RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (designated as carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension in the United States) provides stable plasma levodopa concentrations and reduces motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson's disease patients through continuous delivery of levodopa via percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy. We report long-term safety and efficacy outcomes from an open-label phase 3 treatment program. METHODS: PD patients (n = 262) who completed a 12-week double-blind study and its 52-week open-label extension or a separate 54-week open-label study were enrolled in this ongoing phase 3 open-label, multinational study (NCT00660673). Safety and efficacy assessments were collected every 6 months. RESULTS: Mean total duration of exposure to levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel was 4.1 years (range, 1.2 to 6.9 years). The overall discontinuation rate was 34% (average annual discontinuation rate, 10%). Although most patients (94%) reported an adverse event, the rate of adverse events decreased over time; 53% experienced a serious adverse event. Of patients in this extension study, 54% required jejunal tube replacement during the study, and 37% required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement. Most patients were on levodopa monotherapy. Patients maintained reductions in "off" time and increases in mean "on" time without dyskinesia from initial levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion to he study end point (P < 0.001; n = 81). Activities of daily living and quality-of-life assessments demonstrated significant improvements that persisted through the study. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term study demonstrates sustained and clinically meaningful benefits from levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced PD patients. Although adverse event rates decreased over time, vigilance is required for device-related complications and adverse events. © 2018 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Carbidopa/uso terapéutico , Geles/uso terapéutico , Intestinos/fisiología , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conducta Compulsiva/inducido químicamente , Conducta Compulsiva/epidemiología , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Polineuropatías/inducido químicamente , Polineuropatías/epidemiología , Pérdida de Peso/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Purpose/aim: AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA) is an acetylcholine release inhibitor and a neuromuscular blocking agent. The United States prescribing information for abobotulinumtoxinA previously indicated only one dilution for cervical dystonia: 500 U/1 mL. Clinical trial data supporting a larger volume with a 500 U/2 mL dilution would offer clinicians flexibility with injection volume to better meet patient needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 12-week, phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT01753310). Adult subjects with a primary diagnosis of cervical dystonia were randomized (2:1) to receive a single injection of either abobotulinumtoxinA, 500 U/2 mL dilution, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was changed from baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale total score at Week 4. RESULTS: A total of 134 subjects (abobotulinumtoxinA, n = 89; placebo, n = 45) were randomized (intent-to-treat population) and 129 (abobotulinumtoxinA, n = 84; placebo, n = 45) completed the Week 4 primary endpoint evaluation (modified intent-to-treat population). In the modified intent-to-treat population, subjects receiving abobotulinumtoxinA experienced significantly greater changes from baseline versus placebo on the primary endpoint (weighted overall treatment difference -8.3, P < 0.001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dysphagia, muscle weakness, neck pain and headache. Overall, TEAEs were consistent with those reported in the abobotulinumtoxinA prescribing information (1 mL dilution) for cervical dystonia patients. CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides evidence that a 500 U/2 mL dilution is an effective treatment for cervical dystonia and exhibits a safety profile consistent with the known safety profile of abobotulinumtoxinA.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Liberación de Acetilcolina/uso terapéutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Tortícolis/tratamiento farmacológico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rasagiline and pramipexole act to improve striatal dopaminergic transmission in PD via distinct and potentially synergistic mechanisms. We performed a placebo-controlled study to determine whether 2 doses of a novel slow-release, low-dose combination of rasagiline and pramipexole (P2B001) are effective and have a good safety profile in patients with early untreated PD. METHODS: Previously untreated patients with early PD were randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily treatment with P2B001 (0.3 mg pramipexole/0.75 mg rasagiline), P2B001 (0.6 mg pramipexole/0.75 mg rasagiline) or placebo in a 12-week multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to final visit in Total-UPDRS score versus placebo. Secondary measures included responder analyses of patients achieving ≥4 UPDRS point reduction, and changes in Parkinson Disease Quality of Life Scale-39 and UPDRS activities of daily living and motor scores. RESULTS: A total of 149 participants were randomized and 136 (91.3%) completed the study. Adjusted mean change from baseline to final visit versus placebo in Total-UPDRS score was -4.67 ± 1.28 points for the P2B001 0.6/0.75 mg group (P = .0004) and -3.84 ± 1.25 points for the 0.3/0.75 mg group (P = .003). Significant benefits were also observed for both doses in the responder analysis (P = .0002 and P = .0001), Parkinson Disease Quality of Life Scale-39 scores (P = .05 and P = .01), and the UPDRS motor (P = .02 and P = .006) and activities of daily living (P = .005 and P = .0004) subscores. Adverse events of P2B001 were comparable to placebo apart from transient nausea and somnolence, which were more common with P2B001 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: P2B001 offers a promising treatment option for patients with early PD with good clinical efficacy and a low risk of adverse events. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Benzotiazoles/uso terapéutico , Indanos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pramipexol , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trietilenomelamina , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The metabotropic glutamate receptor 5-negative allosteric modulator dipraglurant reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesia in the MPTP-macaque model. The objective of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability (primary objective), and efficacy (secondary objective) of dipraglurant on levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: The study was a phase 2A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (2:1), 4-week, parallel-group, multicenter dose-escalation (from 50 mg once daily to 100 mg 3 times daily) clinical trial involving 76 PD subjects with moderate to severe levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Safety and tolerability were assessed based on clinical and biological examination and adverse events recording. Secondary efficacy outcome measures included the modified Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, UPDRS, and diaries. Pharmacokinetics were measured at 3 visits following a single dose. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were exposed to dipraglurant and 24 to placebo. There were no major safety concerns. Two subjects did not complete the study because of adverse events. Most frequent adverse events included dyskinesia, dizziness, nausea, and fatigue. Dipraglurant significantly reduced peak dose dyskinesia (modified Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) on day 1 (50 mg, 20%; P = 0.04) and on day 14 (100 mg, 32%; P =0 .04) and across a 3-hour postdose period on day 14 (P = 0.04). There was no evidence of worsening of parkinsonism. Dipraglurant was rapidly absorbed (tmax = 1 hour). The 100-mg dose led to a mean Cmax of 1844 ng/mL on day 28. CONCLUSIONS: Dipraglurant proved to be safe and well tolerated in its first administration to PD patients. Its efficacy in reversing levodopa-induced dyskinesia warrants further investigations in a larger number of patients. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Asunto(s)
Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Imidazoles/farmacología , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridinas/farmacología , Receptor del Glutamato Metabotropico 5/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Continuous administration of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension) through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy is a treatment option for advanced Parkinson disease (PD) patients with motor fluctuations resistant to standard oral medications. Safety data from 4 prospective studies were integrated to assess the safety of this therapy. METHODS: Safety data from 4 studies were summarized using 2 overlapping data sets, permitting the separation of procedure/device-associated (n = 395) from non-procedure/device adverse events (n = 412). RESULTS: At the data cutoff, median exposure to levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel was 911 days (range, 1-1980 days) with 963 total patient-years of exposure. Procedure/device adverse events occurred in 300 patients (76%), and serious adverse events occurred in 68 (17%); most frequently reported procedure/device adverse events and serious adverse events were complications of device insertion (41% and 8%, respectively) and abdominal pain (36% and 4%, respectively). Non-procedure/device adverse events occurred in 92% (379), with most frequently reported being insomnia (23%) and falls (23%); 42% (171) had non-procedure/device serious adverse events, with most frequently reported being pneumonia (5%) and PD symptoms (2%). Adverse events led to discontinuation in 17% (72), most frequently because of complication of device insertion (2.4%). There were 34 treatment-emergent deaths (8.3%) in the overlapping data sets, 2 of which (0.5%) were considered "possibly related" to the treatment system. CONCLUSION: In the largest collection of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel safety data from prospective clinical studies, procedure/device events were frequently reported and occasionally life threatening. Most non-procedure/device events were typical for levodopa treatment and an elderly population. These factors combined with high treatment efficacy led to a relatively low discontinuation rate in advanced PD patients.
Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Carbidopa/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Infusiones Parenterales/efectos adversos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antiparkinsonianos/administración & dosificación , Carbidopa/administración & dosificación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Geles , Humanos , Levodopa/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD) are associated with long-term oral levodopa treatment and linked to pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation. L-dopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is delivered continuously by percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy tube (PEG-J), which reduces L-dopa-plasma-level fluctuations and can translate to reduced motor complications. We present final results of the largest international, prospective, 54-week, open-label LCIG study. PD patients with severe motor fluctuations (>3 h/day "off" time) despite optimized therapy received LCIG monotherapy. Additional PD medications were allowed >28 days post-LCIG initiation. Safety was the primary endpoint measured through adverse events (AEs), device complications, and number of completers. Secondary endpoints included diary-assessed off time, "on" time with/without troublesome dyskinesia, UPDRS, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes. Of 354 enrolled patients, 324 (91.5%) received PEG-J and 272 (76.8%) completed the study. Most AEs were mild/moderate and transient; complication of device insertion (34.9%) was the most common. Twenty-seven (7.6%) patients withdrew because of AEs. Serious AEs occurred in 105 (32.4%), most commonly complication of device insertion (6.5%). Mean daily off time decreased by 4.4 h/65.6% (P < 0.001). On time without troublesome dyskinesia increased by 4.8 h/62.9% (P < 0.001); on time with troublesome dyskinesia decreased by 0.4 h/22.5% (P = 0.023). Improvements persisted from week 4 through study completion. UPDRS and HRQoL outcomes were also improved throughout. In the advanced PD population, LCIG's safety profile consisted primarily of AEs associated with the device/procedure, l-dopa/carbidopa, and advanced PD. LCIG was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinically significant improvements in motor function, daily activities, and HRQoL sustained over 54 weeks.
Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Carbidopa/uso terapéutico , Geles , Intestinos/fisiología , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Geles/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Intestinos/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: There are no treatments available to slow or prevent the progression of Parkinson disease, despite its global prevalence and significant health care burden. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Exploratory Trials in Parkinson Disease program was established to promote discovery of potential therapies. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether creatine monohydrate was more effective than placebo in slowing long-term clinical decline in participants with Parkinson disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Long-term Study 1, a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 1:1 randomized efficacy trial. Participants were recruited from 45 investigative sites in the United States and Canada and included 1741 men and women with early (within 5 years of diagnosis) and treated (receiving dopaminergic therapy) Parkinson disease. Participants were enrolled from March 2007 to May 2010 and followed up until September 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to placebo or creatine (10 g/d) monohydrate for a minimum of 5 years (maximum follow-up, 8 years). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was a difference in clinical decline from baseline to 5-year follow-up, compared between the 2 treatment groups using a global statistical test. Clinical status was defined by 5 outcome measures: Modified Rankin Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, PDQ-39 Summary Index, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living scale, and ambulatory capacity. All outcomes were coded such that higher scores indicated worse outcomes and were analyzed by a global statistical test. Higher summed ranks (range, 5-4775) indicate worse outcomes. RESULTS: The trial was terminated early for futility based on results of a planned interim analysis of participants enrolled at least 5 years prior to the date of the analysis (n = 955). The median follow-up time was 4 years. Of the 955 participants, the mean of the summed ranks for placebo was 2360 (95% CI, 2249-2470) and for creatine was 2414 (95% CI, 2304-2524). The global statistical test yielded t1865.8 = -0.75 (2-sided P = .45). There were no detectable differences (P < .01 to partially adjust for multiple comparisons) in adverse and serious adverse events by body system. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with early and treated Parkinson disease, treatment with creatine monohydrate for at least 5 years, compared with placebo did not improve clinical outcomes. These findings do not support the use of creatine monohydrate in patients with Parkinson disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00449865.
Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Creatina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Creatina/efectos adversos , Creatina/sangre , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Introduction: In the United States (US), prophylactic treatment with the antiemetic trimethobenzamide has been used before initiating apomorphine therapy. However, US trimethobenzamide stores have been depleted, leaving uncertainty regarding whether antiemetic pretreatment is needed. Methods: This modified Delphi panel aimed to inform circumstances when apomorphine is initiated without antiemetic pretreatment. During Round 1, a panel of 9 US movement disorder specialists rated the appropriateness of prescribing apomorphine therapy with and without antiemetic pretreatment across 192 patient scenarios and were able to review their scores in relation to other scores. During the Round 2, consensus was defined for each scenario as either strong (>75 % agreement) or moderate (66 % agreement). Results: There was strong consensus on 118 of 192 scenario's (97 as appropriate and 21 as inappropriate), moderate consensus on 29 scenarios, some agreement on 32 scenarios, and lack of agreement on 13 scenarios. In the absence of an antiemetic, there was strong consensus that titration schedules should be flexible and based on dose response. However, the group only reached moderate consensus on the speed of titration, highlighting the need for more systematic information on this area. In the presence of an antiemetic, panelists considered usual initial dosing and flexible titration to be appropriate in most scenarios except for when the patient is already experiencing dopaminergic adverse events. Conclusions: Experts generally reached consensus that apomorphine can usually be prescribed without antiemetic pretreatment. Recommendations described here reflect the areas of greatest agreement among a panel of experts based on current available evidence.
RESUMEN
Common mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions are large structural variants in the mitochondrial genome that accumulate in metabolically active tissues with age and have been investigated in various diseases. We applied the Splice-Break2 pipeline (designed for high-throughput quantification of mtDNA deletions) to human RNA-Seq datasets and describe the methodological considerations for evaluating common deletions in bulk, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics datasets. A robust evaluation of 1570 samples from 14 RNA-Seq studies showed: (i) the abundance of some common deletions detected in PCR-amplified mtDNA correlates with levels observed in RNA-Seq data; (ii) RNA-Seq library preparation method has a strong effect on deletion detection; (iii) deletions had a significant, positive correlation with age in brain and muscle; (iv) deletions were enriched in cortical grey matter, specifically in layers 3 and 5; and (v) brain regions with dopaminergic neurons (i.e., substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, and caudate nucleus) had remarkable enrichment of common mtDNA deletions.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo , Sustancia Negra , Humanos , RNA-Seq , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Sustancia Negra/metabolismo , ADN Mitocondrial/genética , ADN Mitocondrial/metabolismo , Mitocondrias/genéticaRESUMEN
Tremor is a common symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). The underlying pathophysiology of parkinsonian rest tremor is not well understood. Rest tremor is less responsive to dopaminergic therapy than are symptoms of bradykinesia and rigidity. This paper reviews the effects of 1 mg daily oral rasagiline, as monotherapy and as adjunct therapy, on parkinsonian tremor. A literature search of the EMBASE database was conducted to identify relevant articles in English published between 2000 and October, 2012 using the search terms "rasagiline," or "Azilect®," or "Agilect®," and refined using the terms "Parkinson's disease" and "clinical trial." Of 22 identified publications, two large placebo-controlled trials of rasagiline monotherapy (TEMPO and ADAGIO) and two large placebo-controlled trials of rasagiline as adjunctive therapy with levodopa (PRESTO and LARGO) specifically evaluated the effect of rasagiline on tremor using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor examination. Prospective and post-hoc analyses from these phase III studies show rasagiline monotherapy significantly improved tremor symptoms in early PD, independent of disease duration, compared with placebo. In levodopa-treated patients with motor fluctuations who were already receiving optimized dopaminergic treatment, the addition of rasagiline adjunct therapy significantly improved tremor symptoms. Significant improvement was evident as early as 10 weeks from treatment initiation. Tremor symptoms also improved in a subset of patients with severe tremor when rasagiline was added to their existing PD treatment regimen. These data suggest that rasagiline used as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy is effective for reducing tremor severity in patients with PD.
