Prenatal methadone exposure and child developmental outcomes in 2-year-old children.

AIM: To examine the developmental outcomes of children born to opioid-dependent females enrolled in methadone maintenance and identify pre- and postnatal factors that place these children at developmental risk. METHOD: Ninety-nine methadone-maintained females and their 100 infants (42 females, 58 males, mean gestational age 38.8wks) were recruited during pregnancy/at birth and studied to age 2 years alongside a regionally representative comparison group of 108 non-methadone-maintained females and their 110 infants (62 females, 48 males, mean gestational age 39.2wks). Information about perinatal exposure was collected from medical records, maternal urine and infant meconium toxicological analysis, maternal interviews (at birth and at 18mo), and a home visit (at 18mo). At age 2 years, child neuromotor function, cognition, language, and emotional/behavioral dysregulation were assessed. RESULTS: Opioid-exposed children achieved lower motor, cognitive, and language scores and had poorer self, emotional, eating/feeding, and sensory processing regulation than unexposed children. After adjustment for maternal education and other substance use in pregnancy, between-group differences in child motor, cognitive, and overall dysregulation remained. Postnatal parental and family factors explained a further 40% to 52% of between-group differences in child outcomes. INTERPRETATION: These children and families are extremely high-risk and need antenatal and postnatal support. Children exposed to opioids during pregnancy have pervasive developmental difficulties by age 2 years. These challenges are largely explained by adverse pregnancy and socio-environmental exposures, emphasizing the importance of specialist prenatal care and postnatal intervention support. What this paper adds Children born to opioid-dependent females are at high risk of pervasive developmental problems. These problems span a range of functional domains, including motor, cognitive, language, and behavioral/emotional dysregulation. Contributing factors include other adverse pregnancy exposures, postnatal environmental factors, and the direct effects of prenatal opioid exposure.

An abnormal cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) is predictive of early childhood delayed neurodevelopment in the setting of fetal growth restriction.

BACKGROUND: Fetal growth restriction accounts for a significant proportion of perinatal morbidity and death. The cerebroplacental ratio is gaining much interest as a useful tool in differentiating the "at-risk" fetus in both fetal growth restriction and appropriate-for-gestational-age pregnancies. The Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health in Fetal Growth Restriction group has demonstrated previously that the presence of this "brain-sparing" effect is associated significantly with adverse perinatal outcomes in the fetal growth restriction cohort. However, data about neurodevelopment in children from pregnancies that are complicated by fetal growth restriction are sparse and conflicting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health in Fetal Growth Restriction NeuroDevelopmental Assessment Study was to determine whether children born after fetal growth-restricted pregnancies are at additional risk of adverse early childhood developmental outcomes compared with children born small for gestational age. The objective of this secondary analysis was to describe the role of cerebroplacental ratio in the prediction of adverse early childhood neurodevelopmental outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were recruited prospectively from the Perinatal Ireland multicenter observational Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health in Fetal Growth Restriction study cohort. Fetal growth restriction was defined as birthweight <10th percentile with abnormal antenatal umbilical artery Doppler indices. Small for gestational age was defined similarly in the absence of abnormal Doppler indices. Cerebroplacental ratio was calculated with the pulsatility indices of the middle cerebral artery and divided by umbilical artery with an abnormal value <1. Children (n=375) were assessed at 3 years with the use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition. Small-for-gestational-age pregnancies with normal Doppler indices were compared with (1) fetal growth-restricted cases with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler and normal cerebroplacental ratio or (2) fetal growth restriction cases with both abnormal umbilical artery and cerebroplacental ratio. Statistical analysis was performed with statistical software via 2-sample t-test with Bonferroni adjustment, and a probability value of .00625 was considered significant. RESULTS: Assessments were performed on 198 small-for-gestational-age children, 136 fetal growth-restricted children with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler images and normal cerebroplacental ratio, and 41 fetal growth-restricted children with both abnormal umbilical artery Doppler and cerebroplacental ratio. At 3 years of age, although there were no differences in head circumference, children who also had an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio had persistently shorter stature (P=.005) and lower weight (P=.18). Children from fetal growth restriction-affected pregnancies demonstrated poorer neurodevelopmental outcome than their small-for-gestational-age counterparts. Fetal growth-restricted pregnancies with an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio had significantly poorer neurologic outcome at 3 years of age across all measured variables. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that growth-restricted pregnancies with a cerebroplacental ratio <1 have a significantly increased risk of delayed neurodevelopment at 3 years of age when compared with pregnancies with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler evidence alone. This study further substantiates the benefit of routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio in fetal growth-restricted pregnancies and for counseling parents regarding the long-term outcome of affected infants.

