What Is the Role of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Sonication in Periprosthetic Joint Infections?

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most dreaded complications in joint replacement surgery. Diagnosis and treatment can be difficult and biofilms are of major concern due to their low susceptibility toward antibiotics. METHODS: This review focuses on the use of sonication as an evolving diagnostic and adjunct treatment modality in the context of PJI. Therapeutic application of sonication is discussed separately for its (i) direct action on bacteria, (ii) synergistic effects with antibiotics, and (iii) effects on release of antibiotics from bone cement. RESULTS: Used as a diagnostic tool, sonication shows promising results with respect to sensitivity and specificity when compared to conventional methods, notably after previous administration of antibiotics. As an adjunct treatment modality, the chemical, physical, and mechanical effects of sonication are primarily driven by cavitation and recognized as the main cause for bactericidal effects but the exact underlying mechanisms have not been identified yet. Sonication alone does not have the ability to completely eradicate biofilms but synergistic effects when used in conjunction with antibiotics have been reported. There is also evidence for enhanced antibiotic release from bone cement. CONCLUSION: Sonication is as an evolving modality in the context of PJIs. As a diagnostic tool, it has not been introduced in routine clinical practice and sonication as a treatment modality in PJIs is still in an experimental stage. Factors such as frequency, pressure, chemical activity, intensity, and exposure time need to be evaluated for optimal application of sonication and may also improve study comparison.

Metabolomic correlates of aerobic capacity among elderly adults.

BACKGROUND: Aerobic capacity is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, and it declines with advancing age. HYPOTHESIS: Since physical activity alters body metabolism, metabolism markers will likely differ between subjects with high vs low aerobic capacities. METHODS: Community-based participants without physician-diagnosed heart disease, stroke or cancer underwent same-day multimodal assessment of cardiovascular function (by echocardiography and magnetic resonance feature tracking of left atrium) and aerobic capacity by peak oxygen uptake (VO2 ) metrics. Associations between VO2 and cardiovascular and metabolomics profiles were studied in adjusted models including standard covariates. RESULTS: We studied 141 participants, of whom 82 (58.2%) had low VO2 , while 59 (41.8%) had high VO2 . Compared to participants with high VO2 , participants with low VO2 had more adverse cardiovascular parameters, such as lower ratio of peak velocity flow in early diastole to peak velocity flow in late diastole by atrial contraction of >0.8 (76% vs 35%, adjusted odd ratio [OR] = 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.7-9.5], P = 0.001) and lower left atrial conduit strain (11.3 ± 4.0 vs 15.6 ± 6.1%, adjusted OR = 1.1, 95% CI [1.002-1.3], P = 0.045). High VO2 was associated with lower accumulation of wide-spectrum acyl-carnitines (OR = 0.6, 95% CI [0.4-0.9], P = 0.013), alanine (OR = 0.1, 95% CI [0.01-0.9], P = 0.044) and glutamine /glutamate (OR = 0.1, 95% CI [0.01-0.5], P = 0.007), compared to low VO2. CONCLUSION: Elderly adults with low VO2 have adverse cardiovascular and metabolic parameters compared to their counterparts with high VO2 . Combined cardiac and metabolomics phenotyping may be a promising tool to provide insights into physiological states, useful for tracking future interventions related to physical activity among community cohorts.