Asunto(s)
Indanos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Temblor/tratamiento farmacológico , Temblor/etiología , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Sialorrhea is the excessive accumulation of saliva, a prevalent symptom among a number of neurologic conditions in both pediatric and adult patients. Over the years, the management of sialorrhea has evolved and included a variety of interventions, ranging from nonpharmacologic, pharmacologic, and surgical treatment options. The most common option for treatment has been the use of botulinum toxin injections in the management of sialorrhea. While there have been several clinical trials to assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin in the treatment of sialorrhea, the largest randomized control trials to date have been with incobotulinumtoxin (2019) and rimabotulinumtoxin (2020) which show consistent reduction in salivary flow rate and improvement in clinical outcomes with comparable duration of treatment effectiveness. In this update, we review the evolution of treatment and injection methods for sialorrhea among many neurologic diseases. We discuss the challenges in evaluating and measuring efficacy in clinical trials for sialorrhea and compare the contemporary botulinum toxin clinical trials in the treatment of sialorrhea.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Sialorrea , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Sialorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Swedish population-based national health registers are widely used data sources in epidemiological research. Register-based diagnoses of Parkinson's disease have not been validated against clinical information. METHODS: Parkinson's disease (PD) and other parkinsonian disorder diagnoses were ascertained in two registers, i.e. the National Patient Register (NPR) and the Cause of Death Register (CDR). Diagnoses were validated in terms of accuracy (positive predictive value) and sensitivity against data from a population-based study of PD in 1998-2004 that screened more than 35,000 persons and identified 194 cases of parkinsonian disorders including 132 PD cases (the gold standard for the purposes of this study). RESULTS: Accuracy for any parkinsonian disorder diagnoses was 88.0% in the NPR and 94.4% in the CDR. Accuracy of PD diagnoses was 70.8% in the NPR and 66.7% in the CDR. Misclassification between differential parkinsonian diagnoses was common. The accuracy of PD diagnoses in the NPR improved to 83.0% by restricting the definition to primary diagnoses only. The sensitivity of PD diagnoses in the NPR and CDR combined was 83.1%, with a mean time to detection of 6.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based national health registers are valid data sources in epidemiological studies of PD or parkinsonian disorder etiology but are less suitable in studies of incidence or prevalence.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades en Gemelos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades en Gemelos/epidemiología , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sistema de Registros , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Suecia/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Droxidopa/uso terapéutico , Hipotensión Ortostática/complicaciones , Hipotensión Ortostática/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Hipotensión Ortostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Síncope/tratamiento farmacológico , Síncope/etiologíaAsunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Droxidopa/uso terapéutico , Hipotensión Ortostática/complicaciones , Hipotensión Ortostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Autonómica Pura/complicacionesAsunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Droxidopa/uso terapéutico , Fludrocortisona/uso terapéutico , Hipotensión Ortostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Midodrina/uso terapéutico , Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión Ortostática/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicacionesRESUMEN
We discuss a shift in the treatment paradigm for OFF episode management in patients with Parkinson's disease, based on clinical experience in the United States (US). Three "on-demand" treatments are currently available in the US as follows: subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa inhalation powder, and sublingual apomorphine. We empirically propose that "on-demand" treatments can be utilized as a complementary treatment when OFF episodes emerge and can be utilized when needed rather than reserving these treatments only until other treatment approaches (adjustment of baseline treatment and/or addition of adjunctive treatment with "ON-extenders") have failed. Current treatment approaches combine "ON-extenders" with increasing levodopa dosing and/or frequency to treat OFF episodes. Yet, OFF episodes often persist, with a substantial amount of daily OFF time. OFF episode treatment is hindered by variable gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of oral levodopa, reflecting GI dysmotility and protein competition. Novel "on-demand" treatments bypass the gut and can improve OFF symptoms more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. With the emergence of novel "on-demand" treatments, we conclude that a shift in treatment paradigm to the earlier, complementary use of these medications be considered.
RESUMEN
Disease modification or slowing the progression of any neurodegenerative disorder represents a dire unmet need. There have been trials for several decades specifically designed to help evaluate whether a specific therapy might be able to slow the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) or be disease modifying. Trials evaluating the use of coenzyme Q10, pramipexole, and levodopa suggest that these medications offer symptomatic benefit uniquely, while other studies reveal that rasagiline and selegiline may be disease modifying. This review will discuss in detail the design and results of clinical trials for varied medical therapies that were specifically undertaken to discern whether a particular treatment might be disease modifying in the treatment of PD.
Asunto(s)
Progresión de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/patología , Antiparkinsonianos/clasificación , Antiparkinsonianos/metabolismo , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Humanos , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/clasificación , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/metabolismo , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Assess motor function and quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects with end-of-dose wearing off (EODWO), comparing immediate and delayed switch (IS, DEL) to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE). BACKGROUND: LCE treatment improves motor function in PD patients with EODWO. Correlations with QoL have not been previously assessed. METHODS: A 16-week, prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study in PD subjects on stable levodopa/carbidopa (LC) doses with EODWO. The IS subjects switched to LCE at baseline; DEL subjects at week 4. The primary efficacy variable was UPDRS III score (baseline to week 4). QoL measurements (PDQUALIF, PDQ-39) were assessed at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and study endpoint. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population comprised 350/359 patients (IS, n = 177; DEL, n = 173). A significant decrease in UPDRS III scores at week 4 was observed (IS, 3.7U, p < .0001; DEL, 1.8U, p = .0018). Group differences favored IS (1.9U, p = .0148). At week 8, IS subjects had significant total score decreases in PDQUALIF (2.5U, p = .0133) and PDQ-39 (5.8U, p = .0001). In the mobility and activities of daily living PDQ-39 subdomains, IS subjects had significantly larger week 4 decreases (versus DEL p = .0331 and p = .0125, respectively). Adverse events included diarrhea (14.5%), nausea (12.3%), and dizziness (8.4%). CONCLUSION: The IS provided greater motor improvement at week 4 and improved QoL at week 8.
Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/administración & dosificación , Catecoles/administración & dosificación , Levodopa/administración & dosificación , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/farmacocinética , Carbidopa/administración & dosificación , Carbidopa/efectos adversos , Carbidopa/farmacocinética , Catecoles/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Levodopa/farmacocinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
Long-term safety and efficacy of once-daily ropinirole prolonged release (PR) were evaluated in subjects with early Parkinson's disease (PD). Subjects (n = 83) who completed one of two studies were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, extension study, and followed for up to 78 months. Ropinirole PR was titrated/continued, and adjusted as appropriate during the maintenance phase (maximum 24 mg/day). L-dopa and other non-dopamine agonist PD medications were permitted. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs). Efficacy outcomes included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II and III scores, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scores. The median duration of ropinirole PR exposure was 1,069 days. Most subjects (97.6%) reported at least one AE, most commonly (≥ 30%) nausea (42.2%), dizziness (41.0%), peripheral edema (38.6%), back pain (33.7%), and headache (31.3%). Seventeen (20.5%) subjects discontinued due to an AE. UPDRS and CGI scores indicated that the clinical status of subjects was maintained throughout the treatment period. In patients with early PD, long-term treatment with once-daily ropinirole PR was not associated with any new safety concerns, and was effective in maintaining clinical status. These results support the extended use of ropinirole PR for treatment of PD.