Prenatal stress and hemodynamics in pregnancy: a systematic review.

Maternal prenatal stress is associated with preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, and developmental delay. However, the impact of prenatal stress on hemodynamics during pregnancy remains unclear. This systematic review was conducted in order to assess the quality of the evidence available to date regarding the relationship between prenatal stress and maternal-fetal hemodynamics. The PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Maternity and Infant Care, Trip, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases were searched using the search terms pregnancy; stress; fetus; blood; Doppler; ultrasound. Studies were eligible for inclusion if prenatal stress was assessed with standardized measures, hemodynamics was measured with Doppler ultrasound, and methods were adequately described. A specifically designed data extraction form was used. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using well-accepted quality appraisal guidelines. Of 2532 studies reviewed, 12 met the criteria for inclusion. Six reported that prenatal stress significantly affects maternal or fetal hemodynamics; six found no significant association between maternal stress and circulation. Significant relationships between prenatal stress and uterine artery resistance (RI) and pulsatility (PI) indices, umbilical artery RI, PI, and systolic/diastolic ratio, fetal middle cerebral artery PI, cerebroplacental ratio, and umbilical vein volume blood flow were found. To date, there is limited evidence that prenatal stress is associated with changes in circulation. More carefully designed studies with larger sample sizes, repeated assessments across gestation, tighter control for confounding factors, and measures of pregnancy-specific stress will clarify this relationship.

Early psychosocial development of small for gestational age and intrauterine growth-restricted children: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To examine evidence regarding psychosocial development from one month to four years of age in small for gestational age and intrauterine growth-restricted children. STUDY DESIGN: Studies were included if participants met criteria for small for gestational age or intrauterine growth restriction, follow-up was from age 1 month to 4 years, methods were described, and appropriate comparison groups were included. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using quality-appraisal guidelines. RESULTS: Of 3216 studies reviewed, 24 were included. Poorer psychosocial development was described for small for gestational age children in 15 and for intrauterine growth-restricted children in 3 studies. Only 5 studies measured placental insufficiency using Doppler ultrasound. Study heterogeneity limited synthesis and interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence suggests that small for gestational age children are at risk of poorer early childhood psychosocial outcomes, further research is required to clarify whether placental insufficiency is associated with poorer early psychosocial development.

Early inhibitory control and working memory abilities of children prenatally exposed to methadone.

BACKGROUND: Methadone maintenance is the most common method of treating opioid-dependent pregnant women. However, little is known about the impact of prenatal methadone exposure on child neurocognitive development. AIMS: To examine the early executive functioning of children born to methadone-maintained mothers, and to assess relations between executive functioning and later emotional and behavioral adjustment. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 68 methadone-exposed children and 88 non-methadone-exposed children. OUTCOME MEASURES: At age 2years, children's inhibitory control and working memory were assessed using the Snack Delay and Three Boxes tasks. At 2 and 4.5years, their emotional and behavioral adjustment was assessed using the caregiver-completed Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. RESULTS: Methadone-exposed children had poorer inhibitory control than non-exposed children (p<0.0001). These differences were explained by maternal education and prenatal benzodiazepine use. With respect to working memory, although both groups performed similarly on the first trial set, non-exposed children significantly improved their performance on the second trial set (p=0.002), while methadone-exposed children did not (p=0.92). Inhibitory control at age 2years was predictive of higher conduct (p=0.001), hyperactivity (p=0.0001), peer relationship (p=0.02), and total (p<0.0001) problems at 4.5years even after adjustment for behavioral problems at 2years. CONCLUSIONS: Methadone-exposed children demonstrate difficulties with inhibitory control and possibly sustained attention/learning. These difficulties were explained by factors correlated with maternal prenatal methadone use. Longer-term follow-up of these children is needed to understand the effects of prenatal methadone exposure and related maternal factors on executive functioning and behavioral adjustment.

