, postoperative weight-bearing restrictions, immobilization, and other factors influence a patient's ability to drive after orthopedic surgery. Multiple studies have used driving simulators to predict when it may be safe to return to driving after orthopedic surgery. However, study conclusions and recommendations vary significantly. This article reviews the factors contributing to a patient's ability to return to driving after orthopedic surgery and reviews recommendations based on the available literature following fracture, arthroscopy, and arthroplasty.