The exit of nanoparticles from solid tumours.

Nanoparticles enter tumours through endothelial cells, gaps or other mechanisms, but how they exit is unclear. The current paradigm states that collapsed tumour lymphatic vessels impair the exit of nanoparticles and lead to enhanced retention. Here we show that nanoparticles exit the tumour through the lymphatic vessels within or surrounding the tumour. The dominant lymphatic exit mechanism depends on the nanoparticle size. Nanoparticles that exit the tumour through the lymphatics are returned to the blood system, allowing them to recirculate and interact with the tumour in another pass. Our results enable us to define a mechanism of nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours alternative to the enhanced permeability and retention effect. We call this mechanism the active transport and retention principle. This delivery principle provides a new framework to engineer nanomedicines for cancer treatment and detection.

Identifying cell receptors for the nanoparticle protein corona using genome screens.

Nanotechnology provides platforms to deliver medical agents to specific cells. However, the nanoparticle's surface becomes covered with serum proteins in the blood after administration despite engineering efforts to protect it with targeting or blocking molecules. Here, we developed a strategy to identify the main interactions between nanoparticle-adsorbed proteins and a cell by integrating mass spectrometry with pooled genome screens and Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes analysis. We found that the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor was responsible for approximately 75% of serum-coated gold nanoparticle uptake in U-87 MG cells. Apolipoprotein B and complement C8 proteins on the nanoparticle mediated uptake through the LDL receptor. In vivo, nanoparticle accumulation correlated with LDL receptor expression in the organs of mice. A detailed understanding of how adsorbed serum proteins bind to cell receptors will lay the groundwork for controlling the delivery of nanoparticles at the molecular level to diseased tissues for therapeutic and diagnostic applications.

Nanoparticles Bind to Endothelial Cells in Injured Blood Vessels via a Transient Protein Corona.

Nanoparticles travel through blood vessels to reach disease sites, but the local environment they encounter may affect their surface chemistry and cellular interactions. Here, we found that as nanoparticles transit through injured blood vessels they may interact with a highly localized concentration of platelet factor 4 proteins released from activated platelets. The platelet factor 4 binds to the nanoparticle surface and interacts with heparan sulfate proteoglycans on endothelial cells, and induces uptake. Understanding nanoparticle interactions with blood proteins and endothelial cells during circulation is critical to optimizing their design for diseased tissue targeting and delivery.

Toward Predicting Nanoparticle Distribution in Heterogeneous Tumor Tissues.

Nanobio interaction studies have generated a significant amount of data. An important next step is to organize the data and design computational techniques to analyze the nanobio interactions. Here we developed a computational technique to correlate the nanoparticle spatial distribution within heterogeneous solid tumors. This approach led to greater than 88% predictive accuracy of nanoparticle location within a tumor tissue. This proof-of-concept study shows that tumor heterogeneity might be defined computationally by the patterns of biological structures within the tissue, enabling the identification of tumor patterns for nanoparticle accumulation.

Impact of Tumor Barriers on Nanoparticle Delivery to Macrophages.

The delivery of therapeutic nanoparticles to target cells is critical to their effectiveness. Here we quantified the impact of biological barriers on the delivery of nanoparticles to macrophages in two different tissues. We compared the delivery of gold nanoparticles to macrophages in the liver versus those in the tumor. We found that nanoparticle delivery to macrophages in the tumor was 75% less than to macrophages in the liver due to structural barriers. The tumor-associated macrophages took up more nanoparticles than Kupffer cells in the absence of barriers. Our results highlight the impact of biological barriers on nanoparticle delivery to cellular targets.

The dose threshold for nanoparticle tumour delivery.

Nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours over the past ten years has stagnated at a median of 0.7% of the injected dose. Varying nanoparticle designs and strategies have yielded only minor improvements. Here we discovered a dose threshold for improving nanoparticle tumour delivery: 1 trillion nanoparticles in mice. Doses above this threshold overwhelmed Kupffer cell uptake rates, nonlinearly decreased liver clearance, prolonged circulation and increased nanoparticle tumour delivery. This enabled up to 12% tumour delivery efficiency and delivery to 93% of cells in tumours, and also improved the therapeutic efficacy of Caelyx/Doxil. This threshold was robust across different nanoparticle types, tumour models and studies across ten years of the literature. Our results have implications for human translation and highlight a simple, but powerful, principle for designing nanoparticle cancer treatments.

Delineating the tumour microenvironment response to a lipid nanoparticle formulation.

Nanoparticles can reduce cytotoxicity, increase circulation time and increase accumulation in tumours compared to free drug. However, the value of using nanoparticles for carrying small molecules to treat tumours at the cellular level has been poorly established. Here we conducted a cytodistribution analysis on Doxorubicin-treated and Doxil-treated tumours to delineate the differences between the small molecule therapeutic Doxorubicin and its packaged liposomal formulation Doxil. We found that Doxil kills more cancer cells, macrophages and neutrophils in the 4T1 breast cancer tumour model, but there is delayed killing compared to its small molecule counterpart Doxorubicin. The cellular interaction with Doxil has slower uptake kinetics and the particles must be degraded to release the drug and kill the cells. We also found that macrophages and neutrophils in Doxil-treated tumours repopulated faster than cancer cells during the relapse phase. While researchers conventionally use tumour volume and animal survival to determine a therapeutic effect, our results show diverse cell killing and a greater amount of cell death in vivo after Doxil liposomes are administered. We conclude that the fate and behaviour of the nanocarrier influences its effectiveness as a cancer therapy. Further investigations on the interactions between different nanoparticle designs and the tumour microenvironment components will lead to more precise engineering of nanocarriers to selectively kill tumour cells and prolong the therapeutic effect.

Specific Endothelial Cells Govern Nanoparticle Entry into Solid Tumors.

The successful delivery of nanoparticles to solid tumors depends on their ability to pass through blood vessels and into the tumor microenvironment. Here, we discovered a subset of tumor endothelial cells that facilitate nanoparticle transport into solid tumors. We named these cells nanoparticle transport endothelial cells (N-TECs). We show that only 21% of tumor endothelial cells located on a small number of vessels are involved in transporting nanoparticles into the tumor microenvironment. N-TECs have an increased expression of genes related to nanoparticle transport and vessel permeability compared to other tumor endothelial cells. The N-TECs act as gatekeepers that determine the entry point, distribution, cell accessibility, and number of nanoparticles that enter the tumor microenvironment.