Pregnancy-specific stress, fetoplacental haemodynamics, and neonatal outcomes in women with small for gestational age pregnancies: a secondary analysis of the multicentre Prospective Observational Trial to Optimise Paediatric Health in Intrauterine Growth Restriction.

OBJECTIVES: To examine associations between maternal pregnancy-specific stress and umbilical (UA PI) and middle cerebral artery pulsatility indices (MCA PI), cerebroplacental ratio, absent end diastolic flow (AEDF), birthweight, prematurity, neonatal intensive care unit admission and adverse obstetric outcomes in women with small for gestational age pregnancies. It was hypothesised that maternal pregnancy-specific stress would be associated with fetoplacental haemodynamics and neonatal outcomes. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data collected for a large-scale prospective observational study. SETTING: This study was conducted in the seven major obstetric hospitals in Ireland and Northern Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 331 women who participated in the Prospective Observational Trial to Optimise Paediatric Health in Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Women with singleton pregnancies between 24 and 36 weeks gestation, estimated fetal weight <10th percentile and no major structural or chromosomal abnormalities were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Serial Doppler ultrasound examinations of the umbilical and middle cerebral arteries between 20 and 42 weeks gestation, Pregnancy Distress Questionnaire (PDQ) scores between 23 and 40 weeks gestation and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Concerns about physical symptoms and body image at 35-40 weeks were associated with lower odds of abnormal UAPI (OR 0.826, 95% CI 0.696 to 0.979, p=0.028). PDQ score (OR 1.073, 95% CI 1.012 to 1.137, p=0.017), concerns about birth and the baby (OR 1.143, 95% CI 1.037 to 1.260, p=0.007) and concerns about physical symptoms and body image (OR 1.283, 95% CI 1.070 to 1.538, p=0.007) at 29-34 weeks were associated with higher odds of abnormal MCA PI. Concerns about birth and the baby at 29-34 weeks (OR 1.202, 95% CI 1.018 to 1.421, p=0.030) were associated with higher odds of AEDF. Concerns about physical symptoms and body image at 35-40 weeks were associated with decreased odds of neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR 0.635, 95% CI 0.435 to 0.927, p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that fetoplacental haemodynamics may be a mechanistic link between maternal prenatal stress and fetal and neonatal well-being, but additional research is required.

Early childhood neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Children who experienced intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) may be at increased risk for adverse developmental outcomes in early childhood. The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review of neurodevelopmental outcomes from 6 months to 3 years after IUGR. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Maternity and Infant Care, and CINAHL databases were searched by using the search terms intrauterine, fetal, growth restriction, child development, neurodevelopment, early childhood, cognitive, motor, speech, language. Studies were eligible for inclusion if participants met specified criteria for growth restriction, follow-up was conducted within 6 months to 3 years, methods were adequately described, non-IUGR comparison groups were included, and full English text of the article was available. A specifically designed data extraction form was used. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using well-documented quality-appraisal guidelines. RESULTS: Of 731 studies reviewed, 16 were included. Poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes after IUGR were described in 11. Ten found motor, 8 cognitive, and 7 language delays. Other delays included social development, attention, and adaptive behavior. Only 8 included abnormal Doppler parameters in their definitions of IUGR. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that children are at risk for poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes following IUGR from 6 months to 3 years of age. The heterogeneity of primary outcomes, assessment measures, adjustment for confounding variables, and definitions of IUGR limits synthesis and interpretation. Sample sizes in most studies were small, and some examined preterm IUGR children without including term IUGR or AGA comparison groups, limiting the value of extant studies.