RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate diagnostic accuracy and complications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy of radiologically indeterminate solid renal masses (RM). METHODS: Electronic records of all consecutive patients undergoing MRI-guided biopsy of solid RM (using free-breathing T2-BLADE and BEAT-IRTTT sequences) between April 2014 and October 2018 were reviewed; 101 patients (69 men, 32 women; median age 68 years; range 32-76) were included. Patient and RM characteristics, procedural details/complications, pathologic diagnosis, and clinical management were recorded. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated on an intention-to-diagnose basis. Diagnostic yield was also evaluated. Multi-variable analysis was performed for variables with p < .20, including patient age/sex; RM size/location/contact with vascular pedicle, RENAL score, number and total length of biopsy samples, and biopsy tract embolization, to determine factors associated with diagnostic samples, diagnostic accuracy, and complications. RESULTS: Median RM size was 2.4 cm (range 1-8.4 cm). There were 86 (85%; 95%CI 77-91%) diagnostic and 15 (15%; 95%CI 9-23%) non-diagnostic samples; 6/15 (40%) non-diagnostic biopsies were repeated with 50% malignancy rate. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 96% (95%CI 89-99%), 100% (95%CI 77-100%), 100% (95%CI 95-100%), 82% (95%CI 57-96%), and 97% (95%CI 90-99%), respectively. Primary and secondary diagnostic yields were 85% (95%CI 77-91%) and 91% (95%CI 84-96%), respectively. Seven (7%; 95%CI 1-10%) complications were observed. No tested variables were associated with diagnostic samples, diagnostic accuracy, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided biopsy of solid RM is associated with high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rate. The technique might be helpful for inaccessible tumors. KEY POINTS: ⢠MRI-guided biopsy of radiologically indeterminate solid renal masses (RM) appears safe, with a low rate of minor self-limiting hemorrhagic complications. ⢠Diagnostic accuracy and primary/secondary diagnostic yield are high and appear similar to reported estimates for US- and CT-guided RM biopsy. ⢠MRI guidance may be particularly useful for RM with poor conspicuity on US and CT, for relatively inaccessible tumors (e.g., tumors requiring double-oblique steep-angled approaches), and for young patients or those with renal failure.