Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(12): 4753-4762, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30972646

RESUMEN

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVES: This is the first study to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN twenty-item scale (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20), a validated instrument designed to elicit cancer patients' experience of symptoms and functional limitations related to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. METHODS: Cancer patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy completed EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity [FACT/GOG-NTX] at baseline, second cycle of chemotherapy (T2, n = 287), and 12 months after chemotherapy (T3, n = 191). Anchor-based approach used the validated FACT/GOG-NTX neurotoxicity (Ntx) subscale to identify optimal MCID cutoff for deterioration. Distribution-based approach used one-third standard deviation (SD), half SD, and one standard error of measurement of the total EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 score. RESULTS: There was a moderate correlation between the change scores of the Ntx subscale and sensory and motor subscales of QLQ-CIPN20 (T2: r = - 0.722, p < 0.001 and r = - 0.518, p < 0.001, respectively; T3: r = - 0.699; p < 0.001 and r = - 0.523, p < 0.001, respectively). The correlation between the change scores of the Ntx subscale and the QLQ-CIPN20 autonomic subscale was poor (T2: r = - 0.354, p < 0.001; T3: r = 0.286, p < 0.001). Based on the MCID derived using distribution-based method, the MCID for the QLQ-CIPN20 sensory subscale was 2.5-5.9 (6.9% to 16.4% of the subdomain score) and for motor subscale was 2.6-5.0 (8.1%-15.6% of the subdomain score). CONCLUSION: The MCID for the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 established using distribution-based approaches was 2.5-5.9 for the sensory subscale and 2.6-5.0 for the motor subscale. When noted in assessments even with small change in scores, clinicians can be alerted for appropriate intervention.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diferencia Mínima Clínicamente Importante , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/diagnóstico , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Taxoides/efectos adversos
2.
Brain Behav ; 9(6): e01312, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31063261

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant and difficult to manage side effect of neurotoxic chemotherapies. Several risk factors for CIPN have been identified to date, but inconsistencies and methodological limitations exist in past research. Also, a limited number of potential risk factors has been investigated in the past. AIM: The objective of this study was to assess the relative contribution of a wider range of risk factors in the development of CIPN. METHODS: This analysis used the 6-month data after starting chemotherapy from a larger prospective observational study on CIPN risk, prevalence, and quality of life. Patients were assessed at recruitment for possible CIPN risk factors, including prior history of neuropathies, current/past infectious diseases; neurotoxic medication history; personal and treatment characteristics; smoking history, alcohol use, and vegetable/fruit intake. Neuropathy was assessed at 6-months after starting chemotherapy with the neuropathy (motor/sensory) items of the NCI-CTCAE scale and the WHO criterion for neuropathy. Data on symptom burden were also collected. RESULTS: Data were available from 255 patients from three cancer centers in Hong Kong, Singapore, and UK. The use of different scales did not always identify the same predictor variables. Key risk factors in multivariate regression models included older age (highest OR = 1.08, p < 0.01 with the WHO scale), chemotherapy (platinum-based chemotherapy had OR = 0.20-0.27 in developing CIPN compared to taxane-based chemotherapy), history of neuropathy (for motor CIPN only, OR = 8.36, p < 0.01), symptom burden (OR = 1.06, p < 0.05), number of chemotherapy cycles received (OR = 1.19-1.24, p < 0.01), and alcohol intake (OR = 0.32, p < 0.05). In univariate analysis, the use of statins was implicated with CIPN (p = 0.03-0.04 with different assessments) and diabetes showed a trend (p = 0.09) in the development of CIPN. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the CIPN risk related to certain variables and identified new ones. This knowledge can assist with treatment decisions and patient education.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/efectos adversos , Instituciones Oncológicas , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hong Kong , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Platino/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Taxoides/efectos adversos
3.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 36: 135-141, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30322504

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The study aimed at uncovering the symptom experience of neurotoxicity, self-adopted approaches and perspectives in managing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic (CIPN) symptoms in a sample of Chinese cancer survivors. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was used to explore individual experiences. A purposive sample of 12 female participants experiencing CIPN was invited to semi-structured interviews who were part of a larger prospective observational study investigating the natural progression and risk factors of CIPN. Textual interview data were managed in NVivo. Content analysis was used. RESULTS: Participants were aged 41-64 years and experienced moderate to severe neuropathic symptoms from 5 to 23 months after completion of a six-cycle chemotherapy regimens at reported during the interviews. Four categories emerged from the qualitative data, namely, (1) experience come to reality: characteristics of CIPN symptoms, (2) disruptions and perceived threat: ability to perform activities and resume work, (3) re-establishing an 'at least satisfactory level of well-being', and (4) views of and approaches in managing neuropathic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of CIPN symptoms causing disruptions in functional and/or psychosocial well-being from the patients' perspectives and the self-help strategies used to manage symptoms showed a need to provide quality multidisciplinary supportive care, focusing on restoring functional and psychosocial well-being, and enhancing knowledge about symptom assessment and evidence-based strategies for empowering cancer survivors to cope with this complex symptom.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Investigación Cualitativa , Factores de Riesgo , Automanejo , Evaluación de Síntomas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda