Immersive virtual reality gameplay detects visuospatial atypicality, including unilateral spatial neglect, following brain injury: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: In neurorehabilitation, problems with visuospatial attention, including unilateral spatial neglect, are prevalent and routinely assessed by pen-and-paper tests, which are limited in accuracy and sensitivity. Immersive virtual reality (VR), which motivates a much wider (more intuitive) spatial behaviour, promises new futures for identifying visuospatial atypicality in multiple measures, which reflects cognitive and motor diversity across individuals with brain injuries. METHODS: In this pilot study, we had 9 clinician controls (mean age 43 years; 4 males) and 13 neurorehabilitation inpatients (mean age 59 years; 9 males) recruited a mean of 41 days post-injury play a VR visual search game. Primary injuries included 7 stroke, 4 traumatic brain injury, 2 other acquired brain injury. Three patients were identified as having left sided neglect prior to taking part in the VR. Response accuracy, reaction time, and headset and controller raycast orientation quantified gameplay. Normative modelling identified the typical gameplay bounds, and visuospatial atypicality was defined as gameplay beyond these bounds. RESULTS: The study found VR to be feasible, with only minor instances of motion sickness, positive user experiences, and satisfactory system usability. Crucially, the analytical method, which emphasized identifying 'visuospatial atypicality,' proved effective. Visuospatial atypicality was more commonly observed in patients compared to controls and was prevalent in both groups of patients-those with and without neglect. CONCLUSION: Our research indicates that normative modelling of VR gameplay is a promising tool for identifying visuospatial atypicality after acute brain injury. This approach holds potential for a detailed examination of neglect.

Exploring the goals and outcomes of adults with severe acquired brain injury participating in an extended inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit in Australia.

PURPOSE: To explore the rehabilitation goals and evaluate goal attainment outcomes of people with severe acquired brain injury (ABI), and investigate the relationship between goal engagement and goal attainment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mixed-methods cohort study with twenty-nine adults with severe ABI in Australia. Demographic data, goal statements and pre-post program Goal Attainment Scale scores as well as Goal Engagement Scale scores were collected. Goals were coded using inductive content analysis and categorised by ICF component and domain. Goal attainment within ICF categories was described and compared using descriptive statistics. Pre-post program change in goal attainment was evaluated using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and correlations between goal engagement and attainment was explored using Spearman's (rho). RESULTS: 94% of 320 goals were categorised as ICF Activity and Participation. There was significant improvement in goal attainment between admission and discharge (z=-0.47, p < 0.01). There was no significant relationship between goal engagement and goal attainment however there was a positive association between engagement in goal setting at admission and discharge.Conclusions: This interdisciplinary, inpatient rehabilitation program underpinned by key-worker facilitated person-centred, role-based goal setting resulted in goal attainment in chosen goals, which were primarily activity and participation-focused.

Goal setting is a core rehabilitation practice and service delivery models that facilitate collaborative goal setting which engages patients, their significant others and health professionals as a team are necessary to enable person-centred care.Role-based goal setting effectively engaged patients with acquired brain injury and their families, facilitating goal setting and the formation of activity and participation-focused rehabilitation goals in this extended rehabilitation setting.

Virtual reality gameplay classification illustrates the multidimensionality of visuospatial neglect.

Brain injuries can significantly impact mental processes and lead to hidden disabilities not easily detectable. Traditional methods for assessing these impacts are imprecise, leading to unreliable prevalence estimates and treatments with uncertain effectiveness. Immersive virtual reality has shown promise for assessment, but its use as a standalone tool is rare. Our research focused on developing and validating a standalone immersive virtual reality classification system for unilateral spatial neglect, a condition common following brain injury characterized by inattention to one side of space. Our study involved 51 brain injury inpatients and 30 controls, all engaging with 'The Attention Atlas', an immersive virtual reality game for testing visual search skills. Our classification system aimed to identify patients with neglect, 'minor atypicality' (indicative of inattention not consistent enough to be labelled as neglect) or non-neglect. This categorization was based on a simple mathematical definition, utilizing gameplay to describe spatial orientation (to the left or right side) and attentional challenge (indicative of search inefficiency). These metrics were benchmarked against a normative model to detect atypical visual search, which refers to gameplay beyond the usual bounds. The combination of neglected side, orientation and challenge factors was used to categorize neglect. We discovered a strong correlation between atypical visual search patterns and neglect risk factors, such as middle cerebral artery stroke, parietal injuries and existing neglect diagnoses (Poisson regression incidence rate ratio = 7.18, 95% confidence interval = 4.41-11.90). In our study, immersive virtual reality-identified neglect in one-fourth of the patients (n = 13, 25.5%), minor atypicality in 17.6% (n = 9) and non-neglect in the majority, 56.9% (n = 29). This contrasts with standard assessments, which detected neglect in 17.6% (n = 9) of cases and had no intermediate category. Our analysis determined six categories of neglect, the most common being left hemispace neglect with above-median orientation and challenge scores. Traditional assessments were not significantly more accurate (accuracy = 84.3%, P = 0.06) than a blanket assumption of non-neglect. Traditional assessments were also relatively insensitive in detecting immersive virtual reality-identified neglect (53.8%), particularly in less severe cases and those involving right-side inattention. Our findings underline the effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in revealing various dimensions of neglect, surpassing traditional methods in sensitivity and detail and operating independently from them. To integrate immersive virtual reality into real-world clinical settings, collaboration with healthcare professionals, patients and other stakeholders is crucial to ensure practical applicability and accessibility.

The attention atlas virtual reality platform maps three-dimensional (3D) attention in unilateral spatial neglect patients: a protocol.

BACKGROUND: Deficits in visuospatial attention, known as neglect, are common following brain injury, but underdiagnosed and poorly treated, resulting in long-term cognitive disability. In clinical settings, neglect is often assessed using simple pen-and-paper tests. While convenient, these cannot characterise the full spectrum of neglect. This protocol reports a research programme that compares traditional neglect assessments with a novel virtual reality attention assessment platform: The Attention Atlas (AA). METHODS/DESIGN: The AA was codesigned by researchers and clinicians to meet the clinical need for improved neglect assessment. The AA uses a visual search paradigm to map the attended space in three dimensions and seeks to identify the optimal parameters that best distinguish neglect from non-neglect, and the spectrum of neglect, by providing near-time feedback to clinicians on system-level behavioural performance. A series of experiments will address procedural, scientific, patient, and clinical feasibility domains. RESULTS: Analyses focuses on descriptive measures of reaction time, accuracy data for target localisation, and histogram-based raycast attentional mapping analysis; which measures the individual's orientation in space, and inter- and intra-individual variation of visuospatial attention. We will compare neglect and control data using parametric between-subjects analyses. We present example individual-level results produced in near-time during visual search. CONCLUSIONS: The development and validation of the AA is part of a new generation of translational neuroscience that exploits the latest advances in technology and brain science, including technology repurposed from the consumer gaming market. This approach to rehabilitation has the potential for highly accurate, highly engaging, personalised care.

Affect, attention, or anticipatory arousal? Human blink startle modulation in forward and backward affective conditioning.

Affect modulates the blink startle reflex in the picture-viewing paradigm, however, the process responsible for reflex modulation during conditional stimuli (CSs) that have acquired valence through affective conditioning remains unclear. In Experiment 1, neutral shapes (CSs) and valenced or neutral pictures (USs) were paired in a forward (CS-->US) manner. Pleasantness ratings supported affective learning of positive and negative valence. Post-acquisition, blink reflexes were larger during the pleasant and unpleasant CSs than during the neutral CS. Rather than affect, attention or anticipatory arousal were suggested as sources of startle modulation. Experiment 2 confirmed that affective learning in the picture-picture paradigm was not affected by whether the CS preceded the US. Pleasantness ratings and affective priming revealed similar extents of affective learning following forward, backward or simultaneous pairings of CSs and USs. Experiment 3 utilized a backward conditioning procedure (US-->CS) to minimize effects of US anticipation. Again, blink reflexes were larger during CSs paired with valenced USs regardless of US valence implicating attention rather than anticipatory arousal or affect as the process modulating startle in this paradigm.

The effects of verbal instruction on affective and expectancy learning.

The current research assessed the effects of verbal instruction on affective and expectancy learning during repeated contingency reversals (Experiment 1) and during extinction (Experiment 2) in a picture-picture paradigm. Affective and expectancy learning displayed contingency reversal and extinction, but changes were slower for affective learning. Instructions facilitated reversal and extinction of expectancy learning but did not impact on affective learning. These findings suggest a differential susceptibility of affective and expectancy learning to verbal instruction and question previous reports that verbal instructions can accelerate the extinction of non-prepared fear learning in humans.