Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 59(1): 48-52, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31882147

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to assess inter- and intraobserver agreement of the traditional systems (Ruedi-Allgower, AO [Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen], and Topliss) and the newly proposed Leonetti classification system of pilon fractures. We studied all patients at our center who underwent pilon fracture surgery over a 2-year period: 68 patients (70 legs) were included. Four observers independently classified each pilon fracture according to the Ruedi-Allgower, AO, Topliss, and Leonetti systems by evaluating radiographs and computed tomography images on 2 occasions. The inter- and intraobserver agreements were calculated using the Fleiss kappa test. Interobserver reliability was good for AO types (A, B, and C) and Ruedi-Allgower (κ = 0.71 and 0.61, respectively), whereas the interobserver reliability was moderate for AO groups (A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, and C3), Topliss families, Topliss subfamilies, Leonetti types, and Leonetti subtypes. Intraobserver reproducibility was excellent for the Ruedi-Allgower classification, AO types, and Topliss families and good for AO groups, Topliss subfamilies, and Leonetti types and subtypes. Ruedi-Allgower and AO classification systems are the most reliable among those currently used for pilon fractures, but with lower agreement at the AO group level. The use of Topliss and Leonetti classification systems is not recommended because of less favorable results.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de la Tibia/clasificación , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Fijación de Fractura , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto Joven
2.
Cancer Cell Int ; 19: 22, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30718977

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A series of studies has investigated the prognostic role and clinical significance of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the results were inconsistent. We aimed to clarify the prognostic role of PD-L1 and relationship between PD-L1 expression and several important clinicopathological features. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Science Citation Index Expanded were systematically searched. All cohort or case-control studies comparing the prognosis and clinical features between the high PD-L1 and low PD-L1 groups were included. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Begg's test. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Seventeen studies including 2979 patients were eligible. The overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between the high and low PD-L1 groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.65: P = 0.07) with significant heterogeneity (P < 0.001; I2 = 81%). The recurrence-free survival (RFS) was not significantly different between the high and low PD-L1 groups (HR: 1.22; 95% CI 0.97-1.53; P = 0.09) with significant heterogeneity (P < 0.001; I2 = 78%). The expression of PD-L1 was found to be significantly correlated with alpha-fetoprotein, hepatitis history, and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Begg's test found no significant publication bias for OS and RFS. Sensitivity analysis established the robustness of our results. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis found the region of research as a significant contributor to inter-study heterogeneity in RFS, indicating some racial differences in the prognostic role of PD-L1. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no significant prognostic role of PD-L1 in HCC patients after potential curative hepatectomy based on our included studies. The expression of PD-L1 was significantly correlated with AFP, hepatitis history, and TILs. The prognostic role of PD-L1 in HCC warrants further investigation.

3.
Med Hypotheses ; 136: 109506, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31841766

RESUMEN

Infected nonunion is still a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. The goal of treatment is to eliminate infection and achieve bone union. Surgery is the only effective method currently. However, it is invasive and the results are still unsatisfactory. Therefore, seeking a noninvasive and effective method to resolve infected nonunion is necessary. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) has been used for the treatment of nonunion for more than 40 years. PEMF could promote bone formation at tissue, cell and subcellular levels. Furthermore, our study showed that PEMF had bactericidal effect. The hypothesis we proposed herein is that PEMF may be an adjuvant treatment for infected nonunion by controlling infection and inducing bone formation.


Asunto(s)
Campos Electromagnéticos , Curación de Fractura , Magnetoterapia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Infección de Heridas/prevención & control , Huesos/microbiología , Fracturas Óseas , Fracturas no Consolidadas/fisiopatología , Fracturas no Consolidadas/terapia , Humanos , Riesgo , Staphylococcus aureus , Fracturas de la Tibia/fisiopatología , Fracturas de la Tibia/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda